The Palestinians on Monday rejected a demand by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyhau that they should recognize Israel as a Jewish state in order to secure a new freeze on settlement building.THE IDEA THAT ISRAEL IS AND WILL REMAIN A JEWISH STATE HAS BEEN PART OF THE PROCESS FOR YEARS.
BUSH SAID IT IN FRONT OF ABBAS AND OLMNERT IN ANNAPOLIS; (VIDEO).
EVEN OBAMA SAID IT - IN 2007:
Last week, before would-be POTUSes begun speaking only of all things Christmas, Democratic presidential contender Senator Barack Obama held a foreign policy forum. We've just obtained the transcript for his remarks there on Israel:OBAMA SAID IT AGAIN THIS YEAR:
"I start with the premise that Israel is a stalwart ally of ours and their security cannot be compromised. I also start with the premise that the status quo is unsustainable and that what would be good for Israeli security will be the kind of two-state solution that allows the Palestinians to live and prosper in their own state and allows Israel to maintain the security of its state."
"I think everyone knows what the basic outlines of an agreement would look like. It would mean that the Palestinians would have to reinterpret the notion of right of return in a way that would preserve Israel as a Jewish state. It might involve compensation and other concessions from the Israelis but ultimately Israel is not going to give up its state."
In Thursday's speech before the UN 65th General Assembly convention, Obama said it is time to relaunch the negotiations without preconditions related to the permanent status issues, which have a clear goal, two states living side by side in peace and security, a Jewish state for Israel and another independent Palestinian state within coherent borders.HAMAS OBJECTED AT THE TIME; FATAH AND ABBAS DIDN'T - PUBLICLY.
AND WHEN THE JIHADISTS CALL ISRAEL THE "ZIONIST ENTITY" THEY ARE TACITLY ACKNOWLEDGING ISRAEL IS A JEWISH STATE.
- SO FOR FATAH TO REJECT IT NOW - YEARS AFTER IT WAS A TACIT ASPECT OF THE PEACE PROCESS - REVEALS JUST HOW UTTERLY UNTRUSTWORTHY THEY ARE;
- THEY ARE NOT "PARTNERS FOR PEACE";
- THEY ARE EVERY BIT THE ENEMY THAT HAMAS AND HIZBALLAH ARE,
- AND SHOULD BE TREATED S SUCH;
- THEY SHOULD BE UTTERLY VANQUISHED, NOT APPEASED.
THE NYTIMES JUST PUBLISHED AN ANALYSIS OF THIS AND DID NOT MENTION THE FACT THAT BOTH OBAMA AND BUSH HAVE REPEATEDLY AND EXPLICITLY STATED THAT THE GOAL OF THE PEACE PROCESS WAS A JEWISH STATE OF ISRAEL WITH DEFENSIBLE BORDERS. (THE NYTIMES - CARRYING WATER FOR FATAH - TREATS IT AS A PLOY OF BIBI'S)
THE FACT THAT FATAH WON'T ACCEPT THIS PROVES THAT THE TALKS ARE A NON-STARTER. IF THEY WON'T ACCEPT THIS, THEN THERE IS NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT.
LIKE THE INVENTION OF "THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE," THE TALKS ARE JUST A PLOY FOR THE ARABS AND JIHADISTS TO GAIN TIME AND AN EDGE OVER ISRAEL WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY IT, ERASE IT FROM THE MAP.
THE WORLD WILL END BEFORE ISRAEL CEASES TO EXIST.