The most decisive PROPAGANDA victory the North Vietnamese communists ever won was one they actually lost on the battlefield - the Tet Offensive.
They lost it on the battlefield but won it in the battlefield of public opinion, in the MSM. After Tet, Cronkite basically said the war was "unwinnable" and LBJ said if he'd lost Cronkite, then he'd lost the nation.
That was then.
Now, is not so different. The enemy is losing on the battlefield, but winning in the MSM - and as a result most Americans don't feel like we're winning. Americans are simply not getting enough good news about the surge to convince them the war in Iraq is winnable.
Winning in the battlefield of public opinion is the entire strategy of al Qaeda (it's the entire strategy behind terror) - and the MSM and the Democrat party are their willing collaborators; IN FACT AL QAEDA PROPAGANDA WOULD NOT BE EFFECTIVE WITHOUT THEM.
In fact, all eight of the Democrat candidates for the presidency are more than just merely collaborating with the enemy: they are personally vested in our defeat in Iraq - what they call Bush's War. They can only succeed if Bin Laden succeeds. They might as well be rooting for him, and he for them.
The additional fact that so many of them serve on the committees which Petraeus and Crocker faced this week really drove this fact home.
How sickening that Bin Laden could depend on these EIGHT COLLABORATORS.
These eight who aid an abet al Qaeda propaganda by arguing that we are not winning and we cannot defeat al Qaeda in Iraq, and should DO EXACTLY WHAT BIN LADEN WANT US TO DO: give up.
Cede Iraq to the enemy.
These eight who would have us all believe we must retreat, er um "WITHDRAW", and lose - ER UM I MEAN "END" THE WAR.
These eight:
Bin Laden's Octet Offensive.
In this respect the 2008 election will be between the GOP and al Qaeda.
WHO DO YOU WANT TO WIN?
They lost it on the battlefield but won it in the battlefield of public opinion, in the MSM. After Tet, Cronkite basically said the war was "unwinnable" and LBJ said if he'd lost Cronkite, then he'd lost the nation.
That was then.
Now, is not so different. The enemy is losing on the battlefield, but winning in the MSM - and as a result most Americans don't feel like we're winning. Americans are simply not getting enough good news about the surge to convince them the war in Iraq is winnable.
Winning in the battlefield of public opinion is the entire strategy of al Qaeda (it's the entire strategy behind terror) - and the MSM and the Democrat party are their willing collaborators; IN FACT AL QAEDA PROPAGANDA WOULD NOT BE EFFECTIVE WITHOUT THEM.
In fact, all eight of the Democrat candidates for the presidency are more than just merely collaborating with the enemy: they are personally vested in our defeat in Iraq - what they call Bush's War. They can only succeed if Bin Laden succeeds. They might as well be rooting for him, and he for them.
The additional fact that so many of them serve on the committees which Petraeus and Crocker faced this week really drove this fact home.
How sickening that Bin Laden could depend on these EIGHT COLLABORATORS.
These eight who aid an abet al Qaeda propaganda by arguing that we are not winning and we cannot defeat al Qaeda in Iraq, and should DO EXACTLY WHAT BIN LADEN WANT US TO DO: give up.Cede Iraq to the enemy.
These eight who would have us all believe we must retreat, er um "WITHDRAW", and lose - ER UM I MEAN "END" THE WAR.
These eight:
Bin Laden's Octet Offensive.
In this respect the 2008 election will be between the GOP and al Qaeda.
WHO DO YOU WANT TO WIN?
No comments:
Post a Comment