"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Friday, December 12, 2008

CONGRESSMAN KEITH ELLISON AT THE HAJ

From the Khaleej Times, on December 10, 2008:
As Keith Ellison, the first Muslim member of the US Congress who performed Haj this week, told CNN, you forget who you are –- black or white and American or African — and where you come from when you are before God circling the Kaaba in a two-piece unstitched garment....
Ellison, who serves on the Financial Services and Judiciary Committees, forgot where he came from? He forgot he is supposed to be an American — and, having taken the oath of office, as a public servant in the United States Congress?

Oh, wait.

Ellison took the oath, at least symbolically, on the Koran. Allah and the ummah come first and foremost for him.

And what kind of sermon was preached at the Haj?
Saudi Arabia’s top cleric has used his annual sermon to Muslim pilgrims assembling for hajj to urge Muslim countries to renounce capitalism and form an Islamic economic bloc... [shari'a law]
The United States is already embracing shari'a finance. See this essay by Alyssa A. Lappen.

Shari'a finance is the camel's nose in the tent. Money is power.

5 comments:

Reliapundit said...

with its chants of death to america and death to israel at religious observances in mecca during hajj, well... it proves that islam is incompatible with our constitution.

ellison cannot serve our constitution and islam.

he can eother fulfil his oath of office or the koran, but not both.

maybe he should be a member of the "parliament" in saudi arabia or kuwait or iraq or afghanistan, but not the usa.


only dissident muslims - who openly chastize the religion - can possibly be able to serve both the constitution and ther religion.

Always On Watch said...

IMO, Ellison has made his choice. And it's not the Constitution.

He's also called for some 8000 Moslems to join the Obama administration in various positions. Moslems - specifically.

Can you imagine the furor if a government official called for Christians to apply in a similar manner? The hue and cry would be heard on every news broadcast.

I have looked but can find nowhere that Ellison condemns the chants of death to America and Israel.

McCoy said...

I love watching the American far right increasingly putting their religious bigotry on open display.

I bet the founding fathers would have loved the "choose Islam or the constitution" test-of-office being espoused in this thread, to say nothing at all about the opinion of it of the political "moderates" that the GOP continues to hemorrhage.

The radical right pulled this nonsense with JFK and his Catholicism. How'd that work out for you chaps, btw? Don't you ever learn? How many self-inflicted wounds do you think you can manage in the next 4 years?

Always On Watch said...

McCoy,
There's a world of difference between Islam and Catholicism.

And, for the record, nobody in my circle back in the 1950s and 1960s had any "religious" objections to JFK, though most in my circle at that time were Protestants.

Also, for the record, I'm not registered as a Republican. Rather, I, as most of my circle then and now, am registered as an Independent.

The Dem Party will be hemorrhaging soon enough.

Reliapundit said...

MCCOY; YOUR IGNORANCE NEVER SURPRISES ME:

1 -

JFK WAS THE MORE CONSEERVTIVE AND BELLICOSE CANDIDATE IN 1960; NIXON WAS THE PEACE CANDIDATE.

BOTH WERE ANTI-COMMUNISTS. ANTI-LEFTISTS.

JFK WIRETAPPED DR MLK JR.

2 -

THE DESIRE NOT TO HAVE PEOPLE SWORN TO UPHOLD VALUES ANTI-THETICAL TO OUR CONSTITUTION IS NEOTHER XENOPHOBIA OR BOGOTRY, AND MY COMMENT SPECIFICALLY SAYS THERE ARE MUSLIMS WHO COULD EASILY BE BOTH MUSLIM AND A SWORN MEMBER OF OUR FEDERAL GOVEREMTN - LIKE ZALMAY KHALILIZAD, WHO OBVIOUSLY REJECTS THE ELEMENTS OF ISLAM WHICH ELLISON OBVIOUSLY EMBRACES.

IRSHAD MANJI IS ALSO A TRUE LIBERTARIAN AND CONSIDERS HERSELF A GOOD MUSLIM.

SO IT'S POSSIBLE.

BOTTOM-LINE

CHRISTIANS AND JEWS CAN SWEAR ON THE BIBLE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION - A JUDEO-CHRISTIAN DOCUMENT. BASED ON NATURAL LAW.

BUT NO TRADITIONAL AND DEVOUT MUSLIM CAN SWEAR ON THE KORAN AND UPHOLD THE CONSTOTUTION UNLESS HE ACCEPTS THAT ISLAM CANNOT BE TOTALITARIAN, AND THAT IS COUNTER TO TRADITIONAL ISLAM.

REMEMBER: ISLAM IS NOT MERELY A SPIRITUAL CODE; IT'S CIVIL LAW FOR DEVOUT MUSLIMS.

THAT'S OKAY FOR THEM IN THEIR COUNTRIES - OF THEY SO WANT - BUT IT'S AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION.

ELLEISON'S SCOMMENTS PROVE HE IS UNFIT FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

THE WESTERN TRADITON HOLKDS THE FOLLOWING: CAESAR'S LAW IN CAESAR'S WORLD; GO'S LAW IN THE SPIRITUAL WORLD".

IN ISLAM THERE IS NO SUCH BOUNDARY.


WHICH IS WHY EVEN TURKEY IS CONSTAMNTLY UINDER HTREAT FROM ISLAMISTS IN BOTH THE AKP AND AL QAEDA.

SECUALRISM IS ANATHEMA TO ISLAM.