Obama has famously said he would talk to Iran.
The position is INSANE on its face because Iran is just as bad or worse than Hamas, and Obama has said he wouldn't talk to Hamas.
But let's forget the inconsistency and hypocrisy for a moment.
Let's examine it in terms of Obama's CHIEF PERSONAL MODUS OPERANDI: tossing people under the bus when it's expedient.
He tossed his first book agent under a bus, (when a bigger agent came along - after his first book was published and AFTER his Kerry Convention speech; he broke his contract). He tossed his mother under a bus when he chose to stay in cushy private school in Hawaii rather than be with her in SE Asia. He tossed his white grandmother under a bus in his speech SAVING Wright. Then he promptly tossed Wright under a bridge when Wright became JUST TOO threatening to his personal ambition.
Well, Ahamdinejad is not going to soften the party line for Obama's sake. In fact, he's just said some pretty awful stuff - comparing Israel to a stinking corpse.
PREDICTION: In the middle of the fall campaign, when Ahmadinejad says something similar, Obama will toss him under the bridge - and blame Ahmadinejad and not his own naivete.
Obama will do this when Ahmadinejad starts to reflect badly on HIM. Not because of any principle. Obama has no principles beyond the pursuit of personal power, class warfare and appeasement of any threat to the West.
If Obama had any principles then he would treat Iran as he claims he would treat Hamas.
Hamas knows - through intermediaries, just like FARC knows thorough intermediaries - that Obama is on their side.
If you want to elect a man who favors FARC over the elected leaders of Colombia and Hamas and Iran over Israel, then by all means vote for Obama.