"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Thursday, December 20, 2007

CHARLES JOHNSON OF LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS: HYPOCRITE

NEW ZONKA (DK):
... Charles himself [WAS] pressed into the defensive, having banned most of the brain-power of his Lizard Army, he was left with himself and a group of yea-sayers, but to his rescue came Oyvind Strommen, a hardcore leftist [WHO MAKES IT A POINT TO ATTACK AYAAN HIRSI ALI AND THE LATE ORIANA FALLACI] to Charles’ defense. Providing him with ammunition to use against Vlams Belang and the Counter-Jihad movement.

Now I’m not saying that there is anything wrong with accepting help or information from people on the left, or the right or anywhere else on the political spectrum, far from it (one should double-check the information carefully of course).

But it is a farce when you’re making a point of not associating yourself with partners who allegedly ascribe to unsavory ideologies, and then do exactly that, and that is what Charles Johnson have done.


So irregardless of who is right or wrong in this matter, Charles Johnson have proved that it is acceptable of allying yourself with whoever is ready to fight your opponents with you, by doing exactly what he is accusing the Counter-Jihad movement of doing, only difference is whether Charles Johnson’s original claims of connections between Vlams Belang and White Supremacism and Racism have any merit.

But he have proven that he himself have no qualms of allying himself with somebody who ascribes to Marxism, and ideology accountable for more deaths than Nazism and Fascism and just about any other ideology around, with the possible exception of Islam (nobody knows the number of deaths they are responsible for in the last 1400 years).

  • NEW ZONKA EXACTLY CORRECT: TO MAKE THIS CHARGES, CHARLES ALLIES HIMSELF TO A LEFTIST.

  • WHAT A HYPOCRITE.

  • AND IT'S REALLY WORSE: BECAUSE CHARLES ALLYING HIMSELF TO A MARXIST TO ATTACK COUNTER-JIHADISTS - THE GOOD GUYS.

CHARLES JOHNSON IS AN IDIOT.

3 comments:

ooGcM taobmaetS said...

That would be "regardless". There is no such word as "irregardless".

ooGcM taobmaetS said...

I take it back - they made it a word.

Øyvind Strømmen said...

I do wonder where I have attacked Ayaan Hirsi Ali?