They believe any ol' crap from the jihadothug propaganda machine - (this links to one of the two dozen or major Hizballah lies the MSM happily repeated), but they think 9/11 was an inside job.
They deny 1400 years of jihad, and accept freshly minted lies that were exposed almost as soon as they were told.
They are freakin' insane.
Sadly, they call the shots in the Democrat Party now. And if we're not careful, they could win Congress. And if they do, then they'll do to the Iraqis and the Afghanis and the Israelis what they did to the South Vietnamese and the Contras: abandon them.
They deny 1400 years of jihad, and accept freshly minted lies that were exposed almost as soon as they were told.
They are freakin' insane.
Sadly, they call the shots in the Democrat Party now. And if we're not careful, they could win Congress. And if they do, then they'll do to the Iraqis and the Afghanis and the Israelis what they did to the South Vietnamese and the Contras: abandon them.
14 comments:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/sci/tech/3577711.stm
Read and inwardly digest.Then you might be fractionally more astute.
and another thing.When EXACTLY was South Vietnam abandoned to its fate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_(guerrillas). seems to me like the democrats couldnt be held responsible for abandoning the contras either. since A) they were never abandoned OR B) they had taken over Nicaragua b4 Clinton became President.OR C) they were abandoned by the Republicans
PETER:
vietnamization was a success.
the last us ground/comabt troops left vietnam on 3/39/73.
the congress - controlled by dems/doves - abandoned the south vietnamese democracy, an ally, in 1975 by cutting off all financing of the svg,
that's when they fell.
the contras were also cut off by financing by the appeasing dems of congress - that's why reagan did IRAN-CONTRA: to finance the demoicratoc revolutionaries there.
BTW: it was IRAN contra and not IRAQ contras.
during the iran iraq war we sold missiles to iran. not saddam. saddam was a client of the USSR - using ak's and mig's etc.
you lefties are ignorant dupes fooled by leftie propaganda.
the truth will set you free.
all the best!
so, the last combat troops left when Nixon was President. Reagan thought it wise to support the Iranian Theocracy when it was attacked by the aggressor, the undoubtedly evil, but not madly religious Saddam Hussain, and he also funded Islamic fundamentalists as they fought the Soviet occupiers in Afghanistan (with the support of that lefty congress).
As for the Nicaraguan contras, they were subject to more "splitters" than the notorious"peoples front of Judea or maybe it was the Judean peoples front" (ok these are fictional but you get the idea). The CIA practically gave up on them as a lost cause. By the time they got their act together, the Nicaraguans were heartily sick of the incompetence of the marxist regime anyway. If only Realpolitik was as simple as you seem to think it is.
All the best!
And another thing, Please do not PRETEND that the US were not at least partially responsible for the scale of Iraqi armaments.
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php
Viewing is entirely optional, but you might learn something
peter:
FACT 1 - the scandal which almost bropught down the reagan presidency was iraN contra not iraQ contra; reafan was secretly arming the iraNians, not the iraqis.
ALL the military equipmwent and training thata saddam had was SOVIET: saddams military used ak47, and migs and soviet tanks and missiles; nothing wwas US made.
saddam was a CLIENT of the USSSr; saddam was a socialist in good standing withg the internationale.
fact 2 - saigon fell in 1975. 1975 is TWO YEARS after the last us comabt troops left. 1975 was when the DSEM/DOVE Congress pulled the plug on financing of the SVG. this is the SOLE reason the SVG fell to the Commie Soviet sponsored totalitarian North - IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE PEACE TREAY.
yet you defend the totalitarian north vietnamese. sheesh.
ARguing that the contras were bad becuase the inept/inocmpetent CIUA gave up on them is ludicrous. HAS THE CIA EVER GOT ANYTHING RIGHT!?
sheesh.
contras were for indiviuald liberty and democracy. their enemy were totalitarians, whom you defend.
peter: you are a dupe of leftist propaganda/bs - whi defends saddam and ortega and attacks nixopn and reagan and bush.
YUP: look whoi you stand shoulder to shoulder with: TOTALITARIANS.
that says everything: you are a hypocrite and a dupe.
all the best!
I can see that it is going to take some time to get through to someone as profoundly deluded as you appear to be. Lets just pick out two of the most ludicrous points that you have made.
"ALL the military equipmwent and training thata saddam had was SOVIET"
and
"vietnamization was a success"
sorry, will have to get back to you later as i am earning a living at the moment.(unlike all these other dodgy lefties you mention ad nauseum)
working on labor day!? too bad.
all usa combat troops were exited from vietnam on 3/29/73, and siagon did not fall until TWO YEARS later; therefore vietnamization WORKED. PERIOD.
saddam was a soviet client. PERIOD.
all the rest is propaganda/"faux facts."
our middle east allies were israel, egypt, saudi arabia and jordan. NOT iraq. not ever.
get out from under the leftist lies! open your eyes and see the light!
all the best!
BTW: i was among the last us citizens assigned SSS lottery numbers; i had my physical and was prepeared to serve - even though, AT THE TIME, i opposed the war. in remained and ardent leftist and dove until 1989, when i began to accept the truth: reagan and thastcher and hayek were right and marx and che and chomsky ALL WRONG!
i know you can do it: accept tyhe truth: leftism, and dove appeasement never worked.
deng xiao ping proved in in china. rao in india. ireland proved it again: LEFTISM FAZILS.
chamberlain and OSLO and the north korean nuke pact proved irt again: appeasemtn never works.
when you can admit that leftism was a at the goals it set for itself, and when you can admit that appeasemtn always failed, then you will see the light/grow up/abandon leftist fantasyland for the real world.
all the best!
working on labor day!? too bad.
1)what on earth made you think i was american?
2) I happen to agree with you that Marx, Che and Chomsky were wrong. I also know there are a vast number of alternatives, and Reagan, Thatcher and Hayek were the wrong ones.
3) Just a little something for you whilst i complete this set of accounts i'm working on.
Did Republicans appease the terrorists under Clinton? from
http://www.themoderatevoice.com/
http://archontan.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-armed-saddam.html
Who Armed Saddam?
UPDATE, 8/23/06, 11:37 AM:
Michael Moore: "America used to like Saddam. We LOVED Saddam. We funded him. We armed him."
Al Franken: "Reagan ... armed Saddam"
Nick Cohen: "What percentage of Saddam Hussein’s weapons came from Britain and America? I ask because on the rare occasions the BBC mentions Saddam’s genocidal crimes it always says he was ‘armed by the West.’
I bet you can’t guess the answer. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a mere 0.46 per cent of conventional weapons bought between 1973 and 2002 came from America and 0.17 per cent came from Britain. The overwhelming majority came from France and the Soviet Union, while West Germany gave Saddam the plant to make the poisons he used to gas the Kurds."
glad to see you've expanded the range of your reading material btw. Shame you couldnt bring yourself to admit that Rummy probably sold Saddam chemical weapons though
never happened.
never happened.
Post a Comment