"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Friday, July 21, 2006

EXPOSING RADICAL MUSLIM HYPOCRISY: IMAGES OF MEN VERSUS NO IMAGES OF GOD

Muslims have a strict rule about depictions of God: they are NOT allowed. Images of God are like craven, profane idols, and are not allowed.

Muslims are allowed to have images of men - even so-called radical Muslims; they routinely publish, post and parade around with HUGE photos of Khomeini and Nasrallah and Bin Laden, for example.

Yet these very same "radical Muslims" don't permit ANY images of Mohummed. (They staged riots and made fatwas against those Danish cartoons, cartoonists and cartoon publishers, REMEMBER!?)

This is very strange to me. Why allow pictures of Khomeini or Nasrallah or King Fahd or Bin Laden - or other men they venerate, but not of Mohummed!?

Doesn't this BAN mean that they venerate Mohummed excessively!? Doesn't this BAN of any depiction of Mohummed elevate him over all mankind and put him in the SAME CATEGORY AS GOD - as a being who must not be depicted?! And isn't this a form of SACRELIGIOUS EXALTATION which is exactly what they claim they were trying to avoid by banishing any image of Mohummed!?


YES IT IS.

And it further exposes the utter INSANITY of the radical Muslim value system; it is a hypocritical, illogical and false creed.

No comments: