Zapatero - the socialist PM of Spain, who withdrew Spanish forces from Iraq - has recently begun negotiations with ETA - the Bsaque TERRORIST group - WITHOUT DEMANDING THEY DISARM OR DISAVOW TERROR. IOW: He has caved in, once again.
Well, Spaniards are protesting. (Via Gateway.)
The Left has always appeased tyranny and terror: Castro & Che; Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung/Kim Jong Il; Mugabe; Stalin; Mao; and so on.
6/13: UPDATE: - from PUBLIUS PUNDIT: ONE MILLION MARCHED IN MADRID ... and the MSM ignored it.
Well, Spaniards are protesting. (Via Gateway.)
The Left has always appeased tyranny and terror: Castro & Che; Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung/Kim Jong Il; Mugabe; Stalin; Mao; and so on.
6/13: UPDATE: - from PUBLIUS PUNDIT: ONE MILLION MARCHED IN MADRID ... and the MSM ignored it.
7 comments:
Does AB have any poll results indicating the Spanish "hawks on ETA" are also "hawks on Iraq" &
want Zapatero to re-introduce
troops there? if not, then this is
more misdirection on ABs part.
And why should Spaniards support a
war only 30% of Americans still support? (I'm sure they read our polls). Nice try,no cigar, AB.
i don;lt take a poll to determine what is RIGHT.
the left might, but we on the RIGHT belive that there is an objective truth, there are universal values, and good and evil and right and wrong.
it wouopd be WRONG to abandon an emrging democracy like Iraq and afghanistan - as zaptero the left-wing dove did.
the left/doves did this to south vietnam, too.
let me remind you that it is a FACT that the last US ground troop left vietnam on 3.29.73.
south vietnam doin;t fall until 1975 - until AFTER the dem.doves in congress pulled the plug on fiancing the DEMOCRACY in the south of vietnam, abandoning them to 40 years of impooversihed tyranny.
if given the chance the dem/doves will certainly do the same thing again.
as zapatero did.
it would be wrong.
no matter what the polls say.
you are a dupe.
you stand with cindy sheehan and zapatero and the appeasers of evil.
you have3 no morals or any shame.
you are a coward and would be a bad ally, and send the message tyhat you cannot be depended on inb a cruch. COWARD.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,1795546,00.html
the "democracy" "emerging" in Afghanistan, too, is a fraud, a transparent fraud to all apparently,but "unreliable."
okay, you want to call th democracy there a fruad - as ifg what: the taliban situatiuon was BETTER!?!?!
i think i know EXACTLY what kind of ass you are: someone who'd rather demand that afghanis have a perfect democracy (even while we don;t), and sionce they fall short POO-POO it as if the tlainab cituation for them was better!?!?!?
like what: it was better when women were forbidden to learn to read or see doctors, when all painting and kite-flying amd music was BANNED, and so on!?!?!
if you believe this then you are evil. or a fool/dupe.
wake up.
never make the perfect the enemy of the good.
we have imporved ths situation for 99.9% oif the afghaniosn; they are returning from their refugees camps. their lives ae improving. we gace them democracy and a constitutional a hyimanrights. or AT LEAST at very good start at it while still fighting the evil jihaodterrorists.
wake up.
you are either stupid boring teenage dupe. or an older dupe.
but
PLEASE KEEP POSTING COMMENTS HERE:
you do a better job than me of exposing the UTTER AND COMPLETE MORAL BANKRUPTCY OF THE SO-CALLED ANTI-WAR CROWD.
you are a 12/6/41 & 9/10/01 human.
pitiful.
i pray the dems put up a candiate you like and who will espouse your leftist views about the "failures" in iraq and afghanistan.
Does the AB ever check COLD FURY?
Why over there he got a name-check today! Seems like the crew there put up CONSERVATIVE JOHN DERBYSHIRE'S COLUMN AT NATIONAL REVIEW ON HIS EXASPERATION AT THE IRAQ WAR'S FAILURE(HE'S SURE RIGHT TO BE FRUSTRATED!)TO BE DISCUSSED.
AND SOMEONE CONTRASTED HIS REALISM WITH THE AB'S ESCAPISM IN THE COMMENTS SECTION, WHILE CORRECTING BOTH.
DERBY WAS ALWAYS OPPOSED TO THE WAR. STILL IS.
BIG DEAL.
YOU CITE HIM AS IF HE IS GOD.
I DO NOT ARGUE BY MAKING "APPEALS TO AUTHORITY."
I CITE FACTS.
YOU ATTACK ME, AND CITE "AUTHORITIES" NEITHER OF WHICH CARRIES ANY WATER.
TO LOGICAL PEOPLE THAT IS.
IRAQ IS BETTER OFF. AFGHANISTAN IS BETTER OFF. THE USA IS BETTER OFF.
FACTS.
IRAQIDS HAVE MORE PROSPERITY AND MOTRE FREEDOM.
THE ANNUALIZED DEATH RATE FOR IRAIQIS IS LOWER NOW THAN UNDER SADDAM. FACT.
DITTO AFGHANISTAN: MORE RIGHTS/MORE PROSPERITY/FEWER DEATHS. 2 MILLION REFUGEES RETURNED.
THEY VOTE WITH THEIR FEET.
CHOMSKY SAID THER WOUD BE 2 MILLION DEAD IN THE AFGHAN WAR - AND THAT THIS WAS THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF THE US.
HE WAS WRONG.
AS YOU ARE.
WAKE UP.
FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS.
porperity and freedom are both vastlyu improving in iraq.
that's a FACT. not subjective at all.
and i did niot "appeal to the suthority" of the wannabe chrenkoff: his column is FACTUAL; he reports actual events which belie your defeatist negativism.
wake up.
Post a Comment