DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."
Murtha WAS indeed wrong...to initially support the war. He's redeeming himself. He is an anti-abortion CONSERVATIVE,AND PRO-GUN RIGHTS too. Too bad unrealiable weights his grade on Israel's and Big Oil's "needs" rather than those of the average American.
murtha is a cut& run jerk - ever since somalia.isolationism and retreat is for losers.AND WE ALL NEED OIL.jimmy carter invented the Pesian Gulf Policy - in his 1980 SOTU.google it.said persian gulf oil was a vital NEED of the USA and our allies and that we would go to war to defend it.that JOOOOOO-lover jimmy carter. heh.
I love it when the only retort is to Pavlovian-style bring the Democrats in as if any opponent of the corrupt GOP establishment must be a Democrat. It shows why the US needs a multi-party system as sophisticated European nations have--and also implies why we don't have one. Our electorate issimplistic and yahooish to a faultand will reap the fruits until it wises up.By way of enlightenment, before the Persian Gulf war ,the MAJORITY of independent specialists maintainedit didn't matter if we let Saddam keep Kuwait, the price and availability of oil was going to continue steadily. Only the oiligarchs would lose profits.
to 7pm asshole:thanks for admitting you don't give a shit if a genocidal tyrants invades his neighbor and threatens what dhimmi carter - in his 1980 SOTU - called A VIATKL US INTEREST.assholews like you didnlt care when piland and france were invaded in 1939.jerk.as for those "independent analysts: BS.and so-called "oil oligarchs" make a low margin on a COMMODITY openly traded in free markets. they are no CABAL.some things are just as important as the price and availablility of a commodity.BTW: the entire west would collapse withoiut oil.i think that's a bad thing.if sadam had kuwait and iraq he'd oif had nearly half of all gulf oil - a powerful wedge.so: regime cahnge in iraqw - official us policy from 1998 under clinton - was good morally and economically and in terms of security.the "sphistcated" govts in the EU ALL have worse wlefare states they cannot afford and hogher unemployement and a MUCH lower standfard of living, and fewer rights and libertioes - as in LESS free speech etc.you no nothing.BTW: i have been a card carrying democrat SINCE 1974 SO FUCK OFF
I LOVE THE WACKOS OF THE BUCHANAN-RIGHT AND KOS-LEFT WHO BLAME BOTH --- REPEAT B-O-T-H -- ISRAEL AND BIG OIL, (AS IN THE SAUDIS) AS IF ROVE AND BUSH TOOK THEIR ORDERS SIMUTLANEOUSLY FROM THE HARD-RIGHT LIKUD, THE HARD-LEFT LABOR AND THE WAHHABIST HOUSE OF SAUD.THEY ARE FREAKING INSANE!
Kuwait was Iraq's ninth province until the early 20th Century when British imperialism changed the borders. Saddam was told by Glaspie we didn't care if he retrieved it.
Scandinavian countries have a HIGHER standard of living of late, as the US crime rate drags it down.
saddam claimed it was the 19th prov nopt 9th, but thanks for trying to parrot the lies of sadam: a socialist genocidal racist tyrant.how do you look at yourself in the mirror!?and here's a FACT: the scandi. countries DO NOT have a higher standard of living than anmeicans.sweden is declining as is norway.denmark is fair - and FIGHTNG BACK against muslim recolonization.blacks fams in the USA have highjer average incomes thanm people in the EU and more appliances, more cars, more sq ft of living space.
http://www.scandinavica.com/culture/society/UNreport.htmSorry, you're wrong on the essentials-again. The latest reports demonstrate Scandinaviansuperiority in living standards.(See above link.)And no historian denies that Kuwaitwas once a province of Iraq.
listen you f*cking ass*ole what you're saying is that saddam was right to invade kuwait and that makes you a piece of shit.ask a KUWAITI you turd.but you are TYPICALK of the turds who want to CUT&RUN.scum.scum that's would rather su*k a tyrants dick than fight tyranny.
the HDR is a report written by socialists to promote socialism and which uses socialistic metrics to get results it likes. believing that is like believing what castro says about cuba or mao - china or stalin - russia IOW: YOU ARE A DUPE.i ahve been to scandinavia many MANY times. i read bawer's account of it.you are a dupe. this is from the article you linked to: "Economists, philosophers and political leaders have long emphasised human wellbeing as the sole purpose of economic development. A successful community is not that which has one wealthy member and nine living in poverty, but that one where all members of the community have succeeded in achieving a high standard of living. The HDR measures whether the national income of a nation is creating an environment for its people to enjoy a life with good health services, political freedoms, security against crime, greater access to education and a satisfying leisure time." this is socialist RUBBISH. simple metrics show we in the USA are richer, have more stiff, more living space, more liberty, more rights. \besides: SCANDINAVIAS TOTAL POPULATION IS LESS THAN CALIFORNIA, ny and many other states in the USa. using them - or licthenstein - as a model is idiotic. their life expectancies are INFLATED because they do not count babies under gestated less than 25 weeks or born under a pound as ever having lived; they call them STILLBORN. we do count them and try to save them. try using INDEPENDENT non-SOCIALIST reports.
i have been to scansdinvia many AMNY times.and read bawer's book .you are a dupoe if you think it is paradise.AND THEY LIE ABOUT ALL THEIR DATA.Swedens' OFFICIAL unemloyment data is HALF what it REALLY is.you can google that; it was reported/they were caught a few weeks ago.
in scandinavia the STATE takes 60-70% of your money. IN TAXES. twice as much as here.so you gotta SUBTRACT that from the average income, and then subtrract our taxes from ours.WE ARE RICHER - if you think that richer means having more of YOUR OWN money to spend as you damn please.but, if you want to measure wealth by how much taxes the STATE takes, then the scandynavyians are VERY rich.and food and ebergy and cars are all more expensive.of course YOU GET NATIONALIZED/SOCIALIZE HEALTH CARE/a welfare state.with medical that is INFERIOR to that in the USA.i know: I HAVE INDIRECT EXPERIENCE IN THIS AREA.the USA is a better economy and the average living standard is higher than in europe.and RISING.
this troll is an idiot.where would you want to live:where the government takes 75% of what YOU EARN, and where food and gas and and cars and houses are MORE EXPENSIVE?and where there are OFFICIAL STATE RELIGIONS?! (Lutheran)or would you rather live where cars and gas and homes and food to eat are cheaper, and where you get to keep MORE THAN HALF OF WHAT YOU EARN?!
Post a Comment