"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Sunday, March 05, 2006

CONTEXTUALIZING MUSLIM SECTARIAN VIOLENCE IN IRAQ

I think we should be aware of the CONTEXT of the recent outbreak of violence in Iraq: There has always been sectarian violence within Islam:
There has been Sunni versus Shia, all violence all over the world - in Pakistan, for instance; and there have also been persitient attacks against Sufis by Sunnis and Shias. Most importantly, there were 25 years of persistent Sunni violence against Shias in Iraq: Saddam committed genocide against the Shias who were un-armed then. Now, the difference is that the Shias are also armed (with guns and a major roles in SELF-RULE), and they are fighting back.
This violent sectarian strife - ALWAYS in the backround throughout the enitre Muslim world - was deliberately exacerbated in Iraq by the recent attack on the Shia mosque in Sammarra. But because the Shia led central government and Sistani - and even al Sadr - realize that an all-out sectarian war doesn't serve their goals, (but only the goals of the transnational jihadoterrorists), the Shias have restrained themselves. This means that a sectarian civil war in Iraq is highly unlikely. (The US military agrees.)

LOOK AT IT THIS WAY: The transnational jihadoterrorists hate - and would commit genocide against - ALL non-Muslims and ALL "non-radical Muslims" - favoring ONLY the Wahhabist/Salafist/Qutubists strain of Islam. Because the political and religious leaders of Iraq's two largest groups - the Kurds and the Shias - realize that this recent uptick in sectarian violence is merely the result of the incitement by the transnational jihadoterrorists, they will actively take actions to prevent a sectarian civil war from breaking out. The attack in Sammarra has therefore actually had the effect of STRENGTHENING federalism in Iraq. SO: Al Qaeda has failed again. They must be getting very frustrated and desperate; they must be asking themselves, "If blowing up one of the holiest Shia mosques doesn't create widespread violent chaos, then what can?"

Which means, I expect, they will try even more horrendous attacks in the days ahead. If not in Iraq, then in Jordan, Lebanon, Europe or Israel; (they might attempt to blow up the al Aksa mosque and blame it on Jews). Zawahiri's recent message reinforces this view. The enemy - more desperate than ever - is going to attempt something REALLY big. Stay tuned...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I agree with you though I would add that the sadrists are another threat to iraqi security and unity.

Among the shia, this little group is moved by the khomeynist ideology of velayat-e-fagih. This ideology is opposed to the quietist current underlying Sistani's behavior.

Simply stated, velayat favors religious political power while the quietists think clergy should stay away from corruptive political interests.

That's why Sistani doesn't object to the creation of a secular iraqi state while Al Sadr rebelled once against the coalition troops.

Al Sadr and the Badr Brigade are the instruments of the iranian islamic regime. They are a threat as well as Al Qaeda backed Zarqawi groups.