FITZGERALD WON'T BE ISSUING A FINAL REPORT. Well,, er... um, he can't; it would be ILLEGAL! Anyhow, he PROBABLY won't be indicting anyone either, becasue NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED!
PREDICTION: WHEN FITZGERALD ANNOUNCES THERE WILL BE NO INDICTMENTS, THE DEM/LEFT WILL CALL FOR A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR! Heh!
SERIOUSLY: the SOTU in question - the one mendacious Joe Wilson referred to in his INFAMOUS NYTIMES Op-Ed - was delivered to a joint session of Congress in January 2003, just a few months before the war to oust Saddam. (IMPORTANTLY: Bush NEVER said the word "Niger" in the speech, and specifically cited British intelligence which the Lord Butler Report investigated after the war and found to be valid).
Congress gave Bush the AUTHORITY AND POWER TO MAKE WAR IN OCTOBER OF 2002. Three months BEFORE the SOTU in question!
Therefore, the Dem/Left's contention that Bush MISLED us into war, and that the 16 word-sentence in which cited British intel' was a key part of Bush's deliberate "over-hyping" of the potential of Saddam's WMD threat IS ENTIRELY BOGUS.
Since this charge is BOGUS, there is ABSOLUTELY NO MOTIVATION for Bush or Rove or Cheney or Libby to have to go to ANY EXTREME to discredit Joe Wilson; his charges were untrue; his report did not show what he claimed it showed in his NYTIMES Op-Ed, and there was no need to punish him or his wife or anyone.
The charge that Bush/Rove/Cheney/Libby were "OUT TO GET JOE WILSON" is merely a figment of the idiotically paranoid and confused Left - which has ALWAYS argued that AshKKKroft and SmirkingchimpBusHitler were bigger threats to the USA than Saddam or jihadoterrorism and islamofascism.
On top of that, Bush repeatedly said that we could not wait for the threat to become IMMINENT, and had to act preventatively, BEFORE Saddam had any nuclear weapons, (an ambition he definitively had). So to criticize Bush for acting too soon/"RUSHING TO WAR" - BEFORE an imminent threat was apparent - is too make the charge DOUBLY BOGUS. We did NOT rush to war on deliberately slanted intel'.
That all this criticism of Bush is coming down NOW - JUST AFTER THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ HAS APPROVED A CONSTITUTION AND IS EMERGING AS THE FIRST TRUE ARAB DEMOCRACY - is a shameful sickening display of irrational Bush hatred and self-loathing by a political faction which has almost always taken the side of our enemies and has loathed everything America has always stood for - it is a shameful display of anti-0libertarianism by the prescriptionary statists, the groupist utopianists, and redistributionary elitists of the Left.
Now is the time we should all be rejoicing and praising Bush's courage and the courage and sacrifice of our armed forces.
May God Bless America, and help the Iraqis achieve democracy and liberty and prosperity and peace.
AND MAY WE ALL SOON FORGET THIS WHOLE PLAMEGATE SIDESHOW!
PREDICTION: WHEN FITZGERALD ANNOUNCES THERE WILL BE NO INDICTMENTS, THE DEM/LEFT WILL CALL FOR A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR! Heh!
SERIOUSLY: the SOTU in question - the one mendacious Joe Wilson referred to in his INFAMOUS NYTIMES Op-Ed - was delivered to a joint session of Congress in January 2003, just a few months before the war to oust Saddam. (IMPORTANTLY: Bush NEVER said the word "Niger" in the speech, and specifically cited British intelligence which the Lord Butler Report investigated after the war and found to be valid).
Congress gave Bush the AUTHORITY AND POWER TO MAKE WAR IN OCTOBER OF 2002. Three months BEFORE the SOTU in question!
Therefore, the Dem/Left's contention that Bush MISLED us into war, and that the 16 word-sentence in which cited British intel' was a key part of Bush's deliberate "over-hyping" of the potential of Saddam's WMD threat IS ENTIRELY BOGUS.
Since this charge is BOGUS, there is ABSOLUTELY NO MOTIVATION for Bush or Rove or Cheney or Libby to have to go to ANY EXTREME to discredit Joe Wilson; his charges were untrue; his report did not show what he claimed it showed in his NYTIMES Op-Ed, and there was no need to punish him or his wife or anyone.
The charge that Bush/Rove/Cheney/Libby were "OUT TO GET JOE WILSON" is merely a figment of the idiotically paranoid and confused Left - which has ALWAYS argued that AshKKKroft and SmirkingchimpBusHitler were bigger threats to the USA than Saddam or jihadoterrorism and islamofascism.
On top of that, Bush repeatedly said that we could not wait for the threat to become IMMINENT, and had to act preventatively, BEFORE Saddam had any nuclear weapons, (an ambition he definitively had). So to criticize Bush for acting too soon/"RUSHING TO WAR" - BEFORE an imminent threat was apparent - is too make the charge DOUBLY BOGUS. We did NOT rush to war on deliberately slanted intel'.
That all this criticism of Bush is coming down NOW - JUST AFTER THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ HAS APPROVED A CONSTITUTION AND IS EMERGING AS THE FIRST TRUE ARAB DEMOCRACY - is a shameful sickening display of irrational Bush hatred and self-loathing by a political faction which has almost always taken the side of our enemies and has loathed everything America has always stood for - it is a shameful display of anti-0libertarianism by the prescriptionary statists, the groupist utopianists, and redistributionary elitists of the Left.
Now is the time we should all be rejoicing and praising Bush's courage and the courage and sacrifice of our armed forces.
May God Bless America, and help the Iraqis achieve democracy and liberty and prosperity and peace.
AND MAY WE ALL SOON FORGET THIS WHOLE PLAMEGATE SIDESHOW!
