Tuesday, February 28, 2006
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SO-CALLED ARAB BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL
The Arab boycott, established by the Arab League in 1951 as an economic tool to hurt Israel, is a dying animal. Ask Aramex.THUS WE PROVE THAT YET ANOTHER LINE-OF-ATTACK AGAINST THE DUBAI PORTS DEAL IS TOTALLY BOGUS.
The company, which provides delivery services around the world, is commonly used by Arab and Israeli companies who want to exchange goods without upsetting any Arab port officials. The company provides customers with US mailing addresses where Israeli products can be sent. It then exchanges the Israeli postalstamped packaging for a US-stamped package and sends it on to its Arab destination.
So while some Arab ports will not accept goods marked "Made in Israel," if you take off the sticker and send it through another country, the deal is done.
"Besides Syria, the Arab boycott is now just lip service," said Doron Peskin, head of research at InfoProd, a consulting firm for foreign and Israeli companies specializing in trade to Arab states. ... Today, however, even the most hardline Arab countries are officially dropping the official primary level of the boycott to join trade organizations and agreements.
The most significant "fall" was of Saudi Arabia, which agreed last September to drop the primary boycott of Israel to join the WTO. ... Various historical events weakened the boycott further. Egypt made peace with Israel in 1978. In 1991, Kuwait agreed to rescind its secondary and tertiary boycotts after the US freed it from Iraqi occupation. ... In 1996 the OAB stopped convening.
Today, trade between the Jewish state and the Arab world remains "undercover," but goes on regularly. (The products cannot be identified as Israeli or they may end up back on the ship.).
THE TRUTH ABOUT DUBAI AND ISRAEL - and the anti-Ports World folks ain't gonna like it!
Dubai Ports World, the combined United Emirates (UAE) port management company for the Gulf, has stepped up its challenge to win the operating rights of six major ports in the US, by claiming it has strong business ties with Israeli shipping company Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ...(2) Via Israeli Consulate general (SF):
Asked in an interview last week with “CNN” reporter Wolf Blitzer whether Dubai Ports World was doing business with Israel while the UAE refused to recognize Israel, [CEO Ted] Bilkey replied, “One of our very sound customers is Zim line. It’s the largest shipping company. And the president of that company is very close to our company and supports us, because we have good relations with all of our clients.
“We handle their operations in a number of ports throughout the world because it’s good commercial business for us. They wouldn’t come to us unless we did a good job,” added Bilkey.
Blitzer: “Does the emir know this?”
Bilkey: “Absolutely.”
Dubai to Copy Israeli Hi-Tech Model - Thursday, June 17, 2004:These two items prove that the UAE is in fact among the most moderate of all the Arab nations.
While striving to become the regional financial center of the Middle East, Dubai has decided to develop its hi-tech industry according to the Israeli model, MA’ARIV reported. Senior Dubai officials have approached Israel with the intention of developing joint technology projects.
Dubai officials met with Israeli businessmen during the regional economic conference in Jordan and expressed interest in cooperation with leading Israeli hi-tech companies, which have not yet expanded to the Gulf. Dubai representatives showed excellent understanding of the Israeli legislation governing manufacture and the hi-tech industry.
They also expressed willingness to visit Israel, since the Dubai government does not oppose such visits.
NOTE: This is an excerpt from a recent State Department briefing:
ERELI: I would note that the intelligence community's Risk Acquisition Center, which is under the office of Director of National Intelligence, prepared an assessment to determine if any derogatory information existed on this acquire and whether the acquire would take any action -- might take any action to threaten national security.CASE CLOSED.
And as a result of this very thorough, very exhaustive, very careful review by all the stakeholders, including the Department of Homeland Security, it was decided that there was no objection on national security grounds for this transaction going forward.
I would also point out that nothing in this acquisition has anything to do with the responsibility for security in American ports.
That remains very firmly in the hands of Department of Homeland Security. What we're talking about is management of some port operations.
Department of Homeland Security has had good relations with the Dubai ports role in the past.
And I would note, as the Secretary noted in her remarks on Friday, that from a counterterrorism point of view, we've had a strong and effective partnership with the UAE and those are some of the facts, I think, that are important to bear in mind when looking at this case.
PORT BROUHAHA INITIATED BY PRIVATE, PROTECTIONIST BUSINESS LOBBYIST HIRED BY PORTS WORLD COMPETITOR
Turns out the "political groundswell" of Democrats and some Republicans in Congress was not the result of national security, but in fact the almighty dollar. The Miami port operator Eller & Co. ... sent a team of lobbyist[s] to D.C. to turn the screws. The MSM got it wrong yet again.
Eller's campaign included a lobbying blitz on Capitol Hill that has produced a groundswell of Democratic Party opposition to the deal. Eller "was really the canary in the mineshaft for many people on the Hill and in the media," said Israel Klein, a spokesman for Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.I expect the Dems to do the bidding of isolationist/protectionist lobbyists (working for unions or corporations that can't compete without government intervention), but NOT GOP members of the Congress or governors.
The shame is, that without the GOP demagogues pumping up this bogus flap (King and Pataki and Collins and Ehrlich), it wouldn't have EVER even become a brouhaha. SHAME ON THE GOP DEMAGOGUES WHO DID THE BIDDING OF THE DEMS - AND THEIR PROTECTIONIST-LOBBYIST BUDDIES!
EVEN MORE PROOF SOCIALISM SUCKS
IRAN PLEDGES $250 MILLION TO AID HAMAS
The London-based Dar al-Hiyat newspaper reported on Tuesday that Iran would allocate $250 million to the Palestinian Authority to replace the funding withheld by Israel and the United States following Hamas' election victory. In an interview with the newspaper, Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal said that he officially approved the Iranian support for the new Hamas-led PA.That will buy a lot of bombs and missiles and rockets. And it proves one thing: Jihadoterrorists stick together! We should treat all who support terrorists like the terrorists themselves - even the EU!
I hope that Israel swiftly finishes the security fence and rapidly completes unilateral separation from the West Bank, then - if and when the enemy launches a major attack against Israel - the IDF should utterly destroy the enemy, empty the territories and reduce them to ashes and dust. An uninhabited reminder and a buffer zone.
Making the prospect of this "unilaterally assured destruction" quite clear to the enemy might be the best deterrent to any attack, and best guarantor of "peace." I put "peace" in quotation marks because a true peace can only exist between peoples who accept each other. As long as Muslims don't accept the state of Israel there can be no real peace.
MORE PROOF THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS TREE-MADE, NOT MAN-MADE
Europe's "Little Ice Age" may have been triggered by the 14th Century Black Death plague, according to a new study. Pollen and leaf data support the idea that millions of trees sprang up on abandoned farmland, soaking up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This would have had the effect of cooling the climate, a team from Utrecht University, Netherlands, says. The Little Ice Age was a period of some 300 years when Europe experienced a dip in average temperatures.
This seems to bear out an earlier study, by scientists out of CAL-IRVINE, which suggested that the Amazon Rainforest is actually causing global warming because the trees in the Amazon are the oldest they've ever been - meaning the Amazon is NOT absorbing as much CO2 as it did a hundred years ago when most of the tress were younger and growing fast.
Which implies that the best way to halt "TREE-MADE GLOBAL WARMING" would be IF WE CUT DOWN HUGE SWATHES OF THE AMAZON RAINFOREST AND THEN REPLANTED IT WITH YOUNG, FAST-GROWING TREES! These trees would bind up much more CO2. Once cut down, the old trees could be turned into lumber, houses and furniture - and therefore they would NOT decay and add any CO2 to the atmosphere.
Those who doubt the magnitude of this should note that the Amazon forest contains 35% of all the carbon bound up in land-based vegetation! IOW: it has a HUGE effect on our atmosphere - more than all the man-made industry COMBINED! If we really want to lower atmospheric CO2, then we MUST cut down all t he old trees in the Amazon and replace them with young trees.
This is exactly the opposite of what the Leftie "save the earth" econazis rail on and on and on about. In fact - these studies seem to suggest - the Leftie econazis who say "SAVE THE RAINFOREST" are the true cause of global warming! "Protecting" the Amazon is causing global warming! How effingly ironically delicious!
Too bad there are no politicians with balls big or steely enough to actually propose this logical and scientific plan.
DUBAI TERMINAL DEAL: MSM AND DEMS "CHERRY-PICKING" COAST GUARD COMMENTS
The entire attack against the UK-Dubai-US container terminals deal is BOGUS. It has been from the start. The latest salvo in this BOGUS BROUHAHA is that CFIUS was told by the USCG that there were "intelligence gaps." From POWERLINE:
"Paper: Coast Guard Has Port Co. Intel Gaps." The Associated Press begins breathlessly:Citing broad gaps in U.S. intelligence, the Coast Guard cautioned the Bush administration weeks ago that it could not determine whether a United Arab Emirates-based company seeking a stake in some U.S. port operations might support terrorist operations.Of course, if you continue reading, you find:The Bush administration said the Coast Guard's concerns were raised during its review of the deal, which it approved Jan. 17, and that all those questions were resolved. ***
The Coast Guard said the concerns reflected in the document ultimately were addressed. In a statement, the Coast Guard said other U.S. intelligence agencies were able to provide answers to the questions it raised.
"The Coast Guard, the intelligence community and the entire CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States) panel believed this transaction received the proper review, and national security concerns were, in fact, addressed," the Coast Guard said.
YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT FALSE CHERRY-PICKING LOOKS LIKE!?
Well, when the Left accuses Bush and Cheney of cherry-picking intel on Iraq in order to build up a case for war it's a FALSE charge. WHY?! Well, even Paul Pillar was forced to admit on CNN's THE SITUATION ROOM that all the intel from every agency in the world had overwhelmingly concluded that Saddam had WMD. And he admitted that there was no arm-twisting or slanting of the intel. IN OTHER WORDS: there was no cherry-picking.
IOW: the cherry-picking charge is another Bogus Bush Scandal - just like this Dubai deal. As is latest USCG wrinkle. The whole ENTIRE Dubai controversy is nothing but a disinformation campaign by self-serving demagogues - from BITH parties!
Sadly, the polls seem to suggest that this disinformation campaign is working. SO FAR. But as a great American once said, we have not yet begun to fight.
Monday, February 27, 2006
A TAXONOMY OF CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL CAMPS
REALISTS - who say Saddam was contained, Bush should've left him alone, and they argue that democracy won't work in Iraq because Iraqi culture and social disparities can't accomodate it. They think you can make deals/arrangements/treaties with the enemy, and co-exist with them - from Hamas to Iran to North Korea.
JIHADISTS - like OBL and Zawahiri and Zarqawi - who know that their totalitarian ideology can only be imposed by using horrific intimidation, and who know that only a robust USA can prevent them from imposing their repressive ideology and re-establishing the Caliphate under sharia.
PACIFISTS - who oppose the use of any deadly force - and even opposed the USA's entry into WW2.
POST-MODERNISTS - like Sheehan and Chomsky and Kucinich- who say that we deserved 9/11 and that we should withdraw from the Third World and return to them the wealth we stole as colonialists and imperialists and globalists, and that we should abandon our "colony" Israel and let Muslims run their own world.
OPPORTUNISTS - like Schroeder and Clinton and Biden and Hagel - who oppose Bush whenever they feel they can make a political gain.
And Bush - he's best described as an idealist or a UNIVERSALIST: Bush believes that all people everywhere deserve their innate, inalienable, universal human rights, and that the richest, strongest, most diverse and most powerful democracy in the history of the world has a duty to help lead a movement of all free nations to liberate all our brothers and sisters everywhere from tryanny, genocide, degradation - and the poverty and ignorance and racism which are bred by tyrnannies. (This USED TO BE called liberalism, but has become known as "classical liberalism" or neo-conservatism.)
Take your pick; choose which camp YOU want to be in. I know which one I'm in - the same one as FDR and Truman and JFK and Reagan - and Blair and Bush.
Only this last camp realizes that we are now counter-attacking in what will be a very LONG WAR - one that won't be over until the world's last truly evil totalitarian ideology is defeated everywhere, and every nation everywhere has a self-determined, self-styled democracy. Afghanistan and Iraq are merely the first two major campaigns in this war.
The status quoists, realists and pacifists would appease the enemy in the false hope that this would stall their plans. (Appeasement has never ever accomplished the goals which it sets out for itself - it has always only ever strengthened the enemy and made the inevitable clash worse than it might otherwise have been. ) The post-modernists would go even further and make sacrifices and reparations to the enemy. The opportunists... well, they could never be trusted to do anything based on any prinicple.
THE ONLY CAMP WHICH OFFERS ANY PROACTIVE STRATEGY OR ANY HOPE OF TRUE VICTORY IS THE UNIVERSALIST CAMP.
ADDENDUM: How this taxonomy plays out on the partisan-political landscape:
There are only one or two universalists in the Democrat Party - which is home base for ALL post-modernists and pacificists. Status quoists, realists and opportunists make up strong minorities in both parties. If Bush wasn't a universalist then we wouldn't have EVER invaded Iraq. He is truly LEADING the Free World in The Long War. Only the universalists are hawks; all the other camps are basically doves.
The way things look now, opportunists will gain seats in the 2006 election. The result might be less bold actions - and more appeasement - in the Long War.
If - in 2008 - the USA doesn't elect a POTUS who is a universalist (and with Blair's chosen successor Gordon Brown being an unkown), well.... then the Free World will retreat (by letting Assad stay in power, letting Iran get nukes, letting Kim stay in power, by financing Hamas, and by seceding our foreign polciy to the UN and the EU) - until the next big terrorist attack.
A major jihadoterrorist attack HERE will make us feel like we're in a foxhole together. For a while. If at that time a "non-univeralist" is in the WH, then we will probably point fingers at each other rather than strike back as Bush did.
Because the Democrats have basically not supported the Long War, al Qaeda will do whatever it can to foment an Iraqi Civil War between now and the November election in the US - in order to try to get an appeasing/dovish majority - a DEMOCRAT majority - in one or both houses.
If they accomplish this, then I'd expect them to lauch a really MASSIVE attack against us and/or our allies - so their comrades in the MSM can spin it as a major loss LIKE THEY DID WITH TET. This will give the doves a pretext for blaming Bush and withdrawing, (like the doves did vis a vis Vietnam: They blamed LBJ and Nixon and suspended aid to the South Vietnamese Gov in 1975. This led to the Fall of Saigon, 1 MILLION Boat People, the rise of Pol Pot, and to 3.5 MILLION slaughtered by socialist genocide in SE Asia.)
CLINTON: A FAILURE AND A PHONY, OR TRAITOR?
Clinton either ran away with his tail between his legs or used ineffective pin-prick retaliations. (Former FBI Director Freeh has charged that Clinton was more interested in geting a Saudi donation for his library than getting their cooperation in hunting-down the Khobar attackers.)
Also, during Clinton's two terms he "gave away the sovereignity of our ports" when he allowed Communist China and Saudi Arabia to "control several ports."
NOW... he and his wife attack Bush and our ALLIES in The Long War (like the UAE) using lies and deceit - AS IF HIS RECORD DEMANDED RESPECT! (Bill does this often when overseas!)
JUST HOW DUMB DO THEY THINK WE ARE!?
Obviously, these two hypocrites don't deserve an ounce of respect on ANY issue involving jihadoterrorism or port security! BOTTOM LINE: The Clintons' mendacity and hypocrisy knows no bounds. He and his wife are treacherous OPPORTUNISTS who should NEVER again be trusted with our nation's security.
FRANCE IS AN ENEMY
(1) Pushes to get Hamas EU funding; and (2) Refuses to extradite suspects Lebanon wanted to interrogate in relation to the Hariri assassination.FRANCE: they might as well be al Qaeda. I'd rather lease some terminals in our ports do the UAE than France!
ISRAEL HAS NO CHOICE; NEGOTIATED DEAL IMPOSSIBLE: HAMAS REITERATES REFUSAL TO NEGOTIATE
Top Hamas figures Mahmoud Zahar and Saed Siyam rejected on Sunday any possible peace negotiations with Israel. Speaking in Amman, Jordan before parliament members from all over the Arab world, Zahar said that Israel was an enemy, and thus not a partner for negotiations, Israel Radio reported. He added that Hamas did not plan to renew the failed diplomatic talks with Israel.Israel should finish the security fence ASAP, seal off the borders around Gaza and the West bank, make it impossible for Hamas to get financial or military aid, and then call the whole deal "done."
Hamas officials Sa’id Syiam and Mahmoud a-Zahar told the Associated Press they reject entering into diplomatic talks with Israel, calling past talks a “failed experiment”.Anyone who thinks a negotiated two-state solution is possible is NUTS.
The two were attending a gathering of Arab elected officials in Jordan, telling the media the “Israeli enemy” cannot be a partner, adding US pressure on the PA is insignificant since it is not coming from Arab states. The two added the recent Hamas election victory was another sign of defeat for Israel, emphasizing diplomatic relations with Israel was a non-starter.
IRAQ CIVIL WAR OVER - (before it really started!)
Leaders of the main Sunni Arab political bloc have decided to return to suspended talks over the formation of a new government, the top Sunni negotiator said Sunday. The step could help defuse the sectarian tensions that threatened to spiral into open civil war last week after the bombing of a Shiite shrine and the killings of Sunnis in reprisal.Sheesh, that was the fastest descent into civil war and end of a civil war of all time! Or maybe the nattering nabobs of negativism who said that Iraq was declining into a civil war war wrong!? Maybe they've been wrong all along? Maybe they just wished it was true?
WHY DID GERMANY HAVE SADDAM'S WAR PLANS!?
The classified study contains a copy of the sketch supplied by the Germans. "The overlay was provided to the Germans by one of their sources in Baghdad (identity of the German sources unknown)," the study notes. "When the bombs started falling, the agents ceased ops and went to the French Embassy."
Sunday, February 26, 2006
BUSH, IRAQ, AL QAEDA AND THE LONG WAR: once and for all, dispelling the lies of the Left
(1) "SADDAM AND 9/11": Bush asked for and received a SEPARATE authorization to attack Iraq and did NOT use the 2001 AUMF to attack Saddam. If he had belived that Saddam was connected to 9/11, then he could have merely used the 2001 AUMF. This proves that Bush never EVER DIRECTLY connected Saddam to 9/11. (There are, though, unequivocably ties between Saddam and al Qaeda and other jihadoterrorist groups.)THEREFORE: When Leftists claim that Bush lied about Saddam's connections to 9/11, or Saddam's WMD, and what the exit strategy of mission was, or that democracy was ever a reason to depose Saddam - and that "BIG OIL" was the real reason we went to war - THEY ARE LYING, NOT BUSH.
(2) "BUSH LIED ABOUT WMD": Neither the UNSCR#1441 or the 2002 Congressional authorization to attack Saddam limited the reasons Saddam was a threat to WMD stockpiles, but in fact contained two dozen reasons why Saddam was a threat to the USA and our allies and our interests. If Bush thought that WMD's were the only reason to go to war, then he would NOT have bothered to make sure all those other imporant points were in the resolution. Many had to do with the UNSC resolutions which Saddam had violated, and MOST of these had nothing to do with WMD.
ADDITIONALLY: Ex-Cia man Pillar - who has been getting a lot of press recently, rehashing his old vague and unsupportable charges - has recently been forced to REPEATEDLY admit that the Robb-Silberman Commission report was entirely correct when it concluded that not a single solitary intelligence officer or report was altered or adjusted in any way due to political poressure from anyone. And Pillar has also admitted that Cheney was 100% correct when he said that all intelligence agencies from all nations agreed that Saddam had WMD. Tertefore: BUISH DID NOT LIE.
(3) "SADDAM WASN'T AN IMMINENT THREAT": As to the charge that Bush lied about Saddam being an imminent threat - for without WMD stockpiles there could be no "imminence": Bush specifically argued that he would NOT wait for threats from untrustworthy tyrants like Saddam to become imminent because that would be too late.
.
(4) "MISSION NOT ACCOMPLISHED": When Bush appeared on the deck of that aircraft carrier in front of that banner which said "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" that part of the mission which that aircraft carrier was involved in had been accomplished, as was the mission for most of the troops which invaded Iraq and deposed the genocidal tyrant Saddam.
The current fighting is against DIFFERENT forces with a different goal than Saddam, and as such it comprises what is essentially a SECOND mission: securing a self-determined pluralist democracy for Iraq. When this mission eneds - probably in 2007, then Iraq will have to maintain its security on its own. In a larger sense, we can only declare total victory in Iraq at that time.
(5) "DEMOCRACY FOR IRAQ WAS NEVER REALLY A GOAL": The very challenging goal of democracy for Iraq was EXACTLY what Bush said his ultimate goal was when he addressed the UN General Assembly in September of 2002 - a month before UNSCR#1441 was passed, four months before Saddam filed a false "fional decaration" - in ciolatiuon of UNSCR#1441, and six months before the war began. There was no "rush to war" and democracy was not an after the fact rationalization rushed into place when the ISG failed to find stockpiles. NOTE: the ISG did unequivocably determine that Saddam was in violation of most of the UNSR's which functioned as the armistice for the Gulf War.
(6) "NO BLOOD FOR OIL": It was liberal Democrat president Jimmy Carter (and not Bush, Cheney or Halliburton) who - in 1980 - declared that Gulf Oil was strategic necessity for the USA and the West, and that the USa would use any means necessary to defend its flow to the West. This became known as The Carter Dioctrine and has the same force today as it did then and as the Monroe Doctrine still has today. It is NOT a partisan policy inveernted to please oil companies; it is recognbition that the world's economy and the world's PEOPLE needs energy to survive, and the USA will guarantee that the world gets that energy. (REMEMBER: Europe and Asia get more oil from the Gulf than the USA does!)
If we won't fight to save our way of life and economy from becoming held hostage to oil-strong islamofascist tyrants, then we might as well NOT fight for anything - a position that the Left mostly endorses!
The Left's and the MSM's continuous assault on Bush and Iraq (now screaming "civil war!") only serves the enemy by undermining support for our ultimate cause and the larger war.
Ultimately, we will only defeat jihadoterrorism when we drain the swamp. Tyranny - and the poverty which tyranny produces - is the "swamp." Democracy is the "drain." Since tyrants don't often leave voluntarily - and because islamofascism can only thrive under a tyranny - war and threat of war are really the only means of implementing this policy.
Appeasment only encourages the enemy. Draining the swamp will take a long time; hence, "THE LONG WAR." It might be a shorter war if the Left were firmly on OUR side. I'M NOT HOLDING MY BREATH!
NYTIMES THEATER REVIEW CELEBRATES PERVERSITY
... The spring season in New York is, happily and atypically, plump with demonstrations of such genre bending, with entrancingly wicked shows that extract the profane from the sacred and the rot from the pillars of society.This review PROVES (once again) that the editors of the NYTIMES actively endorse an ideology which is OPENLY hostile to traditional values and to objectivity. They are thoroughly post-modern in their ridicule of everything which has made our civilization free and properous - namely bourgeois culture - and their revulsion for normalcy, and their contempt for traditional Judeo-Christian values, which they deem repressive and anti-libidinal.
[About one the 3 plays reviewed - emphasis added:] ...You could also say that it single-handedly dragged the British sex farce from the realm of seaside-postcard naughtiness into a land-mined field of subversion. In portraying two middle-aged, middle-class siblings drooling over the same cute young thing (a male hustler, in this case), Orton revealed not only the sagging flesh beneath his characters' rigorously conventional clothes but also the wayward, wanton itches beneath the skin. And how many other sex farces blithely factor in sadistic murder?
... The erotic dimension, though, is subjugated to the greater, and disturbingly pertinent, theme about how spin shapes what we think of as rock-hard history.
Of course, like good little post-modernists, they also deny that there can be any objective history (only "spin"). Er um, they believe this is true for everyone EXCEPT for themselves and THEIR read of history! What hypocrites! What perverted and subversive hypocrites! What scum.
BOTTOM-LINE: I am glad people are free to write, perform, observe and critique whatever they want - even the perverse plays reviewed in the linked-to article. If producers want to put on PERVERSE pays and if people want to act in them and pay to see them, and if newspaper reporters want to praise them for their perversity: FINE. People are rightly free to critique my traditional bourgoise values - in plays, movies, and reviews - ANYWHERE THEY CHOOSE. And I am free to critique their critique of my values, too.
MY CRITIQUE: I know the difference between a pigs ear and a silk purse, and won't let anyone tell me the former is the latter. "High" art cannot be both high and serve perversness anymore than a war can be called a just war if it serves perverseness. SIMPLY PUT: If the intentions which inform the act are perverse, then the act is perverse. And we should no more praise perversity than praise chaos, poverty or ignorance.
I would argue that completely "unfettered" human liberty - human liberty that has no respect for Natural Law - always devolves into libertinage, and that this is ultimately destructive to the perpetrators, to society and to culture.
When a newspaper review praises a work which "BLITHELY FACTORS IN SADISTIC MURDER," then I think it is clear that they NO LONGER HAVE A FUCTIONAL OR DEFENSIBLE MORAL COMPASS - not the NYTIMES, not their reviewer, and not the playwright or the producers or the actors or the people in the audience who "GET OFF" on "blithe murderous sadism." People who cannot condemn sadistic sex murderers are amoral at best.
That many chic literati do praise perversity proves only that many are degenerates; they are in fact nothing more than a chic degenerati, and their praise of perversity - posing this time as a review - is no better than a happy sports report from a bloody cockfight. Puns intended.
ASIDE: Isn't it "RICH" that these chic degenerati are the very same people who condemn Bush for fighting a war of liberation!? YUP: To these "perverted subversives", sadists in plays who murder prostitutes deserve praise, but a president who toppled totalitarian regimes which perpetrated crimes against humanity - which murdered and tortured hundreds of thousands of their own citizens - he deserves condemnation. Sheesh. If that doesn't prove to you how basically IMMORAL this chic degenerati crowd is then NOTHING will!
Their fervent anti-traditionalism is why the post-modern Left has had a problem supporting our side in The Long War: Like our enemy, they too want to bring our culture down. Unfortunately for the post-modernists, they don't even appreciate the fact that Bush is far FAR less of a threat to their libertinage than are the jihadoterrorists.
EQUALLY IRONIC IS THIS FACT: Those of us who unabashedly support our side in The Long War are not only defending our nation and the Free World and Natural Law (and its bedrock concept of Universal Human Rights), we are also defending our "perversely subversive" chic degenerati foes - (who abhor Natural Law) - right here at home. Our victory is theirs.
[NOTE: It is fitting that (a) one of the plays reviewed in this column in the NYTIMES stars well-known BDS-afflicted Bush-basher actor Alec Baldwin, and (b) that another article in the NYTIMES announces that the unabashedly Leftist play AWAKE AND SING will also be opening in NYC soon. This further proves that the "sexual perversity crowd" and the "socialism crowd" are one and the same. Essentially, one might say, they have ONE PLANK in their PLATFORM: the desire to destroy the bourgeoisee, to obliterate its economic systems and and cultural values.]
BLAIR : IRA :: BUSH : HAMAS - NOT!!!
Blair basically stuck to this ESSENTIAL point, and let Northern Ireland governments fall over it. It is still a sticking point. And rightly so: a terrorist group which also does crimes for profit cannot be part of any legitimate peace process or legitimate governing process. Terror and criminality are ANTITHETICAL to both.
Bush and Rice made an UNBELIEVEBALY HUGE MISTAKE when they pushed Israel to allow Hamas - a group even worse than the IRA - to particpate in the elections without DISARMING and WITHOUT ANNOUNCING THAT THEY ACCEPTED ALL PREVIOUSLY SIGNED AGREEMENTS BETWEEN ISRAEL AND THE PLO AND/OR PNA.
The result is that Hamas won. SURE: this has brpought some clarity to the situation; it poroves that a majority of so-called Arab Palestinians support terror - like the Taliban and the pakistanis of Waziristan and the Sunnis and many in Northern Ireland. It proves that Israel has a REAL SERIOUS SECURITY PROBLEM BECAUSE THEIR TERRORISTS ARE RIGHT ON THEIR BORDERS.
Bush and Rice should NOT have had a double standard, and demanded of Irael something that they would NOT have EVER accepted themselves for America. The result has greatly complicated things and made armed conflict more likely, not less. And - because Hamas is a repressive and fanatical religious party- it doesn't bring the Arabs living in the territories any closer to attaining liberty; it merely means they are becoming more Taliban-like.
We should NOT trust a single agreement with Hamas; they are no more trustworthy than the Taliban or Saddam or al Qaeda or Iran. There will be no peace in Israel until jihadism is defeated EVERYWHERE - defeated in "Palistan" the way it was in Afghanistan.
Saturday, February 25, 2006
NO SHOCK HERE: THE LEFT CREDITS KHRUSHCHEV FOR THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR, (AND NOT REAGAN)
FIFTY years ago today, the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave a "secret speech" at the 20th Communist Party Congress that changed both his country and the world. By denouncing Stalin, whose God-like status had helped to legitimize Communism in the Soviet Bloc, Khrushchev began a process of unraveling it that culminated in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union. This great deed deserves to be celebrated on its anniversary.
(1) deliver the goods or services to its people; (goods and services which the people TRAPPED under Soviet TYRANNY had recently discovered were WIDELY available in the West - recently, because of detente and because of the availability of Western TV shows in places like East Germany - and specifically shows like "Dallas" which revealed to people trapped behind the Iron Curtian that people in the Free World had better material lives than they did under a system SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED to better distribute "a materially good life" to its citizens); or
(2) keep up with the US in an arms race seriously sped up by Reagan; or
(3) clamp down on genuine human liberation movements like SOLIDARITY - a genuine labor movement that developed in Poland with the help of Reagan and the Pope.
Perhaps Khrushchev ended the death camps, but not much else; he continued the arms race, and the USSR's aggressive global hegemony. Of course he had to: the USSR DEPENDED on swallowing up little economies all over the globe to keep its otherwise non-productive economy afloat.
[YUP: the USSR was sort of like a conglomerate that wasn't really making money, but was able to keep afloat by gobbling up other smaller companies and using their cash flow to fend off bankruptcy. When the USSR no longer had a state of the art military capability or the economic resources to redevelop the military capability needed to swallow up more satellites - (because Reagan's arms build up and aggressive stance toward Soviet hegemony had severely raised the cost of this) - the USSR collapsed. Like ENRON.]
And then, Deng Xiao Ping's accomplishments in China and Rao's India showed that capitalism and trade were better at eradicating poverty than protectionism and socialism. The Fall of the Wall sealed the deal for me: Even the supposedly over-achieving East Germans were fleeing Marxist tyranny. Everywhere you look socialism has uttrly failed to deliver the goods - literally and figuratively. (Nothing proves this more than the Korean peninsula: the North is impoverished and enslaved; the South free and prosperous. END OF STORY!)
YET - UNBELIEVABLY: Leftists to this day refuse to credit Reagan. Leftists like Taubman and the NYTIMES - are still in DEEP DENIAL. And, it's NO SURPRISE that these same people also deny that Bush's neo-conservatism is nothing more then the contemporary version of classical liberalism, a liberalism which was once strongly put forward by FDR, Truman, and JFK. Today, Bush is only doing what each of these these late great Democrat presidents would've done were any one of them now in office.
The Left denies this about Bush for the very same reason they deny that Reagan caused the USSR to collapse: Accepting these TRUTHS means having to admit you were totally WRONG about everything. That's a hard thing to swallow. But take it from me - you Lefties out there - once you DO IT, it's very VERY liberating! (PUN INTENDED!)
In his case, it wasn't the road to hell that was paved with good intentions, but the road from the Stalinist hell in which he had faithfully served, and which he had the courage to try to transcend.This too is PURE BULLSHIT! After trying to close the chapter on Stalin - and blame Marxism's failures and genocidal rampages on "the cult of the personality", Khrushchev RUTHLESSLY put down revolts in Poland and Hungary, and brought the world to the brink of Nuclear War by using Cuba as a nuclear missile base.
These - and many MANY other despicable acts by Khrushchev - were neither "courageous or transcendent." They were the cruel acts of a tyrant seeking to enslave humanity to an evil and ineffective creed.
Khrushchev - and every other person who ever served Soviet hegemony (like Gorbachev) should always ONLY be remembered as enemies of liberty and therefore traitors to Humanity. Taubman is flat out wrong: NEITHER KHRUSHCHEV OR ANY OTHER MARXIST TYRANT SHOULD EVER BE CELEBRATED FOR ANYTHING! Especially not for inconsequential speeches fully vetted by the Politburo and the Central Committee.
Failure to accept this simple truth - that Soviet Marxism was unequivocably evil and wrong and bad and unjust, and that ALL of its leaders were complicit in countless crimes against humanity, crimes committed decade after decade after decade - only brings SHAME ON TAUBMAN, SHAME ON THE NYTIMES, AND SHAME ON THE LEFT.
Shame but no surpirse. YUP: No shock here; the Left was a Fifth Column then - appeasing and apologizing for totalitarianism, and they are a Fifth Column now - appeasing and apologizing to today's enemies and (as this column proves - when they get the chance) yesterday's enemies, too. YUP: It's a nauseatingly nostalgic "Fifth Column Redux."
DUBAI: THE DEMOGOGUE'S LASTEST BOGEYMAN
Security is independent of terminal ownership and it is NOT even merely located at the off-loading terminal; it extends to the foreign PORT where the ship is loaded - (as it MUST if we are REALLY to be safe).
When opponents of the Dubai deal exclaim that we are "surrendering out sovereignity over our ports" (as Hillary has charged), or even argue that Dubai would "control" ANY "port" - they are simply LYING. IT IS THE BIG LIE. It is a BOGUS charge. A BOGEYMAN. PURE DEMAGOGUERY. Unadulterated bullshit.
It's NO DIFFERENT than arguing that the NSA intercept program, which ACTUALLY TARGETS INTERNATIONAL CALLS OF AL QAEDA, is a "DOMESTIC SPYING SCANDAL." It's like arguing that Gitmo is a counter-productive torture-center, or that Abu Ghraib's malpractices were widespread and reflect orders from Rumsfeld. It's like arguing that Bush wants to spy on librarians. Bullshit.
Sadly, all this bullshit really does is undermine our efforts to win the THE LONG WAR. And that's the only way these polices should be measured, judged.
If the opponents of the Dubai deal believe that ALL US TERMINALS should be managed by USA companies, then they should introduce legislation to accomplish that. (Though it's interesting to note they never objected when Clinton was president and Chian and Singapore took over terminal management within many US ports. BUT OKAY: if they feel so now, FINE. FINNY THO' that the much overrated 9/11 Commission NEVER recommended any such thing!)
Or the anti-Dubai crowd should form US companies which would bid for ALL the foreign owned terminals - WHICH IS THE MAJORITY OF TERMINALS IN THE USA. They are free to do either or both. (Leftie NJ governor Corzine is rich enough and savvy enough and connected enough to the investment community to do this himself!)
What they are NOT free to do is spread bullshit. Shame on them. Shame on Malkin and Hillary and Schumer and King and Pataki and Corzine and the rest of the LYING DEMAGOGUES.
HERE'S a link to an article about some of these demagogues.
HOW CALIFORNIA MIGHT EXECUTE CONVICTED RAPIST-MURDERERS HUMANELY
This convicted murderer (Michael Morales) brutally raped, tortured and then murdered his 17 year old female victim (Terri Lynn Winchell).
This convicted murderer raped and tortured and murdered his innocent victim 25 years ago.
This convicted murderer has had 25 years of exhaustive appeals - and all of his appeals failed to clear him on any ground, for any reason.
This convicted murderer should now - ACCORDING TO THE LAW - be executed for his crimes.
If some judges and some doctors in the state of California no longer feel that they can safely and humanely execute this convicted murderer by using lethal injection, then I have a perfectly good alternative method:
WHY DON'T THEY JUST WITHHOLD FOOD AND WATER FROM HIM!?
After all, as we learned in the TERRI SCHIAVO case - death by forced dehydration and starvation is perfectly painless and humane.
[ASIDE: Of course, the Left would NEVER sanction an execution by forced dehydration and forced starvation on a convicted rapist murderer. That would be cruel. Execution by forced dehyadration and forced starvation is only humane when it's done to a helpless patient whose family is in a dispute as to the wishes of the patient.
Which begs the question: What is it about post-modern Leftism that make Leftists defend the rights of murderers and terrorists more than the rights of regular citizens?
I believe the answer is that post-modern Leftism is essentially an ant-Western/anti-Judeo-Christian ideology which favors anything that attacks traditional Western/Judeo-Christian civilization.
Whether the Left is FOR gay marriage, or AGAINST enemy combatant status/Gitmo/renditions/the NSA intercept program; whether it is FOR ceding USA war-making authority to the UN, or AGAINST the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance; whether it is FOR bi-lingualism and multi-culturalism, or AGAINST better illegal immigration border controls - the ONLY thing which unites ALL the Left's positions is that they denigrate traditonal Western and American values, and/or weaken our ability to defend the West and America.
Nothing could more prove their Fifth Column status.]
Thursday, February 23, 2006
PORT BROUHAHA: ALL BASED ON A BIG LIE
This is such a BIG LIE that there's really only one word for it: BULLSHIT.
Here' are the FACTS:
(1) According to DHS testimony at today's Senate Armed Services Committee Briefing, the six ports in question have 829 TERMINALS - each LEASED by the LOCAL Port Authority to PRIVATE COMPANIES.
(2) These private companies ALREADY INCLUDE FOREIGN COMPANIES.
(3) P&O leases 24 of these 829 terminals, and ONLY these TERMINALS will now come under the corporate control of a corporation in part owned by Dubai - which is inarguably one of our very best allies in the LONG WAR.
(4) Our PORT SECURITY has NOTHING/ZERO/ZILCH/NADA/BUPKUS to do with who off-loads/on-loads containers in the terminals in our ports, and stores them and lades them on trucks.
Ports are owned by the locatities (like the NY/NJ Port Authority) - and they stay owned by them. The US Coast Guard and DHS are in charge of security of these ports, and they stay in charge.
According to DHS, EVERY (as in 100%) container is screened before it is LOADED ON TO A SHIP HEADED HERE, and by the end of the year 80% of all containers will be checked for radiation and/or X-rayed.
This FORWARD-BASED security is what's essential to PREVENTING a terrorist from getting a container into our ports - and not checking cargo once it's in the port -THAT WOULD BE TOO LATE.
Dubai Port World ALREADY FULLY COOPERATES with this process.
The CFIUS Committeee was UNANIMOUS in determining that this transfer of leases (for only 24/829 terminals) from a British company to a holding company in part owned by our ALLY Dubai presents NO SECURITY CONCERNS. This was UNANIMOUS; the CIA and DNI, FBI and DIA AND EVERY SINGLE INTELL' ASSET IN EVERY DEPARTMENT - Treasury, State, and DOJ and DHS ALL AGREED.
THEREFORE: This brouhaha is either PURE BS or simple DEMOGUERY. Take your pick.
Bush is right. Hillary, Schumer and Michelle Malkin are totally WRONG
If the MSM got the FACTS out - instead of merely repeating the BS - REPEATING THE BIG LIE, over-and-over, then the public would quickly agree.
(MSM stories HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE. Blog round-up HERE.)
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
OF WITCHES AND TERRORISTS
Too bad the allegory/analogy is way WAY OFF - nothing more than Left-wing propaganda. WHY!? Well, as we all know, witches do not really exist - in the sense that their magic is real or that they ever presented a real threat to Christianity, or a real threat to the folks in colonial Salem. But communists were real and Soviet agents were real and American communists infiltrating the State Department and the US military were REAL. Alger Hiss was really a spy for the Soviet Union, and the Rosenbergs were really spies for the Soviet Union. The VENONA PAPERS prove that McCarthy's efforts were NOT ANYTHING LIKE A WITCHHUNT. His efforts were aimed at a REAL threat, and targeted REAL spies.
When present day Lefties - like Clooney and Moore and Sheehan - accuse McCarthy and Bush and the USA of being evil paranoids, they are essentially making the same false charges that the anti-McCarthy Left made back then, and they are essentially defending the enemy - as they did back then. Their use of the McCarthy analogy really only exposes their ignorance and idiocy. The Left and the MSM were useful idiots then and they're useful idiots now.
BOTTOM-LINE: The Left's fear and hatred of McCarthy and Bush is entirely irrational; while our fear of al Qaeda IS ENTIRELY RATIONAL. McCarthy and Bush are NOT properly called witchhunters because Soviet agents and al Qaeda are neither phantoms of our imagination or innocent people; calling the jihadoterrorist enemy a clear and present danger is not a false charge, and those who make it are not hysterically irrational paranoid "witchhunters." The Clooney's and the Moore's and the Sheehan's are the true paranoids. And their paranoia serves the enemy.
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
ISRAEL'S UN AMBASSADOR: WARNS OF IRAN-SYRIA-HAMAS AXIS
Israel’s envoy to the United Nations, Danny Gillerman, warned the Security Council on Tuesday of the new terror triangle of Syria, Iran and Hamas. Gillerman compared the terror axis to a “new plague” which could kick start “the first world war of the 21 century.”Well, what else would this horrifying threesome be up to, after all, their only unique talents are for islamoterror.
EURABIAN NIGHTMARES: the darkness descends...
... a gathering of people for a scholarly exchange of views on the preservation of Western liberties, can no longer take place in the free West without security measures." [... ] Ever since she was forced to leave Egypt Bat Ye’or has lived in Europe. She does not intend to leave. She feels old and tired, but she urges young people to continue resisting dhimmi status. “We should not ask the moderate Muslims to save us. We have to change the present situation ourselves. That is our duty to our children and our ancestors.”
"... Tim Blair wrote that so far thirteen papers have been closed down after they published the Danish cartoons. At least twelve journalists face charges and seven are in prison. “Most media organisations have taken a stand by boldly running away,” says Blair. “Journalists can spend entire careers mouthing off about their commitment to free speech without ever having the chance to properly demonstrate it. I once had a theory that the lack of repression in modern democracies drove journalists to invent McCarthyesque threats, so much did they crave an opportunity to stare down those who would silence them. Their ideal imagined foes (I’m guessing): brutish religious fundamentalists opposed to progressive notions on women’s rights, homosexuality, art, and education. Problem is, those imagined foes were always named Falwell or Robertson or Nile (or John Paul II). Faced with fundamentalist religious demands from people bearing less familiar titles, however, the media froze.UNFORTUNATELY, THE ENTIRE CONTINENT HAS FROZEN! No surprise here: Europeans are mostly weenies whom we have always protected; they are ripe for intimidation now because they always have been!
Islam is winning because the primary means that Islam has always used to spread the faith has ALWAYS been intimidation: they have ALWAYS proselytized by use of violence. That's why the sword figures so pominently on nearly EVERY Muslim nation's flag. That intimidation is as prevalent NOW as ever, and there are too few signs that enough Europeans are willing to fight back. That's because post-modern Europeans (as a result of the Left's fifty year war on Western Civilization and the USA) no longer have faith in liberty and capitalism, Christianity, or universal rights. They're ripe for tyranny and the fervent tyrants taking advantage of them are the islamothugs in their midst.
If Sarkozy isn't elected - and if he doesn't take HARSH measures aimed at rolling back Islamic inroads into France (like "assimilation or deportation") - then it is ALL OVER FOR OLD EUROPE. I am so sure Europe is UNDEPENDABLE that I believe that our best chance at defeating islamofascism is to demolish Iran ASAP - BEFORE Europe caves in any further.
One non-violent way to bolster our side is to DEMAND that nations which do not enforce the UN's Declaration of Universal Human Rights be relegated to observer status at the UN, and that they no longer receive ANY international aid or loans. That would banish nearly every single Muslim nation to the sidelines WHERE THEY BELONG!
If Bush had balls he'd stand up for something like this instead of the right of Arabs to run our ports!
CHIEF POLITICAL LEADER OF HAMAS MEETS WITH THEIR CHIEF ALLY: IRAN
Hamas' political leader in exile said Tuesday that Iran will have a "major role" in Palestinian affairs. ... "The Ayatollah's regime will have a major role in Palestine," Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal said in a meeting in Teheran with Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki. "We trust Iran to help us deal with the challenges facing us today."
"... when asked if Hamas would recognize the Jewish state's legitimacy, if Israel were to withdraw to the borders before the 1967 war, Mashaal told the gathering of Tehran University students at Shahid Chamran Hall it would not. "We will not recognize Israel at any cost," answered Meshaal, Agence France Presse reported."The battle-lines could not be drawn more clearly. All that remains is exactly when, where and how. I expect that when Iran's nuclear assets, refineries, and miltary assets are destroyed in a preemptive attack that they will counter by attacking israel with everything they've got left, and by using ALL of their jihadoterrorist stooges. Between now and then - (between now and next winter - AT THE LATEST) - Iran will buld up the military assets of gaza and the West bank and south lebanon as much as they can. they will also fortify Syria.
Therefore, defensively (in advance of this inevitable moment), Israel must keep the borders of Gaza and the West Bank as tight as possible and keep all arms shipments to Hamas to an ablsolute minimum - (a la the KARINE A). We must also do whatever we can to get rid of Assad, and neutralize Hizballah. Jordan and Egypt will be key to the success of this. I think they will be helpful since I believe that they recognize - especially after the attacks in Amman (at the wedding) and at the beach resoprts of Egypt - that their nations are at risk, too: The jihadofascists would just as soon kill them as Israelis and Americans.
The formation of the Hamas government will be meaningless, but the Israeli election could be decisive. If the Israeli public gets more worried about Hamas, Netanyahu might very well win. Then - instead of unilateral withdrawal from sections of the West Bank, we might expect NO WITHDRAWALS, and we might see the IDF becoming more active preempting terror in the West Bank and Gaza.
BOTTOM-LINE: After Iran is preemptively whacked, it won't matter whether Kadima aor Likud or Labor is in power: ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE, AND ISRAEL WILL ONCE AGAIN BE IN AN EXISTENTIAL WAR.
LEFT-WING ANTI-SEMITES STRIKE AGAIN: SUMMERS FORCED TO RESIGN AS PRESIDENT OF HARVARD
IMMEDIATELY the hard-left of his base began attacking him. This is exactly when he began a 2 year downward spiral in the polls which ended on election day (when these hard-Left parties ran AGAINST Jospin instead of endorsing him) - AND JOSPIN FINISHED IN THIRD PLACE - BEHIND CHIRAC AND LE PEN!
Like Jospin, Summers supported Israel too much (he opposed divestment of Israeli assets in Harvard's HUGE asset funds) and this pissed off the hard-Left of Harvard's faculty. Then, when he raised accurate but "politically incorrect" questions about gender-based bifurcation in a few academic fields, it was his death knell; the Leftist faculty agitated until they finally forced him to resign this week. THE NY SUN AGREES:
Mr. Summers has shown flashes of brilliance since taking over in July 2001 as president of America's oldest, richest, and most famous university. We were among those who cheered his willingness to confront political anti-Semitism on campus; his speech in Memorial Church, where he said the signers of a petition to get the university to divest from Israel were anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent, is one of the most important ever given by a Harvard president. When Mr. Summers came under attack for remarks on gender differences, we observed - in an editorial called "The Soul of Harvard" - that Mr. Summers's travail could not be separated from his defense of Israel.This sad news about Summers reinforces my firm belief that today's Left - (the Left of Sheehan and Moore and Belafonte and Chavez, to name just a few who have made frequent and blatant anti-Semitic comments) - is utterly reactionary and the true home of anti-Semitism. SCRATCH A LEFTIST AND YOU FIND AN ANTI-SEMITE.
[ASIDE: Summers - you may recall - was an 8 year veteran of the Clinton Adminstration and the Treasury Secretary after Rubin. He is hardly a right-winger. But Leftists simply don't tolerate digression from the "party line." They never have. If you diverge from the "party line" on abortion or the GWOT or taxes or gun owenrship rights then you have wandered off the reservation and you risk EXPULSION FROM THE PARTY. Well, they finally succeeded in "expelling" Summers.]
UPDATE: Of course it didn't help that Summers is a Jew - and not of the self-hating Upper West Side atheistic type, either.
SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR DUBAI/US PORT TAKEOVER BROUHAHA: CALL MAERSK!
Though approved by the WH, the sale has caused a BI-PARTISAN public outcry. Most people think it's simply nuts to have our ports managed by a foreign company, let alone an Arab company - especially in a time of war. This feeling is widespread even though the port operator is NOT responsible for port security - the US government is, (and would remain so even if this deal goes through). (More stories on the brouhaha HERE and HERE and HERE.)
I HAVE A SIMPLE SOLUTION: Let's get P&O - the current British owner - or Ports World (the impending Dubai owner) - to sell the port operations to MAERSK - a DANISH shipping company. They're one of the LARGEST shipping container companies in the world, and already manage dozens and dozens of major ports; in fact, Maersk's APM TERMINALS division is the THIRD LARGEST port operator in the world.
I think most Americans trust the Danes - and would LOVE to see the Danes get this business, especially NOW! DOWN WITH DUBAI! UP WITH DENMARK!
IOW: Let's not just "BUY DANISH!"; let's SELL SOMETHING TO THEM, TOO!
WE CAN "PROTECT OUR PORTS" AND HELP AN ALLY IN NEED AT THE SAME TIME!
UPDATE: Welcome VODKAPUNDIT readers and JAWA REPORT readers! And Hotline's BLOGOMETER, too!
Monday, February 20, 2006
RECENT BAD OMENS
Febrary 15th: Syria shifts out of the dollar and into the euro.
Febraury 19th: Iranian mullahs issue a fatwa approving the use of nukes against the USA in retaliation for any attack against Iran (or the ummah).
February 20th: Bin Laden and Zawahiri have now BOTH released very theatening tapes; it's a rare event when they do so simultaneously.
Are these moves in merely anticipation of a possible US/EU/UNSC move against Assad and against Iran's nuke program (such as sanctions - a move which can EASILY be thwarted by a veto by Russia of China, two nations very friendly to both Syria and Iran), OR ARE THEY IN ANTICIPATION OF A COORDINATED JIHADOTERRORIST STRIKE AGAINST THE USA AND THE EU - AN ATTACK WHICH ASSAD AND IRAN KNOW TO BE IMMINENT?
Remember: Bin Laden said that attackers are already in the USA and are planning a major attack. AND REMEMBER: each succeeding attack by al Qaeda against the USA has always been much bigger than the preceding attack. Also note that defenses in and around DC have been visibly stepped up recently.
Iran and Syria and several jihadoterrorist groups - including Hamas, Hizballah and al Qaeda and Zarqawi and al Sadr - cooperate in relation to their strategy against the USA and Israel. An attack by jihadoterrorist proxies against the USA and Israel may be what Iran and Syria and Bin Laden and Zawahiri -- WHO ARE ALL UNDER MORE AND MORE PRESSURE -- think they need in order to divert the pressure. Stay tuned.
NUCLEAR NEGOTIATION CHARADE: RUSSIA AND IRAN PRETEND TO NEGOTIATE
Sheesh: he's the bastard who building the damn program for them AND selling them anti-aircraft missile systems!
Russia's current effort (which the NYTIMES describes as currently "stalled') is nothing but a HOAX and charade - A DELIBERATE STALLING EFFORT to allow Iran to get nukes.
LOOKIT: Putin is the same former-KBG agent and present-tyrant who helped Saddam sneak his WMD stockpiles into Syria before the war. We shouldn't trust him for a second. Every second we do trust him is another second Iran gets to build nukes and harden their defenses.
IT'S TIME WE STOPPED PRETENDING RUSSIA WIL HELP US AND GAVE IRAN A CLEAR AND SIMPLE ULTIMATUM: desist NOW or we will ATTACK AND DESTROY YOUR NUKE PROGRAM ASSETS, AIR DEFENSES, AIR FORCE, MISSILES, NAVY AND REFINERIES.
Waiting only strengthens their hand.
TWO MORE CHURCHES TORCHED BY MUSLIMS; WHEN WILL THE WORLD CONDEMN THIS OUTRAGE? AND HOW CAN WE DETER IT FROM SPREADING?
The churches torched in France had nothing to do with the accidental electrocution of the Muslim youths (which was used as the pretext/excuse for the Paris Intifada) - THEY WEREN'T EVEN IN PARIS! The churches in Nigeria and Pakistan had NOTHING to do with the Danish Cartoons - THEY WEREN'T EVEN LUTHERAN CHURCHES!
These attacks can ONLY be described as deliberate attacks on the faith of the West. IT'S JIHAD.
AS I'VE WRITTEN BEFORE: if non-Muslims had torched mosques then the Lefties and the MSM they control would be screaming bloody murder, calling for impeachment, and indictments in the ICC.
SO, WHAT SHOULD WE DO? These violent anti-Christian/anti-West acts MUST have consequences; we must establish a deterrence.
To that end, we should first tell the leading Muslim mullahs in each and every country that we will retaliate: an eye for an eye - and we will bomb a mosque for every church destroyed. We could show them a list of the GPS-targeting coordinates of every mosque in the world.
If this fails, we might have to offically warn the House of Saud - the protectors of Mecca and Medina: if you do not call off and clamp down on this global jihad, (shut evey madrassa and every mosque and silence every mullah that promotes jihad), then we will destroy the so called al Aksa mosque, and maybe even nuke Mecca and Medina.
Others have said this before and been met with reproach and castigation. Well, after these global inifadas I now believe that IT'S TIME THAT WE STOPPED CONSIDERING THIS METHOD OF COUNTER-ATTACKING AS "OUT-OF-BOUNDS." Letting THE ENEMY know that we will counter-attack in kind - BUT TO THE ENTH DEGREE - should be a threat that's openly on the table. That's the only way a deterrent can work.
Contrary to what Lefties and appeasers may feel, we do not "cool things down" by giving in, by surrendering our hard-won universal human rights to the threats of jihadothuggery. ON THE CONTRARY: this only encourages them to use more thuggery and threats and riots and violence.
Contrary to what Lefties and appeasers may feel, clearly setting out extremely horrific counter-measures actually LESSENS the chances of us being attacked or of there being an continued escalation of tensions.
That's why we must make a clear statement on what we will do. Lack of clarity and lack of resolve will only lead to more jihadothuggery and less freedom, to more intifadas and less peace.
Israel did not defeat the intifadas by playing nice with jihadoterrorism; they counter-attacked; they assassinated the leaders of the enemy, and they fought and fought and fought and fought back. It's time we showed the same resolve - and the same courage and the same willingness to use every means necessary and every tool in our kit.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
ONE SOLUTION TO THE IRANIAN NUKE CRISIS
We can have the US AIR FORCE deliver some, and others can be delivered by our submarines off their coast. Heh.
THE CARTOON INTIFADA (CONTINUED): RAMPAGING NIGERIAN MUSLIMS KILL DOZENS AND TORCH 15 CHURCHES
Bottom-line: If Christians ANYHWERE torched 15 mosques, then the Left and the MSM would be going nuclear! IT WOULD BE ABU GHRAIB TO THE TENTH POWER!
And yet, when Muslims do it and there's hardly a peep.
One Thing this proves is how LITTLE we all expect of Muslims; yes: ALL MUSLIMS - Africans, Asian, Arab, etc; and YES: this is a generalization, but one based on case after case after case; we expect them to behave like brutal barbaric genocidal racist savages - FOR GOOD REASONS. They have routinely behaved this way in the past; they continue to.
I say: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. It is time we fought back: Europe should deport (as in SEND HOME) ALL Muslims who refuse to assimilate and obey the rules and norms of Europe. AND, I say: it's time the Free World HALTED ALL AID, LOANS, AND TRADE with any and all nations which do NOT prohibit polygamy, consanguinous marriage, and misogyny. We mustn't tolerate OR ENABLE IN ANY WAY those who sytematically disenfranchise people of their UNIVERSAL human rights becuase of their gender or religion - AS MUSLIMS ROUTINELY DO IN THE NATIONS THEY CONTROL.
IS THE WEST CAPITULATING TO THE ENEMY? 3 NEWS ITEMS INDICATE THE ANSWER IS "YES!"
Thirteen people, all members of a dangerous and extremely violent gang, have been arrested following an investigation into the murder of a young Jewish man in the Paris area, French police announced Friday. ... The victim was burnt and cut on 80 percent of his body, died of his wounds as he was taken to hospital.Yet the French police deny that this was an anti-Semitic crime. (Lots more at JUSTIFY THIS! go there and RTWT.) Sheesh. This epitomizes denial.
... the head of the gang has been identified as the 26-year-old Youssef Fofana, a Black Muslim who is calling himself "brain of the barbarians." He is already known to the police services as "extremely dangerous."...
"We think there is anti-Semitism in this affair," Rafi, Ilan's brother in law, told the European Jewish Press. "First because the killers tried to kidnap at least two other Jews and secondly because of what they said on the phone," he added. "When we said we didn't have 500,000 euros to give them they answered we should go to the synagogue and get it," Rafi stressed. "They also recited verses from the Koran. We didn't know what they were saying but the police told us."
ITEM #2 - from BRUCE BAWER via DR. HELEN, (hat tip Professor Reynolds):
In Bruce Bawer's new book, While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within, the side effects of the appeasement of Muslims by the Danish government are clear--as their government pumps more and more welfare money into the pockets of disgruntled Muslims, the rate of violence against "infidels" there increases.ITEM #3 - from POWERLINE:
Bawer points out that in Denmark, Muslims make up only 5% of the population but receive 40% of welfare outlays. Many of these immigrants are told by their leaders that Muslim law gives them the right to "cheat and lie in the countries that harbor them." They are told to view the benefits they receive as jizya--the tributes that "the infidel natives of Muslim-occupied countries are obliged to pay to Muslims in order to preserve their lives."
And the welfare offices in Denmark can be the setting for violence--termed "culture clashes" by Danish journalists. "Some clients lay waste to social security offices and hit social workers--not out of frustration but because they've learned that bullying gets them what they want. The Danish government is not repressive; welfare workers tend to be sympathetic and eager to help. Many immigrants perceive this as weakness, and exploit it, 'tyrannizing' the social workers." The Danish solution? More PC behavior--get translators to translate not only between languages but between cultures. Yeah, that will work.
On the one hand, the culture editor of Jyllands Posten eloquently explains why he published the Mohammad cartoons. On the other hand, the Telegraph reports that Muslim clerics in Britain believe that they have won the debate: "They believe that the British Government has capitulated to them, because it feared the consequences if it did not."You cannot defeat an enemy you deny exists. And denying the nature of the enemy won't ever change the nature of the enemy. It effectively means you have surrendered to them. We need to be MORE confrontational and MORE demanding of the enemy, NOT MORE ACCOMODATING. We need to attack the enemy, not appease them. delaying the inevitable will only increase the costs and worsen the damages.
Karen Hughes's speech at the U.S.-Islamic World Forum suggests a certain capitulation in the American government as well. Together with capitulation comes the art of saying what is referrred to in Book IV of Gulliver's Travels as "the thing which is not":Recently, the Palestinian people had an election and voted for change. I want the Palestinian people to know that America shares your hope for a better life and your dream of a state of your own living side by side in peace with Israel, and we are working to help you achieve both. These three items demostrate why Europe is LIKELY to fall into dhimmitude, if not drfit culturally into becoming an outright Muslim continent: They are unwilling to confront the enemy.
"FASTER, PLEASE!" should be our motto, "not sorry we offended you" or "sure, you can have as many nukes as you want!" or "we weren't really serious when we said terrorist groups had to be dismantled in the occupied territories."
Maybe we could lose the war aganist islamofascism, but losing a fight is better than surrendering - which is what I see happening more and more in Europe and the MSM and from the Bush Adminstration (as the Karen Hughes quote and the "Qatar/US port deal" seem to prove).
What will it take before we pull out all the stops and truly attempt defeat the enemy (instead of continiuing all the half-assed half-measures)!? LIKE: why in the hell haven't we counter-attacked Assad and Iran's because of their interference in Iraq!? Why didn't we ASSASSINATE al Sadr - who had a moderate cleric rival MURDERED within weeks of Saddam's ouster!? AND WHY DON'T WE JUST BOMB THE HELL OUT OF ALL SUSPECTED TALIBAN/AL QAEDA HIDEOUTS IN AFGHANISTAN AND WAZIRISTAN!?
There is only one reason why we are fighting with one hand behind our backs: to appease the "muslim moderates." This is stupid. "When people see a weak horse and a strong horse they are attracted to the strong horse." We are behaving like a weak horse lately. And it is emboldening the enemy.
I fear what it will take to make us fight back with all we've got. And I fear it will come too late. TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE.
We MUST bring Assad and Iran before the UNSC IMMEDIATELY, and if-an-when these multilateral diplomatic measures fail to change the facts on the ground, then we need to take unilateral military action - immediately. Postponing the inevitable only aids the enemy.
Saturday, February 18, 2006
CHINA RUSHES $100 BILLION DEAL WITH IRAN: TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE
SHANGHAI, Feb. 17 -- China is hastening to complete a deal worth as much as $100 billion that would allow a Chinese state-owned energy firm to take a leading role in developing a vast oil field in Iran, complicating the Bush administration's efforts to isolate the Middle Eastern nation and roll back its nuclear development plans, according to published reports.China and Russia - 2 tyrannical socialist countires - are actively aiding and abetting states that OFFICIALY suppport terrorism and genocide: North Korea and Iran and Syria and Zimbabwe and the Sudan - to name just a few.
The completion of the agreement would advance China's global quest for new stocks of energy. It could also undermine U.S. and European initiatives to halt Tehran's nuclear plans, possibly generating friction in Beijing's relations with outside powers.
Russia and China should BOTH be sanctioned for this. If we were REALLY intent on defeating the enemy we would be seeking to penalize EVERY nation which aids and abets and trades with anyn of these pariah states. BOTTOM-LINE: Bush is wimp who is pussy-footing around needs to get MUCH tougher than he has been of late. If FDR or Truman were the POTUS right now we'd be A LOT MORE aggressive!
It's time to force Assad out NOW, and then to attack Iran and North Korea SIMULTANEOUSLY (and for the same reason: they have violated their agreements with the IAEA and international law, and have sought nuclear WMD while pursuing policies which embrace genocide).
Waiting only will make it tougher for us to do what must be done. Time is NOT on our side.
HAMAS TAKES OVER: THE PEACE PROCESS IS OFFICIALLY DEAD
THE ROAD MAP was a last ditch effort to save a negotiated settlement. It died with Abbas's refusal to disarm and dismantle the jihdoterrorists or confront Hamas. This failure on Abbas's part led Sharon to accept the fact that there was NO "PARTNER FOR PEACE" and to embrace the security fence and unilatertal separation - in order to make Israel utterly and totally impenetrable/defendible and defensible against the onslaught that most certainly will occur in the time immediately following the Free World's inevitable preemptive attack on Iran.
THE ELECTION AND SWEARING-IN OF HAMAS ends the so-called "peace process", and marks the beginning of the war process. Brace yourself.
RUSSIA'S NEWEST SATELITE: PUTIN REPORTEDLY READY TO ARM HAMAS
Russia plunged deeper into the maelstrom of Middle Eastern politics yesterday, saying it might sell arms to the Palestinians after talks with Hamas in Moscow early next month. The announcement by Russia's Chief of General Staff, Yuri Baluyevsky, will outrage Israel.LET'S LOOK AT PUTIN'S RECORD: Putin is arming Syria and Iran with its most advanced anti-aircraft missiles, and helping Iran build its nuclear assets. Russia is also a major ally of North Korea. ALSO REMEMBER THAT SADDAM WAS A CLIENT STATE OF THE USSR, AND THAT PUTIN'S RUSSIA WAS AN ALLY OF SADDAM'S, PILFERING MONEY FROM AND BRIBES FROM THE "OIL FOR FOOD" PROGRAM. (And also, remember that it was reportedly the Russians who helped Saddam get his WMD to Syria.)
Just add it up: Iran, Syria, Noth Korea and NOW HAMAS. Just what is Putin assembling here?! I'LL TELL YOU WHAT: A true axis of evil - one led by the NEW KGB. YUP: Russia is a very VERY bad actor on the world stage, and Putin is an emerging tyrant who must be countered. We must do something about this before Putin has finished arming his NEW SATELITES and it's too late.
The best way to counter these aggressively anti-US/anti-Free World moves by Putin is to topple Iran and Syria and North Korean regimes as rapidly as possible. This is truly a race against time.
BILL CLINTON ATTACKS EUROPEAN FREE SPEECH IN PAKISTAN
Former US president Bill Clinton on Friday condemned the publication of Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) caricatures by European newspapers and urged countries concerned to convict the publishers. ...Talking to reporters after meeting Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz in Islamabad, Clinton said he disagreed with the caricatures and that the publication was against religious and ethical norms. He said the people’s religious convictions should be respected at all costs and the media should be disallowed to play with the religious sentiments of other faiths. He said the media could criticise any issue including governments and people, but nobody had the right to play with the sentiments of other faiths.Okay then, let's get this straight - ACCORDING TO CLINTON: we have free speech, but only about certain topics. SHEESH! That's idiotic!
This new utterance by Clinton is therefore HORRIFIC for two reasons: he encourages THE ENEMY who would have us become DHIMMIS, and he thinks it's okay to limit free speech.
I'd like to hear what Hillary thinks of this. If she agrees publicly then she becomes unelectable. Which is another reason why Bill's utterance is so dang mystifying. WHY DID HE SAY THIS?! WHAT CAN HE GAIN!? CAN HE POSSIBLY THINK IT MAKES OUR EFFORTS AT DEFEATING THE ENEMY EASIER!? WHY WOULD HE WANT THINGS TO GET WORSE!?
Ah. That's it: he wants things to get worse - so Hillary can claim that Bush and the GOP can't win the GWOT. This isn't unlike the fact that Dems hate good economic news and always seem to be wishing for bad economic news.
WHY ARE THE DEMS SO NEEDFUL OF BAD NEWS!? Well, since they don't have a positive platform, they can only hope to gain power if everything falls apart.
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
US SOLDIERS IN EUROPE AND TURKEY ARE WARNED ABOUT A POSSIBLE VIOLENT BACKLASH FROM A NEW ANTI-AMERICAN MOVIE
"... [this movie] has a number of scenes depicting US troops in Iraq in a poor light, showing them abusing prisoners, shooting innocent civilians and even being involved in the illegal trade of organs. ... Apart from recommending US troops stay away from cinemas where the movie is being screened, the order also stressed the military personal should “not to discuss the movie with anybody they do not know.” "
This movie - a Turkish movie - is sadly just one of long line of anti-American movies, nit just made by foreigners, but made by the Leftie doves of Hollywood - (this Turkish movie has 2 beens, but this applies to Hollywood's two major Leftie megastars Michael Moore and Clooney). These folks actually produce anti-American propaganda for the enemy, and then have the audacity to blame Bush for our nations bad PR image among foreigners, as if HE was the problem. He isn't; their euroleft-pandering, jihdoterrorist-pandering, back-stabbing self-loathing is.
NEED PROOF? I don't see anyone in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Ukriane, or Georgia thanking Hollywood for their freedom and democracy. They ALL thank GEORGE BUSH and the USA.
Rightly so! By the Way: Can ANYONE imagine Hollywood producing anti-American propaganda during WW2!?!? And FDR INTERNED 50,000 citizens and was FIRE BOMBING civilian targets! But the Left supported him and the USA then. WONDER WHY? Well, I think for three reasons: (1) the studios were owned by 1st generation Americans who had themselves fled tyranny and LOVED America; (2) the Hollywood Left loved FDR - despite his excesses - (excesses which were WORSE than W's and the current Pentagon's) - because FDR was a socialist; and (3) in WW2, the USA was an ally of the USSR, and they LOVED the USSR.
If socialists Schroeder, and Putin, zuh chic frahnshman Jacques Chirac and the UN had suppported Bush's agggressive pro-democracy moves, then I am sure the Lefties in Hollywood would have, too. The Left feels that anything done by ANYONE on the Right - without the imprimatur of socialism - MUST BE FOR EVIL CORPORATIONS, or evil fundamentalist Christians (whom they also fear, and fear MORE than al Qaeda - except for "good" Christians like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and Jimmy Carter and Teddy Jo Kennedy and Genghis Kerry. What makes these "good" Christians? THEY SUPPORT ABORTION).
These Leftie propagandists are dupes and useful idiots. Their propaganda is a threat to our troops and the security of our nation. But a threat we can and will surmount.
MORE HERE AND HERE.
WHO ARE THE REAL PURVEYORS OF HATE? WHO IS REALLY TRYING TO USE FEAR?
To claim that those [like Jihad Watch] who oppose the ideology that led to 9/11, 7/7, 3/11, the Bali bombings, and hundreds of other terror attacks are just "haters" ["Islamophobes"] is to have the telescope the wrong way round; the real haters are those who are perpetrating such attacks, and planning new ones today, in the name of Islam.Jihadoterrorism is, BY DEFINITION, meant to inflict paralyzing fear in order to convert non-believers into Muslims, or cow them into dhimmitude. Bringing focus to this and fighting back is not fear-mongering, but self-defense, and defense of universal human rights. RTWT.
... The resistance to jihad is a struggle to defend the human rights of those who would lose equality of rights under the kind of regime jihadists would like to establish -- particularly women, non-Muslims, and ex-Muslims.
HALF MILLION RALLY IN BEIRUT TO COMMEMORATE HARIRI
6,000 in Pakistan against cartoons, (a few hundred violently).
We're winning.
Don't let the hand-wringing, appeasing doves if the Left, or the rampaging cartoon hoaxers get you down: WE'RE WINNING.
And despite a Fifith Column made up of the Left-wing dominated MSM (that LOVED printing the Abu Ghraib photos but FEAR reprinting the CARTOONS) and BDS afflicted partisans - who're more fearful of the NSA than they are of al Qaeda - WE WILL WIN.
TALIBAN : AFGHANISTAN : : HAMAS : GAZA/WEST BANK
The ascent of Hamas will lead the Palestinians down the same path. WHY? Because Hamas harbors jihadoterrorists, (in the guise of their OWN "military wing"). If the West has any balls, then Hamas should become as isolated as the Taliban were: The world must give them no aid - AND NO SYMPATHY - unless and until they reform.
If they don't reform then they'll become another FAILED STATE - mired in poverty; trapped in chaos, and under the thumb of the ruthless tyranny of islamofanaticism.
(IN THIS CASE - unlike the case of Afghanistan - it'll be a failed state behind a wall. And if the Jordanians and Egyptians have any smarts, then they'll build walls of their own!)
WHAT'S THE REMEDY? We have to make them renounce terror and accept Israel. It's their choice. Co-existence - or a gradual, inexorable decline into "no existence."
I have NO REASON TO BELIEVE that Russia - or anyone else - will make Hamas change their ways. I think Hamas will reject reform and take their people down the path of the Taliban. The election of Hamas will mean the talibanization of the Palestinians. And we know what it took to topple them.
I feel this conflict is inevitable - with the last remnants of Baathism, with Hamas and with Iran. WHY? Well, islamo-totalitarianists who proudly use jihadoterrorism won't ever voluntarily coexist with libertarian secular pluralists. The islamofanatics know that their creed can ONLY spread by intimidation, and that it can't win in any free and open competition with the West. So they know they have no choice BUT to fight, and that it's a fight to the death. WHEN?! Probably... 2007.
Monday, February 13, 2006
GORE SLANDERS WHILE AMERICA IN ARABIA: what ever happened to "speaking truth to power"?!!?
And he said that while USA is under assault because of a CARTOON HOAX. Essentially, Gore is jumping on the Islamothug's anti-West bandwagon. AT BEST, it's an example of despicable pandering.
I thought Lefties were fond of “speaking truth to power"?! If they truly were, then Gore would've taken the opportunity to tell the POWERFUL Saudis to quit their support for all islamo-extremism. Instead he pandered - to the Arabs and the Left.
All Gore and Clinton and Carter and Schroeder and the rest of the Left do is blame America (or the West) first. They all complain about US behavior and not one said BOO about Islamothuggery and Islamic mainstream SILENCE in the face of OUTRAGEOUS Islamothuggery.They're either dupes, a willing Fifth Column, or hard up for $auid money - or all three.
Either way: these leftie Dems ought NEVER to be trusted with the national security of this nation or the Free World ever again. EVER. And I’m a lifelong Democrat (1st registered in 1974!) who supported Clinton because he promised to drag the party back from the McGovernite Left-wing and toward the Scoop Jackson center. At the time - BELIEVE IT OR FRIGGIN NOT - picking Gore was part of how Clinton proved he was a centrist. Sheesh. Now, they have BOTH proven that the heart and soul of the Democrat Party is firmly in the Left and firmly controlled by DOVES.
FDR and Truman and JFK and LBJ and Scoop are SPINNING in their graves.
Guys like Gore (and Henry Wallace before him) are why good FDR Democrats like Reagan left the party.
Since 1989, I have been moving to the center - crediting Reagan for all his accomplishments and rethinking ALL the hogwash I was raised on; (my parents were commie doves). Since 2001, I have been ashamed I was ever a Clinton-Gore supporter. Now I am sickened. Truly sickened. The Corettea Scott King funeral and now this. It all adds up. Pardon my English but: these folks - Carter, Clinton, Gore (and their chic euroweenie comrades: Schroeder and Chirac) are scum. Utter scum. [Other reports HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE.]
TALIBAN DECLARE WAZIRISTAN IS THEIRS
After taking "virtual control" of the entire North Waziristan province of Pakistan, Taliban and Al Qaeda have recently "declared" the establishment of an 'Islamic State' in the area and gained a major base for their operations against the US-led forces in Afghanistan, media reports said.I think we should immediately tender an ULTIMATUM to the Pakistanis/Musharraf: if you do not gani control over this 'tribal region" we will OFFICIALY RECOGNIZE it as the independent state of Waziristan.
And then attack it with everything we've got.
UPDATE/REMINDER: I first posted on the "emerging failed states" and what must be done about them LAST WEEK.
ISRAEL WARNS PUTIN: HAMAS AIDS CHECHENS
[Israeli] Government officials are circulating a document showing Hamas's links to Chechen terrorists in an attempt to influence Russian public opinion against President Vladimir Putin's overtures to Hamas. ...
One poster pictured in the document shows a picture of Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin next to those of Ibn al-Khattab, a Chechen leader killed in 2002, Osama bin Laden and Shamil Basayev, a Chechen warlord who claimed responsibility for the Beslan school massacre in September 2004. Underneath the pictures are the words "Chechnya, Afghanistan, the Balkans, Kashmir, Palestine and Lebanon," as well as a quote attributed to a companion of Muhammad who said Islam would "continue to exist in those regions of the world where Muslims are a minority living in a hostile environment."
Russian officials traditionally bristle at attempts to compare Hamas with the Chechen terrorists, saying that while the international community recognizes Chechnya as an integral part of Russia, the world has never recognized the West Bank as part of Israel.
Only a nationalist tyrant like Putin - himself a "former" KGB agent - would play such a dangerous high-stakes game. (REMEMBER THE KGB is the agency which trained Arafat and Carlos the Jackal!) Putin thinks he can control the Chechens no matter what Hamas - or any other jihadoterrorist group - may try to do there. IN FACT: he probably thinks that he can make Israel into this century's Sudatenland. IOW: Putin probably believes that he can buy peace with the Islamofascists (even his own in Chechnya) by helping them win "the sacrifice Israel".
PAKISTANI AL QAEDA DOCTOR WHACKED
Gunmen on a motorcycle Monday killed a Pakistani doctor who spent six months in jail on suspicions of harboring al-Qaida suspects. Some in this eastern city blamed the United States for the shooting of Ahmad Javed Khawaja. A protest of about 500 people erupted shortly after the killing, with many shouting ''Death to America!'' as they blocked a street and set tires on fire. Khawaja was attacked while walking to his clinic after morning prayers at a mosque, said Mohammed Ali, a Lahore police official.I hope it was us - or our allies - that got him. Or maybe it was al Qaeda - if they believed he "RATTED" on them, (like gave up Zawahiri's dinner party plans)?!
"LEFTSPEAK": WHAT THEY SAY... AND WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN
IOW: When they say_______, they mean_______.
It's deadly accurate and hilarious. Check it out.
Sunday, February 12, 2006
THE HYSTERICAL BLINDNESS OF BEING... THE MSM
Like a patient with a case of hysterical blindness, the mainstream media, blunders along in its reporting of the Iraq War. Determined to be blind to anything postive or even barely suggestive of the slightest deviation from the quagmire template; the media continue to hype the negative--without context; without the slightest knowledge of military culture or tactics.RTWT! She's got more insightful analysis and many links to back it up! The doctor does, most everyday!
In their willful denial of reality, the media have only two acceptable formulas with which to write about military personnel: They are either (a) helpless victims of an oppressive military heirarchy who sends them into battle without training; without armor; without hope; so as to maximize their deaths; or (b) ruthless, homicidal psychopathic oppressors who mistreat women, children, prisoners and kill for the fun of it.
SAGE ADVICE ON "THE LONG WAR" FROM THE SEVEN SAMURAI
The movie takes place in rural 16th Century Japan. Early in the movie there's a scene in which a few of these poor peasant farmers - long the victims of raiding bandits who steal their crops and rape their women - worry about being beseiged by bandits again - AND SOON: as soon as their new crop comes in! They argue about whether to suffer, or to fight back - by hiring some samurai to help them defend themselves. To settle their debate, they seek the advice of "GRANDAD" - the venerable old man of the village who has seen it all. As they present their cases to GRANDAD, one fearful skeptic who doesn't want them to hire samurai says (paraphrasing), "I am against hiring any samurai, because - even though the samurai might indeed fend off the bandits - our daughters admire samurai so much, we might lose some to the samurai!"
The old man - GRANDAD - ponders a moment, and then scratches his unshaven, whiskered chin and says: "What's the use of worrying about your beard when your head's about to be taken?"
I think the Left should take this sage advice: stop worrying about whether the NSA is listening to your international calls with a secret FISA court approved warrant, or directly under an executive order signed by the POTUS himself; (that's your beard!). Worry about al Qaeda; (they might take off your head!).
THE CARTOON INTIFADA: "BLAMING THE CARTOONS IS LIKE BLAMING THE RAPE-VICTIM FOR WEARING A SHORT SKIRT"
Absolutely CORRECT. I have written before that the Muslims reflexive use of violence and their reflexive insistence on blaming others for their violence is EXACTLY like the wife-beater who blames his wife.
And when the Left appeases them and agrees with them - like when (a) Clinton and Carter and Schroeder who say these cartoons should NEVER have been published, and (b) when CNN and others in the MSM who WON'T publish these cartoons, (but who couldn't wait to publish the ABU GHRAIB photos even though the CJCS Meyers begged them not to, and who are NOW suing to publish even MORE Abu Ghraib photos) - it's like EXCUSING the RAPIST and the WIFE-BEATER!
WORSE: it's like begging for more. EVEN WORSE: it's DHIMMITUDE. In fact it's nothing more than surrendering to the enemy.
Saturday, February 11, 2006
MUSHARRAF CONFIRMS ZAWAHIRI RELATIVE KILLED IN US AIR-STRIKE
Pakistan's president has confirmed that "a close relative" of al-Qaeda number two Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed in a US air strike in Pakistan last month. Pervez Musharraf also confirmed for the first time that Zawahiri had been expected to be at the house targeted by the US, a military spokesman says. "Five foreigners were killed in the US attack," Gen Musharraf told tribal leaders in north-western Pakistan, the Associated Press news agency reports. "One of them was a close relative of Ayman al-Zawahri and the other man was wanted by the US and had a US$5 million (4.19 million euro) reward on his head."I think we will get Zawahiri and Binladen and Zarqawi very soon. Just a feeling... WHY?! I dunno.. it's just that the more and more other militaries start to take over regular old protection duties from us, (as NATO and theIraqis are doing in Afghanistan and Iraq, respectively) it means we can devote EVEN MORE resources to the hunt, and EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, it means we will get more and "mo' better" intel from locals. And when these murderous scumbags lose the locals (whose silence protects them): THEY ARE DEAD. Or soon will be. Faster please...
Shortly after the raid, unconfirmed intelligence reports said three high-ranking al-Qaeda members were among those killed in the raid on a village in the Bajaur Agency region on the border with Afghanistan. They named Egyptian bomb expert Midhat Mursi - information on whose whereabouts carries a $5m US bounty. They also named Abdul Rehman al-Misri al-Maghribi, the son-in-law of Zawahiri and reputed head of the al-Qaeda's media operations. The third person named was Abu Obaidah al-Misri, al-Qaeda's head of operations in Kunar province, just over the border in eastern Afghanistan. US officials have refused to comment on the attack.
JIMMY CARTER: TRAITOR - A COMPENDIUM AND A CARTOON
FISA, POTUS, 9/11, CONSTITUTIONALITY - AND COMMON SENSE
... it has seemed commonsensical to me that, if the president has an inherent power under the Constitution, that a statute passed by Congress can't override that power. And Carter's Attorney General knew that at the time FISA was passed and, surely, after 9/11, the president's powers would not have decreased since 1978.
WHO COINED THE TERM "CARTOON INTIFADA"?
Friday, February 10, 2006
FORMER-CIA ANALYST PILLAR MAKES HOLLOW, WEASEL-WORDED CHARGE
Well, as I said, I read the articles and just saw Pillar on CNN, and get this: Pillar agreed with clips from Bush and Cheney in which they argued that the USA intel and foreign intel "OVERWHLEMINGLY" concluded that Saddam had WMD stockpiles.
Pillar also greed that the Silberman-Robb Commisssion Report was entirely accurate when they asserted that there had been ABSOLUTLEY NO coercion put on ANY intel analyst to change or alter or spin their opinions; not ONE IOTA.
Pillar claims it was a subtle "politicization." of the intel. THOSE ARE WEASEL WORDS. I wonder if he - like another former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer and Cindy Sheehan - believes we went to war for Israel's securtity, and not ours!? It wouldn't surprise me.
HERE'S THE FRIGGIN BOTTOM-LINE: Saddam had done nothing - as in ZERO, NADA, ZILCH, BUPKUS - to earn the benefit of the doubt. In fact, Saddam had done TONS OF STUFF which made REASONABLE people ALL OVER THE WORLD consider him totally untrustworthy - HENCE, "THE FULL AND FINAL OPPORTUNITY" TO COME CLEAN; AKA: UNSCR#1441. Saddam did NOT come clean. Kay and Duelfer BOTH concluded Saddam WAS IN VIOLATION OF UNSCR#1441. Therefore war was the only answer.
Pillar, retired after 28 years at the CIA, was an influential behind-the-scenes player and was considered the agency's leading counterterrorism analyst.In all his years as CHIEF OF THE MIDDLE EAST COUNTER-TERRORISM DESK, did the CIA prevent any terrorist attacks on us!? Or did the CIA allow us to get attacked OVER AND OVER AGAIN! Beirut. The embassies. Khobar. The USS Cole. In other words: Pillar's desk was UTTERLY INCOMPETENT at it's assigned duties, and I for one would never EVER put any value on his opinion on ANYTHING. Pillar is a loser and liar and a weasel. A DISGRUNTLED weasel at that.
And here's the BIGGEST thing WRONG WITH PILLAR: he is NOT a decision maker; he is a service provider. In our DEMOCRACY the ELECTED leaders MAKE POLICY. This seems to upset Pillar - and most LEFTIES: they've always preferred the "POLITBURO" approach to public policy, in which "career bureaucrats" - UNELECTED AND UNACCOUNTABLE INSIDERS, (like other disgruntled WHINERS: Larry Wilkerson and Richard Clarke and Rand Beers) - make policy. And that is un-democratic and bad. Here's EXACTLY what this anti-democratic AS--OLE Pillar recommends (from his FA article):
The community needs to remain in the executive branch but be given greater independence and a greater ability to communicate with those other constituencies (fettered only by security considerations, rather than by policy agendas). An appropriate model is the Federal Reserve, which is structured as a quasi-autonomous body overseen by a board of governors with long fixed terms.He WANTS A QUASI-AUTONOMOUS SPY AGENCY!? Sheesh. He is EXACTLY WRONG. The people in the CIA need MORE accountability - (because of their countless, nearly constant FAILURES) - not less accountability.
BOTTOM-LINE: Bush was re-elected. And that means that as far as the way we went to war: THE CASE IS CLOSED. Lefties are wasting their time if they think this issue can have any traction or value. It's like arguing about whether FDR knew about the Pearl Harbor attack BEFORE it happened and ALLOWED it to happen to galvanize support for the war. A stupid waste of time.
RIGHT NOW.... we are in a similar situation with Iran: our intelligence services - and that of MOST of the world - indicate that the Iranians are trying to build nuclear weapons. All we know for sure is that they LIED about their nuclear research activities FOR 18 YEARS! And that makes them as trustworthy as Saddam.
And given what's at stake, we cannot afford to err on the side of caution. WE MUST PRE-EMPTIVELY DESTROY IRAN'S NUCLEAR ASSETS AND THEIR OFFENSIVE MILTARY ASSETS. Even if it turns out that Iran has no nuke weapons program. The cost of doing nothing and being wrong is far FAR greater.
Bush has said as much. Bush has said OVER AND OVER again that he will NOT give tyrants the benefit of the doubt. Jerks like Pillar want to. That's why we shouldn't listen to them. That, and the fact that they're NOT elected, and NOT accountable.
UPDATE: BTW, you'd think Pillar never heard of the friggin 1998 Iraq Regime Change Policy Act. Signed by Clinton. Sheesh. I mean to read Pillar, you'd NEVER think that getting rid of Saddam was the friggin offical policy of the USA ever since Democrat Clinton was POTUS. You'd think - from reading Pillar - that it was an idea hatched in Texas by Rove and Cheney and Wolfowitz (while on the phone with their Zionist boss Arik Sharon and their other boss the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia and their other bosses at Halliburton).
And to read Pillar, you'd never know that JUST IN ORER TO GET INSPECTORS BACK IN, Bush had to amass 500,000 troops in the region (on land and on ships). And you'd think the inspectors were NOT meeting with any delays or deciet or obfuscation. And you'd think that Saddam's "full and final" report was full and final. And you'd think that it was the inspectors jobs to play "DETECTIVE" and not merely audit the factuality of the "full and final report."
IN SHORT, WHAT PILLAR HAS DEMONSTRATED MOST IN THIS ARTICLE IS WHY THE CIA HAS BEEN AN ABJECT FAILURE FOR THE LAST FEW DECADES. WITH MEN LIKE HIM RUNNING THE SHOW, IT'S A MIRACLE WE WON THE COLD WAR! (And probably we woulda lost that one too, if not for Casey and Reagan!)
UPDATE: (MORE on moron Pillar HERE from WEEKLY STANDARD hat tip NRO.)
UPDATE #3: Three days later and POWERLINE posts a comment which reiterates exactly what I've written here. More proof that TAB scoops the big boys BIGTIME - just about everyday.
Thursday, February 09, 2006
PUTIN BREAKS RANKS WITH THE ROADMAP QUARTET: RUSSIA WILL DEAL WITH HAMAS
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday he would invite Hamas leaders to Moscow, opening a crack in a wall of U.S.-led opposition to dealing with the Palestinian election winner until it recognized Israel. ...If Putin does deal with an unchanged Hamas, then we should annouce support for an independent Chechen state. ARE YOU LISTENING AMBASSADOR BOLTON?!
At a meeting in London on January 30, Quartet representatives [the official backers of the "Roadmap For Peace"] said the Palestinians risked losing international aid if Hamas did not renounce violence and recognize Israel. Hamas has rejected the demand.
... U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in Washington that the Bush administration had "contacted the Russian government about what their intentions are. ... If there are any contacts between the Russian government and Hamas, we would expect that they would send that very clear message, both in public and private, that is contained in the Quartet statement." A State Department official said Russia had not revealed Putin's plan to invite Hamas leaders at the Quartet meeting.
THE CARTOON INTIFADA: TWO GEMS FROM BLOGOSPHERE GREATS!
In a NutshellAND FROM MY PET JAWA:
posted by Erik @ 5:45 PM
One can't put it much more concisely than Jane Biran:One wonders if the Prophet Muhammad would approve of rioting, grievous bodily harm and arson.
If the answer is yes, then a depiction of his followers as violent is justified. If no, then some of his followers are causing offense to him on a daily basis.
Abu Ghraib and Cartoon Jihad
Ladies and gentleman, I am proud to call Dr. Leopold Stotch a good friend:there are many people in America and elsewhere in the West are making statements about how the media should self-censor and not publish the Danish cartoons that have sparked several days of Muslim rioting. That’s fine, and their argument isn’t completely without merit.Posted by Dr. Rusty Shackleford
However, it seems to me that these same people are precisely those who said that censoring the Abu Ghraib prison photos would be an unacceptable restriction on freedom of speech and a betrayal of the media’s allegiance to the truth.
WHO'S REALLY PLAYING THE FEAR CARD?
...the GOP election message is: 'All we've got is fear and we're going to keep playing the fear card."
I think it is REASONABLE to be afraid of the terrorists who:
fly jets into skyscrapers; bomb Israeli pizzerias and Muslim weddings and funerals; riot and burn embassies over CARTOONS; blow up bars in Bali; behead charity workers; torch train-cars of Hindu pilgrims; destroy 1000 year old Buddhist monuments and behead Thai Buddhists; murder Russian school-children; condemn rape-victims to hanging; dress up their children as genocidal suicide bombers; deny the Holocaust; bomb subways in London and trains in Madrid; murder filmmakers; put fatwas on novelists; and generally try to establish tyranny and theocratic totalitarianism through intimidation and terror that KNOWS NO BOUNDS, AND ADHERES TO NO CONVENTIONS OF WAR.On the other hand the list of things the Left is afraid of IS TOTALLY UN-FOUNDED, IF NOT - INSANE! The Left says:
"Man-made" global warming is the biggest threat we face; we're running out of oil and other natural resources; federal bureaucrats deliberately withheld hurricane rescue services to New Orleanians; the NSA is illegally intercepting all of everyone's international phone calls - (all 200+ BILLION yearly minutes worth!); the FBI is intimidating librarians; the pharmaceutical companies, Wal Mart and the oil companies are ripping us off BIGTIME - we have to regulate them more!; that off-shore oil-drilling and oil-drilling in ANWR would be desecrations of the environment; that the Bush Tax Cuts are destroying our economy - (and that Bush has the worst jobs record since Hoover - it's the worst economy since Hoover); that abortion will become illegal and unconstitutional if you vote GOP; and that the GOP will take away your right to have a living-will (even though ALL the Bush's have one!); Bush and the GOP are trying make America into a Christain version of the Iranian religious state.The list of unreasonable fear-mongering by the Left goes back in time too. Remember these "golden oldies":
Reagan would start WW3; there will be mass global starvation; we're going to run out of oil; NAFTA will ruin our economy; Bobby Kennedy's ol' boss Joe McCarthy was evil personified and Alger Hiss and the Rosenbergs were innocent; "ending welfare as we know it" will put millions of people on the streets; the Reagan tax cuts will ruin the economy; that Afghanistan was going to be a QUAGMIRE - (we weren't supposed to defeat the Afghanis since the USSR couldn't); we weren't going to be able to defeat Saddam - because the strategy was wrong - we went in too fast and our supply lines were too strung out.And so on. EVERY ONE - as in "EVERY FRIGGIN SOLITARY ONE" - of these Democrat/Left charges were wrong. WRONG! As if that wasn't bad enough: There's a whole 'nother humongous list of things the Left said we SHOULDN'T worry about that turned out wrong, too; here's a smidgen:
Don't worry - the Domino Theory is wrong; don't worry if we take away some of your 2nd Amendment rights - gun control will lower crime; don't worry if we take away some of your 1st Amendment rights - we will take BIG MONEY out of electoral politics; don't worry - bi-lingual education and multi-culturalism won't dis-integrate our assimilated society.AGAIN: wrong every time.
The Democrats and the Left have been IRRATIONALLY fear-mongering for 50 years - they've been TRUMPING UP phoney fears like the true demoagogues they are. YUP: The Left are FEAR-MONGERERS who pedddle PHONEY/TRUMPED UP FEARS (and their "solutions - socialism/dhimmitude/appeasement/disarmament) would actually make our REAL problems WORSE!
BOTTOM-LINE: History has PROVEN that the Left have been wrong every single time. FACT: ALL the things the Left tells us we should be afraid of are nothing but BOGEYMEN!
And when they attack Bush and the war on terror, they are wrong again.
MY ADVICE: if the Left is against it, then you should be for it. If they fear it, then it must be good. The Left has been 180 degrees wrong on just about every issue for the last century. And I see NO signs of that record improving.
OH... there's one other thing (besides jihadoterror) that I am very VERY afraid of: today's Democrats ever taking over the House or the Senate, or the White House. God forbid. Please.
I BLAME BUSH: Cancer deaths fall for first time - EVER
"The number of annual deaths from cancer has fallen for the first time in more than 70 years, researchers announced today."
NSA SIGINT PROGRAM HAD MORE OVERSIGHT THAN NORMAL FISA WARRANTS
According to government officials familiar with the program, the presiding FISA judges insisted that information obtained through NSA surveillance not form the basis for obtaining a warrant and that, instead, independently gathered information provide the justification for FISA monitoring in such cases.
Twice in the past four years, a top Justice Department lawyer warned the presiding judge of a secret surveillance court that information overheard in President Bush's eavesdropping program may have been improperly used to obtain wiretap warrants in the court, according to two sources with knowledge of those events.Sheesh. Only twice!? I was hoping that this intercept program would've yielded more!
BUT WHY SHOULD THE JUDGE BE PREVENTING US FROM USING MILITARY INTEL TO ARREST THE ENEMY?! DIDN'T WE TEAR DOWN "THE WALL" BETWEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT INTEL AND NATIONAL SECURITY INTEL!?
IOW: Why should al Qaeda's jihadoterrorists get a "pass" from our criminal justice system just because we find them through a MILITARY signint program?! THIS IS LUDICROUS!
The two heads of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court were the only judges in the country briefed by the administration on Bush's program. The president's secret order, issued sometime after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, allows the National Security Agency to monitor telephone calls and e-mails between people in the United States and contacts overseas.THEREFORE, THE ARTICLE IS ALSO CONFIRMING THAT TWO - YES TWO (2!) FISA JUDGES WERE KEPT INFORMED OF THE NSA INTERCEPT PROGRAM! When you add it all up, you MUST conclude that in many ways the "ABOVE TOP SECRET" NSA intercept program had MORE OVERSIGHT and MORE "checks and balances" than other FISA surveillance.
This NSA program had TWO (2) FISA JUDGES and EIGHT (8) Congressman kept informed EVERY 45 DAYS. Regular old vanilla FISA surveillance warrants ONLY need one (1) FISA judge to approve it (and they can use it un-rerapproved for 90 days) - and Congressmen NEVER EVER SEE THEM!
It's time to MOVE ON! If the Dems don't it will blow up in their faces: Americans want to be protected from attacks; we don't want jihadoterrorists protected by lawyers.
WHO IS XENOPHOBIC, THE WEST OR ISLAM?
The most important issue in the eyes of Muslims is that Islamic values, the Islamic identity, and I think in this particular sense the protest reflect what I call a state of mind that senses internal and external danger. It's a besieged state of mind. You are attacking us continuously. This is part of you're [sic: your] war against us, against our Islamic identity....
We need to deepen the cultural, intellectual and social links between Muslim societies and Western societies. And also the war on terror -- the war on terror has done a great deal of damage to the image of the West in the eyes of the Muslim. Because [as] I suggested earlier, in the eyes of Muslim majorities, the war on terror is really a war against Islam and Muslims.
And the question is, how do you link Muslim societies with Christian societies? How do you deepen the links? How do you connect with Muslim societies? And fortunately, the cartoon controversy does not help matters. It exacerbates an already raging fire between the Muslim world and the Christian world.
ANSWER: Muslims. So called "radical Muslims."
Gerges - long an apologist for islamofascists - gets it EXACTLY WRONG. This war was declared by the INTOLERANT islamofascists ON THE WEST, and not the other way around. WE ARE JUSTY FRIGGIN FIGHTING BACK!
Religious freedom for all religions is guaranteed in the West, and NOT in all Islamic nations. Harassment of other faiths is routine in Islamic nations; in fact, it is against the law to practice another faith in Saudi Arabia. The islamofascists are the ones trying to enforce their fanatical religious beliefs on us, and not the other way around.
The West would be happy to have Muslims praying 5 times a day in mosques all over our nations if we didn't have to worry that the mosques were really jihadoterrorist clubs planning terror against us!
Today, much of the West is fed up with jihadoterror and the outrageous hypocrisy of apologists for jihadoterror - folks like Gerges (a tenured professor at Sarah Lawrence College in NY). Our tolerance got us into this mess: For way too long we tolerated the intolerance of Muslims. We are sick and tired of hypocrites like Gerges and Abu Laban (one of the 2 Danish imams who trumped up this whole Cartoon Intifada) who berate the West for intolerance while accepting it in Muslim nations - and in Islam itself.
Most Muslims NEVER condemned a single beheading or kidnapping which was done in the name of Islam; when jihadoterrorists beheaded someone on behalf of their faith, or MURDER DOZENS AT WEDDINGS OR FUNERALS, we never heard these apologists say that the jihadoterrorists had slandered Islam. But then, when NON-Muslims publish a few mild CARTOONS, Muslims go on a friggin rampage! Over friggin CARTOONS! And the apologists blame us!
People in the West can ONLY conclude that the rampaging Muslims are absofrigginlutley INSANE - or are jihadoterrorists! And professors who wear suits and appear on CNN should say so, and not argue that we in the West are not tolerant enough, or understanding enough, or that we haven't reached out enough!
LOOKIT: the enemy is attacking us - using violence and intimidation against us because of THEIR xenophobia, not ours.
When Muslim apologists for terror - like Gerges and Abu Laban - go on TV and accuse US OF XENOPHOBIA - when we are merely sticking up for OUR UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND OUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and just beginning our counter-attack... why, why, why... IT'S ABSOFRIGGINLUTELY OUTFRIGGINRAGEOUS!
Then again, we should expect this kind of horrifying behavior towards us by some muslims (and also we should expect the amoral defenses of it by other Muslims). After all, we are mere "kafirs", and they are people whose religion says it's sometimes necessary to murder your own daughter to restore "honor" to your family.
PUTTING SEMI-FAILED STATES ON NOTICE: A PROPOSAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL STRATEGY AGAINST JIHADOTERROR
The ensuing protests by locals and Pakistanis seemingly put Musharraf in a tight spot: he says he wants to cooperate as much as possible, but says he mustn't be seen as surrendering sovereignity to the USA - (by allowing us into his airspace, or by land over the Afghan-Pakistan border - even when we are in hot-pursuit of the enemy).
Failed regions - are like failed states: they are havens for terrorists. The jihadoterrorists fill the vacuum and assert their own sick tryannical form of authority within the otherwise government-less region.
I think we can CLARIFY this situation by publicly announcing a bold new policy: the USA will no longer recognize the international borders of lawless regions PERIOD. (A lawless region is any zone where the statutory authority with legal jurisdiction isn't enforcing the law.) In the case of Waziristan, the statutory authority is Pakistan, but in fact the Pakistani government has very little control of anything in Waziristan.
My propsoal says to Pakistan; "If you cannot enforce control over the "tribal regions" like Waziristan, you FORFEIT sovereignity over it, and we are free to attack it - at will."
The principle here is simple: If a government cannot rule a region by its own laws, then the protections of international law don't apply to that region. Lawless regions become fair game; it becomes OPEN SEASON on lawless regions and on semi-failed states.
This should also be applied to Somalia, and Gaza and the West Bank - and many other semi-failed/lawless states. We should put all of the semi-failed states and lawless regions (like Waziristan/Pakistan) ON NOTICE: enforce the laws or you will be attacked at a time of our choosing - however we choose.
As the situation now exists, these semi-failed states play a double-game - they claim statehood and yet fail to enforce lawfullness. And this is BS. As I said above: If the Pakistani government doesn't or can't control Waziristan, then Waziristan is de facto NOT part of Pakistan, but is de facto a lawless zone - one that can be attacked at will. Ditto Gaza and the West Bank.
We must get "semi-failed states" which "semi-help us" (states like Pakistan) to ante-up - BIGTIME. This proposal puts them on notice - BIGTIME. Help us... or else. Or else we will operate as we wiosh in your lawless zones - including assassinating the enemy with missiles, or by undertaking secret special operations on the ground.
NOTE: If the USA can assassinate al Qaeda in Waziristan without UN censure -as we recently did - then Israel can certainly do the same to the jihadoterrorists on its right border. But Kofi Anan doesn't think this is Israel's right. NOT SURPRISING: This is just another in a long line of anti-Semitic statements from Kofi, who is nothing but a useless, corrupt, incompetent anti-Semite.]
UPDATE: Let's put YEMEN on the list of semi-failed states! NOW!!
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
SYRIAN OPPOSITION COALESCING
Syrian ex-VP, Muslim Brothers team up in bid to topple AssadAssad will fall soon. But before that happens, expect Assad and Iran to get their assorted jihadostooges to create as much havoc as possible - even attempt to ignite an all out Arab-Israeli war. (More HERE from the Arab, GULF DAILY NEWS.)
Former Syrian Vice President Abdel-Halim Khaddam and the exiled leader of the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood agreed on Wednesday to join forces to topple President Bashar al-Assad.An Iranian Website, close to the Revolutionary Guard, reported that the Syrian republican guard, the elite security force that ensure the stability of regime, was placed on high alert and all leaves were cancelled, following Khaddam's recent statements against Assad's rule.
A source at Khaddam's office said the former official held talks with Ali Bayanouni, head of the Sunni Islamist group, in Brussels on Tuesday and Wednesday. "There was agreement on a joint vision to save Syria from the crisis that the regime has placed it in," the source told Reuters in Beirut by telephone. "It was also agreed to contact other opposition leaders inside and outside Syria to come up with a joint plan of action."
CARTOON HOAX : DANES :: BLOOD LIBEL : JEWS
1515AD: MICHELANGELO'S "MOSES WITH HORNS" SPARKED HUGE RIOTS IN ROME'S GHETTO!

The sculpture sits in church of San Pietro in Vincoli on the Esquiline in Rome.
Though it falsely depicts the Jews' greatest prophet (who God spoke with DIRECTLY) as having horns, (a mistake by the artist based on a mistranslation of the Hebrew word for "rays of light" coming from the head of Moses), and though this false depiction may have contributed to the long-held racist myth once believed by many Gentiles that Jews had horns and were satanic, this sculpture has never ever been the object of organized scorn by Jews, nor has it ever been defaced. Jews have never ever even demanded it be altered or taken off of display.
Perhaps Jews were content knowing that this glaring mistake (on this otherwise beautiful sculpture) merely exposes the ignorance of many people regarding the Bible. We see it as a TEACHING moment, as they say.
What is it about so many Muslims that makes them react with violence all the time? I believe it is partly a result of the vehement misogyny, and the polygamy and endogamy which are practiced by Muslims - especially in Arab Muslim nations. After all, if someone is raised to believe that it's okay to murder one's daughter or sister or female cousin in order to restore "honor" to the family, (and that "rape-as-punshment" is okay), then one can certainly do all manner of evil to infidels. Even for disrespectful CARTOONS!
Iran to hang teenage girl attacked by rapists -- Sat. 07 Jan 2006 -- Iran Focus --This sickness should NOT be tolerated by THE FREE WORLD. We ended slavery; we MUST end these awful practices against women. Religion is no excuse for - nor can fanatical belief in any religion justify - slavery or murder or rape. [BTW: The Leftie-dove group AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL/USA is also calling attention to the horrific injustice of this rape victim being sentenced to death. Hat tip NRO.]
Tehran, Iran, Jan. 07 – An Iranian court has sentenced a teenage rape victim to death by hanging after she weepingly confessed that she had unintentionally killed a man who had tried to rape both her and her niece.
THE UK BEGINS TO ENACT KNIFE-CONTROL
A national knife amnesty has been announced by Home Secretary Charles Clarke in a bid to halt the rise in crimes involving the weapons. Mr Clarke said the project, to allow people to hand in weapons without fear of prosecution, would run for five weeks this summer, starting on 24 May. Police forces throughout England, Scotland and Wales will be involved. ...The Brits recently enacted extremely restrictive gun-ownership laws, and as a result.... violent crime WENT UP! So NOW they're gonna have very restrictive knife-ownership laws! Sheesh! How stupid. If they really want to lower violent crime they should UNrestrict gun-ownership and make sure crooks'n hoodlums know that if they try to pull something on the average citizen, they might vry well get SHOT DEAD! THAT WILL LOWER CRIME. It has in the USA.
The announcement of the latest drive comes nearly a month after the high-profile killing of City lawyer Thomas ap Rhys Pryce, who was stabbed to death in North London on his way home from a night out. Home Office figures released in 26 January showed violent crime in England and Wales rose 4% between July and September last year.
The Home Office says the amnesty is part of a wide range of actions being taken to tackle knife crime, including toughening the law on carrying blades. Other proposals include raising the age at which people can legally purchase knives from 16 to 18 and giving teachers power to search pupils for knives at school.
ABU LABAN: BLASPHEMER
This photo was appropriated by Abu Laban, given a new title and a new context. Appropriation iand re-contextualization is a standard way of making art, and has been since early in the last century.
Therefore, the real artist, the REAL CREATOR of this image was ABU LABAN! He is the blasphemer.
Maybe the Danes should deport him the Saudi Arabia where he can be PROPERLY punished: by beheading! After all Abu Laban is a Muslim himself - one who claims to believe in sharia. He would be getting his just desserts. Deliciously ironic dessert it is, too!
[ASIDE: Amir Taheri, in the WSJ, proves that depicting Mohammed has NOT always been considered a crime to Muslims.]
BUDDHIST BLEG
I'd like to do a post on how the Muslim reaction to the cartoons - which were an unreasonable attack to their faith - is really normal and to be expected.
After all, when the Taliban - (devoutly religious Muslims, they say) - destroyed the 500 foot tall, 1000 year old WORLD CULTURAL SITE WITH TNT in March of 2001, it was also an attack on Buddhism itself.
I think the comparison would be helpful. Thanks. (Sarcasm off.)
FISKING FEINGOLD'S LIES ABOUT BUSH, GONZALES AND THE NSA PROGRAM
[1] "... listen to what the President said on June 9, 2005: “Law enforcement officers need a federal judge’s permission to wiretap a foreign terrorist’s phone, a federal judge’s permission to track his calls, or a federal judge’s permission to search his property. Officers must meet strict standards to use any of these tools. And these standards are fully consistent with the Constitution of the U.S.” Now that the public knows about the domestic spying program, he has had to change course. He has looked around for arguments to cloak his actions. And all of them are completely threadbare. "
[2] "The Attorney General knew ... about the NSA program when he sought the Senate’s approval for his nomination to be Attorney General. He wanted the Senate and the American people to think that the President had not acted on the extreme legal theory that the President has the power as Commander in Chief to disobey the criminal laws of this country. But he had. The Attorney General had some explaining to do, and he didn’t do it yesterday. Instead he parsed words, arguing that what he said was truthful because he didn’t believe that the President’s actions violated the law."
AG Gonzales correctly maintains that the program is LEGAL, and therefore his answer to the Feingold question during his confrimation hearing IS ENTIRELY TRUTHFUL!
Again, it comes down to whether or not you accept the fact that we are really at war, (a fact made UNDENIABLE by the fact that the 2001 AUMF clearly states we are at war! Well, it's undeniable to everyone except those afflicted with BDS, evidently). Bush has NO MORE violated the criminal law by ordering the NSA (part of the DoD) to intercept enemy communications, then soldiers who kill al Qaeda have committed murder. SURE: If a soldier were to shoot an innocent, non-threatening US person in the USA, then he'd be A MURDERER. But the soldiers - and law enforcement officers - who kill al Qaeda in the course of their duly assigned duties are not murderers. The rules of war are different than the rules which govern criminal conduct in peacetime.
[3] "... this administration reacts to anyone who questions this illegal program by saying that those of us who demand the truth and stand up for our rights and freedoms have a pre-9/11 view of the world. In fact, the President has a pre-1776 view of the world. "
And let's remember that FISA is merely a statutary law, NOT an amendment to the constitution! The war powers Bush claims to have, have been claimed by nearly every president since Washington, and certainly by EVERY war-time president. These powers have been repeatedly UPHELD by every court which has ruled on them - including SCOTUS and the FISCR. If Bush is a "King George" than so were Truman and FDR and Wilson and Lincoln and Adams and Washington.
I think Bush is like those presidents and that Feingold, and the leakers and the NYTIMES are BENEDICT ARNOLDS. The extraordinary POTUS/CiC war-time powers Bush has utilized since 9/11 PALE in comparison to what FDR did, but you'll never hear a Leftie say FDR should have been IMPEACHED, do you!?!
[Aside: Remember, assuming a "BENEDICT ARNOLD position" is NOT a novel thing for Leftie Dems DURING WAR-TIME. Remember Genghis Kerry's "Winter Soldier" testimony to the Senate in 1971?! He was a traitor too!]
[4] "The Attorney General yesterday was unable to give me one example of a President who, since 1978 when FISA was passed, has authorized warrantless wiretaps outside of FISA."
[5] The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was passed in 1978 to create a secret court, made up of judges who develop national security expertise, to issue warrants for surveillance of terrorists and spies. These are the judges from whom the Bush Administration has obtained thousands of warrants since 9/11. The Administration has almost never had a warrant request rejected by those judges. They have used the FISA Court thousands of times, but at the same time they assert that FISA is an “old law” or “out of date” and they can’t comply with it. Clearly they can and do comply with it – except when they don’t. Then they just arbitrarily decide to go around these judges, and around the law.
[6] "I asked the Attorney General about this, he could point me to no court – not the Supreme Court or any other court – that has considered whether, after FISA was enacted, the President nonetheless had the authority to bypass it and authorize warrantless wiretaps. Not one court. The Administration’s effort to find support for what it has done in snippets of other court decisions would be laughable if this issue were not so serious."
In fact, I'd argue that these decisions taken together constitute a "SUPER-DUPER PRECEDENT" if you ask me! (Heh.) Therefore, even though it is true that no court has SPECIFICALLY ruled on this matter, the precedents are clear - STARE DECISIS is clear.
[7] "Finally, the president has tried to claim that informing a handful of congressional leaders, the so-called Gang of Eight, somehow excuses breaking the law. Of course, several of these members said they weren’t given the full story. And all of them were prohibited from discussing what they were told. So the fact that they were informed under these extraordinary circumstances does not constitute congressional oversight, and it most certainly does not constitute congressional approval of the program. Indeed, it doesn’t even comply with the National Security Act, which requires the entire memberships of the House and Senate Intelligence Committee to be “fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States.”
UPDATE: ANKLE BITING PUNDITS has more on the hearings. More on the difference between law enforcement surveillance and war-time sigint HERE, (hat tip LAURA INGRAHAM). ANOTHER FISKING HERE AT CONFEDERATE YANKEE.
I think these Fiskings are importnt: Rants like Feingold's may very well become the Dem/Left's mantra this fall - if we don't dispense with it now.
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
FRENCH ARREST 2 EGYPTIANS CONNECTED WITH ATOCHA BOMBINGS
French police have arrested two suspects wanted in connection with the 2004 Madrid train bombings, a Paris radio station said. France Info radio said two Egyptians were arrested in the Paris region earlier on Tuesday, suspected of having helped another Egyptian, now in prison in Italy, whom Spain suspected of being involved in the Madrid bombings.Did a newspaper in SPAIN ever print any tasteless anti-Muslim cartoons? Oh, no?!?! Then I guess IT AIN'T ABOUT THE CARTOONS, STUPID!
BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 6: CASTRO AND AHMADINEJAD
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has accepted an invitation to visit Cuba from President Fidel Castro, in gratitude for Cuba's support of Iran's nuclear program, the official Granma newspaper said on Tuesday.Paranoid, anto-American, racist, socialist tyrants stick together.
FISA, THE AUMF AND "SUPER -DUPER PRECEDENTS"
The Legal Arguments
In Limelight at Wiretap Hearing: 2 Laws, but Which Should Rule?
It is the sort of problem that judges confront every day. One law forbids a certain activity. The other may allow it. Which one counts?
And they further assert that the since constitution TRUMPS both laws, these laws MUST EITHER be read in a way which is consistent with the constitution or they must be ruled un-constitutional and null and void. Since these laws are other wise okay in other respects (and since Bush is using FISA warrants in other areas), the Bush Adminstration argues that FISA and ther AUMF must be interpreted in a way which is both constituional and which is in agreement with other statutes (FISA must be read in a way which allows agreement with the AUMF and vice-versa). THIS IS HOW STANDARD CONSTITUIONALITY IS CONSTRUCTED.
This interpretation of the AUMF and FISA is consistent with EVERY SINGLE COURT WHICH HAS EVER RULED ON THE ISSUE of whether the POTUS has the constitutional authoirty to order intercepts of enemy communications - INCLUDING THE SCOTUS (Keith 1972), THE FISCR (obviously a post-FISA ruling), AND SEVERAL FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS (also in post-FISA rulings). This is NOT a novel or contemporary interpreation of the POTUS war powers. Presidents Washington, Adams, Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, and Truman ALL did it. As they should have!
Surveillance of the enemy, and interecepting enemy communications has ALWAYS been considered "an essential incident to waging war" and a power of the POTUS as CiC. SCOTUS upheld this power once again in HAMDI - a decision written by centrist O'Connor. The SCOTUS ruled that the POTUS can declare US citizens enemy combatants, and detan them. This power is GREATER than the power to intercept the international calls of al Qaeda with US persons in the USA. It is ludicrous to argue that the POTUS doesn't have the lesser power, when the Supreme Court - and all other precedent - grants him the greater.
Therefore, the Congress does NOT have to - nor should it - spell out in any AUMF that it ALSO is authorizing the POTUS to detain enemy combatants or to intercept enemy communications. IT IS A GIVEN.
So the Bush Administration's interpretation of the AUMF - (that it statutorily mandates the POTUS to intercept al Qaeda communications) - is the only LOGICAL one, and the only legal one BASED ON SCOTUS STARE DECISIS.
In fact, when taken along-side the 1972 SCOTUS Keith decision, the FISCR decision, the FISC decision, and other federal district court decisons regarding al Qaeda - (all of which have links in this post) - I'd argue that it's s "SUPER-DUPER PRECEDENT!"
What is more, it is LUDICROUS to assert - as the Leftie Dems do (and as Specter seems to!) - that intercepting al Qaeda's calls to the USA (or from the USA) is NOT part of the war we are now egenaged in. The enemy can and will attack us here; they SAY they will, and they have already tried numerous times SINCE 9/11.
This is an enemy whose attacks on us are NOT limited to battlefields overseas. We MUST fight them here if we are to defeat them and if we are going to prevent attacks such as 9/11 - OR WORSE. The POTUS as CiC has the authority to wage this war as it must be waged - according to the AUMF, and the constitution - and this is SETTLED LAW. (More settled than even Roe v. Wade!)
(A previous post is HERE.) (NOTE: This post has been updated to deflect arguments offered by Dr. Steven Taylor of excellent POLIBLOGGER. Check out his counter-argument in the comments section!)
THIS IS NOT A CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS; IT'S A BATTLE FOR OUR UNIVERSAL INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS
The key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise: Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not.I think Pipes is wrong - or at least FRAMED the conflict incorrectly. This is NOT a battle between two civilzations, each trying to impose its peculiar customs and mores on the other, each feeling its customs and mores are under assault by the other.
This is a shallow, culturally relativist argument which misses the key point - and the histroical perspective.
This clash is between people (who happen to live in the West) who live in societies in which humans have regained their natural, inalienable INNATE, UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS, and people who live under tyranny - ALIENATED from their basic, universal human rights. People who live in a tyrannical culture ruled by a totalitarian ideology. An ideology which DEMANDS that women be treated as sub-human chattel, in which polygamy and FORCED consanguinous marriage are the norm. In which "honor-killings" and "rape as punishment" are perfectly acceptable.
We do not seek to "impose" our peculiar culture on them; we seek to LIBERATE them - our brothers and sisters - from this archaic form of tyrannical totalitarianism. They may seek to make us Muslim - or dhimmis, but what they're really doing is seeking to drag us back in time 1000 years - back to a time of tyranny and serfdom, back to a time when we were denied our innate human rights by other types of tyrants.
Well, we didn't win the revolution against the King of England (and defend it in WW2 and the Cold War) only to become the slaves of other kings - or the slaves of politburos, or of caliphs! We will NOT be dragged back in time.
As Bush has said many times, "Freedom is not America's give to the world; it's God's gift to each human."
The Islamofascists seek to deny EVERYONE their human rights - not just us "westerners" but even their own people. They want to take away everyone's PERSONAL autonomy, our PERSONAL sovereignity. To do so they have threatened our nation and the free world with terror. They're using terror to intimidate us into relinquishing our human rights. If we surrender them we don't become less "Western" - we become less free. We become slaves. And wiuth the USA out of the way, it would become easier for them to impose their tyrannical ideology on everyone else.
Just as being a slave in not merely having a bad job, so too is being attacked by Islamofascism NOT merely about being a non-Muslim. It's about being free - and wanting to stay free. And wanting to help make all people EVERYWHERE free. As they should be.
And it's not merely an battle for an abstract ideal, "freedom." There's a HUGE and very real bonus which comes with being free. Being free is not just right and good in-and-of itself; it's also the only way to create PROSPERITY - because prosperity is a by-product of liberty.
THEREFORE, our struggle to liberate our brothers and sisters who are still living under tyrannical totalitarian ideologies isn't merely a clash between morally equivalent ideologies or cultures. And when we win, it won't MERELY make them free. It will also empower each and every one of them to become more prosperous and to live longer, healthier, richer lives.
And they deserve that opportunity as much as they deserve their inalienable and universal human rights - and they deserve all that as much as you and me. We all do. That's what Coretta and Martin fought for!
(MORE HERE ON PIPES FROM POWERLINE.)
THE ECO-LEFT: "PARADISE = NO HUMANS"
An international team of scientists says it has found a "lost world" in the Indonesian jungle that is home to dozens of new animal and plant species. ... "It's as close to the Garden of Eden as you're going to find on Earth," said Bruce Beehler, co-leader of the group. ... "It's beautiful, untouched, unpopulated forest; there's no evidence of human impact or presence" said Dr Bruce Beehler, of Conservation International.
One of the team's most remarkable discoveries was a honeyeater bird with a bright orange patch on its face - the first new bird species to be sighted on the island of New Guinea in more than 60 years.
I'll tell you why: These Leftie enviromentalist/conservationists don't feel that EXTINCTION and CLIMATE CHANGE are a part of nature - that they're NATURAL. They feel that if stinking humans weren't messing the whole planet up then the whole planet would be Paradise. As in, "get your stinking paws out of here you damned dirty human!"
Well, they're wrong extinction,; climate change; predation are all a part of nature - and so are we!
Monday, February 06, 2006
AL SADR IN DAMASCUS - ACTING AS AN AGENT FOR IRAN AND SYRIA
Iraqi Shi'ite Muslim leader Moqtada al-Sadr met Syrian leaders [IN DAMASCUS] on Monday and said the United States and Israel were trying to spread strife among Arab countries.This should surprise NO ONE: al Sadr is a jihadoterrorist - and NOW: obviously shilling for Tehran and Assad. WE SHOULD HAVE KILLED HIM AFTER HE MURDERED THE LEADING MODERATE MULLAH YEARS AGO!
Sadr, who led two anti-U.S. uprisings in Iraq, expressed support for Syria, which is facing western pressure over its alleged support for rebels in Iraq and the killing of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri.
MORE HERE, from KUWAIT NEWS. Excerpt:
Al-Sadr would meet president Bashar Al-Assad to discuss the political and security aspects of life in Iraq within the overall political process and formation of the Iraqi government.NO DOUBT: a meeting arranged by al Sadr's handlers in Tehran.
IRAQI TV: #4 AL QAEDA CAPTURED; ZARQAWI IN IRAN
Baghdad - Iraqi police have arrested the fourth-rankin
g figure in al-Qaida in Iraq, state television said, while officials are investigating whether the group's leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, had fled to neighbouring Iran.
The brief report on Iraqiya television yesterday identified the suspect as Mohammed Rabei, also known as Abu Dhar, and said he was No 4 in the al-Qaida. It gave no further details.
Meanwhile, a senior Iraqi security officer said the Iraqi government has been receiving information that al-Zarqawi may have moved to neighboring Iran after hot pursuit by US and Iraqi forces in western Iraq.
As is FOCUS - who seems to have confirmed it with the iraqi government.
WELL, WELL, WELL: Zarqawi in Iran... and al Sadr in Damascus. Hmmm: Persian and Arab; Allawite, Shia and Sunni jihadoterrorists all cooperating. A true transnational/state-sponsored axis of evil.
WHAT COULD THIS INDICATE? It's simple: I expect things to heat up MORE AND MORE as we put more pressure on Syria and Iran, and(I have been blogging since September of last year) to heat things up they will mostly use their jihadoterrorist stooges - Zarqawi, al Sadr, and even more "spontaneous" gloabl intifadas. Stay tuned... things are JUST BEGINNING to heat up...
INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF NSA INTERCEPTS OF AL QAEDA'S USA/INTERNATIONAL CALLS ARE LEGAL
GETTING OIL FROM A STONE
I posted on coal-to-oil conversion in September of last year.
SO: ample DOMESTIC sources for oil are here - and more importantly - SO ARE THE RESOURCES NEEDED TO DEVELOP THEM: (1) We got the oil-shale and the coal here - (enough to supply the whole planet for a thousand years!); and we got the MONEY to invest in the technology and production.
So.... DO WE NEED GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT?! NO. We just need the price of oil to stay higher than $35/barrel, and we need the government to stay out of the way!
ONCE AGAIN, OBAMA PROVES HE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY
Dear Senator Obama:
I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere. When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership’s preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable.
Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions.
I’m embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble.
Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won’t make the same mistake again. [...]
As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party’s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness.
Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn’t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.
Sincerely, John McCain United States Senate
Here's further proof he's not just ignorant, but that he's an immoral phony:After graduating from Harvard Law, the then utterly unknown Obama was contacted by a bright aggressive literary agent who thought he might have a story to tell. They signed a contract. The agent sold his book.
After his pretty convention speech in 2004 - (and before he was elected to the Senate)- he unilaterally broke this contract in order to sign with another bigger agent (who he was introduced to by Clinton, they say!). He eventually "settled" with his first agent.
My little story proves Obama has no scruples or loyalty.Obama MIGHT have repaid his first agent's efforts with loyalty, and proffeered her the opportunity to gain from his new-found fame. Instead, he bailed-out as soon as a better thing came along. THIS IS A SIGN OF BAD CHARACTER. And now John McCain's story further confirms my point. CASE CLOSED.
THE CARTOON INTIFADA: MORE PROOF IT'S AN ORGANIZED INTIMIDATION EFFORT BY SYRIA AND IRAN
AUSTRIA. WHY?! Did they confuse the Danish embassy with the Austrian embassy? Nope. It's because the Austrians hold the EU presidency right now.
Iran and Syria - (along with Syria infiltrated Beirut) site of the other major embassy attacks - have trumped up the Danish September cartoons into an intifada in order to attemot intimidate the UN and the EU into going wobbly on sanctions against Syria and Iran.
SO... maybe we should do MORE than just throw sanctions on them?
BTW: Iran also cut official relations with Denmark.
MORE PROOF THAT RAGE AND VIOLENCE IS THE SOP OF THE ROP
Relatives of hundreds of passengers killed when a ferry sank in the Red Sea on Friday have attacked the offices of the ship's owners. A crowd broke into Al-Salam Maritime's offices in Safaga, Egypt, and began throwing the contents onto the street. Family members also tried to storm a hospital in the town of Hurghada after it displayed photographs of bodies recovered from the sea.They attacked the office of the ferry company AND A FRIGGIN HOPSITAL!? Sheesh.
Grief is understandable. I feel sorry for them. BUT WHY DID IT TURN VIOLENT? Could it be they have a culture of violence? I think it's a safe bet. After all - according to them - their culture is first and foremost MUSLIM. Maybe there's a connection between this their basic creed and their propensity for rage and violence? Maybe their basic beliefs - which exalt misogyny, xenophobia and genocide (and permits "honor-killing" and rape-as-punishment) - gives them a diathesis for all types of dehumanizing violence?
CHALLENGE TO THE DEMS: INTRODUCE A RESOLUTION EXPLICITLY BANNING THE POTUS FROM UTILIZING ALL TOOLS WHICH ARE NECESSARILY INCIDENTAL TO WAGING WAR
I OFFER IT UP AS A CHALLENGE. After all, Bush is arguing - correctly I believe - that it is the long established "law of the land" that when Congress authorizes the use of force it also tacitly authorizes the POTUS - as CiC - to use ALL the tools which are necessarily incidental to waging that war effectively - like gathering sigint and detaining enemy combatants. (The SCOTUS and several other courts have CONSISTENTLY ruled this way for DECADES!)
THEREFORE, if the Democrats don't want the POTUS - as CiC - to also have the authority to use ALL the tools which are necessarily incidental to waging war, then they MUST specifically amend the 2001 AUMF to specifically ban surveillance of the enemy in the USA without a FISA warrant - and even take away the president's authority to designate anyone an enemy combatant, while they're at it - if they want to.
IMHO: This would play out exactly like when Duncan Black introduced the MURTHA RESOLUTION (calling for IMMEDIATE "redeployment" of our troops OUT OF IRAQ) - which of course went down to ignominous defeat, as it should have.
Do the Democrats FEAR that a resolution banning the POTUS from gathering sigint of the enemy would lose? YES THEY DO; THEY KNOW IT WOULD LOSE BIGTIME.
And, after we all watch the Democrats in Congress squirm over having to choose between their Left-wing base and doing the right thing - we could ALL MOVE ON.
BTW: I've been watching MOST of the Gonzales, and I come away feeling VERY impressed with him and even more impressed with the president's case. Combining the arguments of the 1972 SCOTUS Keith decision, the FISCR decision, the enemy combatant decision, the precedents of Wilson aduting WW1, and FDR during WW2, and of Clinton - and appealing to BOTH the "safety valve" within FISA - (US CODE TITLE 59, 1809, a, 1), and the AUMF - makes it an absofrigginlutely iron-clad case.
MORE ON THE HEARINGS HERE.
MORE EXTRAORDINARY HYPOCRISY FROM THE NYTIMES - and of course it favors the enemy!
NOW, the NYTIMES sides with the islamothugs, claiming that the cartoons were unduly provocative and that Islamic reaction is understandable and logical.
BUT WHEN ANTI-CHRISTIAN ART WAS DISPLAYED IN NYC (in 1999), AND CHRISTIANS COMPLAINED (INLCUDING GIULIANI), THE NYTIMES BERATED THEM AND EVEN COMPARED THE COMPLAINERS TO NAZIS!
This is another in what seems like a never-ending stream of instances in which the NYTIMES takes the PRO side of a debate when it's anti-American or anti-Judeo-Christan, and then argues the exact other side - the CON side - when it supports America or Judeo-Christian values. There can be only one explanation for this: the NYTIMES is FUNDAMENTALLY anti-American and anti-Judeo-Christian.
(Another example comes quicly to mind, today: the NYTIMES supported the overly broad ECHELON surveillance program when Clinton was president, but are now against the targeted jihadoterrorist surveillance program authorized by Bush. Leave other examples in the comments section.)
The Newsbuster post has links and quotes. RTWT.
UPDATE: MORE MSM HYPOCRISY HERE - from MY PET JAWA. The culprit? CNN, of course!
WHY THE LEFT AIDS AND ABETS THE ENEMY
Leftists aid and abet the enemy in other ways, too - as when the ACLU sues to get convicted/admitted jihadoterrorist off the hook and free to attack again, or plan other attacks.
NOW, ZAPATERO HAS DEFINITELY put Spain in the wrong side. With all Western countries publicly defending free speech and condemning the barbaric acts of violence after the publication of the Danish cartoons, Zapatero and Erdogan write an open letter that has been published in today's International Herald Tribune ... you won't find a single line of clear and specific condemnation for the death threats, embassy burnings, etc [in this letter]. There isn't any aknowledgement whatsoever of previous acts of violence in the name of Islam prior to the Danish cartoons, which is specially egregious considering Zapatero is the Prime Minister of a country where 192 people were killed in the name of Islam (at least apparently) almost 2 years ago. Way before any cartoon "provoked" any reaction.There are many reasons why the Left supports the enemy. One is BDS. Another is their loathng of Western Civilization which they blame for the phantom of man-made global-warming, sexual repression and widespread societal sexual dysfunction - (see Marcuse), and the poverty of the Third World. Each of these assertions is demonstrably FALSE, yet these doesn't stop Leftists from BELIVING in them - there faith in Leftism enables them to suspend logic and ignore reality. The lack of falsifiability of most of their arguments doesn't phase them a bit. And they do this inspite of the very obvious fact that our enemy threatens them as muich as anybody. WHY DO THEY DO THIS!?
the left is not motivated by a "subconscious yearning" for America's defeat, but quite self-consciously announces the defeat of America as its primary goal.
Thus a leftist author like William Blum does not think his books are being unfairly used by Usama Bin Laden to provide an ex-post-facto apologia for mass murder. Rather, my impression is that the William Blums in our country are quite confident that they have recruited the Usama Bin Ladens of the world to their banner, and believe that after Al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah have contributed their small part to defeating the Beast, they will return peacefully to their caves to smoke kif while the William Blums, Barbra Streisands, and Cynthia McKinneys take the reins of power.
Unlike Cindy Sheehan, Hugo Chavez, and William Blum, on the other hand, the mass/mainstream/antique media apparatchiks must of course conceal the fact that they have enlisted in the leftist project; thus they give the appearance of merely subconsciously yearning for America's defeat.
The stupidity and blindness of the world view of the fellow travelers, useful idiots, and willing dupes are indeed astonishing.
The irony is that the efforts of those that the left hates are precisely what will, God willing, prevent the left from tasting the bitter sadness of discovering that they did not recruit the tyrants to their causes, but were used by the tyrants who would surely, coming to victory, grind them in the same infernal machine they applied to all their other victims.
WHY IS THIS!? Well, - and this is my second point - the Leftist creed valorizes the rule by an elite, and this has always made them susceptible to falling vitim to the "cult of personality" - and the "benevolent dictator syndrome": Lenin; Hitler (YES: HE WAS A SOCIALIST!); Stalin; Mao; Fidel; Che; Allende; Ho Chiu Minh; Pol Pot; Mugabe; Chavez, etc. The Left IDOLIZED EACH OF THESE TYRANTS. Their diathesis for worshipping tyrants also makes them prone to demonizing their foes. In this light, we see why the Left demonized Nixon and Reagan, and now Bush. What the left fails to understand is the extent to which Leftist tyrannies were defeated by the VALUES of these men (and not their personalities!); the victories of these men were fueled by their belief in liberty and freedom for all humanity, and their knowledge that properity is a by-product of this liberty, and their confidence that democracy is the most effective form of government to promote a free and properous nation.
These VALUES, and not merely the sheer force of our president's will, are what will propel us to our ultimate victory. A victory which will not only defeat the enemy, but finally consign Leftism to the dustbin of history - where it belongs!
IRANIAN NUKE : NOW :: GERMAN NUKE : 1942
If Iran gets nukes, they will use them (on their enemies - which includes US, or merely to enable them to act with EVEN MORE impunity than they already do - and they ALREADY act with terrible impunity as proven by the FACT that they've violated the NPT for 18 years, thumbed their noses at the IAEA and the UN, and have OPENLY aided and abetted international jihadoterrorism).
The costs Iran using a bomb - (or of giving one to their jihadoterrorist stooges to use!) - will be much much much MUCH greater than the costs of us destroying their nuke capability, their navy, their air force and their entire missile system.
It's that simple. Failing to act NOW would be like surrendering to jihadoterrorism. The clock is ticking...
(MORE HERE.)
Sunday, February 05, 2006
JIHADOTERRORISTS MURDER SIX CARTOONISTS IN THE PHILIPPINES
At least six people were killed on Friday when gunmen opened fire at a Christian home on a mainly Muslim island in the southern Philippines, an army general said. ... three men, two women and an eight-month-old infant were killed in the attack. Six others, three of them children, survived the shooting with minor injuries. "We don't know the motive for the shooting," Aleo said.The motive for the attack is simple: they must've been cartoonists. Oh they weren't cartoonists!? Oh. Er, um... then I guess "IT'S NOT THE CARTOONS, STUPID!"
CHRISTIAN PRIEST ASSASSINATED IN TURKEY
An Italian Catholic priest has been shot dead outside his church in north-east Turkey. Police in the Black Sea port of Trabzon said they were searching for a teenage boy seen fleeing from the scene of the attack on Sunday. ... Turkish broadcaster NTV identified the priest as Andrea Santore and said he died from a single shot to the chest.Turkey has seen regular protests in recent days over the Danish caricatures of Muhammad.I wonder if this priest was a cartoonist or if just read cartoons? Or if he EVEN read cartoons!? IOW: "IT AIN'T ABOUT THE CARTOONS, STUPID!"
MORE HERE.)
PALESTINIAN ATTORNEY GENERAL: BILLIONS STOLEN FROM PA FUNDS
HAARETZ/AP:
What wasn't funnelled into jihadoterrorism went into "Swiss" banks - much of for Arafat's "wife" Suha. THIS DEGREE OF THIEVERY BY THE ISLAMOTHUGS ISN'T SURPRISING: those who would commit genocide will of course also steal.PA attorney general says billions may have been stolen from Palestinian coffers - The Palestinian attorney general on Sunday said a corruption investigation has concluded that senior officials in the Palestinian Authority may have stolen billions of dollars of public funds.
...Al-Meghani, who took office last September, said he planned to unveil the results of his investigation in December but delayed the announcement at the request of PA Chairman [and Fatah chairman] Mahmoud Abbas. ...Fatah was trounced in last month's legislative election, in large part because of voter anger over years of corruption.
This news comes at a time when the Palestanis claim that their "government" is broke. Maybe instead of committing genocide against Jews, Hamas should track down the Muslim theives and recover the money!
THE CARTOON INTIFADA IS S.O.P. FOR THE R.O.P.
... there have been enough similar episodes to make clear that self-censorship is at stake here:the fatwa against Salman Rushdie,Bill Clinton, the former US president, and German Muslim leaders have also likened the cartoons to historical anti-Semitism. But this is cant.
the murder of Mr Rushdie's Japanese translator and his Norwegian editor,
the murder of Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands in 2004,
the insistence on anonymity of all translators of the Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and so on.
The worst threats and most unruly demonstrations did not object to any demeaning "message" in the cartoons.
They objected to the sacrilege of depicting Mohammed at all.
This is not a demand for respect or fair treatment. It is a demand that non-Muslims live by Muslim religious rules.
I feel certain that we would destroy Islam before we would accept that. Before we would even accept dhimmitude. Even if that meant that every so-called "moderate Muslim" nation had to fall into the hands of the fanatics along the way. So be it; they've been hostage to jihadoterrorism for too long, anyhow - to the point where we can't trust them... to the point where they side with the fanatics and aganst us as often as not. (Like Libya for instance - Kaddafy recalled his ambassador to Denmark. In return, we should bounce his untrustworthy ass back out in snactions-land.)
NOPE: we should draw the line here and now. If the fanatics thought this would make it LESS likely we would tighten the noose around Iran's and Syria's necks they're mistaken, This just steels our resolve. And when those regimes topple, then the fanatics - who organized the Cartoon Intifada as they did the Paris Intifada - will have no state sponsors, and they'll be completely isolated, in desperate need of funding, and much easier to wipe out.
THE CARTOON INTIFADA ... and the earlier and much less effective "ice cream lid" intifada...
"ALL YOUR words, pictures, cartoons, images, representations, ideas, books, thoughts ARE BELONG TO US."
[In case you don't remember: "THE fast-food chain, Burger King, is withdrawing its ice-cream cones after the lid of the dessert offended a Muslim. The man claimed the design resembled the Arabic inscription for Allah, and branded it sacrilegious, threatening a 'jihad.]
Saturday, February 04, 2006
THE CARTOON INTIFADA, CULTURAL RELATIVISM AND THE POST-MODERN LEFT
These Leftists are REALLY saying, essentially, that the Muslims right to practice their religion the way they want to practice it (without any depictions of their prophet - and including their right to threaten non-believers --- who obviously have no such proscriptions) - TAKES PRECEDENCE over our own culture's freedom of the press and our inherent right to freedom of expression.
What this means - in all practicality - is that they value the tenets of Muslim culture more than the tenets of own their own culture. They are willing to subordinate our own practice of universal human rights, to the Muslim's anti-humanitarian theocratic totalitarianism.
WHY DO THEY FEEL THIS WAY?! WHY ARE THEY MORE DEFENSIVE OF ISLAM THAN THE WEST!? SIMPLE: The post-modern Left is anti-West, and anti-Judeo-Christian. WHY?! SIMPLE: They've been brain-washed to believe that Third World poverty is the result of First World colonialism and imperialism - (as if the Third World was once rich or would have been rich if the West had never "interfered" with them).
These post-modern Leftists believe that Western Civilization is basically harmful to the environment and harmful to humanity, and that Westerners - especially practicing Judeo-Christians - live an inauthentic life, a life alienated from reality, a life where people have been alienated from their sexuality and from nature. They still believe in the Marcussian Revolution.
They believe that the USSR and China failed becasue it wasn't "true Marxism", and that Marxism never took root in the UK or in the USA because the Anglo-Amecian proletariat had become ENBOURGOISEIFIED. By gaining middle-class living standards, the working class lost its identity as an exploited class; this process they call enbourgoisification. And it makes us in the West inauthentic, in the minds of post-modern Leftists.
Post-modern Leftists believe that people of the Third World - what used to be called "primitive cultures - live an authentic life, with values which are in harmony with their environment and culture. And they believe that the West has a lot to make up to the Third World. And the Muslim Wolrd is a major part of the Third World to whom we owe a lot.
These post-modern Leftists see Israel as an outpost of colonialism, and the GWOT as the just desserts for colonialism. The post-modern Left is fond of saying - as regards 9/11 and it's after math: "The chickens have come home to roost."
When the Third World threatens the First, the post-modern Left sides with the Third World. They think this is just. hence their knee-jerk defence of the CARTOON INTIFADA.
In fact: THE POST-MODERN LEFT HAS IT ALL WRONG. Prosperity is a by-product of individual ingenuity and enterprise. When people (anywhere) are liberated and are free to exploit their own ingenuity through enterprise, propserity results.
Lack of liberty, the lack of rule of law, the lack of transparency, and the lask of industrialization and free trade are the true roots of Third World poverty.
The more the Third World EMULATES the First World - (and becomes a part of it though trade), the richer they become and the higher the standards of living they achieve. Post-Maoist China proves this, as does post-Soviet Russia, and Zimabawe. SIMPLY PUT: The more liberty the people have - and the more transparency and accountability their government has - THE RICHER PEOPLE GET.
So, in summary: post-modern Leftists are hypocritical when they adopt culturally relativist positions AND side with Muslims in the CARTOON INTIFADA. By siding with vestigial totalitarianists they deny that there are universal human rights, and basically say that Muslims have more right to practice their religion than we have the right to practice freedom of the press. AND, by siding with these vestigial totalitarianists, they basically consign Muslims to an inferior future of continued poverty, degradation, and violence.
I CAN PROVE THEY ARE WRONG TO DENY UNIVERSALISM: If there are no universal human rights, then there is no basis for outlawing slavery or infanticide or genocide, for without the notion that all humans everywhere are entitled to inalienable human rights solely by virtue of their being human there is no basis for one nation or culture to interfere with ANY PRACTICE in another culture or nation. The only MORAL basis for such interference is the notion of universality. (Post-modern Leftists believe that only when there's cross-cultural or multilatertal/international CONSENSUS can there legitimately be any international or cross-cultural interference. Cross-cultural consensus has relaced universal values for the post-modern Left. Hence their over-valuation of the UN, and hence the result that humanity has JUST RECENTLY allowed countless genocides to occur - all of which could have been AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN stopped. But nothing was done and MILLIONS DIED. becasue no consensus was reached.)
And this is simply no longer a notion that the Left believes in. The lack of a belief in universality is basically what divides old-time liberal from the post-modern Leftists. Old-time liberals - like FDR and Truman and JFK - were hawks. They believed that all people everywhere deserved to be free. They'd be neo-cons today, not post-modern Leftists. They defend the cartoons and the cartoonists, and not those who threaten our hard-won liberties. They'd condemn those who would deny us our human rights - whether they did so in the name of Marxism or Islamicism.
I believe that every woman born everywhere is entitled to do whatever she can achieve in life and that shew should not be forced to marry her married cousin, and not be prevented from learning to read, and not be forced to cover herself in public, and not be the victim of "honor-killings."
And I believe that a people who use religion to foment these practices are ESSENTIALLY ANTI-HUMAN AND EVIL AND SHOULD BE WIPED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.The ideology which foments these practices is worse than Nazism - which we unabashedly wiped out last century.
I do not think it right to sit idly by as Muslim women are SYSTEMATICALLY denied their human rights. I do not think it's okay for my fellow Westerners to be threatened for saying what they believe.
People who systematically degradate (and often murder) their own mothers and sisters and daughters and female cousins are of course more than happy to mistreat us, to lie to us, to chreat us, and to kill us. Anybody who can murder their own daughter to "re-gain family honor" can of course commit more horrible atrocities against infidels. And they will if we let them. THEY ARE: 9/11; Atocha; 7/7; the Weding attck in Amman. And now they threaten us for publishing cartoons!
WELL: When they seek to deny us our inalienable human rights must be taught a lesson they shall never forget. If we do not, then they will try to get away with more the next time. We must teach then a harsh lesson, and the sooner the better.
WHAT MIGHT THIS BE? Well, for starters we should cut them off from our civilization: no trade, no services, no goods, no travel, no contact for any nation which doesn't respect Universal Human Rights. They must give ALL WOMEN UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE, and end polygamy and endogamy AT ONCE! If they do not, then, we should isolate them - ostracize them.
They must be made to pay for their inhuamnity to their own. And for their attacks on our civilization.
Appeasing them sends the opposite message: it says threatening us WORKS! Which means: THREATEN US SOME MORE! Everytime we let them badger us into ANY submission we are appeasing them and this only enpocurages them to do it again - only worse the next time.
So ... it's time to draw the line. It's overdue.
IAEA ACTS : "Iran reported to Security Council"
The ONLY nations that voted to support Iran: Venezuela, Cuba and Syria. (Five abstained.) This is the current roster for the AXIS OF EVIL, (remember, North Korea doesn't get a vote here). And lookie here: they're ALL socialist nations (Syria is Baathist and Baathism is Pan-Arabic socialism). COINCIDENCE!? Nope. Not only is socialism the "opiate of the intelligentsia", and "the road to serfdom", it's tyrannical - and tyrants stick together.
HAMAS AND HIZB'ALLAH STEP UP ROCKET ATTACKS AGAINST ISRAEL
Upsurge in violence aheadMore from earlier TAB posts predicting this upsurge to aid Assad and Iran HERE and HERE.
Hamas is launching violent attacks against Israel. Four family members, including a toddler, were injured when a Qassam rocket fired from the Gaza Strip hit their home in Kibbutz Karmiya, in the western Negev, on Friday afternoon.Hezbollah forces attacked an Israel Defense Forces post on the Lebanese border on Friday, two days after troops shot dead a Lebanese shepherd in the area.One IDF soldier was lightly injured in the attack.I think it is no coincidence that these acts of violence are occurring with the issue of Iran now reaching yet another, critical point. Violence is a signal being sent to Israel and the West. Diplomatic pressure on Iran will prompt a violent response. Expect more attacks in Iraq next. - Ed Lasky [contributor to THE AMERICAN THINKER] 2 03 06
I think the CARTOON INTIFADA first an attempt to cow us into dhimmitude, but it is also a coordinated attempt at misdirection - to make us take the eye off the "Iran/Assad ball" and to dissuade us from making them accountable to international law. It must not be looked at in isolation, but be seen as part of a global effort of the enemy.
LASKY IS RIGHT: EXPECT MORE, ONLY WORSE. AND EXPECT IT ANYWHERE AT ANYTIME.
"THE CARTOON INTIFADA"
This intifada, THE CARTOON INTIFADA, like ALL the previous ones - is ONLY a pretext for global jihad, (an SOP of the ROP). The cartoons are just an excuse for the jihadists to rile up the Arab Muslim masses to attack the West - and to make the West cower into dhimmitude.
Most intifadas are started this way - by way of local excuses:
The "PARIS INTIFADA" was supposedly started (that is, if you ask a local Muslim!) because a few Arab Muslim youths were chased by the police into a train-yard where they were "accidentally" electrocuted. This was just an excuse - a trumped up reason for them to try to intimidate the French - and by extension us, The Free World.Each "intifada" is a little battlefield and a LITTLE SUDATENLAND, of sorts, as the islamofascists systematically seek to diminish the grasp and reach of the Free World. Like Sudatenland and Hitler, our enemy often promises that the current "dust up" is really just about this narrow local issue. As if the tumult and threats we've been witnessing in the Muslim world is REALLY JUST ABOUT CARTOONS. It ain't. Cartoons are merely the proverbial finger before they take the hand.
The so-called "SECOND INTIFADA" - which Arafat initiated after declining to accept all the territories and half of Jerusalem from Barak- was merely a pretext for continued war against Israel. This proved to most observers (from Barak to Dennis Ross) that Arafat never really wanted peaceful co-existence or a negotiated two-state solution, and merely used OSLO as a Trojan Horse, (as Bibi and Arik had always said. YUP: THEY WERE RIGHT!).
Separate, independent nationhood for Arabs in the so-called "occupied territories is just a pretext. Meshal - the head of Hamas - admits this. He admits that Hamas wants all of Israel to be subsumed into the ummah (see below). In fact, one cannot possibly argue against this because the PLO was actually founded BEFORE 1967, before what's presently called "occupied territory" was even "occupied." To the islamofascists of the PLO - and Hamas - ALL of Israel is on Arab Muslim land and all of Israel must be erased. Ahmadinejad and Binladen and Zarqawi and Zawahiri merely say what most others believe and won't say.
The so called insurgency in the Sunni provinces of Iraq is an intifada too; it's "THE SUNNI INTIFADA" - and it isn't really about American occupation, either. All that the so called insurgents REALLY want is to re-establish an islamofascist state.
And Algerians have been fighting jihadoterrorism for a decade; hundreds of thousands of Arab Muslims have died in this conflict. (That's HUNDREDS OF TIMES more Arabs than have been killed by Israelis!). "THE ALGERIAN INTIFADA" is not merely about the islamothugs trying to establish a Taliban-like state in Algeria. That's just their immediate, LOCAL aim.
And there's a THAILAND INTIFADA, and a FILIPINO INTIFADA and there are little intifada's all over the globe. Each seemingly inflamed by LOCAL issues but all really part of the global aspirations of jihad. GLOBAL JIHAD. They want to re-establish the Caliphate from Spain to the Philippines. And place it under extremist rule. Along the way, they will kill or convert - OR THREATEN INTO DHIMMITUDE - everyone who gets in their way.
In terms of territory, they demand we surrender: the West Bank; the Sunni provinces; the Moro Islands; Bali; Kashmir; Israel; Anadalusia; Albania and Kosovo; Serbia; Afghanistan and Pakistan and eventually all of Arabia. Each is a little Sudatenland if taken on it's own. Together it's the old Caliphate.
There are figurative Sudatenlands, too, which then enemy wants us to surrender along the way, like our Freedom of Expression - how we dress, what we say and write and draw and paint, and the music we play and listen to, the movies we make and watch - the websites we construct and visit. They want us to SURRENDER this, too.
And they don't want to allow anyone to have Freedom of Religion, not even fellow Muslims who are Sufi or Shia. And they don't want anyone to have Freedom from Want - their societies a rife with poverty.
And of course, they don't want anybody to have Freedom from Fear; fear is their ONLY weapon; they love inflicting fear more than they love life.
It's long passed time people in the West saw the enemy for what they are: the most evil, despicable, vile inhumane force that has EVER walked on the face of the Earth.
And therefore, it's long passed time everyone saw this CARTOON INTIFADA for what it is: an excuse for the enemy to attack us and make us retreat, and cower before them and their nihilistic, misogynistic, xenophobic, racist creed.
FDR - who defeated Nazism - would be shoulder-to-shoulder with the cartoonists and Bush. HECK: maybe he'd be out front, leading Bush, exhorting him to be even more comprehensive in the counter-attack against jihadism. YUP: maybe if FDR was president he'd of FIRE-BOMBED Tora Bora and Waziristan and Ramadi and Fallujah and every other outpost of islamofascism. YUP: ya gotta hand it to FDR - and Harry S Truman: they didn't pull punches with fascism the way George W Bush does with jihadoterrorism. YUP: I'm beginning to think the "W" stands for WIMP!
And we'll never win this war by wimping out, by surrendering a little Sudatenland here and a little Sudatenland there. We'll never win by giving into little intifadas, or kidnappings or beheadings or suicide bombings - OR WORSE. We'll only win when we smash the enemy and utterly defeat them. No matter how long it takes.
And no matter how many peace-loving, tolerant "moderate" Muslims get angry... and call for our heads!
NEWS AND COMMNENTARY ROUND UP AT MEMEORANDUM.
Friday, February 03, 2006
MSM : CARTOONS : : MSM : THEO VAN GOGH MURDER
Has the WGA or PEN (or any other artists' or writers' organizations) voiced ANY support for the Denmark?
NOPE. They are as silent about this afront to freedom of expression as they were about the murder of Theo van Gogh. They SHOULD be as supportive to Denmark as the dozen or so European newspaper which have reprinted the cartoons in a fabulous display of solidarity with Denmark.
WHY IS THIS!? Because these organizations - like the MSM itself - are dominated by post-modern Leftists who hate the West and Amecia and Bush and believe that the West is simply reaping the seeds of imperialism, colonialism, Judeo-Christian-centrism and "American Cultural Hegemony."
NEED PROOF!? Well, it's been 3 days since the BLOGOSPHERE has proved that the entire protest was the result of LIES about PHONY cartoons spread by islamicist imams from Denmark, lies spread deliberately to inflame a backlash in Muslim Arabia. Yet the MSM has STILL not reported this.
Instead, the MSM is fanning the flames by continuing to portray this story as if the bad guys were the callous cartoonists and bellicose newspapers, instead of the intolerant Muslims. They ignore the fact that this is simply a freedom of expression issue.
These Leftist appeasers - who either appease by criticizing the newspapers which have run the cartoons, or who by silence approve of the threats to free speech of the Muslims - have NO principles except hatred for the West and America and Bush.
Writers and artists who fail to defend the cartoonists and their publishers are scum.
Writers and artists should also declare an "International Day of Anger" - AT THE ISLAMOFASCISTS. (Stories on Islamofascist anger HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE.)
UPDATE: GATES OF VIENNA reports that FOX and CNN have finally reported on the matter.
STILL: Where's their outrage at the islamofascists would blackmail us into surrendering our free press!? Many in the MSM will go to jail rather than cooperate with a grand jury investigating leaks, but they won't say bupkus about those who would deny us our freedoms. GOOGLE will cooperate with the tyranny in China, but not cooperate with our own DoJ and not say BUPKUS about the islamothugs who would limit our freedoms.
More at ALL THINGS BEAUTIFUL.
TCS: BUSH'S USE OF THE TERM "ADDICTED TO OIL" IS DANGEROUS
America is no more addicted to oil than it is addicted to bread, to milk, to paper, to water, to computers or, in the immortal words of the late Robert Palmer, to love. We use oil -- and other unmentioned but implied addictions like coal and natural gas -- to generate energy that powers our cars, heats our homes, lights our cities, runs our factories. By the standard of what they do for us, fossil fuels are pretty cheap. ...
Rather than concentrating on what the U.S. can do now to increase supply, the President instead decided to use a word that is straight out of the radical environmentalists' dictionary: "addicted." The implication is that our desire to use oil is something that is not just uncontrollable but also shameful. The message is that we must kick this disgusting habit....
Instead of concentrating on increasing fossil-fuel supplies at home, the President used all of the energy section of his speech -- four paragraphs -- talking about such exotica as "revolutionary solar and wind technologies," "producing ethanol, not just from corn, but from wood chips and stalks, or switch grass," and "pollution-free cars that run on hydrogen." Of course, since these alternatives have no commercial viability, the government will have to subsidize them. The latest Carteresque concoction, announced in the speech: the "Advanced Energy Initiative." ...
... it may surprise Americans to learn that, according to the most recent import statistics from the Department of Energy, the biggest petroleum exporter to the United States is Canada (at 70 million barrels in November 2005 vs. 41 million for Saudi Arabia, in a distant third place). Second is Mexico. Persian Gulf (including Saudi) oil amounted to about one-sixth of our imports and one-tenth of our total petroleum use last November.
JACK STRAW APPEASES THE ENEMY
"Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has condemned the decision by some European newspapers to reproduce cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad as "disrespectful".This is pure unadulterated APPEASEMENT. Straw has never once criticized anti-Semitic cartoons run by the Guradian - and other Eurpoean newspapers, but now he criticizes anti-Islam cartoons. WHY? becasue of the uproar in the Islamic world. What he and other leaders should be syaing to the Islamic world is "GROW UP, OR SHUT UP!" All his appeasement does is invite more blackmail and enocurage more dhimmitude.
Straw is the same FOOL who said a few weeks ago that military action against Iran was "OFF THE TABLE." Straw is an ass and a fool. Blair should fire him at once; Straw is now every bit as bad as the late Robin Cook.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
FISA AND THE ETHOS OF RETREAT AND DEFEAT
FISA was enacted in the first half of the first term of the very next elected president - the first half of the first and only term of the worst president of all time: Jimmy "I love Hamas" Carter.
What IMMEDIATELY followed the passage of FISA was (a) The Fall of the Shah to Khomeini and the islamofascists; (b) The Invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR; and (c) The Ascension by coup d'etat of Saddam. Did FISA CAUSE all these events - (events which DIRECTLY created the every crisis we are in today!)? NO. But the ETHOS which fomented FISA DID! It's an ethos that argues that a strong POTUS is more a danger to us than our overtly avowed enemies. This ethos also produced:
(1) The unilateral disarmament movement of the 1960's thru the 1980's (or surrendering to the USSR's war machine which spent 40% of its GDP on armaments!); (2) The anti-industry/anti-free trade/"green movement" (or surrendering to isolationism and protectionism and Ludditism); (3) The anti-2ND Amendment movement (which is tantamount to surrendering one's basic human right to self-defense, and surrendering to criminals); and (4) Multi-culturalism - which is essentially surrendering American culture -- (which has grown through the ASSIMILATION of foreign cultures into American culture, and which has always taught that the American political system best allows for maximal individual liberty, which in turns creates the prosperity immigrants seek for themselves and their descendents) -- to a polyglot mosaic of cultural and moral relativism. (5) The so-called "peace dividend" - which was nothing more than the hollowing out the armed forces of this country. It was as foolish in the 1990's as it was in the 1920's and 1930's.
Reagan repudiated the ethos of retreat and defeat. And the result of his successful presidency was a rebirth of American strength and the defeat of the USSR and the liberation of 500 MILLION people - ALL of whom are better of now than they were under Soviet tyranny and hegemony. As a result of the fall of the USSR, we were also liberated - our foreign policy was no longer shackled to the Cold War and we became free to focus our attention on unsavory allies whose allaince we needed only in the context of the Cold War.
Bush's 21st century foreign policy - of aggressively attacking tyranny, and of boldly spreading democracy - (by attacking authoritarianism, totalitarianism and islamofascism) - is ONLY possible in a post-Cold War world. And it's the noblest of causes; one for which FDR and Truman and JFK toiled. It was taken up again by Reagan - and since 9/11, it has been taken up by Bush.
We mustn't let the appeasers and self-doubters ever get back in control of our foreign policy. REMEMEBR: they're the folks who wrote FISA, who were ready to unilaterally disarm and to perpetually co-exist with the USSR. Now these very same people - Teddy Jo Kennedy and Genghis Kerry - would rather attack Bush than our true enemy -- and they'd like to force our armed forces and our intel services to fight the enemy with one hand tied behind their backs.
THAT WON'T HAPPEN ON BUSH'S WATCH. NOPE: It's still morning in America. And, it's still morning for the rest of the world too, if we don't succumb to the ethos of retreat and defeat. At the very least, we owe it to those who sacrificed in the past for our liberty, and to those who are sacrificing right now for our liberty. Most of all, we owe it to generations to come - EVERYWHERE.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
"ADDICTED TO OIL" : SOTU :: HARRIET MIERS : SCOTUS
If we want to lessen our dependence on foreign oil let's just simply drill for more here - we got PLENTY of proven reserves right off the coasts of California and Florida and in Alaska - FOR STARTERS! And then let's make sure there are no state or federal regulations preventing the construction of some more coal-oil conversion plants and mine for more coal RIGHT HERE. Four USA states - Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Idaho and Wyoming - have more energy (in convertible coal) than all of Arabia and the Persian Gulf combined!
IOW: All we really need to do is extract the energy got!
Bush's appeal to invest in new energy technology (and his promise of a big Federal boondoggle to support it) is just like his Harriet Miers nomination: A stupid play for consensus with the Democrats when what he should be doing is sticking to his guns - and his core beliefs and his base.
Alito was a BETTER pick than Miers. It made the people who elected him HAPPY.
And on the energy issue, Bush should have stuck to his guns - and his principles (and his base's issues and values), and just told Congress to OPEN ANWR - and OPEN the coast off California and OPEN the coast off of Florida.
Bush won't gain in the polls by appealing to the Dem/Left. The Teddy Jo Kennedy/Genghis Kerry Pelosi/Dean/Reid/Michael Moore/Cindy Sheehan crowd will NEVER give him credit for anything. He shouldn't angle for it. It's DUMB.
The WH advisors have got encourage BUSH TO BE BUSH! That's who we voted for. Not some guy pandering to the Dems and the MSM.
Others agree: POWERLINE and LIBERTY CORNER and THE AMERICAN THINKER.
DANISH IMAMS MAY LIE TO US (SEE BELOW) BUT THE LEADER OF HAMAS DOESN'T
"... the transcript of an interview [BY the nedia line] with Mahmoud A-Zahhar, the leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The interview was conducted ahead of the January 25th Palestinian parliamentary elections. Hamas, for the first time, participated in these elections, and won 76 out of 132 parliamentary seats.
During the interview, A-Zahhar revealed his movement's political and economic agendas, reiterating the notion that his movement will never recognize Israel.
He also said he expects to see Hamas ministers in the next Palestinian government. In addition, A-Zahhar uncovered in detail Hamas' plan to reconstruct and redefine the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) responsibilities, according to which it would represent the entire Palestinian nation, inside and outside the Palestinian Authority (P.A.).
TML: What is the final goal of Hamas?
A-Z: If you ask any Palestinian or Muslim, wherever he lives – in America or in Britain or in Indonesia – he would tell you that according to the religious point of view, this land is part of the Arab and Muslim nations. This means, that there is no other option but to reunify this land once again.
TML: What is 'this land' that you are talking about? Are you talking about the whole of Israel?
A-Z: I understand where you are headed, and I will answer you.
First of all this Palestinian land, and all the Arabic nation, is all part of the same area. In the past, there was no independent Palestinian state; there was no independent Jordanian state; and so on. There were regions called Iraq or Egypt, but they were all part of one country. That is why it is not permitted to [agree to] establish separate countries, which was the case after the Sykes-Picot Agreement [1916].
Our main goal is to establish a great Islamic state, be it pan-Arabic or pan-Islamic.
Therefore, it is not allowed to establish an Arabic state over the land of Palestine alone.
Also, remember this land is still occupied. To sum up, the Islamic and traditional views reject the notion of establishing an independent Palestinian state.
The Islamists' view, which Hamas adheres to, is that a great Muslim state must be established, with Palestine being a part of it.
Within this state, Israel has no place – its history is different, its language is different, its religion is different, its culture is different, and its security and political affiliations are different. This is the view of Hamas movement.
TML: Is Hamas ever going to recognize the state of Israel?
A-Z: Let me ask you a question, does the Egyptian people recognize Israel? No. That is why it did not normalize relations with Israel. This is not a view held only by Hamas. This is a view held by anyone who believes in Islam."
DANISH IMAM CAUGHT LYING TO EURO-MEDIA
In the Danish media he is quoted as saying he is against the widespread boycott of danish goods in the middle east.I guess this is the Imam's idea of free speech! Heh. Actually, this is an old Arab Muslim trick which Arafat and Abbas used all the time. It plays upon the "willing suspense of disbelief" of Left-wing doves and appeasers. Smart people donlt fall for this trick becasue smart people know how to tell when these folks are lying. HOW?! THEY'RE LIPS ARE MOVING! (Badabumbump!)
An hour later on Al Jizeera TV he says that he thinks it is a great thing that the arab nations and people defend islam through the boycott.
Links to the Danish coverage of this "holy-man's" outting - (in DANISH) - HERE AND HERE.
MORE: (1) Here's a link to backgrounder from DER SPEIGEL (in English) which shows Abu Laban was one of the origianl instigators of the boycott from the start. (2) Here's a link to and ISLAM ONLINE article (in English) in which Abu Laban claims he was against the boycott.
HAMAS WIN WAS NOT A FREE ELECTION
SO WHY DID THE USA AND THE UN AND THE EU ALLOW HAMAS TO EVEN RUN A SINGLE CANDIDATE IN THE RECENT ELECTION!? They are NOT a political party; they are a jihadoterrorist group. Since they don't play by the RULES of politcal engagement, they should NOT have been allowed to run ANY CANDIDATES.
This was the fatal flaw of the recent election.
AND ANSWER ME THIS: Do you think ANY Arab Palestani can voice opposition to HAMAS (or IJ or Al Aksa or the PFLP or any other terrorist group) without FEAR OF REPRISAL!? Of course they can't. And in that atmosphere of intimidation and fear NO ELECTION CAN BE REGARDED AS FAIR OR TRUE OR JUST. Or valid. No matter what Jimmy Carter says.
IOW: the HAMAS WIN IS INVALID.
A STARK CONTRAST: ISRAEL DISMANTLES SETTLEMENTS, WHILE ABBAS AND THE PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT NEVER EVEN TRIED TO DISMANTLE AND DISARM HAMAS
With courage and sadness, Israel's goverment is taking on the illegal settlers and dismantling illegal settlements. (MORE STORIES HERE AND HERE AND HERE.) These actions create real conflict within Israeli society and politics, and foment real danger for the IDF. But Israel pushes ahead.
In stark contrast, Abbas and the rest of the so called "Palestinian" so called "moderates" (HA!) have done NOTHING, ZERO, BUPKUS! They have not disarmed one single solitary terrorist - let alone a single terrorist group AS THEY WERE LEGALLY BOUND TO DO BY "THE ROAD MAP FOR PEACE."
No deal with these Arab palestinians is worth the paper it is written on. Israel must forge ahead with any and all UNILATERAL moves which make it more secure. SCREW THE FRIGGIN ARAB PALESTANIS! SCREW'EM!
HAMAS SCMHAMAS: NO CHANGE FOR ISRAEL - THEY HAD NO PARTNER FOR PEACE BEFORE, AND STILL DON'T HAVE ONE
I couldn't agree more. My earlier posts on this HERE and HERE.
THE UPSIDE-DOWN WORLD OF ARAB MUSLIM MORALITY
Sanctions against Syria and Iran for their CRIMES is morally and legally correct. A boycott against Denmark is insanely wrong and unjust.
We must press ahead with sanctions against Syria and Iran - or even stronger actions! And we must NOT cower or waiver or relent in the face of the Arab Muslim nations attempt to intimidate us and turn us into dhimmis.
The islamofacists think it is a greater sin to publish political cartoons than to kill innocents by the thousands (and even their own daughters!), blow up churches etc etc. They expect the right to build mosques in onther lands, but allow no reciprocal right to other religions...EXACTLY!
FRANCE MORE SUPPORTIVE OF DENMARK THAN CLINTON
France Soir said it had published the cartoons to show that "religious dogma" had no place in a secular society. ... The paper said it had decided to republish them "because no religious dogma can impose itself on a democratic and secular society".BJ Clinton on the other hand has taken the side of the racist misogynist genocidal Aran Muslim nations:
The offices of the Danish newspaper that first published the caricatures, Jyllands-Posten, had to be evacuated on Tuesday because of a bomb threat. ... Thousands of Palestinians demonstrated this week in the Gaza Strip, burning Danish flags and portraits of the Danish prime minister.
Saudi Arabia has recalled its ambassador to Denmark, while Libya said it was closing its embassy in Copenhagen and Iraq summoned the Danish envoy to condemn the cartoons.
Clinton described as “appalling” the 12 cartoons published in a Danish newspaper in September and causing uproar in the Muslim world.I have never ONCE heard Clinton complain about the horrifying and anti-Semitic depeictions of Jews - and of Sharon, for example - which CONSTANTLY APPEAR in the Arab Muslim press - AND IN THE EU's LEFT-WING PRESS! - like ones of Sharon depicted as bloodsucking cannibal eating Arabs.
“None of us are totally free of stereotypes about people of different races, different ethnic groups, and different religions ... there was this appalling example in northern Europe, in Denmark ... these totally outrageous cartoons against Islam,” he said.
Clinton and his fellow travellers on the enemy-appeasing Left - like Carter and Sheehan and Dean and Pelosi and Reid and Murtha and Teddy Jo Kennedy and Genghis Kerry - are running are partly responsible for the mess we're in:
Carter helped Khomeini takeover Iran, let the USSR take over Afgfhanistan, and let Saddam take over Iraq. Clinton ignored al Qaeda - for his entire 8 years in office, and passed up on SEVERAL chances to get Binladen.It is fitting and proper that now BOTH OF THESE USELESS LEFT-WING ENEMY-APPEASING DOVES should trake the side of the those who would limit our freedoms. They are scum.
NOTE: I suspect that Clinton will be getting a lot of "donations" from his new Arab Muslim "friends" (today's Arab press is all over him with praise!) and I suspect that this is one MAJOR reason for his comments: Clinton is doing what he and his fellow travellers have always done - pander for money.
REMEMBER: FORMER FBI DIRECTOR LOUIS FREEH said that Clinton went all soft on the Saudi in 2000 because he was more concerned about getting a donation for his presidential library than in making foreign policy that was good for the USA and our allies.
More on this corrupt philandering perjurious piece of excrement's pandering to Arabs for money HERE and HERE.
More on France growing a spine HERE and HERE.
UPDATE-UPDATE: Well, the fwench have shown their true colors - YELLOW: They fired the editior who published the cartoons! BANGKOK POST:
The editor, Jacques LeFranc, had published the controversial material to demonstrate freedom of the press and solidarity with Danish editors, who printed 12 cartoons showing the Islamic prophet Mohammed in various comic poses.Do you think the owner is more fwench than he is Egypitan?! Might he be worried that his family members in Egypt (if he has any) might be in danger if he didn't fire the courageous editor? Dunno. I just know that we mustn't be intimidated into dhimmitude by the islamothugs.
The owner of France Soir, an Egyptian, Raymond Lakah, said he fired LeFranc to demonstrate "respect for the intimate beliefs of an individual" - apparently a reference to religious beliefs.
MUBARAK TOUGHER ON HAMAS THAN JIMMY CARTER
Meanwhile, Mubarak and leading figures in the Egyptian goverment are saying that HAMAS must FIRST renounce terrorism and accept israel's right to exist BEFORE being allowed to form a government.
Well, it's simple really: Mubarak doesn't want a "little Iran" on it's border - (and neither do Jordan or Lebanon).
If we want ANY CHANCE at getting Hamas to change, then we must present a united front on this issue - and then follow up with a boycott. Hamas must be confronted and defeated - NOT appeased.
Whuich is why appeasing jerks like Carter and Clinton - and now Wolfowitz - should keep their appeasing mouths shut!
WOLFOWITZ HAS GONE STARK RAVING MAD: SAYS WE SHOULD KEEP FUNDING THE PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT EVEN WITH HAMAS
The Palestinian Government should continue to receive international aid despite concerns over last week's election victory by Islamic militant group Hamas, World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz said in an interview today.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Mr Wolfowitz urged Russia, the European Union, the US and the United Nations to allow the bank to continue working in the region. The so-called Quartet of world powers has said Hamas must reject violence and recognise the right of Israel to exist or risk losing the aid.
"What we do now depends on what the Quartet asks us to do," Mr Wolfowitz told the British newspaper. "I hope they will ask us to stay." ... It will help the whole process if the life of the average Palestinian improves. We ought to be the last people to disengage."
The bank chairs the committee of donors for the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority is the biggest single employer in the those areas and relies on foreign aid to stay afloat. Last year, $802.4 million from the European Union and more than $264 million from the US.
I am so incredibly upset at Wolfowitz; this is unpardonable. We must present a united front to the enemy. I'd expect this kind of appeasement from Kofi or Chiraq or the Spainiards, but not Wolfie. Shame on him. Condi and Rummy and "W" should read him the RIOT ACT.
WHY.... IF WE GIVE HAMAS MONEY, THEN WE'D HAVE TO PUT OURSELVES ON OUR OWN TERRORIST LIST AS A STATE WHICH SUPPORTRS TERRORISM!
That's why Wolfie's suggestion is absolutely INSANE! A SANE nation doesn't send aid to it's sworn enemies. I really don't care one whit if the Palestanis suffer as a result. ELECTIONS COUNT! ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES! They've made their beds; now let them sleep in them.
Just because THEY'VE "elected" a bunch of out-and-out terrorists doesn't mean we have to change our policies regarding terrorists. NO! Now THEY have to accept the consequences of their choice!
Sheesh. (Full FT article HERE.)
UPDATE: ISRAEL GETS IT RIGHT:
In a potential blow to the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority, Israel said on Tuesday it might suspend monthly tax payments during a policy review after the victory of Hamas. This follows the call by four countries on Monday for Hamas to renounce violence against Israel to continue getting funding from them.We should put the same sanctions on HAMAS as we would on any genocidal regime - LIKE IRAN AND SYRIA AND NORTH KOREA AND ZIMBABWE. NO AID FOR TERRORISTS. PERIOD.
NEWSANCHOR INJURED IN IRAQ!!! TIME TO REDEPLOY ALL REPORTERS!!! UPDATED AND BUMPED UP: THE TROOPS AGREE WITH ME!
(SATIRE OFF.) First, I want to extend my condolences to the Woodruff anf Vogt families. I am praying for their swift and complete recovery.
Now.... here's the truth:
EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT ACCIDENTALLY ONE OF THE VICTIMS IN THIS ATTACK WAS A CELEBRITY, THERE IS NO NEWS-WORTHINESS IN THIS STORY.
The enemy hasn't surrendered and they continue to target soft targets: mosques; funerals; weddings; children getting candy; Iraqi police; Iraqi Army and and reporters riding in Iraq Army vehicles.
My sarcastic little pitch was only meant to further expose Murtha and his Leftie comrades, fellow appeasers, dupes, and doves who MISCONTRUE THE DATA (IOW: LIE) and advocate cutting and running. Cutting and running is a stupid policy and a worse strategy. Why does the Left advocate the wrong policy, a policy of premature withdrawal and appeasement!? THEY ALWAYS HAVE. They ran out on the South Vietnamese, they abandoned the CONTRAS, and they would do the same to the Iraqis - and the Israelis.
The best strategy is to destroy the enemy. That's how you win wars. The best strategy is to intercept all the sigint - NO MATTTER WHERE IT EMANATES FROM AND NO MATTER WHERE IT GOES.
The Leftie doves - and the Old Media and Democrat Party they control - would rather we purchased temporary truce at the price of eternal chains and everlasting shame. For that is all you ever really get when you give into blackmail and terror. The Left's denial of this fact is no different than their denial of the fact that socialism was not only a abject failure at providing the goods, but the single biggest cause of genocide in all of human history. We should no more listen to the Left now, then jump off a bridge. The Bolsheviks were wrong in 1917 and they are wrong now.
2/1/06 - UPDATE: THE TROOPS AGREE WITH ME! UPI/PAMELA HESS:
The American media stood up and took notice when an improvised explosive device grievously injured an ABC News crew Sunday. In Iraq, and throughout the military, there is sympathy and concern for anchor Bob Woodruff and cameraman Doug Vogt, but there is also this question:The troops are EXACTLY RIGHT: the Old Media care more about themselves than our troops our our cause. That's one big reason the Old Media is scum. And their ratings reflect the fact that patriotic Americans realize this!
"Why do you think this is such a huge story?" wrote an officer stationed in Baqubah, Iraq, Monday via e-mail. "It's a bit stunning to us over here how absolutely dominant the story is on every network and front page. I mean, you'd think we lost the entire 1st Marine Division or something. "There's a lot of grumbling from guys at all ranks about it. That's a really impolite and impolitic thing to say ... but it's what you would hear over here." ... "The point that is currently being made (is that) that press folks are more important than mere military folks," a senior military officer told UPI Tuesday.
