HOW WE CAN SUCCESSFULLY COUNTER ASYMMETRIC JIHADO-TERROR BY NON-NATION-STATE PLAYERS

MANY FOLKS WERE EXHAUSTED BY THE AFGHAN WAR AND THE IRAQ WAR AND THEREFORE HATE THE BUSH DOCTRINE AND ARE WEARY OF WAR AND LEERY OF PUTTING ANY BOOTS ON THE GROUND ANYWHERE.

BUT THE OBAMA DOCTRINE IS AN ABYSMAL FAILURE FOR THE FREE WORLD:

THE WORLD IS AFLAME WITH JIHADIST VIOLENCE FROM WEST AFRICA TO THE PHILIPPINES.

SYRIA AND IRAQ ARE COLLAPSING AND THREATENING OUR ALLIES JORDAN AND EGYPT AND ISRAEL.

OBAMA'S WAR AGAINST KADDAFY HAS MADE LIBYA A STATELESS COUNTRY AND DESTABILIZED NORTH AFRICA.

WE NEED TO CHANGE STRATEGY IF WE ARE TO SURVIVE.

Andy McCarthy suggests we return to the Bush Doctrine, with an addendum:

... the Bush Doctrine [...] remains the only [strategy] that has any chance of working . . . at least if we add a small but crucial addendum — one that should have been obvious enough back in 2001, and that hard lessons of history have now made inescapable. 

[...] The unadorned Bush Doctrine had two straightforward parts. First, because violent jihadists launch attacks against the United States when they have safe havens from which to plot and train, we must hunt down those terrorists wherever on earth they operate. Second, the nations of the world must be put to a choice: You are with us or you are with the terrorists. Period — no middle ground. If you are with the terrorists, you will be regarded, as they are regarded, as an enemy of the United States. 

[...]The Bush Doctrine ...  is the path to victory — if we get that one addendum right. It is this: Our enemies are not driven by American foreign policy, our friendship with Israel, our detention of jihadists at Gitmo, or the supposed “arrogance” our current president likes to apologize for. Those are all pretexts for aggression. Our enemies are driven by an ideology, Islamic supremacism, that is rooted in a classical interpretation of sharia — Islamic law. Islamic supremacism is rabidly anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-Semitic. It rejects the fundamental premise of our liberty: that people are free to govern themselves, rather than be ruled by a totalitarian legal code that suffocates liberty and brutally discriminates against non-Muslims and apostates. And sharia is an actual war on women — denying them equal rights under the law, subjecting them to unthinkable abuse, and reducing them in many ways to chattel. In the “you are with us or you are with the terrorists” view of national security, any Muslim nation, organization, or individual that adheres to Islamic supremacism is on the wrong side. Failing to come to terms with that brute fact is where the Bush Doctrine went awry. 

[...] But it does mean we should be using all our assets — not just military but intelligence, law-enforcement, financial, and diplomatic — to undermine regimes that support sharia supremacism. 

Cutting off that jihadist life-line is the path to victory — just as maintaining a strong military that is allowed to show it means business, that is not hamstrung by irresponsible rules of engagement, is the best way to ensure we won’t have to use it too often. In Iran, where sharia is the law of the land, they persecute non-Muslims and apostates just like ISIS does. In Saudi Arabia, where sharia is the law of the land, they behead their prisoners just like ISIS does. A candidate who cannot tell liberty’s friends from liberty’s enemies is not fit to be commander-in-chief.

I HAVE ARGUED THIS VERY THING FOR YEARS. 

I HAVE ESPECIALLY ARGUED THAT WE NEED TO TREAT SHARIA NATIONS WHICH CONDONE ISLAMO-MISOGYNY AS WE DID STATES WHICH TRADED IN SLAVES AND ALLOWED SLAVERY:

THESE NATIONS NEED TO BE UTTERLY SHUNNED BY THE FREE WORLD; BANNED FROM TRADE AND AL INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

BUT - IN MY OPINION - BECAUSE OUR ENEMIES 

1. ARE NOT ALL NATION-STATES, AND ARE 
2. NOT NECESSARILY CONNECTED BY ANYTHING MORE THAN A COMMITMENT TO THE HIDEOUS IDEOLOGY OF JIHADISM, AND
3. THE ATTACKS ARE OFTEN ASYMMETRIC - COSTING THE ENEMY VERY LITTLE AND COSTING US A LOT - 

WE NEED TO ADD MORE MORE ELEMENT: 

WE NEED TO ANNOUNCE THAT WHEN JIHADISTS FROM ANY JIHADIST GROUP LOCATED ANYWHERE ATTACK US OR OUR ALLIES ANYWHERE, THEN WE WILL RETALIATE ON ANY JIHADISTS ANYWHERE.

WE WASTE TOO MUCH TIME AND ENERGY TRYING TO CONNECT EACH ATTACK TO AN EXACT SET OF CONSPIRATORS AND TRYING TO PINPOINT A COUNTER-ATTACK ON ONLY THOSE CONSPIRATORS.

IN THE VAST SCHEME OF THINGS, IT REALLY MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IF, FOR EXAMPLE, THE CHARLIE HEDBO ATTACKS WERE PLANNED BY AQAP IN YEMEN OR ISIS IN SYRIA OR WERE LONE WOLVES ATTACKS CARRIED OUT BY SOCIOPATHS INSPIRED BY A VARIETY OF IMAMS ON THE INTERNET.

WHAT MATTERS IS THAT WE SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE THAT ATTACKS ON US AND OUR ALLIES WILL NOT BE TOLERATED, AND THAT WE WILL NOT BE BULLIED INTO SUBMISSION.

WHAT MATTERS IS THAT JIHADISTS AND WANNABE JIHADISTS LEARN THAT THEIR ATTACKS WILL NEVER SUCCEED AND WILL ONLY BRING THEM AND THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORS AND THEIR SPIRITUAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS DISPROPORTIONATE SUFFERING DEATH AND DEFEAT.

AND THAT MEANS THAT:

• AFTER AN JIHADIST TERROR ATTACK...
• ON US OR OUR ALLIES...
• WE WILL SPEEDILY COUNTER-ATTACK... 
• AGAINST THE MOST OPPORTUNE JIHADIST TARGET AVAILABLE... 
• WITH AS MUCH DISPROPORTIONATE FORCE AS POSSIBLE... 
• THAT YIELDS THE LEAST POSSIBLE COLLATERAL DAMAGE.

FOR EXAMPLE: AN ATTACK BY ISIS IN FRANCE MIGHT BE COUNTERED BY BOMBING A BOKO HARAM CAMP IN NIGERIA.

FOR EXAMPLE: AN ATTACK BY AQAP IN SINAI MIGHT BE COUNTERED BY BOMBING AN MILF CAMP IN MINDANAO, OR A TALIBAN CAMP IN AFGHANISTAN.

AND THIS REQUIRES NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND, JUST MISSILES AND DRONES LAUNCHED BY THE US NAVY, AIR FORCE AND MARINES.

A GLOBAL PROBLEM REQUIRES A GLOBAL RESPONSE.

WHEN WE RESPOND GLOBALLY WE SEND A MESSAGE TO ALL THE JIHADISTS - OF EVERY VARIETY - AND ALL THE NATIONS WHICH HARBOR THEM OR AID THEM.

WE ESSENTIALLY TELL THE ENEMY:

IF WE ARE NOT SAFE, THEN YOU ARE NOT SAFE.

NOT YOU AND NOT ANYONE LIKE YOU, IDEOLOGICALLY.

MIGHT A QUARANTINE OF ALL ISLAMIC NATIONS NOT FIGHTING JIHADISM MAKE ECONOMIC, MORAL, AND NATIONAL SECURITY SENSE?

ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY ISOLATING ISLAMIC NATIONS WHICH DON'T DO ENOUGH TO STOP ISLAMO-TERROR GROUPS - 

(OR WHICH TOLERATE ISLAMO-MISOGYNY, A FORM OF SLAVERY) -

WOULD PUT POWERFUL LEVERAGE ON THEM WHILE PROTECTING US.

THAT WOULD MEAN ENDING ALL TRADE WITH THEM AND BANNING THEM FROM ALL INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS - SUCH AS THE UN, THE IMF, THE WB THE ICC THE WTO, ETC.

AND ENDING ALL IMMIGRATION AND TOURISM WITH THEM.

THAT WOULD INCLUDE SAUDI ARABIA, TURKEY, IRAQ, IRAN, INDONESIA, MALAYSIA, YEMEN, ET AL.

NOT EGYPT OR JORDAN - WHICH ARE ACTIVELY FIGHTING AND KILING THE ENEMY AND TAKING STEPS TO END THE ENEMY'S EFFORTS AT POLITICAL POWER WITHIN THEIR OWN NATION.

IT'S PROBABLY A GOOD TIME TO DO THIS WITH OIL NOW 50% LOWER THIS YEAR THAN LAST YEAR.

MORE HERE.

MORE HERE, TOO.

ALSO, MORE HERE.

BIN LADEN, ZARQAWI, AHMADINEJAD, AND OTHER SO-CALLED "LEADERS" OF JIHADIST GROUPS ARE A DISTRACTION FROM CORE PROBLEM

MUCH HAS BEEN MADE OF LATE ABOUT HOW BJ CLINTON SAID - ON 9/10/01 - HE COULD HAVE KILLED BIN LADEN BUT DIDN'T.

MUCH HAS BEEN SAID ABOUT HOW OBAMA "GOT" BIN LADEN; "BIN LADEN IS DEAD AND GM IS ALIVE" BECAME A MANTRA OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.




AHMADINEJAD WAS VILIFIED BY MANY, AND MANY SEE HIS SUCCESSOR AS A PRESIDENT OF IRAN THE WEST CAN MAKE A DEAL WITH.

BUT IRAN IS NOT ANY EASIER TO DEAL WITH NOW THAT AHMADINEJAD IS GONE.

ALL THIS PERSONALIZATION OF THE CURRENT GLOBAL WAR IS A DISTRACTION FROM THE REAL CORE OF ENEMY'S POWER, AND THE REAL SOURCE OF THE THREAT WE FACE.

IT IS NOT A WHO; IT IS A WHAT.

IT MATTERS NOT WHO LEADS

• ISIS OR 
• IRAN OR 
• THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD OR 
• HAMAS OR 
• BOKO HARAM OR 
• AL SHABAB OR 
• AQAP  

OR ANY OF THE OTHER JIHADIST GROUPS.

WHAT INSPIRES JIHADISM IS NOT THE CHARISMA OF CURRENT LEADERS, BUT A FUNDAMENTALIST, LITERAL DEVOTION TO ISLAM AND A DESIRE TO EMULATE ISLAM'S "PROPHET".

AND THAT'S WHAT MUST BE ERADICATED IF WE ARE EVER TO WIN THIS 1400 YEAR OLD WAR.

KILLING BIN LADEN DID NOT DECREASE GLOBAL JIHADISM OR JIHADIST ATTACKS ONE BIT.

IN FACT, SINCE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE AND BEGAN HIS INCESSANT APPEASEMENT IF GLOBAL JIHAD JIHADIST ATTACKS HAVE STEADILY INCREASED.

WE NEED TO ATTACK JIHADISM, ISLAMO-MISOGYNY, AND ISLAMO-COLONIZATION AND ISLAMIFICATION EVERYWHERE USING EVERY TOOL: DIPLOMACY, SANCTIONS, AND WAR.

EVERY STRONGHOLD OF ISLAMISM SHOULD BE BOMBED TO SMITHEREENS: BOKO HARAM'S; ISIS'S; ALL OF THEM.

AND HERE IN THE WEST, THAT MEANS DEPORTING OR JAILING EVERY IMAM WHO CALLS FOR ESTABLISHING SHARIA AND ISLAM-ONLY NEIGHBORHOODS, AND A MORATORIUM OF MOSQUES IN THE WEST.

DEMOGRAPHICALLY SPEAKING, UNLESS THE WEST DOES THIS IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE EUROPE GOES THE WAY OF BYZANTIUM.

The conquest of Constantinople followed a seven-week siege
that had begun on Friday, 6 April 1453.

JUST SAYING...

CLIMATE ALARMISM IS HURTING THE WORLD'S POOR: THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS SCOOPS BJORN LOMBORG BY 8 YEARS

BJORN LOMBORG TODAY:

Britain’s environmentalists proudly announce that households have reduced their electricity consumption by almost 10 per cent since 2005.They seldom mention that this is helped by a 50 per cent increase in electricity prices, in part to pay for Britain increasing its share of renewables from 1.8 per cent to 4.6 per cent. Such a price increase of course hits the poorest hardest. As with many green taxes, it does so because it taxes a basic necessity that makes up a larger proportion of a small budget. Not surprisingly, higher energy prices mean the poor are forced to reduce their electricity consumption far more than the richest, who haven’t reduced their electricity consumption at all. 

Over the past five years, heating a home in the UK has become 63 per cent more expensive, while real wages have declined. Unsurprisingly, a greater number of poor households must spend more than 10 per cent of their income on energy, becoming what is known as energy poor. This category now covers some 17 per cent of all British households. 

Worse, because the elderly are typically poorer, energy poverty affects about a quarter of all households whose inhabitants are over 60. 

Deprived pensioners are spending their days riding heated buses to keep warm, while a third are leaving part of their homes cold. 

... Wealthy homeowners in Bavaria might feel good about installing inefficient solar panels on their roofs, but their lavish subsidies are essentially financed by poor tenants in the Ruhr paying higher electricity costs. 

Climate policies take an even larger toll on people in the developing world. Almost three billion people rely on burning twigs and dung to cook and keep warm. This causes indoor air pollution, at the cost of 4.3 million lives a year, and creates the world’s biggest environmental problem. Access to cheap and plentiful electricity is one of the most effective ways out of poverty — curtailing indoor air pollution and allowing refrigeration to keep food from spoiling (and people from starving). Cheap electricity charges computers that connect the poor to the world. It powers agriculture and businesses that provide jobs and economic growth. 

... In 1971, China derived 40 per cent of its energy from renewables. 

Since then, it has powered its incredible growth almost exclusively on heavily polluting coal, lifting a historic 680 million people out of poverty. Today, China gets a trifling 0.23 per cent of its energy from unreliable wind and solar. 

Yet most Westerners still want to focus on putting up more inefficient solar panels in the developing world. But this infatuation inflicts a real cost. A recent analysis from the Centre for Global Development shows that $10 billion invested in such renewables would help lift 20 million people in Africa out of poverty. It sounds impressive, until you learn that if this sum was spent on gas electrification it would lift 90 million people out of poverty. So in choosing to spend that $10 billion on renewables, we deliberately end up choosing to leave more than 70 million people in darkness and poverty. 

In the West, we take our supply of electricity for granted. After a century, we’ve forgotten that plentiful, affordable and dependable energy is the lifeblood of modern civilisation and prosperity. 

Discussions about saving the world seldom acknowledge the 1.3 billion people living without any electricity whatsoever. Their problems seem otherworldly to us — and we neglect the fact that the same sort of access to cheap electricity would substantially improve their lives. 

When it comes to helping the world’s poor, a topic like climate change seems to interest the West far more than such mundane matters as helping them power their houses.

TAB IN 2006:

 "man-made global-warming' - is merely a theoretical danger, one I am skeptical of because it is a FACT that the globe has had many MANY eras of warming and cooling, ALL before SUV's or man-made "greenhouse gases." 

And then there's this FACT: As CO2 levels increased from 1940-1970, global temperatures DECLINED; this is DISPOSITIVE PROOF; increases in atmospheric CO2 cannot cause global warming. In fact, many areas where we see OBVIOUS warming are places where the local conditions are the cause - like Kilimanjaro and the Arctic. 

People who are more worried about "man-made global warming:" are either DUPES or INSANE; most're victims of a deliberately provoked mass-hysteria perpetrated by politicians who literally and absolutely (and self-admittedly) want to enact laws which give government more control over the marketplace, if not the global economy, and who want to stultify the growth of trade and industrialization - the two economic engines which can actually best END worldwide poverty.

TAB IN OCTOBER 2009: 

WUWT: Thus, empirical data do not support the underlying premise that industrialization of today’s developed countries has caused net harm to developing countries. In fact, a major harm to developing countries seems to have resulted, in part from climate change policies instituted in industrialized countries. 

• WHAT THE THIRD WORLD NEEDS IS INDUSTRIALIZATION AND FREE MARKETS AND FREE TRADE - NOT HANDOUTS OR CARBON SWAPS.
• THE PEOPLE WHO RETARD THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF THE THIRD WORLD ARE THE LEADING CAUSE OF THIRD WORLD POVERTY AND MALNUTRITION AND SHORTER LIVE SPANS.
• WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? ARE THEY BIG CORPORATIONS? GREEDY CAPITALISTS? UNSCRUPULOUS CONSERVATIVES?
• NO, THEY'RE LIBERALS. LIBERALS WHO ADVOCATE THINGS LIKE PROTECTIONISM, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE GREEN ECONOMY.
• IN OTHER WORDS:
• TO MAKE THIRD WORLD POVERTY HISTORY WE NEED TO MAKE THE LEFT HISTORY.

TAB IN NOVEMBER 2009:

• Africa doesn't need us to build wind mill farms or solar arrays.
• Africa needs coal burning power plants and factories and sweat shops.
• What prevents this? Who prevents this?
• The Left - the Reds and the Greens.
• If you want to eliminate Third World Poverty you cannot do it with transfers of wealth or "impact-less/sustainable" development.
• Africans need to do there what the Chinese did in China.
• WHAT STOPS THEM?
• The Left - the Greens and the Reds.
• To make poverty history we need to make Leftism history - we need to demolish the Reds and the Greens.

TAB IN JUNE 2010:

PROOF: The leading cause of human suffering in the Third World is the Left

PROOF HERE.

THE THIRD WORLD NEEDS INDUSTRIALIZATION, FREE MARKETS AND FREE TRADE - NOT HANDOUTS OR CARBON SWAPS.

PEOPLE WHO PROMOTE HANDOUTS, A "SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY" AND CARBON SWAPS AND WHO OPPOSE GOOD OL' INDUSTRIALIZATION ARE ACTUALLY THE LEADING CAUSE OF THIRD WORLD POVERTY, MALNUTRITION AND SHORTER LIVE SPANS.

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?

ARE THEY BIG CORPORATIONS?

GREEDY CAPITALISTS?

UNSCRUPULOUS CONSERVATIVES?

NO, THEY'RE LIBERALS.

LIBERALS WHO ADVOCATE THINGS LIKE PROTECTIONISM, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE GREEN ECONOMY.

IN OTHER WORDS:

TO MAKE THIRD WORLD POVERTY HISTORY WE NEED TO MAKE THE LEFT HISTORY.

TAB IN FEBRUARY 2011:

According to the latest edition of Food Price Watch, the World Bank's food price index was up by 15% between October 2010 and January 2011, is 29% above its level a year earlier, and only 3% below its 2008 peak. 

Wheat prices have seen the most pronounced increases, doubling between June last year and January 2011, while maize prices were up 73%.

• THIS IS MOSTLY THE RESULT OF THE LEFT'S "GREEN ECONOMY" PROGRAMS: THEY RAISE THE PRICE OF ENERGY AND FERTILIZER AND TRANSPORTATION.
• IF WE WANT TO REDUCE POVERTY, THEN WE HAVE TO PUT THE KIBOSH ON ALL THE LEFT-WING POLICIES.

TAB IN JULY 2011:

The potential is huge, on the order of hundreds of billions of barrels of recoverable reserves,” said Michael C. Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research, a consulting firm, who is preparing a report on global shale oil.  

Similar fields in North Dakota and Texas are already beginning to gush oil. The techniques used to extract it include hydraulic fracturing, in which high-pressure fluids are used to break up shale rock to release the oil, and horizontal drilling, which allows drillers to tap thin layers of oil-filled shale that are sandwiched between layers of other rock. 

• PEAK OIL IS PART OF THE "GREEN ECONOMY" SCAM.
• DON'T BE DUPED BY CO2PHOBIA AND THE CALL FOR GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR RENEWABLES AND THEIR DEMAND FOR CARBON TAXES. 
• CO2 IS HARMLESS AT WORST, AND PROBABLY BENEFICIAL.
• SO-CALLED FOSSIL FUELS - INCLUDING COAL - WHICH CAN BE BURNED CLEANLY AND ONLY EMIT SOME CO2 ARE PERFECTLY HEALTHY AND GOOD FOR PLANT LIFE AND AGRICULTURE. 
• LEFT-WING GOVERNMENT SCHEMES TO LIMIT THEIR USE HURTS THE POOR AND THE THIRD WORLD THE MOST. 
• THAT'S WHY I HAVE LONG ARGUED THAT TO MAKE POVERTY HISTORY WE NEED TO MAKE THE LEFT HISTORY.

TAB IN SEPTEMBER 2011:

• N FACT, CO2PHOBIA HAS HURT THE THIRD WORLD AND INCREASED POVERTY BY SLOWING GLOBAL INDUSTRIALIZATION.
• THE QUICKEST AND SUREST WAY TO END THE GLOBAL RECESSION IS TO REPEAL ALL CO2PHOBIA LAWS AND FULLY EXPLOIT OUR NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES.
• THIS WILL BRING DOWN THE COST OF ENERGY AND LOWER FOOD PRICES AND THE PRICES OF GOODS GLOBALLY.
• THE LONGER WE WAIT, THE DEEPER WILL BE THEE RECESSION.
• BOTTOM-LINE:
• IF WE REALLY WANT TO END POVERTY, THEN WE HAVE TO END CO2PHOBIA.

TAB IN MAY 2012:

SATURDAY, MAY 05, 2012ONLY THREE THINGS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSISTENT GLOBAL POVERTY
THE THREE THINGS ARE:

• SOCIALISM
• ISLAMISM
• CLIMATE ALARMISM

1. SOCIALISM PREVENTS PEOPLE FROM FREELY PRODUCING AND CONSUMING WHAT THEY WANT, PUNISHES THE MOST PRODUCTIVE PEOPLE WHILE REWARDING SLOTH, AND PREDETERMINES OUTCOMES BY MAKING EVERYONE POORER. 

NO NATION HAS GOTTEN MORE PROSPEROUS BY REDISTRIBUTING ITS GDP OR CENTRALLY CONTROLLING GDP; THEY HAVE ALL GOTTEN POORER. EVERY SOCIALIST NATION THAT HAS TRANSITIONED TO FREER MARKETS HAS GOTTEN MORE PROSPEROUS. 

2. ISLAMISM IS A TOTALITARIAN PROGRAM WHICH SEEKS TO CENTRALLY CONTROL ALL BEHAVIOR AND LIMIT ALL INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVOR TO THOSE ACCEPTABLE TO SHARIA. AS A RESULT, NO ISLAMIC NATION HAS EVER INNOVATED ANYTHING; EVERY INNOVATION CREDITED BY DHIMMIS TO ISLAMIC CULTURE WERE IN FACT INNOVATIONS CREATED BY NON-MUSLIMS UNDER THEIR TYRANNICAL CONTROL. 

AS PEOPLE BECOME LESS FREE TO PRODUCE AND CONSUME WHAT THEY WANT, THEY PRODUCE AND CONSUME LESS, AND BECOME POORER AND LESS ABLE TO PRODUCE OR CONSUME ANYTHING. AFTER ALL, PROSPERITY IS A BY PRODUCT OF LIBERTY.

WITHOUT OIL - AND PERHAPS TOURISM, NO ISLAMIC NATION WOULD HAVE ANY GDP WORTH MENTIONING. 

NEARLY 3/4 OF A BILLION MUSLIMS LIVE UNDER GOVERNMENTS AND IN CULTURES WHICH ARE OVERTLY CONTROLLED BY ISLAM - AND AN EQUAL AMOUNT IS UNDER THREAT OF GLOBAL JIHAD.
UNTIL THEY NO LONGER LIVE UNDER OR ARE THREATENED BY THIS ANTI-LIBERTARIAN IDEOLOGY THEY WILL REMAIN IN ECONOMIC DISTRESS. 

3. CLIMATE ALARMISM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INFLATING THE COST OF ALL ENERGY AND RETARDING THE EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIALIZATION TO THE THIRD WORLD. 

EXPENSIVE ENERGY INFLATES THE COST OF EVERYTHING ELSE, AND THAT HURTS POOR WORKING CLASS PEOPLE AND IMPOVERISHED THIRD WORLD PEOPLE THE MOST. 

CLIMATE ALARMISM - OR CO2PHOBIA - IS BASED ON THE FALSE IDEA THAT MAN-MADE CO2 IS CAUSING ALARMING GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE. 

THREE INDISPUTABLE FACTS PROVE THAT AGW AKA "MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE" IS A FALSE IDEA:
(A) THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT THE CLIMATE CHANGE THAT HAS OCCURRED SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE THAT IS OUTSIDE THE PROVEN CLIMATE CHANGE THAT OCCURRED DURING THE PRE-INDUSTRIAL ERA OF OUR  HISTORICAL AGE OR THE PREHISTORICAL/GEOLOGICAL RECORD.
(B) CO2 HAS STEADILY INCREASED THE LAST 12 YEARS BUT GLOBAL TEMPERATURES HAVEN'T AND NEITHER HAS THE FREQUENCY OR INTENSITY OF STORMS OF ANY TYPE - TORNADOES, HURRICANES, TYPHOONS, OR BLIZZARDS.
(C) ALL DRAMATIC APPEARING CHANGES - FROM KILIMANJARO, TO THE HIMALAYAS, GREENLAND, THE ARCTIC AND THE ANTARCTIC - CAN BE MORE EASILY EXPLAINED BY APPEALING TO LOCAL INPUTS AND NOT GLOBAL ONES. 

THE CARBON-CONTROL SCHEMES DEVELOPED BY THE CLIMATE ALARMISTS HAVE NOT REDUCED MAN-MADE CO2 - NOT EVEN ONE-PART-PER-MILLION, BUT THEY HAVE IMPOVERISHED WORKING CLASS PEOPLE, SLOWED GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AND RETARDED INDUSTRIALIZATION OF THE THIRD WORLD WHILE ENRICHING MANY ALARMISTS AND THEIR CRONIES IN THE RULING CLASS. 

IMPOVERISHING PEOPLE AND DISTORTING MARKETS - WHILE BENEFITING ITS PROPONENTS - ARE THE ONLY THING THE CLIMATE ALARMISTS HAVE REALLY ACCOMPLISHED.
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO MAKE POVERTY HISTORY, THEN YOU SHOULD WORK TO MAKE SOCIALISM, ISLAMISM, AND CLIMATE ALARMISM HISTORY. 

UNTIL THESE THREE IDEOLOGIES ARE VANQUISHED POVERTY WILL PERSIST AND GROW.

TAB IN AUGUST 2012

The single most remediable economically repressive idea in the world today is CO2PHOBIA. 

Misogyny, islamism and leftism are as damaging, but they are more difficult to remediate. 

CO2phobia is the idea that too much man-made CO2 is toxic to the global ecology. 

This irrational fear has driven up the cost of ALL energy and expensive energy is a major factor in the current global recession - as it has been in all recent recessions...

Recessions closely follow bug run-ups and energy prices and these run-ups were usually caused by islamo-hegemony. 

Since the advent of KYOTO - as result of CO2phobia - the global economy has therefore been under attack of a double whammy.
That's why the global economy really  REALLY sucks. 

KYOTO AND 9/11, AND ITS AFTERMATH - (THE IRAQ WAR, THE IRANIAN NUKE PROGRAM, THE ARAB SPRING) - ARE WHAT'S DRIVEN ENERGY COSTS UP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH DOWN, DOWN, DOWN. 

And the irrational fear of CO2 is also preventing the Third World from becoming industrialized. Without industrialization the Third World will never have the economic engine they need to be able to create the prosperity they need to improve living standards and lifespans. 

... REPEAT: CO2phobia is the chief reason the world economy is in recession and the Third World is impoverished. 

If you want to make the recession and Third World poverty history, then you have to make CO2phobia history.

TAB IN MARCH 2013:

... THE CO2PHOBIC ALARMIST CAMP SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. 

BECAUSE THEIR POLICIES HAVE RAISED THE COST OF ENERGY GLOBALLY... 

... AND REDUCED THE AMOUNT OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT GLOBALLY, 

THE CLIMATE CHANGE COMPLEX - 

COMPRISED OF LEFT-WING ACADEMICS, REGULATION-LOVING BUREAUCRATS AND LIBERAL POLITICIANS WHO FAVOR SOCIALISTIC POLICIES - 

IS THE SECOND GREATEST THREAT TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION - RIGHT AFTER GLOBAL JIHAD. 

THOUGH THEY PROBABLY THINK OF THEMSELVES AS DO-GOODERS 

AND THOUGH THEY PROBABLY SEE THEIR DELIBERATE LIES AS ULTIMATELY FORGIVABLE (BECAUSE THEY SERVE "THE COMMON GOOD"), 

THE CLIMATE CHANGE COMPLEX IS ACTUALLY A REGRESSIVE FORCE: 

THE POLICES OF THE CO2PHOBIC CLIMATE CHANGE COMPLEX HAVE PREVENTED THE THIRD WORLD FROM DEVELOPING INDUSTRIALLY AND THIS IS KEEPING POOR PEOPLE POOR. 

IF WE WANT TO END GLOBAL POVERTY, THEN WE HAVE TO DEMOLISH THE CLIMATE CHANGE COMPLEX.

YOU CAN SEE THIS HAS BEEN A TOPIC OF MAJOR CONCERN AT TAB.

IT IS WONDERFUL THAT AN ECONOMIST OF INTERNATIONAL RENOWN IS NOW ARGUING THE SAME BASIC AND IMPORTANT POINT.

ENDING CLIMATE ALARMISM IS IN THE INTEREST OF ALL HUMANITY - ESPECIALLY THE POOREST AMONG US.

GUARANTEED NOT HALAL: HANSEL AND GRETEL'S GEMMA ATHERTON

BRITISH ACTRESS GEMMA ATHERTON STARS AS GRETEL IN THE UPDATED VERSION OF HANSEL AND GRETEL:

SHE WAS BORN WITH A CRUMPLED EAR AND EXTRA FINGERS.

SURGERY FIXED THEM.

AND SHE WAS RAISED BY A SINGLE MOTHER.

I SHUDDER TO THINK OF HOW SHE AND HER MOTHER MIGHT HAVE BEEN TREATED IN A NATION UNDER ISLAMISM.

SHE CERTAINLY WOULDN'T BE AN ACTRESS, AND PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE EVER HAD THE COSMETIC SURGERY SHE RECEIVED.

AND HER MOTHER WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ALLOWED O DIVORCE OR WORK.

ISLAMO-MISOGYNY DESTROYS MORE LIVES EACH YEAR THAN ISLAMO-TERROR.

WE SHOULD REALLY UNTIL TO PUT AN END TO IT.

IT HAS NO MORE A PLACE ON EARTH TODAY THEM SLAVERY - OF WHICH IT IS A SUB-FORM.

GUARANTEED NOT HALAL: ZERO DARK THIRTY'S JESSICA CHASTAIN

ISLAMO-MISOGYNY IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

GLOBAL IN SCALE. HORRIFIC IN ITS COST.

FEMALES IN ISLAMISM ARE CHATTEL  SUITABLE FOR RAPE, FORCED MARRIAGE, CHILD MARRIAGE, AND HONOR-KILLING.

IN THE WEST, WOMEN CAN BE CIA AGENTS, OR GORGEOUS TALENTED ACTRESSES AND ANYTHING IN BETWEEN.

OR BOTH, AS IN THE CASE OF THE GORGEOUS AND TALENTED JESSICA CHASTAIN: - THE STAR OF ZERO DARK THIRTY.

SHE PLAYS A CIA AGENT WHO PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN GETTING THE VICIOUS SOCIOPATHIC GENOCIDAL MANIAC AKA "DEVOUT ISLAMIST" OSAMA BIN LADEN.

FOR ACTING - AND JUST DRESSING AS SHE PLEASES - CHASTAIN WOULD BE ATTACKED WITH ACID OR RAPED AND MURDERED IN PLACES UNDER ISLAMIST CONTROL.

IF YOU THINK THAT'S BAD, THEN JOIN THE EFFORT TO DEFEAT GLOBAL ISLAMISM.

NEED A FEW MORE REASONS? HERE:

DENMARK ENACTS A GOOD ANTI- ISLAMO-MISOGYNY LAW

IT'S A START.

VIA CREEPING SHARIA WHO HAS A LOT MORE.

LEFTISTS WHO OPPOSE BULLYING IN SCHOOLS SHOULD ALSO OPPOSE ISLAMISM - EVEN MORE

JUST SAYING.

THE ANTI-BULLYING MOVEMENT IN THE USA HAS BEEN GROWING STEADILY.

PARTS OF THE ANTI-BULLYING CROWD ARE TOO PC - AND TOO FOCUSED ON LGBT, BUT IN PRINCIPLE IT'S FINE:

PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ATTACKED BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY ARE.

I THINK THE FOLKS WHO ARE EXPENDING GREAT EFFORTS ON THIS FRONT SHOULD BE EXPENDING THE SAME - IF NOT GREATER EFFORTS COMBATING ISLAMO-SUPREMACISM AND ISLAMO-MISOGYNY AND ANTI-LIBERTARIAN ISLAMISM.

BUT THE LEFT IS LARGELY SILENT ON THESE MATTERS.

THAT'S BECAUSE OF TWO THINGS:

ONE: THEY SHARE A COMMON ENEMY WITH THE ISLAMISTS (JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION) AND SO FEEL A COMMONALITY WHICH INHIBITS THEM.

TWO: THEY ARE COWARDS - THEY ARE THE TRUE ISLAMOPHOBES WHO ARE AFRAID OF THE ISLAMISTS AND ARE INTIMIDATED BY AND BULLIED BY ISLAMO-THUGGERY, AND THE SAVAGERY OF THE ISLAMISTS.

ONLY A FEW ON THE LEFT HAVE HAD THE COURAGE TO STAND UP TO THE ISLAMISTS: THE LATE CHRIS HITCHENS AND ALSO SALMON RUSHDIE, COME TO MIND.

HITCHENS WAS OSTRACIZED FOR IT.

RUSHDIE MARGINALIZED.

WHEN THE LEFT WAKES UP - AND EITHER REALIGNS ITSELF TO THE WEST, (OR - EVEN BETTER - ABANDONS LEFTISM), THEN WE WILL DEFEAT ISLAMO-SUPREMACISM.

THE ISLAMISTS NEED THE LEFT - TO OPERATE AS A FIST COLUMN - IN ORDER TO WIN.

THAT'S WHY I HAVE ALWAYS SAID:

TO DEFEAT GLOBAL JIHAD, WE NEED TO DEFEAT LEFTISM.

JORDANIANS TRAINING FOR PARALYMPICS IN NORTHERN IRELAND ARRESTED FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT

ISLAMO-MISOGYNY STRIKES AGAIN:

Two Jordanian Paralympic power-lifters and a trainer were granted bail Wednesday after being accused of sexual assault in Northern Ireland.
The three men were arrested Monday northwest of Belfast where Jordan’s squad is one of several national teams training before the Paralympic Games, which begin Aug. 29. 

Police said a 14-year-old girl claimed that she posed for photographs with Omar Sami Qaradhi, 31, before he groped her between the legs in the town center of Antrim on Aug. 18.That same day, a 16-year-old girl said she and a friend were walking along the river near the sports center where the men were training when they blocked their path. Police allege that one of the men pushed the girl towards Qaradhi, who wrapped his arm around her waist and tightened his grip before she ran away.

Qaradhi is facing three charges of sexual assault, two of which are against a child. He also is charged with one count of voyeurism after allegedly entering a women’s changing room at the local sports center.

THE KING OF JORDAN IS INTERVENING.

THIS IS HOW ISLAMISTS TREAT NON-MUSLIM WOMEN. AND WORSE.

(MORE - MUCH MORE - HERE.)

IF YOU DON'T THINK WOMEN SHOULD BE TREATED THIS WAY, THEN JOIN THE FIGHT AGAINST ISLAMIZATION OF THE WEST.

THE SINGLE MOST ECONOMICALLY DAMAGING IDEA IN THE WORLD IS CO2PHOBIA

The single most remediable economically repressive idea in the world today is CO2PHOBIA.

Misogyny, islamism and leftism are as damaging, but they are more difficult to remediate.

CO2phobia is the idea that too much man-made CO2 is toxic to the global ecology.

This irrational fear has driven up the cost of ALL energy and expensive energy is a major factor in the current global recession - as it has been in all recent recessions:

Recessions closely follow bug run-ups and energy prices and these run-ups were usually caused by islamo-hegemony.

Since the advent of KYOTO - as result of CO2phobia - the global economy has therefore been under attack of a double whammy. 

That's why the global economy really  REALLY sucks.

KYOTO AND 9/11, AND ITS AFTERMATH - (THE IRAQ WAR, THE IRANIAN NUKE PROGRAM, THE ARAB SPRING) - ARE WHAT'S DRIVEN ENERGY COSTS UP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH DOWN, DOWN, DOWN.

And the irrational fear of CO2 is also preventing the Third World from becoming industrialized. Without industrialization the Third World will never have the economic engine they need to be able to create the prosperity they need to improve living standards and lifespans.

The Third World also suffers from too much islamism and misogyny and leftism, but they are more difficult to eradicate than CO2phobia.

We could eliminate CO2phobia in a few weeks of deprogramming, just by exposing those afflicted with this condition to the facts, to the truth:

1. climate change is natural - and always has been; 
2. there is nothing about recent changes that is in any way different from previous changes, 
3. a warmer world is probably one better for human life.

Once freed from this irrational fear, industrialization - which is the only true type of sustainable economic development - can take root and the still impoverished parts of the third World can grow as India and China and SE Asia have.

As we did. As Europe did.

REPEAT: CO2phobia is the chief reason the world economy is in recession and the Third World is impoverished.

If you want to make the recession and Third World poverty history, then you have to make CO2phobia history.

We also need to defeat islamism abroad, and to do that we need to defeat the leftists at home.

Vote accordingly.

Vote Romney-Ryan.

GUARANTEED NOT HALAL: ICELAND'S BERGLIND ICEY

WIKI: 

There are currently no mosques in Iceland.... The Nordic country Iceland has 644 Muslims, 404 members of "The Association of Muslims in Iceland" and 274 members of "The Muslim Culter Center of Iceland" (as of 2011). This corresponds to 0.2% of the population of Iceland.

GOOD. THIS MEANS BERGLIN ICEY DOESN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ISLAMO-MISOGYNY AS MUCH AS WOMEN IN AFRICA OR ASIA OR EUROPE. YET.

SO SHE'S GUARANTEED NOT HALAL.

LET'S KEEP HER THAT WAY:

NYTIMES OP-ED CONFLATES INDIVIDUALISM WITH SELFISHNESS

ANDERSEN COMMITS A FALLACY HERE: "The Downside of Liberty"

HE WRITES: "... sometimes we have gone overboard indulging our propensities to self-gratification..." AS IF THERE CAN BE TOO MUCH LIBERTY.

HE IS WRONG.

THE PROBLEM IS NOT INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, BUT LIBERTY WITHOUT NATURAL LAW.

LIBERTY WITHOUT NATURAL LAW DEVOLVES INTO LIBERTINAGE.

WITHOUT NATURAL LAW, LIBERTY IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE THAT KNOWS NO END BUT THE ABYSS.

HE WRITES:

But then came the late 1960s, and over the next two decades American individualism was fully unleashed. A kind of tacit grand bargain was forged between the counterculture and the establishment, between the forever-young and the moneyed. 

Going forward, the youthful masses of every age would be permitted as never before to indulge their self-expressive and hedonistic impulses. But capitalists in return would be unshackled as well, free to indulge their own animal spirits with fewer and fewer fetters in the forms of regulation, taxes or social opprobrium.... “Do your own thing” is not so different than “every man for himself.” If it feels good, do it... Thanks to the ’60s, we are all shamelessly selfish.

BESIDES BEING WRONG, THIS GIVES RISE TO SEVERAL QUESTIONS:

• WHAT DID THEY BECOME UNSHACKLED FROM? 
• MERE "SELF-RESTRAINT"? 
• WHERE DOES SELF-RESTRAINT COME FROM? 
• WHAT MIGHT DEFINE ITS BOUNDS? 
• ARE THE LIMITS TO LIBERTY PERSONAL AND SUBJECTIVE? 
• IF SO, THEN IS THERE ANY BASIS FOR CRITIQUING THEM?
• ARE THE BOUNDS MERELY MECHANICAL, AS IN THE OLD SAYING, "ONE MAN'S RIGHT TO SWING HIS ARM ENDS WHERE THE NET MAN'S NOSE BEGINS"?

20TH CENTURY LEFTISTS SEEKING TO DESTROY WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND TO REPLACE IT WITH A TOTALITARIAN SOCIALISTIC STATE USED MORAL RELATIVISM TO TRY TO STRIP NATURAL LAW - AND G-D - OUT OF OUR CIVILIZATION IN ORDER TO CREATE A VACUUM THEY MIGHT FILL WITH MARXISM - AND THEY'VE SUCCEEDED WITH A LARGE PART OF OUR POPULATION.

ANDERSEN'S ANALYSIS IS ESSENTIALLY RELATIVISTIC: HE EQUATES THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT AND CALLS BOTH EQUALLY SELFISH.

HE IS WRONG. LEFTISTS ARE LIBERTINES, AND RIGHT-WINGERS ARE NOT.

LEFTISTS WANTED TO DESTROY MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY (BASIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF CIVILIZATION) IN THE 1960'S AND REPLACE THEM WITH FREE LOVE AND COMMUNES.

HAVING FAILED, THEY HAVE RECENTLY TURNED TO GAY MARRIAGE AND NOW MULTIPLE PARENTING.

LEFTISTS ARE ESSENTIALLY MORALLY RELATIVIST PEOPLE WHO DO WHAT IS RIGHT IN THEIR OWN EYES AND HAVE TURNED AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL, 3000 YEAR OLD, RELIGIOUS VALUES THAT ARE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WEST.

THEY ARE EITHER ATHEISTS WHO DON'T BELIEVE IN AN ETERNAL TRANSCENDENT G-D, OR PSEUDO-RELIGIOUS FOLKS WHO THINK THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO FASHION A G-D AND A RELIGION OUT OF WHATEVER VALUES THEY HOLD AT THE MOMENT - OR WHICH APPEAR IN EDITORIALS AT THE NYTIMES.

NOT ONLY DOES THIS LEAD TO WANTONLY BAD BEHAVIOR, BUT TO INTERNATIONAL STALEMATE:

WITHOUT A TRANSCENDENTALLY BASED MORAL CODE, THE ONLY BASIS FOR INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION IS CONSENSUS.

THIS IS WHY THEY OVERVALUE THE UN, AND WHY THE UN IS A USELESS ORGANIZATION THAT HAS PERMITTED SEVERAL GENOCIDAL WARS GO UN CONTESTED - IN RWANDA AND SYRIA FOR EXAMPLE - AND ALSO PERMITS HORRIBLE ISLAMO-MISOGYNY TO GO ON AND ON AND ON AND ON.

MORALLY RELATIVISTIC MORALITY IS NOT MORALITY AT ALL.

AND MORAL RELATIVISM IS WHY SOME PEOPLE TURN THEIR INNATE LIBERTY TO BAD ENDS.

THE PROBLEM ISN'T UNBRIDLED LIBERTY OR EVEN SELFISHNESS, BUT LIBERTY AND SELF-HOOD UN-TETHERED FROM G-D AND G-D'S LAW, NATURAL LAW.

WITHOUT THE GOD OF NATURE AND NATURAL LAW PEOPLE HAVE NO TRANSCENDENT AND ETERNAL COMPASS WITH WHICH TO HARNESS THEIR OWN DESIRES AND DREAMS AND INCLINATIONS.

AND PEOPLE DO WHAT IS RIGHT IN THEIR OWN EYES, AND THIS IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF EVIL.


ANOTHER TAKE ON MORAL RELATIVISM HERE.

2 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE "SWAMP" IN WHICH ISLAMO-TERRORISM GROWS

LIBERALS LIKE TO SAY THAT ISLAMO-TERROR IS THE RESULT OF POVERTY AND IGNORANCE; THAT THEY ARE THE "SWAMP" IN WHICH TERROR GROWS.

BULLSHIT.

HERE ARE TWO PHOTOGRAPHS THAT DEPICT THE REAL "SWAMP" IN WHICH ISLAMO-TERROR GROWS - FOR TERRORISTS ARE NOT BORN; THEY ARE  TRAINED, AND THEY ARE NOT MERELY TRAINED IN TERROR-CAMPS, OR IN MADRASSAS. THEY ARE FIRST TRAINED IN THE HOME:

FIRST: RITUAL CHILD ABUSE:

MORE ON ASHOURA HERE.

SECOND: RITUAL ISLAMO-MISOGYNY:

MORE ON ISLAMO-MISOGYNY HERE.

AND HERE'S PROOF THAT WHAT GLOBAL JIHAD IS ALL ABOUT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWS OR ISRAEL, OR NEOCONS, OR CAPITALISM, OR THE WEST:

MORE ON THE BUDDHAS OF BAMIYAN HERE.

IF WE REALLY WANT TO END GLOBAL JIHAD, THEN WE NEED TO END ISLAMO-CHILD ABUSE AND ISLAMO-MISOGYNY.

MUSLIMS WHO WANT TO END ISLAMO-TERROR - AND WHO WANT THE ISLAMO-TERRORISTS TO STOP BESMIRCHING AND DEMEANING THEIR RELIGION - SHOULD JOIN THIS EFFORT.

ISLAMISM CAUSING YOUNG IRAQI WOMEN TO COMMIT SUICIDE

THEY'D RATHER DIE THAN BE FORCED INTO MARRIAGES.

FORCED MARRIAGE IS ANTI-HUMAN AND VIOLATES THE UN'S DECLARATION OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS.

IT MUST BE BANNED AS SLAVERY WAS BANNED.

ISLAMO-MISOGYNY IS THE BIGGEST HUMAN RIGHTS PROBLEM IN THE WHOLE WORLD.

TODAY'S MUST READS:

• ISLAMO-MISOGYNY - THE REAL WAR ON WOMEN

• CO2PHOBIA IS WRECKING THE GLOBAL ECONOMY - (ALSO READ THIS, HERE)

• OBAMA'S CHOSEN CHAIRMAN OF THE JCOS IS PROTECTING THE JIHAD

• UNLESS WE CHANGE COURSE, THE GLOBAL ECONOMY IS HEADED FOR ANOTHER BIG RECESSION

• NY'S DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN ARE TRAITORS

9 MUSLIMS MEN CONVITCED OF 631 RAPES OF CHILDREN

ISLAM = ROR. LINK FIXED


THE SWAMP THAT BREEDS ISLAMO-TERROR IS THE ISLAMO-MISOGYNIST HOME: 


FAMILIES THAT BREED BOYS WHO BELIEVE IT'S GOOD TO MURDER THEIR OWN MOTHERS AND SISTERS TO RESTORE "FAMILY HONOR" ARE OF COURSE GOING TO GROW INTO MEN CAPABLE OF COMMITTING GENOCIDE AND MASS RAPE AGAINST PEOPLE THEY DEEM "INFIDELS".


THE END GLOBAL JIHAD WE HAVE TO END ISLAMO-MISOGYNY.


JUST AS WE ENDED SLAVERY.

GUARANTEED NOT HALAL: POLISH-AMERICAN JOANNA KRUPA

WE OWE THE POLES A GREAT DEAL - NOT JUST FOR CHOPIN AND POPE JP2 AND LECH WALESA, BUT JAN SOBIESKI - TO WHOM WE OWE A CHRISTIAN EUROPE:

John III Sobieski (Polish: Jan III Sobieski, Lithuanian: Jonas Sobieskis) (17 August 1629 – 17 June 1696) was one of the most notable monarchs of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, from 1674 until his death King of Poland andGrand Duke of Lithuania. Sobieski's 22-year-reign was marked by a period of the Commonwealth's stabilization, much needed after the turmoil of the Delugeand Khmelnytsky Uprising.^[1] Popular among his subjects, he was an able military commander, most famous for the victory over the Turks in the 1683Battle of Vienna.^[2] Following his victories over the Ottoman Empire, he was called by the Turks the "Lion of Lechistan" and held as the saviour of European Christendom by the pope.^[3]  

The Battle of Vienna (German: Schlacht am Kahlenberg, Polish: Bitwa pod Wiedniem or Odsiecz Wiedeńska, Turkish: İkinci Viyana Kuşatması,Ukrainian: Віденська відсіч / Viděns'ka Vidsič) took place on 11 and 12 September^[8] 1683 after Vienna had been besieged by the Ottoman Empirefor two months. It was a battle of the Holy Roman Empire in league with thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (Holy League) versus the Ottoman Empire and fiefdoms of the Ottoman Empire at the Kahlenberg mountain near Vienna. The battle marked the beginning of the political hegemony of the Habsburg dynasty in the Holy Roman Empire and Central Europe. 

The battle was won by the combined forces of the Holy Roman Empire and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The forces of the Holy Roman Empire were led by Ernst Rüdiger Graf von Starhemberg subordinate of Leopold I Habsburg, Holy Roman Emperor. Command of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as well as overall command, was held by the King of Poland,Jan III Sobieski.

The alliance fought the army of the Ottoman Empire and those of Ottoman fiefdoms commanded by Grand Vizier Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha. The siege itself began on 14 July 1683, by the Ottoman Empire army of approximately 150,000 men.^[9] The besieging force was composed of 60 ortas of Janissaries (12,000 men paper strength) with an observation army of c.70,000^[10] men watching the countryside. The decisive battle took place on 12 September, after the united relief army of approximately 80,000 men had arrived.

WERE IT NOT FOR POLES LIKE POPE JP2 AND LECH WALESA EUROPE MIGHT STILL BE UNDER SOVIET DOMINATION.

WERE IT NOT FOR JAN SOBIESKI, EUROPE MIGHT HAVE BEEN ISLAMIC FOR FOR CENTURIES BEFORE 9/11/01.

AND WOMEN LIKE JOANNA KRUPA - A POLISH-AMERICAN - MIGHT BE HAVE BEEN CONSIGNED TO SECOND-CLASS EXISTENCE UNDER A BURQA AND UNDER ISLAMO-MISOGYNISTIC SHARIA LAW.

WE MUST'NT EVER LET THAT HAPPEN.

I'LL LET KRUPA'S IMAGES PROVE WHY SHE IS AND MUST REMAIN GUARANTEED NOT HALAL:

MORE ON ISLAMO-MISOGYNY HERE.