"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Sunday, February 01, 2015

WHICH IS THE BEST TICKET: WALKER-BOLTON, WALKER-RICE, WALKER-GIULIANI,OR WALKER-COHEN?

WALKER LACKS A B.A., ANY MILITARY SERVICE - AND ANY DIRECT FOREIGN POLICY EXPERIENCE.

HE'S A PROVEN EXECUTIVE, MANAGER AND LEADER WITH A RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT, BUT THAT MIGHT NOT BE ENOUGH TO WIN - OR RUN AN EFFECTIVE WHITE HOUSE.

WALKER WOULD NEED AT LEAST AS MUCH HELP ON THE TICKET AS DUBYA DID.

DUBYA REACHED OUT TO CHENEY, WHO HAD THE DEFENSE AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE - AND GRAVITAS - BUSH LACKED.

THAT HELPED IN BOTH CAMPAIGNS AND GOVERNING.

WHO SHOULD WALKER CONSIDER?

WHO WILL HELP HIM MOST ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL AND IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
  • WALKER-BOLTON
  • WALKER-RICE
  • WALKER-GIULIANI
  • WALKER-COHEN
  • WALKER- MCCAIN
  • WALKER-GINGRICH


2 comments:

Pastorius said...

I very much like Rice, but I think Jindal would be an even better pick.

Reliapundit said...

i lie jindal. but he has zero foreign policy or military exerience. that walker needs that on his ticket is the premise of this post.