"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Friday, November 07, 2008

The big picture: America is no longer ruled by whites

The article below is written by the Chief Reporter for Britain's leading conservative newspaper. It addresses matters that U.S. commentators tend to slide over (out of political correctness) but which need mentioning, in my view. There have been many knowledgeable analyses of the demographics behind Obama's victory (e.g. by Karl Rove) but to me they seem unable to see the forest for the trees. The plain fact is that there is large population growth in segments of the population who are systematically hostile to the GOP and it is difficult to see a way around that. Will Obama be the first in a long line of Democrat Presidents?

The only hope -- and it is a good one -- is that the Donks will make such a huge mess of things in the next two to four years that many voters will vote for any alternative to them. That suggests to me that the GOP senators should make sparing use of the filibuster in the next two to four years. Let the Democrats have their own way on most things and just say "I told you so" when it all implodes (e.g. in huge unemployment). Let them hang themselves by their own stupidity.

President-Elect Obama attracted 43 per cent of the white vote, with 55 per cent backing John McCain. But because white voters make up an ever-decreasing percentage of the total, Mr Obama still achieved an overwhelming victory because he attracted 95 per cent of the black vote and two thirds of Hispanic and Asian voters. Black and ethnic minority voters accounted for 26 per cent of all votes cast in the election. As recently as 2000, they made up just 19 per cent of voters. At the current rate of change, white voters will be in the minority by 2042, and with black and ethnic minority voters traditionally voting Democrat, regardless of the candidate's skin colour, the Republicans are facing a long-term problem.

Mr Obama's campaign team said the Democrat had put together a "national coalition" of voters from all backgrounds. "We were able to overcome a lot of the things that a lot of people thought were insuperable barriers in our politics," his chief strategist, David Axelrod, said. Mr Obama may not have won over the majority of white voters but he still managed a larger slice of the white vote than any of his recent predecessors, including Bill Clinton. The President-Elect also increased the Democratic share of the vote in almost every other demographic sector. Male voters were split almost exactly down the middle between the two candidates, compared with 55 per cent voting Republican in 2004, and Mr Obama increased the Democratic share of the female vote from 51 per cent in 2004 to 56 per cent.

One of the biggest swings to the Democrats came among the youngest voters, with 66 per cent of 18-29 year old voters backing Mr Obama, compared with 54 per cent in the previous election. Mr Obama also picked up 69 per cent of first time voters, compared with just 53 per cent who voted for John Kerry in 2004. One in five of all first time voters were black. Dr Scott Blinder, Research Fellow in US Politics at Nuffield College, Oxford, said: "As well as the changes in the racial composition of the electorate, we have seen a significant shift in the youth vote towards the Democrats. "Obama has taken 69 per cent of first time voters, a significant increase on previous elections, and that might have long-term implications for the Republicans, as we are seeing a whole new generation of Democratic voters coming through.

More here

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of anti-Greenie news and commentary at GREENIE WATCH . Email me (John Ray) here

OLMERT'S 9TH QUIZZING BY POLICE

Ehud Olmert, still as disrespectful as ever, undergoes his ninth interrogation yet.

Eventually, he's going to go down for his crimes, and learn an important lesson.

Thursday, November 06, 2008

WHITE MARINE SERGEANT AND HIS BLACK WIFE TORTURED AND MURDERED BY 4 BLACK MARINES UNDER HIS COMMAND

A HORRIFIC, VICIOUS CRIME:
A Brooklyn-raised Marine sergeant and his new bride were tortured and killed execution-style in their California home - allegedly by four other Marines under his command.

... Sgt. Jan Pawel Pietrzak, who was raised in Bensonhurst, and his wife, Quiana, were found bound and gagged in the ransacked house, each shot in the head.

... Charged with murder and other crimes are Pvt. Emrys John, 18, of Maryland; Lance Cpl. Tyrone Miller, 20, of North Carolina; Pvt. Kevin Darnell Cox, 20, of Tennessee, and Pvt. Kesuan Sykes, 21, of California.

THE VICTIMS:



THE PERPS
:












WAS BLACK RACISM AGAINST WHITES AND MISCEGENATION THE REAL MOTIVE?

IF SO, WILL IT BECOME A ROUTINE PART OF OBAMA'S BRAVE NEW WORLD?

MILTON FRIEDMAN ON LIMITED GOVERNMENT

SEVEN PLEDGES FOR AMERICA

THERE MUST BE NO HONEYMOON FOR OBAMA.

THE GOP MUST OPPOSE OBAMA, PELOSI AND REID IN A CLEAR AND SIMPLE WAY WHICH ALL AMERICANS CAN UNDERSTAND.

THE GOP NEEDS TO MAKE A STAND IN CONGRESS, BY TAKING SIMPLE, CLEAR STAND ON KEY ISSUES.

HERE'S HOW: "OUR SEVEN PLEDGES FOR AMERICA":



"WE WILL VOTE NO ON ALL NEW TAXES."








"WE WILL VOTE NO ON ALL DEFENSE CUTS."








"WE WILL VOTE NO ON ALL OIL-DRILLING BANS."








"WE WILL VOTE NO ON ALL BILLS WITH EARMARKS OR PORK."







"WE WILL VOTE NO ON RETREAT FROM OUR ENEMIES."








"WE WILL VOTE NO ON ALL NEW GUN CONTROLS."








"WE WILL VOTE NO ON WEAKENING LAW ENFORCEMENT."






PASS IT ON...

UPDATE: POWER LINE HAS SIMILAR THOUGHTS REGARDING THE CENTRALITY OF A GOOD SIMPLE CONSISTENT CONSERVATIVE MESSAGE:
the Republicans' problem doesn't lie with their leadership, it lies in their inability in recent years to articulate conservative principles and apply them to legislation in a way that the American people find persuasive. To a great extent, their ability to do this was undermined by the fact that some Republicans were more interested in cementing their own popularity through spending increases. Being in the minority may well free Republicans to go back to taking principled, conservative stands on legislation.
I THINK THAT THESE SEVEN PLEDGES - OR SOMETHING LIKE THEM - ARE JUST THE TICKET.

PROOF OBAMA BOUGHT THE WHITE HOUSE - AND WHAT IT BODES...

THE DEMS USED TO ABHOR THE MIX OF MONEY AND POLITICS.

OBAMA'S DECISION TO REND ON HIS WON PROMISE AND LONGSTANDING DEMOCRAT PARTY POSITION ON PUBLIC FINANCING PROVES HE HAS NO PRINCIPLES AND IS A BAD OMEN.

HOW MUCH DID MONEY INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME?



WE REPORT; YOU DECIDE:


OBAMA OUTSPENT MCCAIN BY NEARLY 10-1 PER VOTE

DISGUSTING. I'D SAY IT WAS HYPOCRITICAL OF THE DEMS, EXCEPT MAYB E IT PORVES THAT THEY REALLY HAVE NO CORE PRINCIPLES.

ANYHOW...

THIS HYPOCRISY, OR LACK OF PRINCIPLES, IS WHY OBAMA WILL FAIL:

TO STEER THE SHIP OF STATE THROUGH UNCHARTED WATERS, DURING STORMY TIMES AND ROUGH SEAS, YOU NEED A COMPASS AND "AN INMOST CHART".
  • REAGAN HAD THIS - WHICH IS WHY HE WAS ABLE TO SUSTAIN HIS COURSE AFTER CUTTING TAXES WHEN THE INITIAL PERIOD WAS MET WITH AN INCREASE IN ECONOMIC HARDSHIP.
  • BUSH HAD THIS, TOO - WHICH IS WHY HE WAS ABLE TO SUSTAIN OUR NATION'S COURSE IN IRAQ WITH THE SURGE DESPITE THE FACT MANY PEOPLE WERE CONVINCED THE WAR WAS LOST AND DOUBTED IT WOULD WORK.
  • OBAMA EITHER HAS NO PRINCIPLES - OR IF HE DOES, THEN BY EXAMINING HIS LIFE, WE CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THEY ARE LEFTIST PRINCIPLES WHICH HAVE ALWAYS FAILED EVERY TIME THEY'VE EVER BEEN TRIED EVERYWHERE THEY'VE EVER BEEN TRIED.
THIS MEANS WE'RE IN FOR SOME ROUGH TIMES.

BETTER BRACE YOURSELVES...

DOMESTIC WIND TURBINES: 'A NET USER OF ELECTRICITY'

A fun email from Paul Biggs [p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk] below:


The October edition of Which? Magazine [in the UK] reported on domestic wind turbines in an article entitled 'Wind turbine blows cold.' Which? installed one in a house and monitored it from December 2007 to June 2008. The result was that it used more electricity than it generated. This is because the turbine includes an "inverter" that converts the energy into electricity to go into the mains, and the inverter needs power which it draws whether the wind is turning the turbine or not. If the 'greens' want to 'save the planet' with domestic wind turbines, then they will have to make sure that they live somewhere very windy. Given the energy used and costs involved in manufacturing, installing, maintaining, plus eventual decommissioning - there may not be anywhere that is windy enough!

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

McCain was too "moderate"

Excerpts from Ann Coulter below:

Last night was truly a historic occasion: For only the second time in her adult life, Michelle Obama was proud of her country! The big loser of this election is Colin Powell, whose last-minute endorsement of Obama put the Illinois senator over the top. Powell was probably at home last night, yelling at his TV, "Are you KIDDING me? That endorsement was sarcastic!"

The winner, of course, is Obama, who must be excited because now he can start hanging out in public with Bill Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright again. John McCain is a winner because he can resume buying more houses. And we're all winners because we will never again have to hear McCain say, "my friends."

After Bill Clinton won the 1992 presidential election, Hillary Clinton immediately announced that, henceforth, she would be known as "Hillary Rodham Clinton." So maybe Obama can now become B. Hussein Obama, his rightful name.

This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists. It turns out they're not racists - they're retards. Question: What exactly would one have to say to alienate Pennsylvanians? That Joe Paterno should retire? Apparently, Florida voters didn't mind Obama's palling around with Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, either. There must be a whole bunch of retired Pennsylvania Jews down there.

Republicans lost this presidential election, and I don't blame the messenger; I blame the message. How could Republicans go after B. Hussein Obama (as he is now known) on planning to bankrupt the coal companies when McCain supports the exact same cap and trade policies and earnestly believes in global warming?

How could we go after Obama for his illegal alien aunt and for supporting driver's licenses for illegal aliens when McCain fanatically pushed amnesty along with his good friend Teddy Kennedy? How could we go after Obama for Jeremiah Wright when McCain denounced any Republicans who did so? How could we go after Obama for planning to hike taxes on the "rich," when McCain was the only Republican to vote against both of Bush's tax cuts on the grounds that they were tax cuts for the rich?

And why should Republican activists slave away working for McCain when he has personally, viciously attacked: John O'Neill and the Swift Boat Veterans, National Right to Life director Doug Johnson, evangelical pastors Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, various conservative talk radio hosts, the Tennessee Republican Party and on and on and on?....

How many times do we have to run this experiment before Republican primary voters learn that "moderate," "independent," "maverick" Republicans never win, and right-wing Republicans never lose? Indeed, the only good thing about McCain is that he gave us a genuine conservative, Sarah Palin. He's like one of those insects that lives just long enough to reproduce so that the species can survive. That's why a lot of us are referring to Sarah as "The One" these days.

For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president. Starting tomorrow, if not sooner.

More here

***************************

A Mephistophelian look

I am following the Coulter advice above:



The above looks to me like Mephistopheles saying: "Now you've got it coming to you. You just wait and see"

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

PAPER DEFEATS ROCK


Reflections upon this historic election have employed the pendulum metaphor. This swing ( or wobble ) from left to right is a natural result of democracy- just as price fluctuations are the result of a free market. Another metaphor - which I borrow from a childrens game - Rock Paper Scissor - is perhaps more telling. John McCain was the Rock and Obama the Paper. John McCain represented values that are permanent and unchanging. Barack Obama was a blank page - undefined, flexible. His campaign was based on the creation of a brand accompanied by simple slogans: Change/Yes We Can. By maintaining his personal and political ambiguity Obama emerged as a concept who, williingly served by an uncritical mass media, was defined in the minds of his audience. You might ask -why didn't McCain employ a Scissor? I think the paper could have been cut into a thousand pieces but like starfish they would regenerate into the original ambiguous Obama brand.
What has Obama achieved and what will he do? The time for talk is over. Now his actions will tell. Soon he must govern and lead. I doubt he expects his charismatic talk alone will move the leaders of China, Russia, Iran, Syria or North Korea. His selection of Rahm Emanuel, and rumors he will be rewarding the Kennedy machine for their support, demonstrate that Obama and his team understand the political game in Washington and that they intend to play it full out.

FEAR NOT



Wednesday, November 05, 2008

BIGGEST POST-ELECTION STOCK CRASH IN HISTORY

President-elect Obama made more history today:
The stock market posted its biggest plunge following a presidential election as reports on jobs and service industries stoked concern the economy will worsen even as President-elect Barack Obama tries to stimulate growth.
Yeah, or maybe investors have figured out that more socialism isn't going to stimulate much of anything except more dependency.

THAT WAS FAST: BUYER'S REMORSE: STOCKS FALL BY BIGGEST AMOUNT IN ANY POST-ELECTION DAY - EVER!

VIA GLENN:
U.S. Stocks Post Biggest Post-Election Drop ...

Biggest Rally Erased

The market's decline came a day after the biggest presidential Election Day gain since the New York Stock Exchange first opened for trading on a voting day in 1984.

BRACE YOURSELVES: OBAMA'S BASIC POLICIES WILL MAKE THINGS WORSE - THEY ALWAYS HAVE, EVERYWHERE AND EVERY TIME THEY'VE EVER BEEN EMPLOYED...

A SEVEN POINT PLAN FOR AMERICA

THE GOP NEEDS TO TAKE A STAND IN CONGRESS.

A SIMPLE, CLEAR STAND ON THE KEY ISSUES.

HERE IS A SEVEN POINT PLAN FOR AMERICA:
  1. NO NEW TAXES
  2. NO DEFENSE CUTS
  3. NO OIL-DRILLING BANS
  4. NO EARMARKS
  5. NO RETREAT
  6. NO NEW GUN CONTROLS
  7. NO MORE LIBERAL JUDGES
THE GOP MUST OPPOSE OBAMA IN A CLEAR AND SIMPLE WAY WHICH ALL AMERICANS CAN UNDERSTAND.

THIS COVERS IT IN MY BOOK.

MORE SIMPLY THAN THE CONTRACT WITH AMERICA, TOO.

PASS IT ON.

GRAMSCI TRIUMPHANT!

Andrew C. McCarthy notes the leftward drift of youthful voters:
Preliminary indications are that the youth vote (ages 18-29) was way up: an increase of somewhere over 2.2 million (maybe way over) from 2004 (a year in which it was very high), and as much as 13% over 2000. The Left's dominance of the academy is now having a material impact on electoral politics. As we think about the future of conservatism, we ignore that at our peril. [Emphasis added.]
The "left's dominance of the academy" includes not only Ivy League institutions, large State universities, but also the teachers' colleges that prepare young people to promulgate the Teachings of Chairmen Chomsky, Zinn, and Ayers to elementary and high school students. This is the triumph of the Gramscian walk through the institutions of the West, weakening our culture from within.

There was never any chance for a Maoist peasant revolt in the 20th century West, and the Leninist vanguard of the working class has also faltered. But Gramsci's approach is still working. Gramsci was perhaps the most dangerous communist strategist of all.
Lenin held that culture was 'ancillary' to political objectives but for Gramsci it was fundamental to the attainment of power that cultural hegemony be achieved first.
It is no accident that self-avowed revolutionary communist and unrepentant would-be mass murderer Bill Ayers chose to follow up his underground career in terrorism with a career as an "educator," transforming America's schools from places where our history, our freedoms, and our technological know how are preserved, into places where our own children are indoctrinated into becoming the radical insurgents who will bring down their own country, and with it the rest of the free world.

McCarthy recommends study of Roger Kimball's book, Tenured Radicals. In addition to that resource, I'd like to add a note of praise to the often unheralded but surely vital work of David Horowitz, who has struggled against the radical corruption of the academy for years. Check out the resources at Front Page.

CHICAGO MACHINE TRIUMPHANT?

Maybe this is good news.
ABC News has learned that President-elect Obama has offered the White House chief of staff job to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill.
As Rosslyn Smith notes at American Thinker:
How interesting that the first name offered by our President elect who ran on the platform of hope and change is a veteran of the Clinton administration who has long been known to be Chicago mayor Richard Daley's eyes and ears in Washington, DC.
Thin gruel, but perhaps Barack Hussein Obama's inner Chicago machine hack will temper his lifelong apprenticeship to communists, radicals, racists, and jihadists.

ALREADY!

76 days before Barack Hussein Obama's inauguration, Israeli MK Eldad warns that his country is facing a nuclear Iran alone:

"Israel should prepare for a situation that (US president-elect) Barack Obama will try and pay for agreements for a withdrawal from Iraq with Israeli interests.

"Israel should know that from now on it is facing the Iranian nuclear threat on its own, because Obama wants to talk to Iran and has already accepted a nuclear Iran," he added.

The challenges about which Joe Biden warned are starting to accumulate . . .

RUSSIA UPS THE ANTE

It's happening already . . .
President Dmitry Medvedev says Russia will deploy missiles in its Baltic Sea territory in response to U.S. missile defense plans.
There will be more challenges to come . . .

(Hat tip: Insty.)

THE MEDIA WON

They created Obama. They could have destroyed him in a minute if they had wanted to. Instead they promoted him, covered for him and used anything they could to discredit his opponents.

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

ACERBIC DERB

John Derbyshire is probably right:
What won this election was the packaging skills of David Axelrod, the swooning complicity of the media, the ruthless opportunism of Barack Obama, and the unprincipled thuggishness of his supporters.
But so is Maggie Gallagher:
This vote [a sweep for pro-marriage amendments in California, Arizona, and Florida], like earlier votes in Wisconsin, Oregon, and Michigan, affirms that when it comes to marriage there is no such thing as a blue state or a red state. Americans support marriage as the union of husband and wife.
And so is Mark Levin:
It will be difficult to voice legitimate criticism of Obama and his policies if the response of his campaign and surrogates these last many months — some vicious and some perfectly fine — is any indication. I agree with Mark when he underscores the battle ahead. It is very serious.
On the other hand, I am not sure that Obama's victory really proves Mark Hemingway's assertion:
In so far as an Obama victory proves that America truly is a meritocracy where the arbitrary circumstances of your birth won't impede your success, that is a wonderful, wonderful thing.
Well, may the seriousness of the battle bring forth the best that we have. I should probably close with a stern quote from LOTR. Any suggestions?

IT'S TIME FOR NEW GOP LEADERSHIP IN THE CONGRESS

Out with McConnell and Boehner.

In with Demint and Cantor.

WE NEED CLARITY, FOCUS AN A CLEAR COMMITTMENT TO CONSERVATIVE VALUES AND CONSERVATIVE POLICIES.

AND DISCIPLINE.

The simple program:
  • NO CUTS TO DEFENSE.
  • KEEP DEPLOYING MISSILE DEFENSE.
  • NO EARMARKS; NO TAX INCREASES.
  • KEEPING SECRET BALLOTS IN ALL UNION VOTES.
  • NO TO KYOTO.
  • KEEP THE OCS OPEN FOR DRILLING AND OPEN ANWR.
  • NO TO ANY MORE GUN CONTROLS.
UPDATE: DERB GETS IT:
What did it all get us, those 8 years of pandering and spending?

If GWB had turned his face against new entitlements, closed the borders, deported the illegals, held the line on calls to loosen mortgage-lending standards, starved the Department of Education, and declined those invitations to mosque functions, would the GOP be in any worse shape now?


What won this election was the packaging skills of David Axelrod, the swooning complicity of the media, the ruthless opportunism of Barack Obama, and the unprincipled thuggishness of his supporters.

What lost this election was the cloth-eared cluelessness of George W. Bush, the timid squeamishness of John McCain, and the deep lack of interest in conservative principles among Republican primary voters
AND ANOTHER THING: WHAT ALSO AIDED THEM IMMENSELY WAS THE FACT THAT (1) OBAMA IS THE MOST ACCOMPLISHED LIAR OF ALL TIME; (2) WE HAD THE "PERFECTLY TIMED" CRASH OF '08, AND (3) A COMPLIANT MSM.

THE GOOD THING FOR TH USA: AS SOON AS HE IS SWORN IN, ALL NEWS WILL BE SPUN IN PRO-USA WAYS!

PREDICTION: THE ELECTION OF AMERICA'S "CLEMENT ATTLEE" WILL BRING ON "THE OBAMA INTIFADA"


We first posted on this parallel in July, and it has come to pass: THE USA ELECTED ITS ATTLEE.

WIKI ON ATTLEE:
The government he led put in place the post-war consensus, based upon the assumption that full employment would be maintained by Keynesian policies, and that a greatly enlarged system of social services would be created -- aspirations that had been outlined in the wartime Beveridge Report. Within this context, his government undertook the nationalisation of major industries and public utilities as well as the creation of the National Health Service. After initial Conservative opposition, this settlement was by and large accepted by all parties[2] until Margaret Thatcher became leader of the Conservative Party in the 1970s.
WHAT WE POSTED IN JULY 2008:
Tired of war, the British people thought they could atke a holiday from history - again, just as they had after WW1.

Just as we did after the collapse of the USSR.

And the people who want Obama to become POTUS and CiC are animated by the same misguided, irrational and anti-historical impulses.

And the desire to have the government do for them what they should do for themselves.

The British Welfare State - like ours and like welfare states everywhere - was a failure. It diminished Great Britain and led to increased suffering. It took 30 years and Thatcher to undo it's stranglehold and save Britain from collapse.

The USA and Great Britain don't need to replay the mistakes of the past and elect Attlees or Carters or Clintons.

We don't need to take another holiday from history - not with Iran and al Qaeda still threatening the free world.

We don't need to expand the welfare state. That would just drag down the entire economy, if not the world's economy.

We don't need another Clement Attlee.

We need Reagans and Thatchers.

The closest we'll come this election is McCain - who is more like Churchill than Attlee.


CLEMENT ATTLEE OBAMA -
a dove who wants to reinvigorate the welfare state
WELL... HERE WE GO AGAIN!

The socialistic policies of Attlee and Obama always have the same results.

The policy of appeasement always has the same results, too.

Socialism and appeasement will make the USA weaker and poorer - and this sends a clear signal to our adversaries.

Because weakness invites adventurism, there will be another intifada in Israel (their third), another in Europe - AND OUR FIRST IN THE USA.

THE OBAMA INTIFADA.

And Putin and Iran will become more aggressive in Venezuela.

And Putin will become more aggressive in Georgia and Ukraine.

And Iran will become more aggressive in Iraq.

And al Qaeda will become more aggressive in Pakistan and Kashmir.

And al Qaeda will attack us here again, too.

Obama will weaken our defenses by weakening our ability to gather intel by weakening the NSA Intercept Programs.

Obama will weaken us by ceasing deployment of Missile defense in Eastern Europe and Alaska.

And Obama will weaken us by cutting the defense budget.

TO AVOID THE CATASTROPHE OBAMA'S POLICIES WILL PRODUCE, WE MUST FIGHT OBAMA'S DANGEROUS POLICIES EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

WE SHALL.

MAY GOD CONTINUE TO BLESS AMERICA

What will Barack Obama's presidency be like?

That is the question.

Will it follow the outlines of his centrist campaign narrative?

Will it follow the shining radical path suggested by his associations with Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn, ACORN, the "New Party," and Rashid Al Khalidi?

Will it conform to his record as a knee-jerk liberal hack politician who never deviated from the line laid out by his Democratic leaders?

As almost all news analysts agreed over the past 72 hours, Obama is a cipher. Nobody claims to know what he really thinks, or what positions he will actually take.

Now that could be a dodge, a way of continuing to cover up his radical history.

But if it is true that the strongest elements in his personality are narcissism and a Quixotic quest to remedy the wounds of abandonment by his parents in early childhood, then we might see a "pragmatic" Obama who will throw the more radical elements of his Party's program under the same bus he threw every other impediment to his electoral success.

That is I think the best we can hope for,

Unfortunately, the Democrat Party in the Congress has very few conservative or moderate Democrats left, and it is as a party dominated by radical, leftist Statists who are acting out their own psychopathologies on the national stage.

Therefore, I suspect that we will see much of the radical agenda emerging not from sweeping policy initiatives of the Obama Administration, but from the Congress.

And if his past behavior in the Illinois Senate and the United States Senate is a predictor, Obama will be content to go along with whatever they present for his signature.

Look for a concerted push by Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of their gang of idiots to quickly pass the "card-check" end of secret ballots in union elections, a return to the "fairness doctrine" in order to get independent talk radio hosts off the air, a federal measure eliminating any and all State restrictions on abortion along with protections for infanticide, and a formal timetable for retreat from Iraq.

If they get those through, bolder measures will follow.

I would expect any attempt to cobble together a comprehensive "universal health care" plan to fail. It always does.

Tax hikes, on the other hand, are likely, with considerable damage to the economy in their wake. I expect unemployment to rise significantly. After all, the neo-socialist economies of Western Europe have unemployment rates in the range of 10-20%.

I doubt there will be an immediate push to discard, ignore, and subvert the Second Amendment. The likely course for that program will be the appointment of Marxist judges at all levels of the Federal judiciary. The tenor of their decisions will be used to strangle our rights more gradually but no less systematically for that matter.

Obama's election will not defuse the angry race-baiting of the Jeremiah Wrights, Al Sharptons, and Jesse Jacksons. On the contrary, John Conyers will press for the payment of reparations to black Americans, and he will undoubtedly step up a concerted attempt to try President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld for "war crimes," if not in an American or United Nations court, then before a congressional committee.

On the other hand, the foreign policy disasters will largely flow from the White House. The leftists in the State Department will feel unleashed, and Obama may feel that he can try for a few dramatic foreign gestures, coddling America's enemies and encouraging bolder moves on their part.

Retreat in Iraq would demoralize the United States Armed Forces the way retreat from Vietnam did in the seventies. God forbid that our brave Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines feel that their sacrifices were for nought, and the tremendous successes of the three wars they won in Iraq are tossed aside by a callous, callow administration.

Look for an Iranian nuclear test before the end of 2009, along with a renewed and intensified terror campaign against Israel. Obama has already secretly promised Mahmoud Abbas that he will favor the re-partition of Jerusalem, and Israeli leftists will go along with a retreat that might spark civil war in Israel. An increasing tempo of terror attacks in the Israeli capital is already gaining the jihadists control of the streets.

Any sign of weakness on Obama's part will dishearten our allies and encourage more Russian and Chinese adventurism. Look for Putin to press and provoke wherever he can, in Georgia, the Ukraine, and against the Baltic states. I would not be surprised if Chavez invited the Russians to install intercontinental nuclear missiles in Venezuela.

To the problems that already exist in the world, the Obama Administration and the Democrat Congress will add their own folly. That's why Thomas Sowell said that a McCain administration might be a disaster, but an Obama administration would be a catastrophe.

America will indeed need continual blessings from our Creator in order to thrive. May the damage be as minimal as possible until the electorate wakes up, and may that awakening come in 2010!

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

WHAT OBAMA'S ELECTION MEANS: TIME TO END AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

MANY OF MY LIB FRIENDS THOUGHT OBAMA COULD NEVER BE ELECTED: THAT ELECTING A BLACK PRESIDENT WAS IMPOSSIBLE.

BUT I THOUGHT WE COULD - CUZ I KNEW THE RIGHT-WING IN THE USA ISN'T RACIST.

I WUZ RIGHT DEY WUZ WRONG. BIGTIME.

NOW, EVERYONE SHOULD ACCEPT THAT OBAMA'S ELECTION MEANS RACISM IN THE USA IS DEAD.


GOOD.

NOW, LET'S END ALL AFFRIMATIVE ACTION, PLEASE.

WHAT OBAMA WILL DO FIRST IN THE FIRST 100 DAYS

  1. RAISE TAXES ON CAPITAL GAINS.
  2. ALLOW GAYS OPENLY THE MILITARY.
  3. RAISE TAXES ON EVERYONE MAKING MORE THAN $100K.
  4. CLOSE GITMO.
  5. RAISE TAXES ON CO2/CARBON.
  6. RETREAT FROM IRAQ.
  7. RAISE TAXES ON OIL COMPANIES.
  8. CLOSE THE OCS TO OIL EXPLORATION.
  9. RAISE TAXES ON PHARMACEUTICALS.
  10. SIGN KYOTO.
  11. RAISE TAXES BUSINESSES.
  12. SIDE WITH THE ARABS IN THE UNSC.
  13. RAISE TAXES.
  14. REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING.
  15. RAISE TAXES.
  16. CANCEL MISSILE DEFENSE.
  17. RAISE TAXES.
  18. BAN "ASSAULT" GUNS.
  19. RAISE TAXES.
  20. BAN SECRET BALLOTS FOR UNIONS.
  21. RAISE TAXES.
  22. BRING BACK PROTECTIONISM.
  23. RAISE TAXES.
  24. BRING BACK THE "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE".
  25. RAISE TAXES.
  26. INVITE CHAVEZ AND AHMADINEJAD AND ASSAD TO CAMP DAVID FOR A RETREAT WITH WRIGHT AND FARRAKHAN...
OKAY: THE LAST ONE IS A JOKE, BUT YOU GET THE IDEA...

THESE LEFTIST POLICIES WILL MAKE US WEAKER AND POORER AND LESS SECURE - AND OBAMA WILL BLAME BUSH AND DIG US IN EVEN DEEPER.

WE'D BETTER BRACE OURSELVES...

AND FIGHT ACCORDINGLY.

IT APPEARS THAT THE PENDULUM HAS SWUNG BACK TO THE LEFT - THE EXTREME LEFT...

That's the way it works: the right had it's way for a while and now it's the left;s turn.

TO BAD THEIR POLICIES HAVE FAILED EVERYWHERE THEY'VE EVER BEEN TRIED.

If Obama gets his way -- and only public outcry (such as defeated the Immigration Reform) can stop him -- America will be poorer, weaker, and less secure - and it will take us a decade or so to recover.

How sad. I feel sad for my country and for our allies. Especially Israel and Iraq.

But THANK GOD: for every Carter and Obama there's a Reagan.

Dubya was no Reagan: he presided over a HUGE boom in unnecessary spending because Dubya's compassionate Conservatism was really very centrist of not liberal thing.

Nevertheless, just because Dubya was a HAWK, they libs pilloried him non-stop for 7 years.

Bush and the GOP got blamed for LOSING IRAQ - EVEN THOUGH WE WON!

BUSH AND THE GOP GOT BLAMED FOR THE FINANCIAL CRISIS - EVEN THOUGH IT WAS CAUSED BY THE DEMOCRATS WHO PROTECTED FANNIE MAE.

Bush hurt the GOP because - like McCain - too much of a "gentleman": Dubya didn't fight back sufficiently on the Plame thing or the numerous national security leaks and the constant anti-war propaganda in general.

Bush also devoted too much "POLITICAL CAPITAL" to reforming social security. It was the wrong battle at the wrong time.

He should have fought the Democrats harder on Fannie Mae and on energy exploration.

Bush fatigue and the MSM-propaganda and the stock plunge AND BEING OUTSPENT 7-1 all hurt McCain, but I think that Mitt might have done better than McCain.

And the Fred we saw at the convention and since was better than the one who entered the primaries late and seemed half-hearted.

MITT AND FRED MIGHT HAVE CARRIED THE DAY. But they failed to stop McCain - though this was in no small measure because the early GOP primaries allowed crossover voting, and because the MSM wanted an Obama-McCain match up.

And Rudy sucked bigtime, too.

WHO WILL PICK UP THE PIECES?

Haley Barbour is a pro.

PALIN IS A STAR.

Romney is brilliant.

And the there's this guy named BOBBY JINDAL....

Ahhh... or oy....

We have remain steadfast to our principles and fight them tooth and nail.

And look forward to the mid-terms...

BTW: Will Reverend Wright lead the invocation at the inaugural or Farrakhan?

OBAMA MIGHT WIN, AFTER ALL...

  • THE NETS CALLED PA FOR OBAMA.
  • IF IT HOLDS UP, THEN IT'S PROBABLY OVER.
  • MCCAIN HAD AN UPHILL RACE:
  • THE MSM, THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THE STOCK PLUNGE, HIS REFUSAL TO USE WRIGHT OR INFANTICIDE, AND OBAMA OUTSPENDING HIM 7-1...
  • NOW IT'S TIME FOR US TO BE IN THE OPPOSITION.
  • WE HAVE NOBODY IN THE WHITE HOUSE OR THE CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP TO DEFEND ANYMORE - AND THAT'S A RELIEF.
  • I FOR ONE WILL NOT LET THE SOCIALISTS TAKE OVER WITHOUT A KNOCKDOWN DRAG OUT BRAWL.
  • IF YOU THOUGHT MICHAEL MOORE AND THE KOSSACKS WERE DERANGED, THEN YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET.

THE PSYCHOPATHIC NARCISSIST

The indefatigable Ali Sina analyzes Obama's narcissism at Faith Freedom.

It isn't too late.

If you haven't voted already, then --

Read. The. Whole. Thing. Now.


-- and vote accordingly.

(Thanks to reader Paul who linked to this article in a comment to my post on Obama's Sturmabteilung, below.)

AND NOT SO GOOD

There are reports of voter intimidation and harassment of Republican poll watchers in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut. Evidently the Democrats themselves are not quite as sure of an Obama victory as they would like you to think . . .

SO FAR, SO GOOD

For those of us who are following this election closely, the following links might be of interest:

Sean Malstrom has a thorough analysis. He has noticed that neither the McCain nor the Obama campaigns seem to think that the publicly available polls have any validity. Remember that nearly all of the predictions you see, and also the results of the legal betting sites, are based on those polls. And it has been shown repeatedly that the publicly available polls exhibit significant methodological deficiencies.

Paul Marston is predicting a landslide for McCain-Palin! The major factor in his analysis is that the disaffected Hillary Clinton voters (the PUMAs) are ignored by all of the polls, and that the defection of so many Democrat voters is historically unprecedented. He is an experienced political analyst, and he gives detailed figures to back up his perceptions.

By all accounts, voter turnout is extraordinary -- everywhere. On balance, I think that is a plus for McCain. His voters are likely under-represented in the polling data.

SONDRAK HACKED?

One of my favorite, funny group blogs, "Knowledge Is Power," at sondrak.com might have been hacked.

When you try to go to sondrak.com, you get connactivity.com, which asks you to redirect to the Longwater Development Corporation, which seems to be an ISP/web development outfit in Massachusetts.

I wonder what's up.

UPDATE: (At 4:34 PM EST.) Whatever it was, it's fixed now. Go visit!

Exit poll warning

We all remember how far off the exit polls were in 2004. But we don't recall how far off some of the leaked exit poll results were in 2006. In the races were expected blowouts - Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island - the exit polls were pretty accurate. But on some of the close ones - the ones where race-watchers want reliable data the most - they managed to botch it pretty badly.

Virginia Exit Poll Result: D: 52 R: 47. Actual result: Webb 49.59 percent, Allen 49.2 percent. The exit poll margin was 5 percent; the actual margin was less than one percent.

Montana Exit Poll Result: D: 53 R: 46. Actual result: Tester 49.16, Burns 48.29. The exit poll margin was 7 percent; the actual margin was less than one percent.

Arizona Exit Poll Result: R: 50 D: 46. Actual result: Kyl 53, Pederson 44. The exit poll margin was 2 percent, the actual margin was 9 percent.

Because they correctly predicted the ultimate winner, no one remembers these poll results as being egregiously off-base. But a few thousand votes here and there, and they would have had the wrong winner in Virginia and Montana. And you notice which direction these results skew.

Source

NOTE: Suitably Flip and Jim Geraghty have been looking closely at the public opinion polls and predict a McCain win.

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

OBAMA VERSUS MCCAIN EQUALS DAVID DINKINS VERSUS RUDY GIULIANI

  • DINKINS WAS AN AMIABLE LIB WHO RUINED THE CITY.
  • RUDY IS THE TOUGH GUY WHO SAVED IT.
  • NOW, AMERICA HAS A SIMILAR CHOICE.
  • IF AMERICA CHOOSES OBAMA, IT WILL SINK THE USA AS SURELY AS DINKINS SUNK NYC.

WHY THE 2008 ELECTION IS EVEN CLOSE...

1 - THE MSM IS WORTH 10%
2 - THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM MELTDOWN - CAUSED BY THE DEMOCRATS WHO PROTECTED FANNIE MAE FROM GOP REGULATION - IS BEING BLAMED ON THE PARTY IN POWER IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
3 - GOOD NEWS FROM IRAQ ISN'T BEING REPORTED - AND HASN'T BEEN FOR A YEAR.
4 - THE BAD NEWS/TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA ISN'T BEING REPORTED
5 - MANY JEWS THINK VOTING DEMOCRAT IS THE 11TH COMMANDMENT - ESPECIALLY THE SECULAR JEWS.
6 - OBAMA IS TALLER, AND SPEAKS BETTER THAN MCCAIN.
7 - OBAMA IS OUTSPENDING MCCAIN BY 7-1.

NEVERTHELESS, MCCAIN - A GENUINE HERO WITH A REAL RECORD OF BI-PARTISAN ACCOMPLISHMENT - WILL WIN.
  • IN A FAIR AND HONEST WORLD MCCAIN WOULD WIN IN A LANDSLIDE.
  • AMERICA MUSTN'T ELECT A MAN FARRAKHAN, WRIGHT, AYERS, KHALIDI, HAMAS, HIZBALLAH. IRAN. PUTIN. AND CHAVEZ PREFER.
  • NO SANE PERSON CAN DOUBT THAT THESE SCUMBAGS DON'T HAVE AMERICAN INTERESTS AT HEART.
  • THEY HATE AMERIKKKA.
  • AND WANT AMERIKKKA DAMNED.
  • WITH OBAMA AS POTUS.... WE SHALL BE.
PLEASE GOD FORBID.

NOW PRAY - AND THEN GET OUT AND VOTE MCCAIN!

OBAMA'S STURMABTEILUNG

The blogosphere discussion of Obama's proposed "civilian defense force" has obscured the simple fact that this corps would be Obama's Sturmabteilung. Watch to see how gang bangers are recruited into it, and how it will "clear the streets" of any opposition to the Obamessiah's programs.I'd be surprised if he doesn't move to arm his own corps, in case he needs to use them against the Armed Forces, whose members are voting about 80% for McCain, and who will not likely approve of Obama's cut&run surrender and appeasement of any and all of America's enemies.

Obama already owns the media, and by using the "fairness doctirne" to eliminate talk radio, there will be no public voice to oppose him. Watch to see how he moves to choke the blogosphere and the internet, in the guise of eliminating "hate speech."

This day may well be the last free (albeit stolen) election in the history of the United States.

OBAMA SOLICITED ILLEGAL FOREIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

Over at Pajamas Media, John Rosenthal quotes Kenneth Timmerman and uncovers evidence in Italy's Corrierre Della Sera, that the Obama campaing actively solicited illegal foreign money, deliberately asking for small contributions that could be hidden by its web-based system:
In the meanwhile, Timmerman has calculated that over $6 million in contributions to the Obama campaign from identified sources were made in non-rounded dollar amounts: such as $223.88, $388.67, and $876.09. This odd anomaly suggests that the dollar amounts were converted from foreign currencies. The donors in question gave a total of over $30 million. Timmerman speculates that roughly the same amount of non-itemized contributions from unidentified donors may have come from foreign sources. Of course, if foreign sources were being specifically targeted for “small” contributions, in order to circumvent the disclosure requirements, this could well be a conservative estimate. Timmerman’s calculations, moreover, do not include the Obama campaign’s record haul of $150 million in contributions for September, nor, of course, do they include the as yet unavailable figures for October.
A special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the Obama campaign and apply the RICO laws.

WHY DOES OBAMA HATE AMERICA?

Over at NRO, Andrew McCarthy & Claudia Rosett show how it is that a major party's candidate for President came to hate the United States he aspires to lead down the primrose path to ruin:
The United States gave the Obamas privileged educational opportunities. At America’s top colleges, they were steeped in Leftist radicalism. As they came of age, they thought nothing of exposing their children to an ideology that paints their country as racist, rife with injustice, and in need of drastic, fundamental change. And why should we expect otherwise? It is what they believe.

It is also the way things are done in the circle of friends they developed during years of living in Hyde Park — friends like Rashid and Mona Khalidi, and Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.
They live their lives in a Cloud Cuckoo Land of deranged leftist posturing. Their friend Khalidi, erstwhile PLO spokesman in Beirut, is also a complete phony. And notice how it was the New Duranty Times that burnished Khalidi's phony "credentials":
Two New York Times obituaries, one published when his father, Ismail, died in 1968, and the other when his more famous uncle, Hussein, died in 1962, paint a portrait of Rashid Khalidi as Palestinian royalty — albeit with elusive Palestinian roots. Ismail Khalidi was actually a Saudi citizen, educated in American schools in Lebanon and in the U.S. — including at Columbia, his son Rashid’s current pulpit, where the elder Khalidi got his doctorate in 1955.
So it turns out that Rashid Khalidi’s claim to Palestinian heritage is derived not from the struggle but from antiquity. He was born not among the impoverished masses of Gaza or the West Bank but into a life of privilege in New York City. The Times reports that the Khalidis claim they are descended from Khalid Ibn Walid, “who defeated the Byzantine armies at the battle of the Yarmuk River in 634 that opened the way for the Arab conquest of the Middle East, North Africa and Spain” — making the family, the Times tells us, “one of Palestine’s oldest and most influential.”
Khalidi, like Ayers and Dohrn, was part of the Obamas' family circle. In summary:
Why would Barack and Michelle Obama expose their children to Rev. Wright’s America-hating spew? Because in the circle from which Obama hails, that spew isn’t considered spew. It’s considered truth, and it gets passed along from generation to generation.
Read. The. Whole. Thing. Now.

And consider what a disaster it would be if such America-hating ideology gains a foothold in the White House.

Vote accordingly.

STATE BOARD EXONERATES GOVERNOR PALIN

The "troopergate" scandal that the drive-by media attempted to gin up on behalf of their chosen candidate never did get much traction outside of the leftist lunatic fringe and those it has enthralled with its drooling drivel, but it's over now, anyway.

The Alaska state personnel board has completely exonerated Governor Palin. As reported by the AP in the New Duranty Times:
Gov. Sarah Palin violated no ethics laws when she fired her public safety commissioner, the state personnel board concluded in a report released Monday. ''There is no probable cause to believe that the governor, or any other state official, violated the Alaska Executive Ethics Act in connection with these matters,'' the report says.
After all, do you think that even one of the 50 Governors would think he or she was getting out of line to question the employment of a State trooper who tasered a child, was driving drunk on the job, and took big game out of season? Wouldn't that just be normal, responsible oversight?

And Governor Palin's reassignment of State Safety Commissioner had nothing to do with that, anyway.

If President McCain decides not to run again in 2012, I think a Palin-Jindal ticket is looking pretty good.

Monday, November 03, 2008

LAST ELECTION AT AROUND THIS JUNCTURE: ZOGBY HAD KERRY LEADING IN THE DECIDED COLUMN AND GAVE HIM 2/3RDS OF THE BATTLEGROUND STATES

ZOGBY AND MOST POLLSTERS WERE WRONG IN 2004; (ZOGBY PREDICTED AT LEAST 311 FOR KERRY).

THE POLLSTERS ARE MOSTLY WRONG NOW.
  • THE UNDECIDEDS ARE MOSTLY WHITE AND MOSTLY INDEPENDENTS AND THEY WILL BREAK FOR MCCAIN - BIGTIME.
  • MCCAIN IS GETTING A HIGHER % OF THE GOP THAN OBAMA IS OF THE DEMOCRATS.
  • AND MCCAIN IS GETTING MORE DEMOCRATS THEN OBAMA IS GETTING GOP.
THE GOP IS ENERGIZED - BY PALIN AND... OBAMA! 

THE GOP HATES OBAMA MORE THAT THEY HATED HILLARY.

ZOGBY PREDICTED THAT OHIO AND FLORIDA AND IOWA WOULD BE RED. MUCH LIKE THE POLSTERS DO NOW.


AND HOLD VIRGINIA.

AND HOLD GEORGIA.

AND HOLD NORTH CAROLINA.

AND WIN.

HOW THE "RUST BELT" GOT RUSTY

Shannon Love posted an excellent analysis at ChicagoBoyz.

He asks, "Why isn't Detroit a paradise?"

One really has to ask the obvious question: If Obama’s economic policies work so well, why isn’t Detroit a paradise?

In 1950, America produced 51% of the GNP for the entire world. Of that production, roughly 70% took place in the eight states surrounding the Great Lakes: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York.

The productive capability of this small area of earth staggers the imagination. Virtually everything that rebuilt the industrial bases of Europe and Japan came from those eight states. Cars, planes, electronics, machine tools, consumer goods, generators, concrete - any conceivable item manufactured by industrial humanity poured out this tiny region and enriched the world. The region shone with widespread prosperity. People migrated from the South and West to work in these Herculean engines of industry.

So what happened?

It's simple, really.

Yet, a mere 30 years later, by 1980, we called that area the “rustbelt” and it became synonymous with joblessness, collapsing cities, high crime, failing schools and general hopelessness.

What the hell happened?

Obama happened.

Of course, not Obama personally but rather the same ideas that Obama espouses. What those ideas did to the Great Lakes states, they can do to the entire country.

Shannon Love identifies the specific policy problems as the unions' stranglehold and invasive, nanny-state government interventions.

Read. The. Whole Thing. Now.

The thing is, applying these failed socialistic policies nationwide could turn the entire United States into a "rust belt," and if the economic engine engine of the American economy fails, tens of millions of people around the world will literally starve.

The election of Obama would consign the world's poor to misery and starvation.

If that's not what you want, vote accordingly.

A COLD AND RUTHLESS NARCISSIST








Listen to the voice of a cold and ruthless, narcissistic psychopath:


Listen to how calmly and coldly he announces his intention of bankrupting the coal industry.

And then listen to him claim that bankrupting the coal industry will generate billions of dollars for alternative energy programs.

And if you think the cold, ruthless voice of the narcissistic psychopath is disturbing, just watch him in action:



Don't like what you hear? Don't like what you see?

Like the man says, vote accordingly.

YOU CAN'T AFFORD AN OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."

Hat tip: Hot air.

IF THIS IS HOW OBAMA TAKES CARE OF HIS OWN FAMILY . . .

Here's a thoughtful presentation from an outfit called "SoundtheAlarmNow:"



Hat tip: Gateway.

OBAMA'S DEEP TIES TO FARRAKHAN

As we get closer and closer to the election, more bits and pieces about Barack [middle name redacted] Obama are leaking out. Today, Kenneth Timmerman reports on Obama's close ties to Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan:
A former top deputy to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan tells Newsmax that Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep, and that for many years the two men have had “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries.
Farrakhan is more plain-spoken than Obama:
Farrakhan has called Jews “bloodsuckers,” “satanic” and accused them of running the slave trade. He has labeled gays as “degenerates.” In a 2006 speech, the ADL again condemned Farrakhan when he said: “These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood that is seeding the American people and the people of the world and bringing you down in moral strength. … It's the wicked Jews the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality. It's wicked Jews, false Jews that make it a crime for you to preach the word of God, then they call you homophobic!"
But Obama evidently shares more of Farrakhan's views than he would like his Jewish followers to believe:
Obama was careful to “denounce” Farrakhan’s comments – but not the man -- during the Democratic primary season earlier this year, but only after Hillary Clinton called him out for benefiting from Farrakhan’s support.
And don't forget:
Farrakhan endorsed Obama in a videotaped speech to his followers at Mosque Miryam in Chicago in February. “You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth,” Farrakhan said.
What flavor Kool Aid do you think those Jews for Obama were drinking?

Say Goodbye to America

Excerpt:

No matter who wins Tuesday America is going to be a different country. When the sun rises on November 5, regardless of who the president-elect is, a more un-United States than has existed since the Civil War will wake to dispute the results of the disgusting campaign that has mercifully come to an end.

Whoever the losers, they will believe they were cheated, and will point fingers at those they believe responsible. Almost half the nation will view the winner as illegitimate, and will do everything in their power to undermine his authority as long as he's in the White House. With this animosity will come a new level of hatred between those of differing political persuasions like nothing our country has experienced in the modern era. Putting it bluntly, and without sounding too much like Rev. Jeremiah "G-d Damn America" Wright, there will be no such thing as Americans anymore.

Instead, there'll be Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives, and encounters between the members of these groups will for years nay decades be at best unfriendly, and at worst quite hostile if not downright violent.

Think this an overstatement? Consider first what Wednesday will look like if John McCain pulls off the upset. To begin with, let's be very clear about one thing: Democrats believe that if they lose an election it's because their opponent cheated. It's never their fault. It's never because they ran a poor campaign. It's never because their opponent ran a better one. Heck no! It's always about voter fraud, disenfranchisement, not enough ballots, faulty machinery, hanging chads, negative advertising, intimidation tactics, campaign finance abuses, you name it.

Such is the legacy of Al Sore Loser Gore: regardless of how many news outlets went to Florida in January 2001 and found that if the counting had continued Bush still would have won, the overwhelming majority of Democrats think that election was stolen....

To make my point, I offer the now overly-discussed Bradley effect and how it relates to exit polls: How many people as they leave the voting booth Tuesday will lie to pollsters about who they voted for? Before you answer, try to imagine the pressures many people are going to feel in certain districts around the country to answer "Obama" rather than "McCain" irrespective of the truth. Also consider the possibility that many McCain supporters will just refuse to answer the question thereby skewing the results.....

Can you imagine the Rodney King-style rioting that might occur as a result, especially when folks like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, and the usual suspects get in front of television cameras blaming Republicans and John McCain for stealing another election, this time from a black man? They'll be on all the morning shows Wednesday doing what they do best: fomenting hate, and pointing fingers....

On the flipside, although an Obama victory will likely not result in immediate acts of violence, Republicans already feel cheated by this campaign for a number of reasons, and understand full well that they literally have the most to lose in this election; the Messiah, contrary to all his lies on the stump, clearly intends to redistribute wealth, and it sure isn't Republicans that are going to be on the receiving end of the junior senator from Illinois' charity....

Once Hillary was tossed aside like so much garbage, media ignored each and every issue that could possibly undermine Obama's ascendancy while savagely attacking Sarah Palin as well as an Ohio plumber that had the unmitigated audacity to actually ask the Messiah a decent question. Don't even get me started on how the so-called impartial press overlooked every gaffe and misstatement made by Joe Biden while giving the Messiah a pass for going back on his promise to accept public campaign funds instead opting to raise and spend more money on his presidential aspirations than anybody ever believed possible....

Just imagine the kind of press McCain would have gotten if he had refused public financing, and spent the kind of ad dollars Obama has. Americans likely would have been told virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week that rich Republicans were trying to buy the election. However, because this is the Messiah, such talk was practically verboten.

Without a doubt, the media playing field this campaign season was as un-level as most Americans have probably ever experienced, or, for that matter ever imagined, and if Obama wins, this is going to leave a bad taste in the mouths of Republicans for many years to come....

And therein lies the real tragedy, for November 4, 2008, could have been a shining moment in American history. After all, a black man is running for president, and might actually win. This should have united the country like never before, and come close to ending the racism that has been one of our nation's banes since its inception. However, because Obama used race to get himself to this point, while also pitting folks of differing incomes against each other for his own political benefit, it seems far more likely that tomorrow will divide our country like it hasn't been in over a century ushering back in hatred that will make Martin Luther King Jr. roll over in his grave.

More here

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

Brainless Obama the Warmist wants to bankrupt coal-fired electricity generation

And thus cause blackouts in most of America, apparently


Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately be front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview. The result? Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the public...until now. Here is the transcript of Obama's statement about bankrupting the coal industry:
Let me sort of describe my overall policy. What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches. The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them.

Amazing that this statement by Obama about bankrupting the coal industry has been kept under wraps until this time.

UPDATE: NewsBusters' Tom Blumer has found out that the San Francisco Chronicle story published on January 18 based upon this January 17 interview did not include any mention of Obama's willingness to bankrupt the coal industry which you can hear on the audio. You can read the story here when you scroll down to the "In His Own Words" section. Way to cover up for The One, SF Chronicle!

Source (See the original for links, graphics etc.)

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH (2). Email me (John Ray) here

Sunday, November 02, 2008

AMAZING VIDEO: MCCAIN TELLING OBAMA OFF!



INSPIRED BY THIS - VIA ACE:



AND REMEMBER THIS - AN ACTUAL LETTER MCCAIN SENT OBAMA, WHEN HE REALLY DID TELL HIM OFF:
ONCE AGAIN, OBAMA PROVES HE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY
John McCain released a SCATHING and SARCASTIC letter he sent to Senator Barack Obama.

Here's an EXCERPT:
Dear Senator Obama:

I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere.

When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership’s preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable.


Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions.

I’m embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble.

Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won’t make the same mistake again. [...]

As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party’s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness.

Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn’t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.

Sincerely,

John McCain United States Senate
Readers of this blog ARE NOT SURPRISED BY OBAMA'S UNTRUSTWORTHINESS. I posted a story about Obama in June 2005 which proved he has NO HONOR and NO CLASS. EXCERPT.
WE CAN WIN THIS THING IF YOU VOTE MCCAIN!

DON'T LET THE BASTARDS GET YOU DOWN!

KEEP FIGHTIN'! LIKE SPARTANS!

WE MUSTN'T DO NOW WHAT GREAT BRITAIN DID IN 1946.

THEY ELECTED CLEMENT ATTLEE AND STARTED DOWN THE ROAD TO SERFDOM.

A FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL WRECK, THEY HAD TO BE SAVED BY THATCHER 35 YEARS LATER.

OBAMA IS OUR ATTLEE.

VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

PETRAEUS IN PAKISTAN

BBC:
US Gen David Petraeus is due to meet Pakistan's army chief on his first visit to the country since becoming head of US Central command.

The trip comes amid tensions between Islamabad and Washington over US missile strikes on suspected Islamist militants in northwest Pakistan.

Last Friday Gen Petraeus took control of US military operations throughout the Middle East and much of Asia.

His responsibilities include Iraq and Afghanistan as well as Pakistan.

The general is being accompanied by US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher.

As well as meetings with Pakistani army chief Gen Ashfaq Kayani, the visit will include meetings with other senior political leaders.

The American envoys face the delicate task of explaining US actions without upsetting its ally, says the BBC's South Asia analyst Anbarasan Ethirajan.
THIS MEETING IS NEARLY AS MOMENTOUS AS THE ELECTION TUESDAY.

STAY TUNED...

HOT NEW OBAMA THEME SONG: "SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND!"



VIA POWER LINE.

WHY THEY SUPPORT MCCAIN, HERE.

EVIDENCE THAT THE GOP IS VERY ENERGIZED AND VOTING IN LARGE NUMBERS ALREADY!

JIM:
... the Campaign Spot Hilton Head Bureau Chief (a.k.a., "Dad") is resigning in the near future to become the new president of the Hilton Head Republican Club. He mentioned an interesting anecdote to me recently.

South Carolina in general, and the Low Country/Beaufort County portion of the state, are some of the most deep red sections of the country as you're going to find; in a year when traditionally Republican states Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia has wavered, no one has contemplated any Obama movement in the Palmetto State.

Anyway, in this certain-for-McCain corner of this certain-for-McCain state, the wait on the lines for early voting have been... two hours. There's not a ton of locations, and not a ton of machines, which contributes to the wait, but still, that's an awful lot of enthusastic voters in a region considered completely uncompetitive. And even with the early rush, poll workers are being told to "expect the worst" on Election Day.

There aren't any dramatic Senate races, House races, or local initiatives to drive all this; it is, as the Beaufort County GOP chairman puts it, "I have never seen our base as energized as they are about this election. The reason is we have never had two candidates whose philosophies as different as this year."

This won't make a difference in the electoral college; everyone has put Texas and South Carolina into the McCain pile since Day One.

But it may make a difference in the popular vote nationwide.

And if the GOP base is fired up and showing up in places like Texas and South Carolina, is there some reason it wouldn't show up in Indiana, North Carolina or Virginia?

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't bet on it.
PALIN AND OBAMA HAVE ENERGIZED THE GOP BASE!

WE WILL WIN IF YOU VOTE!