2004 could be a decisive victory for Kerry. The reason to think so is historical. Elections that feature a sitting president tend to be referendums on the incumbent--and in recent elections, the incumbent has either won or lost by large electoral margins. If you look at key indicators beyond the neck-and-neck support for the two candidates in the polls--such as high turnout in the early Democratic primaries and the likelihood of a high turnout in November--it seems improbable that Bush will win big. More likely, it's going to be Kerry in a rout.
- HE WAS WRONG THEN,
- THE MSM IS WRONG NOW.
- THEY WANT THE DEMOCRAT/LEFTIST CANDIDATE TO IN AND TO MAKE THE GOP VOTERS TO STAY HOME.
No comments:
Post a Comment