"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Showing posts with label Rosie O'Donnell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosie O'Donnell. Show all posts

Sunday, May 27, 2007

KHALID SHEIKH MOHAMMED'S SISTER FOUND!


Just in case you haven't seen this yet.

It provides great entertainment for conservatives and probably caused Rosie to trash yet another room.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

YOU GO ELISABETH HASSELBACK!!


Why is Elisabeth finally dishing it back to Rosie and not holding back??

1) She's got nothing to lose, because Rosie is on her way out.

2) She's got pregnancy hormones that are helping her be a little more aggressive :-)!

3) She's probably tired of people accusing her of not defending herself.


I am very impressed with Elisabeth!! She is in a lion's den where she is the lone conservative against 3 other liberals. The audience is also clearly liberal and yet she holds her own, she doesn't back down, and she's articulate with facts to back up what she says.

Rosie on the other hand is a bully who tries to badger her opponents into agreeing with her and validating her. She sat there and accused Elisabeth of betraying their friendship when Elisabeth takes her crap every single day. To be honest, I think Rosie is a bully who dishes out hateful stuff but has such a low self-esteem that she can't take it when its dished back to her.

Friday, April 06, 2007

IT IS TIME FOR ROSIE TO GO

Jonah Goldberg has written an excellent article entitled, Barbara Walters and ABC Give Soapbox to a Wacko. Here are some great excerpts:
But ABC isn’t obliged to give O’Donnell a nationally televised platform. Barbara Walters, the matriarch of The View and its executive producer, is supposed to be a titan of American journalism. She has all the awards any broadcast journalist could ever want. But today she knowingly gives a soapbox to a wacko.

Walters and ABC no doubt will seek comfort in any number of rationalizations, from gooey platitudes about free speech to the glories of diverse opinion to the fundamental unseriousness of Café Vienna-moment television. And yes, human train wrecks make for good ratings — which is why O’Donnell may get another $40 million before her View contract expires in June.

Granted, The View isn’t 60 Minutes, so why should we care that much if the girl talk gets a little silly? After all, Walters has spent much of her career muddying the distinction between entertainment and hard news, what with her saccharine “What kind of tree would you be?” interviews.

Yet there is a difference between taking silly topics seriously and being silly about serious stuff. When you discuss hair-care products or lavish weddings, the subject telegraphs its own triviality. Walters may risk her journalistic reputation when she jibber-jabbers about such things, but that ship sailed long ago. It’s another thing entirely when ABC’s most venerated on-air journalist gives a megaphone to someone who frets that poor Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was railroaded, who insinuates that the U.S. government had a hand in any part of 9/11 and who insists Elvis Presley is alive and living on an island with Bruce Lee (O.K., I made that last one up).

Related links:
StopRosie.com
Should Rosie Be Fired From ‘The View’?

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

ROSIE ADVISORY SYSTEM

You gotta love this!!

Hat tip: Special Agent Utah

Friday, March 30, 2007

ROSIE 'S IRRESPONSIBLE AND IGNORANT COMMENTS


"'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."--Abraham Lincoln

If you are as fed up with Rosie as I am check out my anti-view.

Monday, March 26, 2007

ROSIE CRACKS THE BRITISH SAILOR HOSTAGE CONSPIRACY

Caught this on Hot Air. Rosie O'Donnell, the new high priestess of all things moonbat, was talking about the British sailors being held hostage by Iran this morning on The View. Rosie wouldn't go into detail, except to offer this little nugget: “I have one thing to say: Gulf of Tonkin. Google it."

For those unfamiliar, the Gulf of Tonkin was a pair of naval attacks on two American destroyers by the Viet Cong in August of 1964. Many today believe that these attacks were either exaggerated or, at worst, completely made up a la Hitler's claim of being attacked by Poland. Nevertheless, it was this incident that allowed LBJ to escalate the war, and we all know how well that worked out for him.

So, Rosie is implying that the UK (and I'm sure George W., he's responsible for everything) purposely provoked the Iranians into this conflict in order to have just cause for going to war with Iran.

As much as I hate to say it, I almost wish Rosie was right. If there were such a conspiracy afoot, that would tell me that the USA and UK were at least planning to strike Iran (something that should have been done 2-3 years ago!) instead of hitching their wagons to the U.N. and the "diplomatic process."