"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Showing posts with label Carter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carter. Show all posts

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Back to the Future

Do you pick up that eerie feeling? That we've seen this endemic, uncomfortable presidential indecisiveness before?

What's that called again?

Deja Carter?

Every day -- and in every way -- the modern Democrat Party reaffirms its well-deserved nickname.

"Party of Weakness".

Monday, July 21, 2008

General Obama calls for shifting troops to Afghanistan

Headline in today's Wall Street Journal: "Obama calls for shifting troops to Afghanistan."

On the first stop of his weeklong foreign tour, Sen. Barack Obama Sunday called for shifting U.S. military forces from Iraq to Afghanistan, which he called "the central front on our battle against terrorism."

One tiny problem: that announcement was made without consulting General Petraeus, seeing the situation in Iraq, listening to any of Iraq's leaders or consulting with other experts. But no one should be surprised: Obama has a long history of botched predictions made in a complete absence of information.

Last week Charles Krauthammer observed:

[What would Iraq] look like if what Obama had proposed at the beginning of '07 had occurred. He would have had all our troops out four months ago, which means we would have al-Queda in control of large elements of Iraq with a strong base... It means that Iran would have the control that it had before the central government kicked Iran and its cohorts, allies, and clients out of the southern areas of Iraq. It would have tremendous influence over Iraq.

And probably the central government would have a collapsed, and it would be in the middle of a civil war and possibly genocide.

The best argument against Obama, the best antiwar argument to use against him, is to say that if we had listened to him we'd be in a position where we would be looking at a strategic calamity on our hands, as I described, also, a humanitarian one, which would impel us to have a third Iraqi war.

Which could, of course, have also touched off a world war.

As Jimmy Carter reminds us daily, the price of presidential stupidity is high. Vote accordingly in 2008.

Update: Exhibiting all the courage of Carter: "after talking for two years about timetables to remove troops from Iraq, Barack Obama goes to Baghdad and wimps out... He didn't even bring it up with the Iraqi Prime Minister!"

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

JIMMY CARTER: IRAN IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT

Yesterday TAB's Pastorius blogged this story about how Jimmy Carter's former NSA Chief Brzezinski is quite sanguine about Iran. You have to admire that former administration's message discipline. Not content with urging urging Iowa voters to reject "knee-jerk" supporters of Israel - because the vicious, frothing at the mouth anti-Israel side is so level-headed and thoughtful - Jimmy Carter wants you to know that things are just fine with Iran:
In "The Gathering Storm," his history of World War II, Winston Churchill recalls how President Roosevelt once asked for suggestions about what the war should be called. "The Unnecessary War," Britain's wartime prime minister replied. "There never was a war more easy to stop than that which has just wrecked what was left of the world from the previous struggle."... Former President Jimmy Carter says we shouldn't take the Iran threats seriously. "I think it would be almost inconceivable that Iran would commit suicide by launching one or two missiles of any kind against the nation of Israel," he said. Many of Churchill's critics said the same about Nazi Germany in the 1930s. But apocalyptic fanatics have been known to be suicidal, and Carter, of course, has been wrong about Iran before.
The last time Jimmy Carter said that things were just fine with Iran, it took Ronald Reagan to even start cleaning up that mess.

[Cross-posted to Mere Rhetoric]

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

IS JONATHAN DEMME TAKING JIMMY CARTER'S SIDE?

It would seem as though film director Jonathan Demme is one of the few people who's willing to side with the horrible Jimmy Carter, and has just made a documentary about him called "Man From Plains". John Podhoretz got a news clip about it.
Demme and a camera crew led by Declan Quinn filmed an intimate portrait of Carter as he dealt with the slings and arrows generated by his provocative public appearances across the country.
I wouldn't be surprised if it were favorable towards this awful man. "Intimate"? I think that could signal that this is gonna be bad.

There's an earlier report here that Brandeis University had denied Demme permission to film one of Carter's speeches that says:
Demme said he had hoped Tuesday's speech and the planned question-and-answer session afterward would be part of a powerful ending to his documentary, "He Comes in Peace."
When they speak about a powerful end, that too could tell that something is wrong. And the title given there, which must've been the initial title they were going to give it, also smells fishy.

Monday, June 18, 2007

HIGH COURT OF ISRAELI APARTHEID STATE FORCES GOVERNMENT TO INCREASE FUNDING TO ARAB SCHOOLS

Not that Arab schools weren't being funded, mind you. They just weren't being funded enough to satisfy the justices. And so they threw Israel's educational system into a literal crises - risking the jobs of thousands of teachers - until the government promised to fix it:
The High Court of Justice ruled on Sunday to allow the Education Ministry to implement a plan that would change the status of "national priority areas" gradually, eliminating the need to fire 1,500 teachers in schools that will lose their funding due to the decision... In February 2006, the High Court canceled the 'national priority areas' status after the map... was deemed unfair by the Court because it heavily favored Jewish areas over Arab ones in education spending. The Education Ministry was ordered to develop a map that was in keeping with the principle of 'equality.'... 15 months after the High Court decision, the Education Ministry announced in an internal memo that it was seeking legal ways to delay implementing the ruling. However, the deadline for firing teachers - a move that would be necessary for dozens of schools if the national priority map were canceled for next year - was only two days later, on May 31.
Now you might be like "well then wasn't the Education Ministry trying to implement an apartheid system". And we'd say "no, they were corrupt and returning political favors to local constituents - and since the effect of that might have been discriminatory, the High Court struck it down anyway". Which is just like what used to happen with black public schools in apartheid South Africa, right? And Jimmy Carter isn't either an idiot or a potential latent anti-Semite for his irrational hatred of the Jewish State, right?

[Cross-posted to Mere Rhetoric]

Saturday, May 19, 2007

JIMMY CARTER ON IRAQ AND BLAIR: DEPOSING A GENOCIDAL TYRANT AND REPLACING IT WITH DEMOCRACY WAS A TRAGEDY











BREITBART/AFP (VIA DRUDGE): Former US president Jimmy Carter on Saturday attacked outgoing Prime Minister Tony Blair for his "blind" support of the Iraq war, describing it as a "major tragedy for the world".

In an interview with BBC radio, Carter was asked how he would describe Blair's attitude to US President George W. Bush. He replied: "Abominable. Loyal, blind, apparently subservient.

"I think that the almost undeviating support by Great Britain for the ill-advised policies of President Bush in Iraq have been a major tragedy for the world."
RANT ALERT:

APPARENTLY, CARTER - LIKE NEARLY ALL OF THE LEFT -

THINKS THAT DEPOSING A GENOCIDAL TYRANT,

AND REPLACING HIS LYING, CHEATING, BRIBING, MURDERING, ECOLOGY-DESTROYING REGIME

WITH A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED CONSTITUTIONAL AND PLURALISTIC GOVERNMENT

WAS: "A MAJOR TRAGEDY FOR THE WORLD."

HE SAYS THIS EVEN THOUGH - FOR THE MOST PART - "THE WORLD" HAS STOOD BY AND DONE NOTHING TO HELP - AND HAS NOT BEEN HURT ONE IOTA BY THE CONTINUING BLOODSHED,

90% OF WHICH IS IRAQI-VERSUS-IRAQI OR MUSLIM-VERSUS-MUSLIM, AND NOT "OCCUPIER" VERSUS NATIVE.

THE FACT IS - NO MATTER WHAT IDIOTS LIKE CARTER SAY -

IRAQ IS WHERE THE FREE WORLD IS FIGHTING AND KILLING MOST OF THE JIHADISTS, AND WHERE WE MUST SUCCEED IF WE ARE TO DEFEAT THEM ANYWHERE ELSE,

FOR IF WE ABANDON THE NASCENT DEMOCRACY OF IRAQ - (THE WAY DOVES LIKE CARTER MADE US ABANDON THE SOUTH VIETNAMESE GOVERNMENT AND THE CONTRAS) --

A U.N. RECOGNIZED IRAQI GOVERNMENT WHICH HAS REQUESTED AND AUTHORIZED OUR CONTINUED PRESENCE, (ALONG WITH POST-WAR UNSC RESOLUTIONS) --

THEN WE SHALL SURELY NOT BE ABLE TO CONVINCE OTHER ALLIES AND POTENTIAL ALLIES THAT THEY CAN DEPEND ON US IN THE FUTURE BATTLES IN THE WAR AGAINST GLOBAL JIHADISM.

POLITICIANS LIKE CARTER - WHO CONTINUALLY ATTACK THE USA AND OUR ALLIES, AND MAKE THE EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS ABOUT OUR POLICIES AS DOES AL QAEDA - SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH TREASON AND TRIED - AND IF CONVICTED EXECUTED.

CARTER - LIKE THE REST OF THE LEFT - HAS FOR YEARS SUCKED UP TO, APPEASED CODDLED, COOED AND HUGGED NEARLY EVERY SINGLE TYRANT ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH - FROM KHOMEINI TO ARAFAT TO KIM IL SUNG TO FIDEL AND ORTEGA AND MUGABE AND CHAVEZ.

CARTER - LIKE THE REST OF THE LEFT - ARE NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITICAL, COWARDLY ANTI-AMERICAN, LEFTIST SCUM.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

WHO MIGHT BECOME OBAMA'S VEEP?

They ask the question over at HOT AIR. They suggest Hagel - which is NUTS.

Like Bush, Obama'd seek an elder statesman-type, a Washington Insider.

Therefore, the two best Veeps for Obama would be GORE, or... CARTER! (YUP: Carter is eligible.)














OBAMA-GORE.
OR, OBAMA-CARTER.

(I really think it's gonna be GORE-OBAMA.)

BTW: Watch the two Richardson commercials. They're very good. Of all the Dems, he is BY FAR the most qualified to be POTUS.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

ZBIG: WRONG THEN; WRONG NOW ... ZBIG TIME!


ZBIG WAS DHIMMI CARTER'S NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR.

CARTER'S SINGLE TERM WAS THE MOST DISASTROUS TERM IN US HISTORY ESPECIALLY IN FOREIGN POLICY: AFGHANISTAN WAS INVADED, THE SHAH TOPPLED, OPEC EMBOLDENED; THE USSR ADVANCED THROUGH AFRICA AND CENTRAL AMERICA UNCHECKED.

ZBIG HAS WRITTEN AN OP-ED IN THE WASH POST. HE BLAMES BUSH FOR FOMENTING A "CULTURE OF FEAR." (INSTEAD OF BLAMING THE JIHADISTS WHO HAVE STAGED NEARLY 8000 ATTACKS WORLDWIDE SINCE 9/11 - INCLUDING KILLING MORE PEOPLE IN THAILAND THAT IN IRAQ!) HERE'S AN EXCERPT:
The atmosphere generated by the "war on terror" has encouraged legal and political harassment of Arab Americans (generally loyal Americans) for conduct that has not been unique to them. A case in point is the reported harassment of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for its attempts to emulate, not very successfully, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Some House Republicans recently described CAIR members as "terrorist apologists" who should not be allowed to use a Capitol meeting room for a panel discussion.

Social discrimination, for example toward Muslim air travelers, has also been its unintended byproduct.
YUP: ZBIG DEFENDS CAIR AND BY IMPLICATION THE FLYING IMAMS. WHAT AN ASS - A BIG ASS -- A ZBIG ASS ---- A REAL ZBIG ASS!

HE ACTUALLY ARGUES THAT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION MORE CULPABLE THAN THE JIHADISTS! INCREDIBLE! BUT MAYBE NOT... NOT FROM TODAY'S DEMOCRAT PARTY!


POWER LINE HAS MORE. Complete round up at Memeorandum.

Monday, February 26, 2007

WHAT ARE THE OSCARS?

A politically correct, liberal love fest!! An opportunity for snobby, Hollywood elitists to bash Bush, our country and the people who live in the midwest and believe in traditional values. I love movies but the Oscars very rarely nominates or awards people and/or movies that I like. The only winning movies in the past 11 yrs. that I've thought were worthy of Oscars were Braveheart and Titanic.

Last night the movies nominated for best documentary included a propaganda film about global warming, a film that bashed Christian home schoolers, a film that bashed Catholic priests, a film about Iraq from the perspective of "An outspoken critic of the U.S. occupation", and another film about Iraq described like this, "told by Iraqis living in a time of war, occupation and ethnic tension". All of these documentaries reek with political correctness and a hostility to average, every day Americans.

So Al Gore got his Oscar last night for best propaganda film. Melissa Etheridge also won for best song from the film and she said this after kissing her wife:
"Mostly, I have to thank Al Gore for inspiring me, showing me that caring about the earth is not Republican or Democrat, it's not red or blue. We are all green," Etheridge said.
I thought I was going to be ill.

Does Gore getting the award impress me? No, I figure if Michael Moore can get one they aren't that hard to earn. Then I see that Gore is Carter's favorite pick to run for president on the Democrat ticket for 2008. Go here to see the video. I literally am shaking my head trying to figure out who is more insane, Carter or Gore? It's a toss-up!!

Bottom line:
There are a lot of good movies out there but few that will be nominated, let alone win Academy Awards.