I think the Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner thing contradicts itself and exposes the contradictions within the postmodernist vision of feminism and genderism.
Bruce didn't just want to have a vagina and pendulous breasts - or to take care of home and hearth, have babies and nurse them; he wanted lipstick and high heels and dresses.
Doesn't that prove that, despite what he and the transgender advocates argue, he was really only identifying with the socially constructed aspects of gender and not the genetically inheritable aspects - unless you believe that dresses and lipstick and high heels are genetically encoded, which the postmodern feminists certainly do not believe.
If, as the pomo leftists believe, gender is socially constructed, then all Bruce Jenner, and other boys and men who think they are really girls and women, would really crave are vaginas and breasts and lots of estrogen. Because the transgender crave the things the left says are socially constructed, it would aeem their ceaving cannot be genetically bases, but must also be constructed.
And why do so many homosexual men seem effeminate, and so many lesbians... butch? Are their homosexual genes preprogrammed to ceave socially constructed trappings of gender?
So it would seem that the postmodernist's embrace of transgenderism and radical feminism and homosexuality is filled with contradictions.
Or the truth might just be even simpler: postmodernism's Gramscian attack on gender and sex and marriage is opportunistic, unprincipled, and absolutely full of shit. The postmodernist left is merely embracing any handy deviant, decadent, depraved, destructive, and transgressive thing they can to attack and destroy Judeo-Christian Civilization.