"That's what I will do in bringing all parties together, not negotiating behind closed doors, but bringing all parties together, and broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so that the American people can see what the choices are, because part of what we have to do is enlist the American people in this process," Obama said at a debate in Los Angeles on Jan. 31, 2008.EVEN CBS CALLED IT A BROKEN PROMISE AT THE TIME.
2 - OBAMA PROMISED OBAMACARE WOULD LOWER PREMIUMS BY AN AVERAGE OF $2500/FAMILY - AND IT HAS NOT; (LINKS TO POLITIFACT PROVING RATES HAVE NOT COME DOWN).
HERE IS OBAMA LYING AGAIN:
THIS VIDEO ALSO PROVES THAT OBAMA UNDERSTOOD THAT THE SUBSIDY WOULD ONLY GO TO STATES WHEN HE ARGUES THAT ONLY 60% OF TH UNINSURED WILL GET SUBSIDIES ENABLING THEM TO GET A PLAN FOR LESS THAN A CELLPHONE BILL.
THIS LIE HELPED GET OBAMA ELECTED, BUT AS SOON AS OBAMACARE WAS PASSED (IN A STRAIGHT PARTY-LINE VOTE, AND ONLY BECAUSE OBAMA MADE A DEAL WITH BART STUPAK - WHICH HE LATER BROKE (SEE BELOW VIDEO) - AND BOUGHT THE VOTES OF BILL NELSON AND MARY LANDRIEU AND A FEW OTHERS).
NELSON WAS FACING DEFEAT SO DIDN'T RUN AGAIN. LANDRIEU IS ABOUT TO BE DEFEATED.
3 - OBAMA PROMISED DURING HIS RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN 2012 THAT ANYONE WHO LIKED THEIR HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COULD KEEP IT, AND HE KNEW THIS WAS A LIE; HE WAS ADVISED BY SOME NOT TO SAY IT, BUT HE DID ANYWAY - MANY TIMES:
4 - THE GOP SAID AT THE TIME THE BILL WAS PROPOSED THAT THE ABOVE CLAIM REPEATEDLY MADE BY OBAMA AND HIS COMRADES WAS A LIE, BUT BECAUSE OBAMA AND HIS COMRADES DEFTLY DELAYED 3 YEARS THE ENACTMENT OF OBAMACARE UNTIL AFTER THE 2012 ELECTION CONTEST THIS LIE WAS NOT EXPOSED TO MOST AMERICANS UNTIL AFTER HIS RE-ELECTION.
THE FACT THAT OBAMA LIED IS ONE MAJOR REASON IT PASSED AND WHY NOW 62% OF AMERICANS WANT IT REPEALED AND REPLACED.
5 - DESPITE 3 YEARS TO GET IT RIGHT - AND MORE THAN $1BILLION SPENT ON THE FEDERAL AND STATE WEBSITES, THE OBAMACARE ROLL-OUT WAS A DISASTER AND A NATIONAL DISGRACE.
6 - THE SCOTUS UPHELD THE LAW BY ONE VOTE AND ONLY BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DECIDED THAT WHAT LAWMAKERS HAD CALLED A MANDATE AND A PENALTY WAS IN FACT A TAX. BUT THE TRUTH IS - ACCORDING TO JON GRUBER (VIDEO BELOW) AND OTHERS - THAT IF PROPONENTS HAD CALLED IT A TAX, THE BILL WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SCORED BY THE CBO AS BUDGET NEUTRAL WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED.
7 - OBAMACARE IS A LAW THAT CANNOT WITHSATND THE LIGHT OF DAY:
WHEN OBAMA AND REID AND PELOSI PASSED THE BILL - WITH PORK BARREL BRIBERY AND LIES, THEY LOST THE HOUSE IN THE VERY NEXT ELECTION.
WHEN THE LIES WERE EXPOSED IN 2013, THEY LOST THE SENATE IN THE VERY NEXT ELECTION.
8 - THE OBAMACARE LAW NOW GOES BACK TO THE SCOTUS. ON DECEMBER 17TH THEY WILL HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS IN THE KING V BURWELL CASE. WIKI:
King v. Burwell, Halbig v. Burwell, Pruitt v. Burwell, and Indiana v. IRS are a set of related lawsuits challenging U.S. Treasury regulation, 26 C.F.R. § 1.36B-2(a)(1), issued under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The challengers argue that the text of the ACA only allows for subsidies on state-run exchanges, and that the regulation as implemented by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), providing for subsidies on state-run exchanges as well as federal exchanges, exceeded the authority Congress granted to it.ACCORDING TO GRUBER, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO GIVE PEOPLE SUBSIDIES:
GRUBER ONCE CLAIMED THAT THIS WAS AN ORAL "TYPO" OR "SPEAKO", BUT HE MADE IT SO OFTEN THAT HE NOW JUST SAYS "NO COMMENT".
OTHERS ARE ARGUING THAT IT WAS LITERALLY A TYPO THAT INADVERTENTLY GOT INTO THE FINAL LAW WHICH WAS VOTED ON WITHOUT ANYONE READING IT FIRST. THIS ARGUMENT IS PROVED WRONG BY THE LEGISLATIVE RECORD.
IF THE SCOTUS DECIDES THE WORDS INN THE LAW DO NOT MEAN WHAT GRUBER - A MAJOR ARCHITECT OF THE PLAN - AND OTHERS SAY THEY MEANT, THEN THE COURT WILL BE COMMITTING A LEGAL AND MORAL ERROR AS BIG AS DRED SCOTT.
BOTTOM-LINE:
OBAMACARE WAS PASSED BY LIES AND BRIBES, AND IT NEVER EVER HAD THE SUPPORT OF A MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC A FACT PROVEN BY THIS: EVERY TIME THE PUBLIC HAS HAD A TRUTHFULLY INFORMED VOTE ON IT, THEY HAVE VOTED ITS SUPPORTERS DOWN.
No comments:
Post a Comment