IT DOESN'T MATTER IF OBAMA READ AND IGNORED THE PDB'S, OR IF HE DIDN'T READ THEM, THE RESULT IS THE SAME AND THE REMEDY IS THE SAME:
CONGRESS MUST IMPEACH OBAMA FOR MALFEASANCE.
The main “go-to” treatise on the Constitution I use is The Heritage Guide to the Constitution published by the Heritage Foundation. It says, “Because ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’ was a term of art in English impeachments, a plausible reading supported by many scholars is that the grounds for impeachment can not only be the defined crimes of treason and bribery, but also other criminal or even noncriminal behavior amounting to a serious dereliction of duty.” ... So if a president is guilty of significant malfeasance or misfeasance in office he can be removed by impeachment. [UMPH ADDED]OBAMA ADMITS HE ONLY RECEIVED ABOUT 40% OF THE PDB'S IN PERSON, BUT GOT THEM ALL ON HIS TABLET.
THE PROOF (THAT HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE PDB'S OR DID NOT READ THEM) IS IN PUDDING: ISIS DID WHAT WAS PREDICTED THEY WOULD DO.
- CAN HE PROVE HE READ THEM?
- IF HE DID READ THEM, THEN DID HE SUBMIT ANY QUESTIONS TO HIS EXPERT AIDES?
SEAN AND MARK AGREE IN A VIDEO HERE.