THE EVOLUTION OF THEIR ATTACKS ON SKEPTICS PROVES IT:
THE DEBATE IS OVER, MAN-MADEIF THEY WERE RIGHT, THEN ONE OF THE 40 IPCC MODELS WOULD HAVE CORRECTLY PREDICTED THE LAST 17 YEARS, BUT NOT ONE DID.ICE AGEGLOBAL WARMINGCLIMATE CHANGECLIMATE DISRUPTION IS REAL!
IF THEY WERE RIGHT, THEN THEY WOULDN'T BE CHANGING THEIR DIRE PREDICTIONS AND THEY WOULDN'T BE CHANGING THE UMBRELLA TERM FOR THEIR MOVEMENT.
IF THEY WERE RIGHT, THEN THE LEADERS AND PSEUDO-INTELLECTUALS OF THEIR MOVEMENT WOULD HOLD SKYPE TELECONFERENCES INSTEAD OF JETTING AROUND THE GLOBE TO SEVERAL CONFERENCES A YEAR.
IF THEY WERE RIGHT, THEN SLIGHT WARMING IN THE 50 YEARS PREVIOUS TO THE LAST 17 MIGHT HAVE EXCEEDED THE WARMING OVER THE LAST 3 MILLION YEARS.
BUT, THEY ARE WRONG.
THE WORST PART IS THE FACT THAT THEIR POLICIES HAVE RETARDED WORLD ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ROBBED THE POOR AND THE THIRD WORLD OF 40 YEARS OF INDUSTRIALIZATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH.
THAT'S RIGHT:
GLOBAL POVERTY HAS WORSENED BECAUSE OF THE CLIMATE ALARMISTS.
CLIMATE ALARMISM IS THE THIRD MOST HARMFUL IDEOLOGY ON EARTH - AFTER LEFTISM AND ISLAMISM.
IF WE WANT TO MAKE POVERTY HISTORY, THEN WE HAVE TO MAKE LEFTISM, ISLAMISM, AND CLIMATE ALARMISM HISTORY.
1 comment:
Human activity has no significant effect on climate change.
Discover the cause of the warming, the end of it, why temperatures are (unfortunately) headed down and what to expect.
Two primary drivers explain average global temperature change. They very accurately explain the reported up and down measurements since before 1900 with R2>0.9 (correlation coefficient = 0.95) and provide credible estimates back to the low temperatures of the Little Ice Age (1610).
CO2 change is NOT one of the drivers.
The drivers are given at
http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/
which includes eye opening graphs of the past, what to expect, and a plethora of links and sub-links to the credible data sources that were used.
Once the climate drivers are identified it is obvious why the warming ended.
Post a Comment