THE BENGHAZI COVER-UP IS A SCANDAL, BUT THE REAL MAJOR DISASTER IS OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY

The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928.

In 80 years of constant battling they never made ANY headway in Egypt.

Then Obama gets elected and 3 short years later they are in total control of Egypt.

Simultaneously, islamists are gaining in most of north Africa and Jordan and Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan.

I would say this is all the result of appeasement and ineptness and naivete except for the FACT that the results are entirely consistent: In NOT A SINGLE CASE has any islamist group ANYWHERE really suffered a strategic setback. They have all gained.

Usually such consistency of results is indicative of design, not happenstance.

DOUBT ME THAT ISLAMISTS ARE GAINING?

Ask Lara Logan.

They are stronger EVERYWHERE.

And it is the direct result of Obama's proactive policies: insisting on the inclusion of the MB at his Cairo speech and then on the ousting of Mubarak; negotiating with the Taliban; waging war on Kaddafy - and aiding islamists there and in Syria.

And so on.

Nowhere is Obama aiding the cause of liberty.

Or our national security.

Or the security of our long-term allies, like Israel - and even Jordan and Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states are all in a much more precarious situation than when Bush was president.

That's the true disaster.

The Benghazi attack is a direct result of Obama's pro-islamist policies. The murder of our Ambassador and his aides was not just a grievous loss for the families of those murdered; it was a major disaster for our nation.

And the Benghazi COVER UP is peanuts compared to the larger crisis that's been created by Obama's policies.

REPEAT:

The Benghazi COVER UP is peanuts compared to the larger crisis that's been created by Obama's policies. 

There's one way to stop the bleeding:

Elect Romney.