FORMER MOSSAD CHIEF SAYS IRAN AND AHMADINEJAD ARE RATIONAL - BUT NOT RATIONAL IS A WESTERN SENSE

MAY FAVORITE QUOTE FROM THIS TURD WAS WHEN HE SAID THAT HE FELT THE IRANIANS WERE RATIONAL, BUT NOT RATIONAL N TERMS OF WHAT WE IN THE WEST THINK IS RATIONAL - AS IF THERE ARE TYPES OF REASON AND TYPES OF LOGIC:

Dagan: The regime in Iran is a very rational regime. 

Stahl: Do you think Ahmadinejad is rational? 

Dagan: The answer is yes. Not exactly our rationale, but I think that he is rational. 

Stahl: Do you think they're rational enough that they are capable of backing down from this? 

Dagan: No doubt that the Iranian regime is maybe not exactly rational based on what I call Western-thinking, but no doubt they are considering all the implications of their actions.

THIS SMACKS OF RELATIVISM, A POSTMODERN CONCEPT - ONE ONLY LEFTISTS BUY INTO.

SO HE OUTED HIMSELF AS A LEFTIST - A COMMON THING IN ISRAEL. AND AS DANGEROUS AND HARMFUL THERE AS IT IS EVERYWHERE  ELSE.

DAGAN (A FORMER MOSSAD CHIEF WHO BOTCHED THE DUBAI HIT AND ALLOWED IRAN TO GET AS AFAR AS THEY HAVE) ARGUES THAT ISRAEL SHOULD  NOT ATTACK IRAN BECAUSE IRAN'S COUNTER-ATTACK MIGHT VERY WELL SEVERELY DEMOLISH TEL  AVIV.

THE IDEA THAT WE SHOULD NOT ATTACK IRAN BEFORE THEY GET A NUKE BECAUSE THEIR CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS MIGHT SEVERELY DAMAGE US IS ON ITS FACE IDIOTIC AND ASININE.


IF THEIR CONVENTIONAL FORCE COULD SEVERELY DAMAGE US, THEN WHAT MIGHT THEIR NUKES  DO!?

IT'S NOW OR NEVER. AND BY NEVER I MEAN IF WE LET THEM  GET  A  NUKE THEN THE WEST IS COMPLETELY THROUGH FOR 1000 YEARS.