DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
7 comments:
Splitting the delegate count is hardly a 'win' for Mittens? Another interesting item, why is it wrong for Santorum to court Regan Democraps and independents while that is the only reason as to why Mittens should be the GOP standard bearer?
"why is it wrong for Santorum to court Regan Democraps "
no republican ever did this before.
none.
actually took out ad's asking for support from dems and unions in the dens back pocket.
and what makes it especially reprehensible is the fact that trucky ricky was opposed to the auot bailiut just like mitt.
tricky ricky is exactly what newt said he is: a tool of big labor.
and a guy who plays both sides of every issue.
he is no more a "true Conservative" than mitt or newt.
they are all a mixed bag.
mitt is by far the best of a weak lot.
i would prefer jindal or demint or daniels or ryan.
but they ain't in it.
mitt is the best who is in it.
You know, I work every day with Union workers, who supported Obama last election.
For the most part they are true democrats but they hate Obama. No one has to tell them what a failure hope and change are, they know and they are living it.
They also know Mittens is an establishment GOP hack that is not one bit different than what we have now.
They are paying attention, and yes they will vote, but Mitt is just not their man, never will be.
As for me, anybody but Obama.
UAW ARE CORRUPT SCUM LIKE ACORN.
MY GRAMPS WAS A FOUNDING MEMBER OF ONE OF THE BIGGEST UNIONS IN THE USA.
I MARCHED WITH HIM ON LABOR DAY.
NO MORE:
UNIONS SUCK AND ARE HURTING THE USA.
RIGHT TO WORK STATES ALL HAVE HIGHER AVERAGE INCOMES AND LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT THAN UNION STATES.
FUCK THE UNIONS.
Yep, saying Unions suck is correct but it still doesn't change the fact that Mitt will loose a big part of their vote.
Now Mitt URGED Obama to 'embrace' the single payer model....
Super Tuesday is going to get interesting
HERE'S MITT:
Our experience also demonstrates that getting every citizen insured doesn't have to break the bank. First, we established incentives for those who were uninsured to buy insurance. Using tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as others have proposed, encourages "free riders" to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass their medical costs on to others. This doesn't cost the government a single dollar. Second, we helped pay for our new program by ending an old one — something government should do more often. The federal government sends an estimated $42 billion to hospitals that care for the poor: Use those funds instead to help the poor buy private insurance, as we did.
THERE IS NOTHING LIBERAL ABOUT WHAT HE SAYS:
PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD TO BUY INSURANCE OR PAY FOR THEIR OWN CARE SHOULD.
LETTING THE TAXPAYER PAY FOR IT IS LIBERAL.
OPEN UP YOUR FUCKING EYES, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!
HE NEVER EVER USES THE TERM MANDATE.
PENALTIES AND INCENTIVES.
BEFORE ROMNEYCARE, THIRD ARTY TAXPAYERS HAD TO PAY FOR THE FREELOADERS.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO HAPPEN IN THE USA!?!?
SHOULD PEOPLE BUY THEIR OWN HIMS AND THEIR OWN CARS AND THEIR OWN HEALTHCARE!?!?!
OR ARE YOU A FUCKING SOCIALIST?
#8 March 2, 2012 at 7:52 pm
Jeffery commented:
sigh… the individual mandate (like cap and trade) is a conservative idea. The Heritage Foundation proposed essentially what you incorrectly call Obamacare 2 decades ago.
Read about it here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/20/how-a-conservative-think-tank-invented-the-individual-mandate/
This was at a time when mindful conservatives recognized that healthcare needed to be reformed and wanted to avoid single payer.
Explain how a system that originated from a conservative think tank is now a communist plot?
Post a Comment