I think he is accurate.
THE ANTI-MITT FOLKS WHO ATTACK HIM AS A LIBERAL ARE OUT OF THEIR FREAKIN' MINDS!
Mitt USED TO BE A LIBERAL. HE USED TO BE A MODERATE.
BUT in 2008 Mitt was CPAC's #1 choice, and he has done nothing since then except move further to the right.
ONE MORE TIME FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE HARED OF HEARING:
In 2008 Mitt was CPAC's #1 choice, and he has done nothing since then except move further to the right.
Besides that, he is the only one in this field who has the organization and fundraising ability to run a campaign against Obama, and he is the only one with ANY executive experience.
The folks who call Mitt a liberal or even a moderate anymore are nuts.
Mitt USED TO be a Republican liberal - (like that "awful" former Mayor of NYC --- who saved NYC from bankruptcy, poverty and crime and uplifted the entire nation after 9/11 -- RUDY GIULIANI) - and Mitt has moved steadily to the right - like many Americans.
Like me, tooi
If the GOP wants to attract more voters - and if the CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT wants to attract more members, then they had better effin' not attack folks like me and Mitt who have moved from the left to the right.
IT'S IDIOTIC TO ATTACK CONVERTS TO CONSERVATISM.
And it will lose us the White House this year.