"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Sunday, January 08, 2012

There's no 2-state solution

Barbara Lerner makes a good case in National Review (via One Jerusalem) against the disastrous brew of a two-state solution, and also brings up a bit of history about where the name "palestine" originated:
The “two-state solution” wasn’t always sacrosanct. In the 1940s and ’50s, it didn’t even exist. There were no Palestinians then, although the territory had been called the British Mandate for Palestine (after the old Roman name for Israel, Palestina). Arabs had never called themselves Palestinians; the few Jews who had called themselves that in the 1930s no longer did. There were only Arabs and Jews, and the openly avowed goal of all the Arab states surrounding Israel was to drive the Jews into the sea, and divide up the land amongst themselves. Arabs inside Israel were no less committed to that same pan-Arab goal. It was only in the 1960s, after the abject failure of repeated multi-state military assaults by massed Arab armies, that Arab rulers finally accepted the fact that Israel was not yet weak enough for them to destroy in open warfare.
Make sure to read further about why the biblical Israel is a good answer.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Hi Avi.
I'm asking myself the following questions about the 'deployment' of US troops in Israel:

- Calling it not just an “exercise”, but a “deployment”

- Now, it’s reported that the US military, including the US Navy, will be stationed throughout Israel.

While American troops will be stationed in Israel for an unspecified amount of time, many would be staying up to the end of the year as part of the US-IDF deployment.

Has the Foreign Invasion of Israel Begun?

What will happen when Obama gets a second Term?

Will he divide Jerusalem?

Split up Israel?

Remember what happened when the Jews 'invited' the Romans to help solve their differences.

I can't help feeling there's more to it than meets the eye.