BECAUSE YOU INCESSANTLY TRASH MITT FOR ROMNEYCARE NOW - EVEN THOUGH IT WAS PASSED IN 2006, TWO YEARS BEFORE YOU ENDORSED HIM IN 2008 IN HIS CONTEST VERSUS MCCAIN.
AND AT NO TIME IN THE LAST 6 YEARS HAVE YOU OR YOUR FOUNDATION EVEN QUESTIONED THE LEGALITY OF ROMNEYCARE OR ITS MANDATE.
NOT ONCE.
- TACITLY, YOU AND YOUR FOUNDATION ARE ADMITTING THAT ROMNEYCARE IS ENTIRELY LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL.
- AND THAT STATES CAN DO WHAT ROMNEYCARE DOES - IN ALL OF ITS 70 PAGES.
AND FOLKS IN TEXAS AND MINNESOTA AND FLORIDA, THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT, TOO.
THAT'S ALL MITT IS ARGUING:
ROMNEYCARE IS OKAY FOR MASSACHUSETTS, AND OBAMACARE IS BAD BECAUSE IT'S A 2700 PAGE FEDERAL ONE-SIZE FITS ALL NATIONALIZED BOONDOGGLE.
- MITT ALSO HAS ENDORSED THE RYAN PLAN - THAT NEWT TRASHED.
- MITT HAS ALSO CALLED FOR BLOCK-GRANTING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID TO UNLEASH STATE INGENUITY AND ALLOW STATES THE FLEXIBILITY TO DEVELOP PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR CITIZENS' WISHES.
- IF ROMNEY WAS BETTER THAN McCAIN IN 2008,
- AND IF McCAIN WAS BETTER THAN OBAMA,
- THEN HOW CAN ROMNEY - WHO HAS MOVED EVEN FURTHER TO THE RIGHT SINCE 2008 - BE A BAD CHOICE NOW AGAINST OBAMA!?
AND I'LL TELL YOU SOMETHING ELSE, MARK LEVIN:
YOU REPEATEDLY ARGUE THAT ROMNEYCARE "WILL TAKE OBAMACARE OFF THE TABLE IN A CONTEST BETWEEN MITT AND OBAMA".
- WRONG!
- ROMNEYCARE DOESN'T "TAKE OBAMACARE OFF THE TABLE" AT ALL.
- I'LL TELL YOU WHAT ROMENYCARE TAKES OFF THE TABLE: "MEDISCARE".
- ROMNEYCARE IMMUNIZES MITT FROM THE TYPICAL AND TYPICALLY SUCCESSFUL ATTACKS DEMOCRATS WAGE AGAINST REPUBLICANS: THAT REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT HEALTHCARE FOR THE AGED AND POOR.
- (1) QUIT YAPPING ABOUT HOW ROMNEYCARE MAKES MITT WEAKER,
- AND (2), TELL THE WORLD WHY YOU HAVE NEVER SUED MASSACHUSETTS OVER ROMNEYCARE.
No comments:
Post a Comment