DEADLY DRONE ATTACKS AGAINST ENEMY COMBATANTS VERSUS CAPTURING THEM AND TAKING THEM TO GITMO

CAN SOME LIBERAL PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY IT'S OKAY FOR OBAMA TO KILL ENEMY COMBATANTS WITH DRONE ATTACKS IN AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN AND YEMEN AND LIBYA, BUT IT'S NOT OKAY TO CAPTURE THEM AND TAKE THEM TO GITMO WHERE WE MIGHT ACTUALLY LEARN A LOT FROM THEM ABOUT ENEMY OPERATIONS - MAYBE EVEN ENOUGH TO PREVENT FUTURE ATTACKS?

HERE' WHY IS ASK: IT TAKES A COUPLA THREE YEARS TO PLAN A MAJOR TERROR ATTACK. AND IT'S BEEN A COUPLA THREE YEARS SINCE OBAMA STOPPED CAPTURING ENEMY COMBATANTS OR USING RENDITION.

ERGO: THERE WILL BE A SUCCESSFUL ATTACK IN THE USA SOON = A BIG ONE.

THANKS OBAMA.