Cain said he had never seen Bialek before she held a news conference on Monday to lay out accusations that he made a crude sexual advance towards her when he was head of the National Restaurant Association in 1997.
WELL...
Since someone can produce a receipt for her stay at the dc hotel and for the dinner he bought, we can easily find out if Cain is lying and if he knew her.
If Cain lied about that, then he has lied about it all and them all.
I BELIEVE HER. WHY? SIMPLE:
Because she also has a sworn affidavit from her former boyfriend who swears she told him about it at the time - and since she has to assume that the hotel can verify her story.
ALL WE NEED IS FOR SOMEONE TO GET THE HOTEL TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR HER HOTEL STAY AND HIS RECEIPT FOR THE MEAL.
Cain's blanket denials of any and all instances of sexual harassment are more obfuscatory than anything else.
He should be willing to answer direct questions about every case.
UPDATE: ACCUSER #2 HAS GONE PUBLIC.
CONSERVATIVES: SHOULD ABANDON THE CAIN SHIP. AND CAIN SHOULD WITHDRAW.
No comments:
Post a Comment