JUST ASKING.
BECAUSE WE OFTEN HEAR FROM LIBERAL APPEASERS THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE AND THAT THE JIHADO-TERRORISTS ARE THE BAD MUSLIMS.
BUT IS THAT TRUE?
NOPE.
PEACEFUL MUSLIMS - THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS IN THE WORLD - WHO CO-EXIST WITH NON-MUSLIMS IN PLURALISTIC SOCIETIES AND WHO PRACTICE NO MISOGYNY OR ANTISEMITISM ARE ACTUALLY THE BAD MUSLIMS.
AND THE SO-CALLED RADICAL MUSLIMS - THE JIHADISTS, THE ISLAMISTS - THEY ARE THE GOOD MUSLIMS.
DON'T AGREE? THEN, YOU'RE WRONG. CAN I PROVE IT? YES.
JUST ANSWER THIS QUESTION:
WAS MOHAMED A GOOD OR A BAD MUSLIM?
MOHAMED WAS A THIEF A LIAR A PEDOPHILE AND A GENOCIDAL TERRORIST.
AND THE KORAN - SUPPOSEDLY A REVELATION - IS LITTERED WITH RACIST, MISOGYNIST, AND ANTISEMITIC FILTH - NOT TO MENTION HISTORICAL ERRORS.
IF THE SO-CALLED PROPHET OF ISLAM WAS SO EVIL AND SO VIOLENT - A MAN WHO COULDN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SATAN AND GABRIEL...
AND IF EMULATING HIM MAKES YOU A "GOOD MUSLIM"...
THEN ALL THE JIHADO-TERRORISTS IN THE WORLD ARE "GOOD MUSLIMS"...
AND MOST OF THE MUSLIMS IN THE WORLD ARE BAD MUSLIMS.
MUSLIM/LIBERAL/LESBIAN/REFORMER IRSHAD MANJI IMPLICITLY AGREES.
SHE ARGUES THAT THE JIHADO-TERRORISTS ARE LITERALISTS AND THAT WHAT ISLAM NEEDS TO DO - TO BECOME MORE COMPATIBLE WITH MODERNITY - IS TO BECOME A RELIGION THAT TREATS MOST OF ITS "HOLY" TEXTS FIGURATIVELY.
THAT QUOTE REVEALS THAT MANJI KNOWS THAT THE KORAN IS FILLED WITH COMMANDMENTS WHICH - IF TAKEN LITERALLY - LEAD TO JIHADO-TERROR.
THINK ABOUT IT.
MOHAMED WAS A TERRORIST AND THE KORAN IS TAKEN LITERALLY IS A PROSCRIPTION FOR TERROR.
ERGO, IF YOU FOLLOW MOHAMED AS AN EXAMPLE AND THE KORAN AS AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL THEN YOU ARE A GOOD MUSLIM - AND A BAD PERSON, A JIHADO-TERRORIST.
IF YOU IGNORE MOHAMED AS AN EXAMPLE AND DON'T FOLLOW THE KORAN, THEN YOU ARE A GOOD PERSON AND A BAD MUSLIM.
THESE GOOD PEOPLE SHOULD LEAVE ISLAM AND PRACTICE A FAITH WHOSE VALUES ARE CONSISTENT WITH BEING A GOOD PERSON AND WITH MODERNITY.
No comments:
Post a Comment