THIS IS BS. HERE'S WHY:
- UNABOMBER : GREENS :: BREIVIK : ANTI-JIAHDISTS
- UNABOMBER : AL GORE, IPCC:: BREIVIK : GEERT WILDERS, SIOE
BREIVIK'S ACT WAS AN ACT OF MONSTROUS TERRORISM AND EVIL, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL COUNTER-JIHADISTS ARE EVIL OR RESPONSIBLE FOR BREIVIK'S HORRIFIC ACT OF TERROR.
HOWEVER:
- BINLADENISTS : ISLAM :: MOHAMED : ISLAM
THE UNABOMBER IS A BAD GREEN AND BREIVIK IS A BAD ANTI-JIHADIST, BUT BINLADEN IS FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF THE FOUNDER OF ISLAM.
IOW:
- THE UNABOMBER'S MANIFESTO AND BREIVIK'S MANIFESTO ARE TWISTED PSYCHOTIC VERSIONS OF LEGITIMATE POLITICAL OUTLOOKS
- BUT BINLADENIST'S MANIFESTO IS THE KORAN AND SURA.
THINK ABOUT IT.
2 comments:
Good lord.
This is completely incoherent.
let me use baby words so you understand.
the unabomber is to the green movement as breivik is to the counter-jihad.
iow:
just as the unabomber could not discredit the green movement, breivik cannot discredit the counter-jihad.
now, wisoc the crisco, dispute that.
Post a Comment