BUT, WE ON THE RIGHT - WHO EXPOUNDED ON JIHADO-TERROR AFTER ACCEPTING THAT IT WAS A JIHADIST ATTACK AFTER A JIHADIST GROUP TOOK CREDIT FOR IT (FALSELY, IT TURNS OUT) - WERE NEVER GLEEFUL ABOUT IT. WE WEREN'T HAPPY IT WAS A JIHADIST ATTACK; WE WERE UNHAPPY THERE WAS AN ATTACK AND UNHAPPY WE HAVE SO MANY GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD DOING TO LITTLE TO PREVENT THEM.
THAT'S A VERY INTERESTING DIFFERENCE.
THINK ABOUT IT.
MORE/UPDATE:
THEY ARE DEMANDING WE APOLOGIZE AND ACCUSE OF OF "JUMPING THE GUN":
Ali Gharib / ThinkProgress:
Right-Wing Pundits Jumped To Blame Muslims And ‘Jihadists’ For Norway AttacksDiscussion: Guardian, Erick's blog, American Power, Wall Street Journal, EcoLocalizer and The Atlantic Online
AND ANOTHER THING:
"SPLAIN" THIS TO ME:
- HOW COME WHEN A JIHADIST GROUP TAKES CREDIT FOR A HORRIFYING ATTACK THEY ARE NOT SAYING SOMETHING AWFUL ABOUT THEMSELVES...
- BUT WHEN ME AND SOME OTHER ANTI-JIHADISTS ATTACK THEM AFTER THEY TOOK CREDIT FOR THE ATTACKS WE ARE SOMEHOW RACISTS WHO ARE SAYING SOMETHING BAD ABOUT THEM!?!?!?!?!?!
No comments:
Post a Comment