The USA is better off because Joe Lieberman is in the US Senate.
Although he is a liberal on nearly all social issues, he can be counted on as far as national security policy and many fiscal issues.
Lieberman is infinitely better than Ned Lamont would've been - and Lamont would've been elected had not Joe sought and won election as an independent.
It is better to have a liberal you can count on on the most important issues, than a liberal you cannot count on at all.
The same is true of Castle: he is better than the Democrat alternative.
And only he can win the general - and beat Delanware's Democrat nominee.
That's why - in a way - a vote for Christine O'Donnell is a vote for Ned Lamont.
COMPLETE ROUND UP HERE.
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
3 comments:
Please! How can you masquerade as an astute blogger and say things like that. There is no parallel between a Christine ODonnell and Ned Lamont. And Connecticut would have been much better off with Lamont than with Lieberman. Now that's an astute observation.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I MEANT IT WAS A WASTED VOTE.
BUT I THINK I MIGHT HAVE BEEN WRONG.
Post a Comment