"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Monday, July 12, 2010

*******UPDATED!: 3 Britons Sentenced in Plane Bomb Plot

From the NYT:
Ibrahin Savant 29, Arafat Waheed Khan, 29, and Waheed Zaman, 26, were convicted last week of conspiracy for being part of a group that planned to detonate liquid explosives hidden in drink bottles, attacks that could have killed people on a similar scale to Sept. 11, 2001.
It gets old pointing it out, but the words "Islam" and "Muslim" do not appear anywhere in this NYT article.

We can be quite sure these three men would tell us straight up, if they were asked, that they planned on killing Infidels because that's what Allah tells them to do IN THE KRAYON.

Despite the fact that we have been told, over and over, by Muslims, that they kill us because they are ordered to do so in their sacred texts, THE LEFT (which controls the White houde and the MSM) insists on keeping up the charade that it is just a few "extremists".

But, of course, if that were true, then every single one of the hundreds and hundreds of times some Muslim "extremist" attempted to kill Infidels, we would here a huge outcry from ordinary Muslims.

And, one would presume that outcry would get louder as the hundreds became thousands.

Instead, we sit amidst the almost Zen-like silence of moderate Muslims, contemplating the reality of the now that faces us; for Muslims, enlightenment IS killing Infidels.

UPDATE (Reliapundit):

Ill. Cousins Being Sentenced in Antimilitary Plot


TOLEDO, Ohio (AP) -- A federal judge in Ohio is sentencing two Chicago-area cousins who pleaded guilty in a plot to recruit terrorists and raise money for a holy war against U.S. troops.

U.S. attorneys say the two were training to kill American soldiers in Iraq as part of a plot organized by three men in Toledo.

Prosecutors planned to recommend a nine-year term for Khaleel Ahmed of Chicago and 10 years for Zubair Ahmed of suburban North Chicago. The sentencing hearing began late Monday morning.


Both men pleaded guilty in January 2009 to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.


Authorities say the men once traveled to Egypt intending to commit violence and that they met with an FBI informant and talked about learning to shoot machine guns and sniper rifles.
THIS ARTICLE FROM TODAY'S "PAPER OF RECORD" DOESN'T MENTION ISLAM OR MUSLIM ONCE, EITHER.

IT ID'S THEM AS ILLINOISANS AS IF THAT WERE ID ENOUGH/EXPLANATION ENOUGH.

THIS IS DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA - AND OT COMES STRAIGHT FROM THE WHITE HOUSE:

THE HUSSEIN OBAMA WHITE HOUSE DOESN'T WANT THE WORDS ISLAM OR MUSLIM USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE VIOLENCE ASSOCIATED WITH WW4.
MORE ACCURATE TERMS ANYWAY:

The White House's official policy of banning the word "Islam" in describing America's terrorist enemies is in direct conflict with the U.S. military's war-fighting doctrine now guiding commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan.

John O. Brennan, President Obama's chief national security adviser for counterterrorism, delivered a major policy address on defining the enemy. He laid out the White House policy of detaching any reference to Islam when referring to terrorists, be it al Qaeda, the Taliban or any other group.

But Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the man tapped by Mr. Obama as the new top commander in Afghanistan, led the production of an extensive counterinsurgency manual in December 2006 that does, in fact, tell commanders of a link between Islam and extremists.

The Petraeus doctrine refers to "Islamic insurgents," "Islamic extremists" and "Islamic subversives." It details ties between Muslim support groups and terrorists. His co-author was Gen. James F. Amos, whom Mr. Obama has picked as the next Marine Corps commandant and Joint Chiefs of Staff member.

PETRAEUS IS RIGHT AND OBAMA IS WRONG.

AND THE EXPLANATION THAT PASTORIUS GAVE IS EXACTLY RIGHT:

THIS IS HOW THE ENEMY IDENTIFIES ITSELF, AND IT'S WHAT INSPIRES, INFORMS AND DIRECTS THEIR STRATEGIES AND TACTICS AND TARGETS.

THEREFORE THERE IS NO BETTER WAY OR MORE USEFUL OR EFFECTIVE WAY FOR US TO IDENTIFY THEM.

NEED MORE PROOF?

HERE - ANOTHER HEADLINE FROM TODAY'S TIMES (WHICH SOMEHOW SLIPPED THROUGH THEIR LEFTIST CENSORS!):


WE NEED TO ACCEPT THE ENEMY FOR WHAT IT IS AND ATTACK THEM ACCORDINGLY.

SWEEPING THEIR CORE IDEOLOGY UNDER THE RUG IS JUST AS BAD AS APPEASING THEM.

IT MAKES IT TOUGHER FOR US TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

WE CAN END THIS CHARADE THIS NOVEMBER: VOTE GOP!

No comments: