"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Sunday, January 17, 2010

NEW NOAA/GISS SCANDAL AS BIG AS CLIMATEGATE!

CCF:

For those who haven’t seen it, here’s a link to US weatherman John Coleman’s magisterial demolition of the Great AGW Scam.

I particularly recommend part 4 because that’s the one with all the meat.

It shows how temperature readings have been manipulated at the two key climate data centres in the United States – the NASA Goddard Science and Space Institute at Columbia University in New York and the NOAA National Climate Data Center in Ashville, North Carolina. (Hat tip: Platosays)

This is a scandal to rank with Climategate.

What it shows is that, just like in Britain at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) temperature data records have been grotesquely distorted by activist scientists in order to exaggerate the appearance of late 20th century global warming.

They achieved this – with an insouciant disregard for scientific integrity which quite beggars belief – through the simple expedient of ignoring most of those weather station sited in higher, colder places and using mainly ones in warmer spots.

Then, they averaged out the temperature readings given by the warmer stations to give a global average.

Et voila: exactly the scary “climate change” they needed to persuade bodies like the IPCC that AGW was a clear and present danger requiring urgent pan-governmental action.

The man who spotted all this is a computer programmer called EM Smith – aka the Chiefio.

You can read the full report at his excellent blog.

In the 70s, the Chiefio discovered, GISS and NOAA took their temperature data from 6,000 weather stations around the world. By 1990, though, this figure had mysteriously dropped to 1500.

Even more mysteriously this 75 per cent reduction in the number of stations used had a clear bias against those at higher latitudes and elevations.

Here’s an excellent example of this: Bolivia.

Notice that nice rosy red over the top of Bolivia? Bolivia is that country near, but not on, the coast just about half way up the Pacific Ocean side. It has a patch of high cold Andes Mountains where most of the population live. One Small Problem with the anomaly map. There has not been any thermometer data for Bolivia in GHCN since 1990.

None. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nothing. Empty Set.

So just how can it be so Hot Hot Hot! in Bolivia if there is NO data from the last 20 years?

Easy. GIStemp “makes it up” from “nearby” thermometers up to 1200 km away. So what is within 1200 km of Bolivia? The beaches of Chili, Peru and the Amazon Jungle.

Not exactly the same as snow capped peaks and high cold desert, but hey, you gotta make do with what you have, you know?

MORE AT THE LINK - USE IT!

2 comments:

Unknown said...

"75 per cent reduction in the number of stations" is not correct. Removing 1500 stations from 6000 total is a 25 percent reduction. You probably meant that the number of stations was reduced TO 75 percent of the previous number.

Reliapundit said...

U READ IT WRONG:

THERE WERE 6000.

THERE ARE NOW 1500.

THAT'S A SUBTRACTION OF 4500.

0R 75%.