WHAT AGW IS REALLY ALL ABOUT AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN ABOUT FROM THE START: GLOBAL SOCIALISM
LINDZEN HAS SPOKEN ABOUT THIS: (VIDEO AT LINK)Pushing rich-world countries like the United States and the European Union to lay money on the table for poor countries may prove to be the most significant obstacle to reaching a global agreement on curbing global warming, Connie Hedegaard, the Danish minister for the United Nations climate conference in Copenhagen, warned at an opening ceremony for the conference on Monday.
... On Saturday, Achim Steiner, the head of the United Nations Environment Program, warned wealthy industrialized countries to come up with an adequate financing package for poorer countries or risk a public outcry in Copenhagen.
As far back as the 1970’s, Bert Bolin, advisor to the Swedish Prime Minister and later the first head of the IPCC openly announced that “Climate Change” would be used as a vehicle to implement a variety of agendas.AGW IS RUSE.
Two cooperating institutions emerged n the 1990’s:
- the Tyndal Centre for Climate Studies at UEA, headed by Michael Hulme
- Potsdam Institute for Climate impact Research, headed by Joachim Schellnhuber
Both these institutions epitomize the exploitation of the climate issue.
Both have interlocking directorates (they are effectively one institution).
Mike Hulme’s recent book “Why We Disagree About Climate Change” contains some revealing quotes. He readily acknowledges that the science is uncertain, but that this doesn’t matter given the uses that this issue may be put:“The idea of climate change should be seen as an intellectual resource around which our collective and personal identities and projects can form and take shape. We need to ask not what we can do for climate change, but what climate change can do for us.”– quote which might apply to CAGW.
“Because the idea of climate change is so plastic. It can be deployed across many of our human projects and can serve many of our psychological, ethical and spiritual needs.”
“We will continue to create and tell new stories about climate change and mobilise them in support of our projects.”
“These myths transcend the scientific categories of “true” and “false.”
“Create a concept and reality leaves the room”
The vulnerability of science was well understood by President Eisenhower, in his farewell address to the nation in 1961, he said “that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite” and that “Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract virtually becomes a substitute for intellectual curiosity …. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations and the power of money is ever present, and is gravely to be regarded.“
ALL THE AGW ALARMISTS REALLY WANT IS TO SHACKLE INDUSTRY AND THE FREEMARKET TO HIGH TAXES TO FINANCE THEIR SOCIALIST-UTOPIANISTIC TRANSNATIONAL GOALS
THE LEFT IS ALWAYS EMPLOYING THESE SEEMINGLY "HIGH & MIGHTY" SOP'S - LIKE "PC":
OH, YOU CAN'T SAY THIS OR THAT ABOUT THEIR "PETS", BUT YOU CAN CALL BUSH "BUSHITLER" AND SAY ANYTHING YOU WANT ABOUT PALIN.
IF THEY WERE REALLY FOR CIVIL DIALOG THEN THEY WOULDN'T HAVE CALLED BUSH BUSHITLER - OR BE CALLING TEA PARTYERS "TEABAGGERS".
THE LEFT RESORTS TO THESE RUSES BECAUSE THE LEFT KNOWS THEY CAN'T DEFEND THEIR ACTIONS OR GOALS ON THE MERITS, SO THEY RESORT TO LIES, PROPAGANDA, SUBTERFUGE, VICTIMHOOD ETC - AND WHY THEY TRY TO IMPLEMENT THEIR AGENDA VIA STEALTH.
IT'S WHY THE LEFT CONSTANTLY CALLS ANYONE WHO IS CRITICAL OF OBAMA'S IDEOLOGY A RACIST.
OCCASIONALLY THE MASK SLIPS.
TODAY, IT SLIPPED IN COPENHAGEN.
THEY SHOWED THAT THEY'RE WATERMELONS: GREEN ON THE OUTSIDE AND RED ON THE INSIDE.