OBAMA'S TREATMENT OF 9/11 AS A CRIMINAL ISSUE RATHER THAN AN ACT OF WAR SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TREASON

None dare call it treason, but it is.

Here's the Presidential Oath of Office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Al Qaeda, and all the other Jihadists like them, want to destroy the United States, and replace our Constitution with Sharia Law.

• The Jihadists have declared war on us. They tell us they are waging Jihad on Dar al-Harb (the house of War) or Infidel land. We are the Great Satan.

• Obama does not want to call it war. Bringing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to New York to stand trial shows that Obama thinks of 9/11 as a criminal act, not a war.

I think we need a Constitutional Amendment which states that, if a nation or group of people declare war on the U.S., and then actually proceed to carry out acts of war resulting in the deaths of over 1000 people, the President is REQUIRED TO WAGE WAR IN RETURN.

IF HE DOES NOT DO SO, HE IS GUILTY OF TREASON HIMSELF,

BECAUSE HE IS NOT HONORING HIS OATH OF OFFICE TO SERVE, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Reliapundit adds: IMHO: We don't need ANY constitutional amendment; we have elections and the impeachment clause.

Obama wants KSM to get a trial to "expose" the CIA and Bushitlercheneyhalliburton and aid the enemy. It's a clever/stealthy anti-American act and does merit impeachment.