"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Sunday, June 21, 2009

OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK

There is absolutely no end to governmental wastefulness:
The federal government is spending $423,500 to find out why men don't like to wear condoms, a project government watchdogs say is a nearly-half-a-million-dollar waste of taxpayer money.

Researchers at Indiana University's Kinsey Institute, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, are investigating why "young, heterosexual adult men" have problems using condoms. The study will include "skill-based intervention" to teach grown men how to use protection.


The first phase of the two-year study called "Barriers to Correct Condom Use" will be a simple Q&A, but doctors say the second phase will plumb uncharted territory....

[...]

But the $423,500 grant for the study is just a crumb in the NIH pie. The NIH spends $29 billion each year to help fund thousands of health studies at home and abroad.

But some questionable queries have come under close scrutiny, including a $400,000 study being conducted in bars in Buenos Aires to find out why gay men engage in risky sexual behavior while drunk; a $2.6 million study dedicated to teaching prostitutes in China to drink less while having sex on the job; and a $178,000 study to better understand why drug-abusing prostitutes in Thailand are at greater risk for HIV infection.
You have to read the rest to get the full stupidity of what the NIH is funding.

2 comments:

SugarBitch said...

"a $400,000 study being conducted in bars in Buenos Aires to find out why gay men engage in risky sexual behavior while drunk" That's easy! More alcohol=less inhibitions. Study completed. I'll take that $400,000 now, please. Why don't they also study how the rate of sexual intercourse escalates when the girl is drunk, while they're at it. Oh, and the condom study, do we really need to spend all that money when you could do man-on-the-street interview for free for that one.

Always On Watch said...

The NIH could be spending this money on research a lot more important, IMO.