President Obama has made “empathy” with certain groups one of his criteria for choosing a Supreme Court nominee is a dangerous sign of how much farther the Supreme Court may be pushed away from the rule of law and toward even more arbitrary judicial edicts to advance the agenda of the Left and set it in legal concrete, immune from the democratic process.TAB ON SUNDAY:
Would you want to go into court to appear before a judge with “empathy” for groups A, B, and C, if you were a member of groups X, Y, or Z?
Nothing could be farther from the rule of law.
REGULAR READERS OF TAB KNOW WE SCOOP ALL THE BIGGIES ALL THE TIME BECAUSE WE DON'T JUST FOLLOW THE PACK
OBAMA SEEKS AN ACTIVIST WHO WILL DECIDE CASES BASED ON OUTCOMES AND NOT THE LAW. HE SAID THIS DOZENS OF TIME ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL. IT'S WHAT HE WILL DO AND WHO HE WILL PICK.
THIS IS NOT PRAGMATISM; IT IS ALINSKY ACTIVISM - AND IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND BAD FOR OUR NATION.
- SEE THE SUB-TITLE OF ALINSKY'S BOOK? HERE: "A PRAGMATIC PRIMER FOR REALISTIC RADICALS".
- THIS IS THE KIND OF "PRAGMATIST" OBAMA IS: AN "ALINSKY PRAGMATIST".
- LOOK AT THE PHOTO ABOVE (IN THE NYT ARTICLE) - OF OBAMA SUPPOSEDLY TEACHING LAW:
- IT DOESN'T SHOW OBAMA PARSING THE LAW;
- IT DEPICTS OBAMA DIAGRAMMING "POWER RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ECONOMY", (CORPORATIONS, BANKS, UTILITIES); IT'S MARXIST ANALYSIS PURE & SIMPLE.
BOOKMARK US; BLOGROLL US; SPREAD THE WORD.
No comments:
Post a Comment