No end in sight in GazaTHIS IS WISHFUL-THINKING BY SOMEONE WHO THINKS WE SHOULDN'T FIGHT BACK.
- THEY SAID THE SAME CRAP ABOUT IRAQ - THAT THERE WAS "NO END IN SIGHT" - THEY EVEN MADE A FREAKIN' MOVIE ABOUT IRAQ WITH THAT TITLE!!!
- WELL, THEY WERE WRONG ABOUT IRAQ.
- THEY WOULD RATHER WE APPEASE AND SLIP INTO DHIMMITUDE, THAN FIGHT BACK.
- THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY TO DEFEAT AN ENEMY: FIGHTING BACK.
- GAZA IS A COUNTER-OFFENSIVE - ONE ISRAEL CAN WIN, IF THE WEST LET'S THEM.
- THE LEFT IS DETERMINED NOT TO LET ISRAEL WIN.
- WHY?
- THEY HATE THE USA AND ISRAEL AND WANT BOTH TO GET THEIR "COMEUPPANCE".
- THAT'S WHY I HAVE LONG ARGUED, THAT TO DEFEAT THE JIHADISTS ABROAD WE NEED TO DEFEAT THE LEFTISTS AT HOME, AND THE DEFEATIST WHINERS.
- NOTE: LANG IS A DISTINGUISHED FORMER MILITARY ANALYST - AND HIS ANTI-ISRAEL, APPEASING STATUS-QUOIST "REALISM" IS THE DOMINANT MODE AT BOTH THE PENTAGON AND THE CIA.
- THAT'S WHY RUMSFELD WAS HATED WITHIN THE PENTAGON - AND ESPECIALLY BUT MOST OF THE BRASS; RUMMY KNEW WHO AND WHAT HE WAS UP AGAINST AND SOUGHT TO FIX IT.
GIVING OURSELVES DEADLINES AND HOLDING OURSELVES TO DOUBLE-STANDARDS - (STANDARDS WE APPLY TO US AND OUR ALLIES, BUT NOT THE ENEMY) - ARE ONE-WAY TICKETS TO DEFEAT.
THAT'S WHY THE LEFT AND THE JIHADISTS LIKE DEADLINES AND DOUBLE-STANDARDS.
ASIDE: LARRY JOHNSON IS THE FORMER HEAD OF COUNTER-TERROR AT THEN STATE DEPARTMENT WHO WROTE AN OP-ED IN THE NYTIMES - 3 MONTHS BEFORE 9/11 - WHICH WAS TITLED:
The Declining Terrorist Threat
IOW: HE'S A MORON.
4 comments:
If you lower your standards to the same level as you enemy, then what is it worth?
You write a lot about how much better Israel is handling the war,compared to Hamas. But according to this post, they are wrong this this?
The cover of the current issue of Time blares out "Why Israel Can't Win."
The propaganda war is hot and heavy now.
FDR USED ANY/ALL MEASN AND FOUGHT UNTIL THE ENEMY UNCONDITIONALLY SURRENDERED.
THAT'S HOW YOU WIN.
ANYTHING LESS IS FOOLSIH AND DEFEATIST.
LEFTISTS HAVE NO REAL FAITH ION THE SUPERIORITY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CULTURE; IN FACT, THEY BLAME IT FOR WHAT THEY FEEL ARE THE WORLD'S WORST CRIMES: GLOBAL WARMING; THRID WORLD POVERTY, AND MOST OF HISTORY'S GENOCIDE.
THEY ARE FACTUALLY WRONG ON ALL THREE.
BUT BECAUSE THEY FEEL IT'S BAD, THEY WANT IT TO GET ITS COMEUPPANCE.
THAT'S WHY THEY LIKE GLOBAL JIHAD AND THE GRAMSCIAN AGENDA.
FDR - AND CLASSICAL LIBERALS/NEOCONS - BELIEVE IN UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND REALIZE THAT THEY WERE WON AT HUGE COST AND MUST BE PROTECTED AT ANY COST.
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE.
USING HARSH TACTICS DOESN'T MAKE US LIKE THE ENEMY BECAUSE WE ARE FIGHTING FOR LIBERTY AND UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS.
IF YOU THINK IT MATTERS NOT WHAT YOU FIGHT FOR - OR AGAINST - THEN YOU MIGHT AS WELL ENDORSE THE CONFEDERACY OR CALL THEM THE MORAL EQUIVALENT OF THE UNION.
THAT LINCOLN AND GRANT AND SHERMAN DID WHATEVER IT TOOK TO DEFEAT THE SOUTH AND SLAVERY DID NOT MAKE THEM LIKE THE SOUTH; IT MADE THEM HEROES, SYMBOLS OF LIBERTY, IMMORTALS.
WE MUST BE WILLING TO FIGHT LIKE FDR AND GRANT ANDS SHERMAN.
AND IKE.
AND SO ON.
If you say that wester civilized countries = judeo-christians, you are wrong. We need less of that, and more rational people.
Post a Comment