"VOUCHERS, NOT BAILOUTS!"I DON'T WANT BAILOUT MONEY GOING DIRECTLY TO CEO'S OR STOCKHOLDERS.
I THINK WE SHOULD ONLY GIVE THE MONEY TO TAX-PAYERS IN VOUCHER FORM:
HAVE EACH VOUCHER TARGETED TO A SPECIFIC SECTOR OF THE ECONOMY:
- A CAR VOUCHER GOOD AT GM, CHRYSLER OR FORD - FOR THEIR US BUILT CARS.
- A VOUCHER GOOD FOR HOME IMPROVEMENT WHICH MIGHT ALSO BE USED FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
- A VOUCHER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION.
- A VOUCHER FOR A BLUE-CHIP STOCK HELD IN A TAX -FREE ACCOUNT UNTIL RETIREMENT.
THIS WILL GIVE A DIRECT BENEFIT TO THE TAX-PAYER, AND THEN TO THE PRIVATE COMPANIES THAT THE TAX-PAYER DECIDES IS RIGHT FOR HIM/HER.THIS WAY, POLITICIANS WON'T BE PICKING WINNERS AND LOSERS - PEOPLE WILL!
POWER TOP THE PEOPLE!
VOUCHERS TO THE PEOPLE!
"VOUCHERS, NOT BAILOUTS!"
SPREAD THE WORD.
3 comments:
A VOUCHER GOOD FOR HOME IMPROVEMENT WHICH MIGHT ALSO BE USED FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
I'd love one of these if it were retroactive. I installed thermal windows last March in this old house.
Reliapundit,
I've been thinking about this. It makes sense.
However, doesn't this mean you are arguing for a bottom-up solution, instead of a trickle-down solution?
whatever.
up down.
that's bs.
if we want our gov to stimulate the economy it's better if people pick the winners and losers than dc pols.
fist - the peeps get a primary/immediate reward for the added debt,
and - 2- only genuinely useful shit will get bought.
the makers/purveyors of those goods and services get a JUST reward and not politically connected corps/unions.
Post a Comment