- WHAT IS MORE, OBAMA RAN ON THE NEW PARTY LINE IN 1996. THE NEW PARTY WAS A SOCIALIST PARTY.
- I KNOW ONE OF THE FINANCIAL BACKERS OF THIS PARTY AND HE ADMITS IT.
- OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST, NOT A CENTRIST.
- ELECTING HIM WITH PELOSI AND REID RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE WILL MEAN THEY CAN EUROPEANIZE THE USA - RUIN US.
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
AUDIO PROOF FROM 2001 THAT OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST
FROM STACLU: HERE'S EVEN MORE PROOF THAT OBAMA IS A STALWART REDISTRIBUTIONIST - IOW: SOCIALIST:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Newsflash Mr. "Censor everyone who disagrees with me": Every single last bit of government spending is a "redistribution", including the funding of the military!
Again, that you and the radical right would continue to characterize this as "socialism" shows either your own ignorance of politics and ideology or your contempt for the intelligence of the electorate and its ability to see through that kind of dishonest hysteria. But by all means stay the course, TAB. It's been working well for you thus far!
BTW, I've got a great log of posts you've deleted and the lies you've told regarding why they were censored. Let me know if you'd like me to email them to you.
Food for thought: WCTHDAWWJD? (What comments that he didn't agree with would Jesus delete?) Better yet, is censorship of comments more like America or more like what occurs in a tyrannical dictatorship?
Obama is the better choice
Published: October 26 2008 19:31 | Last updated: October 26 2008 19:31
FINANCIAL TIMES
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1d0b127c-a380-11dd-942c-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
mccoy,
The point is, Obama thinks that re-distribution is a legitimate government purpose.
That is, he thinks the government should be able to confiscate what you have produced, and turn it over to whomever it decides is more deserving.
That is a sure fire formula for economic ruin. It has ruined every economy in which it has been applied.
Punditarian,
So does every single other politician that hasn't advocated funding government programs with only user fees or voluntary donations.
I actually think it's quite funny that Obama has driven conservatives to all start spouting Ron Paul-like extremist hysterics. I am curious to know what countries you think Obama's policies have been applied in and failed, as I think such a list would illustrate the very mischaracterization I identified above.
Again, I don't know if the extreme right of the blogosphere is too ignorant to understand how completely untenable the claims it's making are or that it has such contempt for the electorate that it thinks voters will be unable to see it for what it is, but either way, the tactics you're using are increasingly proving themselves to be counterproductive.
The inability to evolve or learn from new information doesn't bode well for your ideological leaning.
Post a Comment