This is only a small advance on what was already known. It is known that Left/Right orientation is strongly genetic and the study below shows that the strength of that orientation is also genetically inherited -- JR
A groundbreaking new study finds that genes significantly affect variation in voter turnout, shedding new light on the reasons why people vote and participate in the political system. The research, conducted by political scientists James H. Fowler, Christopher T. Dawes (of UC San Diego) and psychologist Laura A. Baker (of University of Southern California), appears in the May issue of the American Political Science Review, a journal of the American Political Science Association (APSA).
"Although we are not the first to suggest a link between genes and political participation," note the authors, "this study is the first attempt to test the idea empirically." They do so by conducting three tests of the claim that part of the variation in political participation can be attributed to genetic factors. The results suggest that individual genetic differences make up a large and significant portion of the variation in political participation, even after taking socialization and other environmental factors into account. They also suggest that, contrary to decades of conventional wisdom, family upbringing may have little or no effect on children's future participatory behavior.
In conducting their study, the authors examine the turnout patterns of identical and non-identical twins-including 396 twins in Los Angeles County and 806 twins in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Their findings suggest that 53% of the variation in turnout can be accounted for by genetic effects in the former, with similar outcomes in the latter.
Moreover, genetic-based differences extend to a broad class of acts of political participation, including donating to a campaign, contacting an official, running for office, and attending a rally. According to Fowler, "we expected to find that genes played some role in political behavior, but we were quite surprised by the size of the effect and how widely it applies to all kinds of participation." "The fact that we have found genetic variation in voting, and political participation in general, should not be surprising given the large numbers of behaviors that have already been found to be heritable," observe the authors.
Source
Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
1 comment:
I'm on the go right now and don't have time to follow the link, so this may be covered, but do they make any distinctions?
For instance, when I look back thru my own genealogy, I see a whole bunch of "freedom" lovers who ended up in America as rebels. From my very independent and wild Scots-Irish ready to fight at the drop of the hat and Revolutionary leaders, to my rebellious religious Welsh Quakers escaping persecution, to my Huguenot French ancestors and the German Protestants escaping religious persecution in Europe in the 16th and 17th centures, they were all people who did not like other people telling them how to live their lives, who or what to worship, or how to use their own property.
Most of my ancestors were in America by the early 1700s, but by 1776, they were their community leaders and signing up for the early militias ready to fight to the death for their freedoms. I've always been proud to know I had some of those independent genes, especially from some of my ancestral Grandmothers who were ready to fight right alongside their men.
I don't think that makes me genetically more likely to vote now, just less likely to submit to tyrants and those wanting to take my freedoms away. That I believe is in the genes.
Post a Comment