He's raising so much money that lefties no longer consider money a bad influence!
Which really just proves once again how unprincipled the left really is - and always has been, too.
Unprincipled or not, Obama has a lot of money, and money can buy a lot of things.
But can it buy a victory?
The Democrat super-delegates might feel that it can. Most who supported Obama were most impressed with his fund-raising ability - and then his youth support.
Are they right?
NO. Evidence seems to indicate that money cannot make Obama a winner.
Look at the Hillary versus Obama primary in PA.
Obama got his ass kicked while outspending here 5 to one. (See here and here and here.)
And Hillary is no McCain.
Obama outspent Hillary in Ohio - by 2-to-one, and still got his ass kicked.
Obama outspent Hillary in Texas - and lost the popular vote there too.
OBVIOUSLY: McCain and the GOP can win even if outspent by Obama. Especially if they make Obama's flip-flop on campaign financing an issue - one which exposes Obama is basically an unprincipled politician. And that Obama's lack of principles on top of his lack of experience make him even less trustworthy.
THE REAL THREAT IS ORGANIZED DEMOCRAT VOTER FRAUD BY OBAMA'S OLD LEFT-WING ALLIES AT ACORN, SEIU, A.C.T. AND THE LIKE.
It was voter fraud which gave Kerry a very tight win in Wisconsin. And made other states tight, too.
I expect it to be a rampant as ever in Detroit, Philly, St Louis and in other Dem machine strongholds like CHICAGO, where they hold the patent on it!
I hope the GOP has a plan to defeat it. If not, then this is how Obama might pull out a win.
UPDATE: Ed at HOT AIR posts news that Obama did NOT raise a lot of money in May, and this might be a sigh of things to come - that perhaps the Obama money machine has peaked too soon.
If this is the case, then ALL the SDems have left in their bag of tricks is voter fraud.
STAY TUNED...
3 comments:
I went on record a little while ago stating that Obama's win was primarily an anti-Hillary vote.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/05/a_democratic_year.html
If I am correct, then Obama's fundraising is headed for the pits. I'm following this.
good analysis roy.
tho i disagree w/ur characterization of goldwater.
Dear Reliapundit,
I was a Goldwater supporter. I voted for him. The point I was making is that Goldwater was perceived by the electorate to be a radical. Whether this was an informed opinion or, as many maintain, propaganda it makes no difference politically.
Regards,
Roy
Post a Comment