"BP" stands for "Before the Present". Argon in the period above is quite a close correlate with CO2. That both argon and CO2 levels might be an EFFECT of warming rather than vice versa must not be mentioned, of course. Everyone knows how the fizz fizzles away as a Pepsi gets warm. Likewise, since the ocean contains vast reserves of CO2, anyone can easily grasp what happens when the ocean gets warm. The scales should fall off of people's eyes when that simple fact is explained.
Posted by John Ray
6 comments:
"Thank you coming to testify at our Senatorial investigation, Mr. Ray- Now, I've been told that you bring with you some new evidence demonstrating the cause and effects of global weather change?"
"Yes, Sir."
"Mr, Ray, could you now present the evidence that you have brought with you?"
"Absolutely, Sir!" (places can of Pepsi on table and opens it) psshhtt!!
(short pause)
"Mr. Ray?"
"Yes, Sir?"
"The evidence, Mr, Ray?"
"Yes, Sir. Right there, Sir."
"Right where, Mr. Ray?"
"Right there, Sir. The Pepsi."
"The Pepsi?"
"Yes, Sir."
(another short pause)
"Well, I for one am now thirsty, and propose a twenty-minute recess. Thank you, Mr. Ray"
david u are STILL a jerk.
here's a good summary:
"The sun has a variable output and, after a warming stage, is beginning to enter a cooling stage. CO2 is simply a lagging indicator of global temperatures. When the sun warms up the oceans during periods of greater output, the oceans release CO2 increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. When the sun has lower output, the oceans cool and absorb CO2 which reduces the level of CO2 in the atmosphere."
that's why co2 increases come 800 years AFTER temperature increases.
watch this: 1hr 14 minutes.
you'll learn something.
http://video.google.com/
videoplay?docid=
-6772058898203776825&q=
global+warming+swindle&total=212&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
That "lagging indicator" canard is far more complex than the Pepsi explanation. It almost seems like you are saying, "The way to control CO2 is for us to control the sun"
Here's an explanatory video for you to watch: (less than a minute)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZ3qd7ziGcY
What are the chances that you'll learn something too?
.
DAVID:
I AM SAYING WHAT A THOUSAND SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING:
GLOBAL WARMING IS PERIODIC AND
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL.
PROVE IT ISN'T.
YOU ASSHOLE.
CO2 DOESN'T CAUSE GW AND IT NEVER HAS.
FACT: WE HAVE HAD SERIOUS GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES THE LAST TWO THOUSAND YEARS WHICH HAVE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CO2 OR ANY MAN-MADE EFFECT.
BESIDES: IT'S NOT GETTING WARMER ANYMORE.
NO FU**OFF UNTIL YOU'VE WATCHED THE ENTIRE GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE DOCUMENTARY.
OR ARE YOU TOO SCARED TO WATCH IT!?
I think you're getting grumpier; lately it only takes me TWO notes to get you to flip out.
PS: I've watched your favorite "documentary", learned plenty of things from it, and I happen to agree with the IPCC that it is...
"a mixture of truth, half truth and falsehood put together with the sole purpose of discrediting the science of global warming"
Have you ever read what Carl Wunsch himself said about how his interview was completely misrepresented in the film?
Live with it.
HOW COLD DID IT GET IN MELBOURNE FLA AS**OLE?
EUROPE IS HAVING ITS SNOWIEST WINTER IN 60 YEARS.
DOES THAT SOUND LIKE GLOBAL WARMING CAUSED BY THE INEXORABLY IN CREASING CO2!?!?
IF CO2 CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING THEM THIS WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE.
EVERY YEAR THERE IS MORE MAN-MADE CO2 AND YET EVERY YEAR IT DOESN'T GET WARMER.
WAKE UP.
Post a Comment