"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Saturday, November 17, 2007

DEMS IN CONGRESS ATTACK ANOTHER AMERICAN ALLY: ETHIOPIA

The Democrats in Congress continue to seek new fronts in which to aid America's enemies. Having failed to defeat America in Iraq, and after their second-place Presidential aspirant threatened to bomb American ally Pakistan, the Dems are now turning against Ethiopia, a critical ally on the front lines of the jihad in the strategically critical Horn of Africa.

As described in an op-ed by two former chiefs-of-mission at the American Embassy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in the New Duranty Times:
Sadly, Congress is poised to fuel the march toward war by passing a bill that threatens to cut off technical assistance to Ethiopia, one of our closest allies, if it does not, among other things, release political prisoners, ensure that the judiciary operates independently and permit the news media to operate freely. Ethiopia has already freed opposition leaders, reformed parliamentary rules to give opposition parties greater legislative responsibility and approved a new media law that meets international standards. By singling out Ethiopia for public embarrassment, the bill puts Congress unwittingly on the side of Islamic jihadists and insurgents.
Well said, as far as it goes. But after we have seen the Democrats repeatedly attempt to torpedo the war against the jihadi terrorists in Iraq by attempting time and again to cut off funding to our frontline troops, and repeatedly attempt to defeat the counter-terrorism measures the Bush administration has employed in the United States, and repeatedly attempt to undermine the administration diplomatically by privately treating with our enemies in Syria and Iran, and repeatedly act to snub and humiliate American allies as they did with Colombia and Turkey, you have to wonder just why anyone would think they are "unwittingly on the side of Islamic jihadists and insurgents."

I think the Democrats know what they are doing. They are trying to defeat President Bush every which way but loose, and in the blind madness of their partisanship and Bush-hatred, they don't realize that they are working to defeat America. And they know very well that they are doing everything they can to establish a socialist nanny-state in America and carry out Gramsci's program of undermining the social and cultural foundations of our republican democracy.

You and I are on the front lines of this momentous cultural struggle. The lives of hundreds of millions of people around the world depend on our ability to defeat the left in America. If America falls to the left, there will be nothing to hold back the tide of tyranny. I mean this with the utmost seriousness. There is no rear echelon in the war against jihadi terror. We are all on the front lines, one way or another.

1 comment:

Reliapundit said...

i shudder to think of what jihadoterrorist atrocity would have to occur for the dems to rejoin our side in WW4...

i think that it is more likely that were nyc to be nuked or "prez hillary" (puke/shudder to think) to be assassinated by jihadists that they would just BLAME BUSH.

i think we'd have to have proof of dem leadership's ACTIVE collusion with the enemy - rather than their passive collusion - to open up the eyes of the democrat masses.

and then of course there's the fact that much of the electorate grew up in the post-Reagan era and have no idea how evil and useless leftist policies have been throughout the last century; these folks are more liable to be fooled by promises of what government can do for them.

it very worrisome.

the pendulum may be swinging back to the left, and this favors scum like hillary, reid, pelosi and their comrade BIN LADEN.

without a charismatic and weighty leader on the right, it's hard to see how we can win.

and as you say: this is not a sideshow: it's the front-line.

i think we need to begin a grass-roots "reach out" effort like the GOP did so well ion 2004.

IOW: Organization IS KEY.

WHICH LEADS ME TO THINK MITT IS OUR MAN.

i like rudy more on WW4. but mitt is a better organizational person.

whattyatink?