Emerging economies such as China are justified in holding back on fighting greenhouse gas emissions until richer polluters like the United States do more to solve the problem, former Vice President Al Gore said Wednesday.THE FACT THAT CHINA AND INDIA WERE EXEMPTED FROM KYOTO IS PRECISELY WHY IT WAS VOTED DOWN IN 1998 BY 95-0. EVEN KERRY VOTED AGAINST IT.
AND IF REDUCING GREENHOUSE GASES WERE REALLY SO EFFIN' PARAMOUNT TO SAVING HUMANITY - (IF NOT ALL LIFE ON EARTH!) - THEN IT SHOULD NOT MATTER WHICH NATION PRODUCES THWM; IT MUST BE STOPPED AT ALL COSTS.
BUT GORE GIVES THE SOCIALIST TYRANTS IN CHINA A PASS. IT DOESN'T GET MORE HYPOCRITICAL THAN THAT.
(ARE THERE ANY SOCIALIST TYRANNIES THE POST MODERN LEFT DOESN'T LIKE!? NO! THEY WOULD FAVOR ANY SOCIALIST - OR THIRD WORLD - TYRANNY OVER THE USA AND THE WEST. HECK: IT VIRTUALLY DEFINES POST MODERNISM.)
NEED MORE PROOF THAT THE ENTIRE MAN-MADE GREENHOUSE GASES DEBATE IS A POST MODERN LEFTIST ATTACK ON THE WEST? WELL, HERE'S ANOTHER EXAMPLE:
China produces about 14.5% of the planet’s alleged global warming emissions. Australia produces only 1.6%. Which leads the Sydney Morning Herald’s Mary-Anne Toy to ask:Is it fair to expect China to cut carbon emissions, which per capita are a tiny fraction of Australia’s?
Well, it depends; are you opposed to carbon emissions, or opposed to Australia?