Friday, June 30, 2006
WASH POST: "House Passes Bill Ending Ban On Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling"
BRAVO!
TAB has been calling for this ever since KATRINA PROVED that off-shore drilling is ENTIRELY SAFE (links to a 9/25/05 post); (there were NO oil spills related to off-shore platform which weathered the WORST of Katrina's cat 5 winds and storm surge).
Now we gotta get this pandering piece of crap Democrat Senator Bill Nelson to GET OUT OF THE FREAKING WAY so the Senate can pass a similar bill and get it to GWB to sign into law.
There is NO RATIONAL REASON TO OPPOSE OFF-SHORE DRILLING: REPEAT: We need the oil; we need DOMESTIC energy sources, and it's ENITRELY SAFE AND ENTIRELY CLEAN.
TAB has been calling for this ever since KATRINA PROVED that off-shore drilling is ENTIRELY SAFE (links to a 9/25/05 post); (there were NO oil spills related to off-shore platform which weathered the WORST of Katrina's cat 5 winds and storm surge).
Now we gotta get this pandering piece of crap Democrat Senator Bill Nelson to GET OUT OF THE FREAKING WAY so the Senate can pass a similar bill and get it to GWB to sign into law.
There is NO RATIONAL REASON TO OPPOSE OFF-SHORE DRILLING: REPEAT: We need the oil; we need DOMESTIC energy sources, and it's ENITRELY SAFE AND ENTIRELY CLEAN.
LEFTIES ARE FREAKING INSANE: A QUICK ROUND-UP OF TODAY'S LEFT-WING LUNACIES
YEAH: TODAY'S!
Sept. 11 claim stirs U.W. probe: Professor says U.S. planned 9/11 to provoke war; al Qaeda a tool of CheneyThat's just their lunacy from TODAY! They're freaking insane!
Hollywood makes Superman un-American
Sulzberger attacks the WSJ
Rosa Brooks / Los Angeles Times: Did Bush commit war crimes?
Blaming Israel for the current Gaza conflict
Washington made "a small and fractious al Qaeda a global threat" - from NEWSWEEK!
Thursday, June 29, 2006
G-8 BACKS EU3: GIVES IRAN A DEADLINE. AND THEN WHAT!?
NYTIMES:
The time for talking and letter-writing and diplomacy uis OVER. It is time to act. I think that we need to start cranking up our preemptive military "machinery": meaning, it's time to get our forces deployed and missiles ready.
Iran has it coming to them! Especially when we couple Iran's nuclear ambition with this:
Diplomats from the world's richest countries set a deadline of next Wednesday for receiving a "clear and substantive" response from Iran to the package of incentives offered by major powers in exchange for its suspending its enrichment of uranium.AND THEN WHAT THEY DO IF IRAN STALLS?! WILL THEY HAVE ELBARADEI JUST SEND IRAN ANOTHER VERY TOUGH-WORDED LETTER!?
In the first explicit timetable for Iran to formally respond to the offer, foreign ministers from the Group of Eight leading industrialized economies issued a statement that "We are disappointed in the absence of an official Iranian response to this positive proposal." They said that Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, and the European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana will meet on July 5, adding that they expect "to bring these discussions to a rapid conclusion."
The time for talking and letter-writing and diplomacy uis OVER. It is time to act. I think that we need to start cranking up our preemptive military "machinery": meaning, it's time to get our forces deployed and missiles ready.
Iran has it coming to them! Especially when we couple Iran's nuclear ambition with this:
WASH POST: Iranian Gunmen Caught in Iraq:
And with this: Iran was behind KHOBAR - which occurred 10 years ago, this week.Iraqi security officials said Iranian fighters had been captured in the fighting, in which a sniper shot dead the commander of an Iraqi quick reaction force and two of his men. They did not say how the Iranians had been identified.
THEY'RE BACK: JAWA!!!!
FIRST KELO, NOW HAMDAN: THE LEFTIES ON THE SCOTUS HAVE SCREWED US AGAIN:
NOW - WITH HAMDAN - THE LEFTIES ON THE COURT HAVE JUST MADE IT HARDER FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE US SAFE FROM THE JIHADOMANIACS:... in the Kelo decision the Supreme Court diverged from centuries of precedent by declaring that cities could seize private property and turn it over to another private party, so long as the action was taken in the name of “economic development.” If there was even a possibility that the transfer would result in greater tax revenues, the seizure could be justified, the Court ruled.
In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor blasted the decision: “Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party… The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms.”
The decision had immediate and unsurprising results. According to a just-released report by the Institute for Justice, in the wake of Kelo, “local governments threatened eminent domain or condemned at least 5,783 homes, businesses, churches, and other properties so that they could be transferred to another private party.”
The ruling was by a 5-3 majority; Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito were the dissenters. The Chief Justice did not participate since he was one of the judges who decided the case in the D.C. Circuit.
Scalia's dissent accuses the majority of ignoring the plain language of Congress's enactment providing that:
[N]o court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Scalia further argues that the majority substitutes its own judgment as to "military necessity" for that of the executive branch.
THESE DECISIONS ARE AS SOUND AND AS GOOD FOR OUR NATION AS THE DRED SCOT DECISION WAS - IN OTHER WORDS: THEY ARE "DRED"-FUL DECISIONS... (PUN INTENDED: DREDFUL = DREADFUL).
AND THEY COME COURTESY OF THE LEFTIES ON THE COURT: SOUTER; KENNEDY; STEVENS, AND BREYER, GINSZBURG.
THEY HAVE EXTENDED RIGHTS NOT EVEN GUARANTEED TO UNIFORMED POW'S WHILE THE CONFLICT IS ON-GOING TO UN-UNIFORMED, NON-SIGNATORY PARTIES.
IF IT WASN'T SO SURREAL AND SO FRIGGIN' OUTRAGEOUS IT WOULD BE HILARIOUS.
THIS IS A DARK DAY FOR AMERICANS WHO WANT US TO WIN THE GWOT - A WAR AGAINST THE MOST VICIOUS AND BLOODTHIRSTY AND LAWLESS ENEMY WE HAVE EVER FACED.
THE MURDERERS OF KRISTIAN MENCHACA AND THOMAS TUCKER SHOULD NOT GET KIND OF TREATMENT THAT THE LEFT HAS ORDERED WE GIVE THEM.
THEY DESERVE WHAT PUTIN HAS PROMSED THEM FOR MURDERING BY DECAPATATION) THE FOUR RUSSIANS IN IRAQ: THEY DESERVE TO DIE.
KELO AND HAMDAN: NAMES THAT WILL REMAIN IN INFAMY - LIKE DRED SCOT.
HERE'S a MUST READ that spells it ALL OUT!
More HERE and HERE and HERE. COMPLETE MSM/BLOG round-up HERE - at MEMEORANDUM.
AND THEY COME COURTESY OF THE LEFTIES ON THE COURT: SOUTER; KENNEDY; STEVENS, AND BREYER, GINSZBURG.
THEY HAVE EXTENDED RIGHTS NOT EVEN GUARANTEED TO UNIFORMED POW'S WHILE THE CONFLICT IS ON-GOING TO UN-UNIFORMED, NON-SIGNATORY PARTIES.
IF IT WASN'T SO SURREAL AND SO FRIGGIN' OUTRAGEOUS IT WOULD BE HILARIOUS.
THIS IS A DARK DAY FOR AMERICANS WHO WANT US TO WIN THE GWOT - A WAR AGAINST THE MOST VICIOUS AND BLOODTHIRSTY AND LAWLESS ENEMY WE HAVE EVER FACED.
THE MURDERERS OF KRISTIAN MENCHACA AND THOMAS TUCKER SHOULD NOT GET KIND OF TREATMENT THAT THE LEFT HAS ORDERED WE GIVE THEM.
THEY DESERVE WHAT PUTIN HAS PROMSED THEM FOR MURDERING BY DECAPATATION) THE FOUR RUSSIANS IN IRAQ: THEY DESERVE TO DIE.
KELO AND HAMDAN: NAMES THAT WILL REMAIN IN INFAMY - LIKE DRED SCOT.
HERE'S a MUST READ that spells it ALL OUT!
More HERE and HERE and HERE. COMPLETE MSM/BLOG round-up HERE - at MEMEORANDUM.
AL AKSA CLAIMS IT USED A WMD AGAINST ISRAEL
"Reuters":
A spokesman for gunmen in the Gaza Strip said they had fired a rocket tipped with a chemical warhead at Israel early on Thursday. The Israeli army had no immediate comment on the claim by the spokesman from the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, an armed wing of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement.
The group had recently claimed to possess about 20 biological warheads for the makeshift rockets commonly fired from Gaza at Israeli towns. This was the first time the group had claimed firing such a rocket. "The al-Aqsa Brigades have fired one rocket with a chemical warhead" at southern Israel, Abu Qusai, a spokesman for the group, said in Gaza.
THIS CLAIM IS UNCONFIRMED. BUT WHAT DOES IT TELL THE WORLD ABOUT THE UTTER DEPRAVITY OF THE PALIS, THAT THEY'D BRAG ABOUT USING WMD!? AND THAT THE BRAG MIGHT BE A LIE!?
ISRAEL'S RESPONSE MUST HAVE THE EFFECT OF DESTROYING THE ENEMY'S ABILITY TO RETALIATE, AND THEIR WILL TO RETALIATE. THE ENEMY MUST BE VANQUISHED, UTTERLY - THEIR LEADERSHIP ENTIRELY ERASED, THEIR ABILITY TO INFLICT AN ATTACK WIPED OUT, ALL THEIR WEAPONS CONFISCATED.
AND THEN THEY MUST ADMIT DEFEAT AND SIGN AN UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.
THIS IS HOW WARS END.
(More on the claim HERE.) MORE HERE AND HERE AND HERE AT ATLAS SHRUGS. Complete round-up HERE at MEMEORANDUM.
ISRAEL'S RESPONSE MUST HAVE THE EFFECT OF DESTROYING THE ENEMY'S ABILITY TO RETALIATE, AND THEIR WILL TO RETALIATE. THE ENEMY MUST BE VANQUISHED, UTTERLY - THEIR LEADERSHIP ENTIRELY ERASED, THEIR ABILITY TO INFLICT AN ATTACK WIPED OUT, ALL THEIR WEAPONS CONFISCATED.
AND THEN THEY MUST ADMIT DEFEAT AND SIGN AN UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.
THIS IS HOW WARS END.
(More on the claim HERE.) MORE HERE AND HERE AND HERE AT ATLAS SHRUGS. Complete round-up HERE at MEMEORANDUM.
WHAT SHE SAID.
ALL THINGS BEAUTIFUL:
Nearly 40 years of pin-point targeted response to Arab rabid hostilities has lead to this perverse situation where the West pays the Palestinian officials, which is synonymous with the term 'terrorists', billions of Dollars so that they can keep spitting into Israel's face.
End this charade now and break up the evil. Stop worrying about public opinion in the West - it's a no-win effort anyway. Kill the cancer dead now, once and for all.
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
SENATE COMMITTEE SMACKS DOWN ANOTHER WILD GORE CLAIM
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT:
AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE’S MOVIE
June 27, 2006
The June 27, 2006 Associated Press (AP) article titled “Scientists OK Gore’s Movie for Accuracy” by Seth Borenstein raises some serious questions about AP’s bias and methodology.
AP chose to ignore the scores of scientists who have harshly criticized the science presented in former Vice President Al Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth.”
[...]
Here is a sampling of the views of some of the scientific critics of Gore:
Professor Bob Carter, of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia, on Gore’s film:
"Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."
"The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science." – Bob Carter as quoted in the Canadian Free Press, June 12, 2006
Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, wrote:
“A general characteristic of Mr. Gore's approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that the earth and its climate are dynamic; they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse.” - Lindzen wrote in an op-ed in the June 26, 2006 Wall Street Journal
Truth is not decided by majority vote. Man-made global warming is merely a hypothesis; it is not a fact.
Perhaps a majority of ecology pro's in the academy have faith that this hypothesis is true, but that might say more about them than the truth: I'd bet that most of these ecologists were drawn into the field by their experiences in the 1970's when idiots like Paul Ehrlich were screaming (like Gore is today) about how the population explosion was gonna mean we were all gonna starve to death and how pollution was gonna cause GLOBAL FREEZING AND A NEW ICE AGE THAT WOULD KILL BILLIONS!
In other words, I'd bet that most of the ecologists who now worry about MAN-MADE global warming are preselected from the general population and reflect the segment who are hyper-worried about man's effect on the environment, and people who are PREDISPOSED to blame industry and capitalism - the twin bogeymen of the Left.
Another of example of this might occur of you were take a poll of SOCIAL WORKERS and ask them if welfare payments were good. I'd bet that the "yes" response would be higher for social workers than for the general population, AND NOT BECAUSE THEY KNOW BETTER.
Likewise, if yopu polled astroscientists on the importance of space exploration.
So let's NOT out too much stock on polls of environmental scientists.
Let's base our policies on FACTS. And MAN-MADE global warming is NOT A PROVEN FACT.
Perhaps a majority of ecology pro's in the academy have faith that this hypothesis is true, but that might say more about them than the truth: I'd bet that most of these ecologists were drawn into the field by their experiences in the 1970's when idiots like Paul Ehrlich were screaming (like Gore is today) about how the population explosion was gonna mean we were all gonna starve to death and how pollution was gonna cause GLOBAL FREEZING AND A NEW ICE AGE THAT WOULD KILL BILLIONS!
In other words, I'd bet that most of the ecologists who now worry about MAN-MADE global warming are preselected from the general population and reflect the segment who are hyper-worried about man's effect on the environment, and people who are PREDISPOSED to blame industry and capitalism - the twin bogeymen of the Left.
Another of example of this might occur of you were take a poll of SOCIAL WORKERS and ask them if welfare payments were good. I'd bet that the "yes" response would be higher for social workers than for the general population, AND NOT BECAUSE THEY KNOW BETTER.
Likewise, if yopu polled astroscientists on the importance of space exploration.
So let's NOT out too much stock on polls of environmental scientists.
Let's base our policies on FACTS. And MAN-MADE global warming is NOT A PROVEN FACT.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
DID THE TRAITOROUS LEAKERS FORCE THE NYTIMES HAND?
I just read this tidbit over at HUGH's BLOG:
So, it seems what REALLY happened was that the traitorous leakers FIRST took the story to the NYTIMES. And that then the NYTIMES took some time and did some due diligence and got some feedback from the WH and the 9/11 Commissioners. And then, THE LEAKERS GOT IMPATIENT, and decided to go to the LATIMES with it, TO SQUEEZE/THREATEN THE NYTIMES, IN EFFECT SAYING: "PRINT IT NOW OR WE GO TO THE LATIMES." This forced the hands of Keller and Pinch, who decided the scoop was more important than the nation's security. But they barely beat the LATIMES, anyhow.
IOW: The NYTIMES is well-known to be very VERY eager to get stuff that hurts President Bush; this makes them an easy mark for the anti-Bush rogues within the Pentagon, the CIA and FBI and other US agencies. And if the NYTIMES doesn't move fast enough, then the rogues just move on to another BDS-afflicted part of the MSM - like the LATIMES. This quote from Lichtblau proves it to me.
The GREAT ROGER L. SIMON has similar thoughts.
Lichtblau of 'NYT' Explains Attempt to Halt His Bank Records ScoopI read this comment - about the competition cathcing up to them - a little differently. After all, the LATIMES didn't sniff-out the story; they were merely contacted by the very SAME leakers.
by Hugh Hewitt
The national security cannot possibly come before the race for the next Pulitzer:"I don't think we could reasonably be accused of moving too quickly," he said. "We waited so long that the competition caught up to us."
This comment referred to the Los Angeles Times' posting a story about the bank records program on its Web site last night.
So, it seems what REALLY happened was that the traitorous leakers FIRST took the story to the NYTIMES. And that then the NYTIMES took some time and did some due diligence and got some feedback from the WH and the 9/11 Commissioners. And then, THE LEAKERS GOT IMPATIENT, and decided to go to the LATIMES with it, TO SQUEEZE/THREATEN THE NYTIMES, IN EFFECT SAYING: "PRINT IT NOW OR WE GO TO THE LATIMES." This forced the hands of Keller and Pinch, who decided the scoop was more important than the nation's security. But they barely beat the LATIMES, anyhow.
IOW: The NYTIMES is well-known to be very VERY eager to get stuff that hurts President Bush; this makes them an easy mark for the anti-Bush rogues within the Pentagon, the CIA and FBI and other US agencies. And if the NYTIMES doesn't move fast enough, then the rogues just move on to another BDS-afflicted part of the MSM - like the LATIMES. This quote from Lichtblau proves it to me.
The GREAT ROGER L. SIMON has similar thoughts.
PATRIOT MISSILE SYSTEMS TO BE DEPLOYED A.S.A.P. IN JAPAN
WASH POST:
Kim Jong Il is a genocidal madman willing to starve his own people to death. His desire to have long-range missiles - and NUKES - is a bald-faced attempt to intimidate the West. Deploying Patriot missile systems, Aegis battle groups and NMD to protect the our key allies in the region is an essential first-step.The Pentagon is reportedly speeding up plans to deploy advanced Patriot interceptor missiles on U.S. bases in Japan for the first time, a countermeasure seen as a response to the increasing threat of North Korean missiles.
This episode PROVES that Bush was 100% right to withdraw from the ABM Treaty - according to terms permitted under the treaty.
NYTIMES REVEALS ITS PRIORITIES: AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMY
The NYTIMES REFUSED TO POUBLISH THE MOHUMMED CARTOONS, BUT INSISTED IT HAD TO PUBLISH THE DETAILS OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM AND THE SWIFT SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM.
WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE NYTIMES?
DR. SANITY (who links to the NYTIMES' own expanation for each):
WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE NYTIMES?
DR. SANITY (who links to the NYTIMES' own expanation for each):
Thus we can conclude that--from the perspective of the NY Times editorial staff-- protecting the feelings of Muslims is far more important than protecting the lives of Americans.
Pinch and Keller should be arrested for treason, tried, convicted, and executed. Sound harsh?! Well, er, um... THIS IS WAR! And they have REPEATEDLY aided the enemy.
Monday, June 26, 2006
NYTIMES AND JOHN MURTHA: COPPERHEADS
WHAT'S A COPPERHEAD? HERE:
"The Copperheads were a faction of Democrats in the North who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates ... They were also called "Peace Democrats" ... The most famous Copperhead was Ohio's Clement L. Vallandigham, who was a vehement opponent of Lincoln's policies."
VALLANDIGHAM:
Today's so-called "peace Democrats" would have a similarly DISASTEROUS effect on the GWOT. Freedom and suffrage and democracy for 1/6th of humanity would be setback for many MANY generations to come. And we would be made less safe - because retreat would encourgae the enemy by proving to them that their tactics work.
Perhaps it's time that the DOJ enforced our laws as assiduously as Lincoln and Burnside did.
... denounced "King Lincoln," calling for Abraham Lincoln's removal from the presidency [Sounds like Feingold and Sheehan and Moore]. ... To those who supported the war he declared, "Defeat, debt, taxation [and] sepulchres - these are your trophies." [Sounds just like Dean and Kennedy and Pelosi and Reid.] ...Had the PEACE CANDIDATE and DEMOCRAT presidential nominee in 1864 - George McClellan - won the election, the confederacy or slavery or both would have survived. There would have been NO "NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM." There would have been no USA to win either WW1 or WW2 or the Cold War.
On May 5 he was arrested as a violator of General Order No. 38. ... General Ambrose E. Burnside had issued General Order Number 38, warning that the "habit of declaring sympathies for the enemy" would not be tolerated in the Military District of Ohio...
Today's so-called "peace Democrats" would have a similarly DISASTEROUS effect on the GWOT. Freedom and suffrage and democracy for 1/6th of humanity would be setback for many MANY generations to come. And we would be made less safe - because retreat would encourgae the enemy by proving to them that their tactics work.
Perhaps it's time that the DOJ enforced our laws as assiduously as Lincoln and Burnside did.
HOW THE DAILY KOS PRESSURED THE NYTIMES INTO TREASON, AND TOWARD MARGINALIZATION
The NYTIMES withheld what it knew about the NSA Surveillance Program for a year before publishing it - (COINCIDENTLY just before they published a book about it, in 2005).
Because of the delay, the NYTIMES took HELL from the Left.
Basically, Leftists charged that the NYTIMES deliberately withheld the info to help Bush win re-election, (AS IF "PINCH" TOOK ORDERS FROM ROVE!). The Left would've preferred it if the NSA leak had been published just before the election - like the "FAKE BUT ACCURATE" T.A.N.G. documents. The Left thinks that if the NSA leak 's publication had been properly timed, it might've helped Kerry defeat Bush. (This is probably what the NSA leakers had wanted and wished for when they leaked the info.)
I think the attack by the Left against the NYTIMES on the NSA leak has made the NTIMES shyer of holding back sensitive info, and had a major influence on their decision to publish info about the SWIFT Surveillance program - even though the program has lead to the capture of terrorists, is entirely legal, and only monitored INTERNATIONAL & INSTITUTIONAL transactions and had absolutley NO effect on the privacy of a single solitary American citizen.
In effect, the NYTIMES decided it was better to pander to their base than do the right thing. JUST LIKE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
By driving the Democrats and media outlet like the NYTIMES and the LATIMES teven further to the Left, all the DAILY KOS types are really accomplishing is the MARGINALIZATION of the Democrat Party and the MSM. Which will only hasten their demise. GOOD RIDDANCE.
Because of the delay, the NYTIMES took HELL from the Left.
Basically, Leftists charged that the NYTIMES deliberately withheld the info to help Bush win re-election, (AS IF "PINCH" TOOK ORDERS FROM ROVE!). The Left would've preferred it if the NSA leak had been published just before the election - like the "FAKE BUT ACCURATE" T.A.N.G. documents. The Left thinks that if the NSA leak 's publication had been properly timed, it might've helped Kerry defeat Bush. (This is probably what the NSA leakers had wanted and wished for when they leaked the info.)
I think the attack by the Left against the NYTIMES on the NSA leak has made the NTIMES shyer of holding back sensitive info, and had a major influence on their decision to publish info about the SWIFT Surveillance program - even though the program has lead to the capture of terrorists, is entirely legal, and only monitored INTERNATIONAL & INSTITUTIONAL transactions and had absolutley NO effect on the privacy of a single solitary American citizen.
In effect, the NYTIMES decided it was better to pander to their base than do the right thing. JUST LIKE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
By driving the Democrats and media outlet like the NYTIMES and the LATIMES teven further to the Left, all the DAILY KOS types are really accomplishing is the MARGINALIZATION of the Democrat Party and the MSM. Which will only hasten their demise. GOOD RIDDANCE.
MORE PROOF - FROM THE NYTIMES! - THAT WE ARE WINNING IN IRAQ
NYTIMES:
The only way we can lose is if the Democrats - dominated by doves, defeatists, demagogues and isolationists - win Congress and then do to the Iraqis what they did to the South Vietnamese and the Contras: abandon them to totalitarianism.
Enrollment in Iraqi schools has risen every year since the American invasion, according to Iraqi government figures, reversing more than a decade of declines and offering evidence of increased prosperity for some Iraqis. ... while life in Baghdad grows more paralyzed — it was the only province in the country where primary school enrollment fell — the figures for the rest of Iraq show that everyday life goes on, particularly in the largely peaceful south, which experienced the biggest jumps, with some regions having above 40 percent enrollment increases since 2002.We are winning.
... the growth is too broad to be explained only by migration patterns. According to American government estimates, Iraq's population grew by about 8 percent to 26 million from 2002 to 2005.
Even in provinces that have experienced population declines, for example, school enrollment is still up. In Anbar — the large desert province in western Iraq, where insurgents regularly battle American soldiers, causing residents to flee — enrollment in primary school is up by 15 percent, and in secondary and high school it is up by 37 percent.
The only way we can lose is if the Democrats - dominated by doves, defeatists, demagogues and isolationists - win Congress and then do to the Iraqis what they did to the South Vietnamese and the Contras: abandon them to totalitarianism.
DID THE NYTIMES LEAK TO PROTECT NGO-FRONTS FOR TERROR?
A recent HUGH HEWITT SHOW (transcript and link to MP3) - discusses the traitorous leak by the NYTIMES about the international, institutional financial surveillance program.
During a segment with Professor Reynolds, the INSTAPUNDIT related the fact that S.W.I.F.T keeps track of institutional transactions - (and not those of individuals), and that these include international transactions by many isnitutions, INCLUDING NGO's.
This set off an alarm, for me: NGO's include many organizations which aid and abet terror. (MORE HERE.) Many might LAUNDER MONEY FOR THE TERRORISTS. And now - courtesy of the NYTIMES - corrupt NGO's will avoid transfering money in the normal way. And it will be harder for us to track the terrorists.
Tracking the NGO's money tranfers through SWIFT, might have been especially important in order to prevent money from being transfered to Hamas.
BUT THE NYTIMES MAKE IT MOOT.
In my opinion, the ONLY explanation is that BOTH the NYTIMES and their leakers KNEW THAT THIS WOULD AID THE TERRORISTS. And that this was the CHIEF REASON THEY DID IT.
WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO HURT THE USA AND AID THE TERRORISTS?!
Because they are Arabists who hate Bush and Israel.
During a segment with Professor Reynolds, the INSTAPUNDIT related the fact that S.W.I.F.T keeps track of institutional transactions - (and not those of individuals), and that these include international transactions by many isnitutions, INCLUDING NGO's.
This set off an alarm, for me: NGO's include many organizations which aid and abet terror. (MORE HERE.) Many might LAUNDER MONEY FOR THE TERRORISTS. And now - courtesy of the NYTIMES - corrupt NGO's will avoid transfering money in the normal way. And it will be harder for us to track the terrorists.
Tracking the NGO's money tranfers through SWIFT, might have been especially important in order to prevent money from being transfered to Hamas.
BUT THE NYTIMES MAKE IT MOOT.
In my opinion, the ONLY explanation is that BOTH the NYTIMES and their leakers KNEW THAT THIS WOULD AID THE TERRORISTS. And that this was the CHIEF REASON THEY DID IT.
WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO HURT THE USA AND AID THE TERRORISTS?!
Because they are Arabists who hate Bush and Israel.
Sunday, June 25, 2006
ITALY'S NEW PM - PRODI, AN APPEASER AND A SOCIALIST - ADMITS HE IS PRIMARILY MOTIVATED BY FEAR
WASH POST:
Speaking in accented but clear English, Prodi said that "the conflict of civilizations must be tackled with knowledge and cooperation" as well as with security policies. Europe in general and Italy specifically share U.S. concern about jihadist terrorism, he noted, adding:FEAR. COWARDICE. The WASH POST CONTINUES:
"Public opinion in Europe is not anti-American," even though there are many protests and negative comments about U.S. policy. What motivates the protests and negativism "is maybe fear, deep fear, the idea that we are so close to this area of fire. . . . After all, it was fear that guided us against the war in Iraq, and it is fear that guides us against terrorism as well."
American and British troops undertake nearly all the combat duties while other partners look for less risky roles or just depart.The socialist appeasers of Europe - like Zapatero and Schroeder and Prodi - who look for less dangerous roles in the GWOT are pitiful ingrates.
The USA and the UK are carrying the burden here EXACTLY AS WE DID IN WW2 and the Cold War. WHY"! Because we are less motivated by fear than by duty, honor, pride, faith, and a strong sense justice. God Bless Our Troops.
FEINGOLD'S ASTROLOGICAL CHART: "HIS MARS MAKES A SQUARE TO URANUS" - or - COULD A CHART BY JEROME ARMSTRONG CREATE A BETTER "CONJUCTION"
FROM BLOGGER "Astrological Musings":
What do the planets show about Russ Feingold?Maybe it would be a good idea if FEINGOLD purchased ANOTHER very EXPENSIVE chart from astrologer and stock touter JEROME ARMSTRONG?! He might get the added bonus of an endorsement from Kos!? Even though Feingold is a TRUE LEFTIST - like Kos - Kos seems to be leaning to Warner, ever since Warner hired his "partner" Jerome Armstrong. Coincidentally, of course. Heh. More here.
He has a Pisces Sun, not a common placement for a politician, but he also has a strong Aries influence. Pisces people are ... empathetic and sensitive to the needs of others, and one of Feingold's campaign promises when he ran for state Senator was to hold listening parties to stay in touch with constituents. His positions on the issues show a tendency to side with the needs of the people rather than corporations.
Mercury in Feingold's chart is in Aries, as is Mars and Venus. Aries is god of war, ruled by Mars (the Roman counterpart of the god Ares). Mercury in Aries shows Feingold's courage to speak out where others fear to, and is not afraid to stand alone in the face of battle. ... His Mars makes a trine (harmonious aspect) to Pluto, connecting the will of the individual self (Mars) with the god of personal power (Pluto). This is a powerful aspect that propels him effortlessly into the accumulation of real power.
His Sun makes a trine (harmonious aspect) to Uranus, showing that he is an individualist: he is also inventive and concerned with social issues (Uranus). His Mars makes a square (challenging aspect) to Uranus, showing that this individualism can be expressed in impulsive (Mars/Uranus) ways.
Feingold has a complex system in his chart called a Grand Cross (a stressful combination of planets with two oppositions (180 degrees) square each other). This Grand Cross includes Mars which is conjunct Venus, both in Aries opposite Saturn and Neptune, both in Libra and both retrograde. ... Men with Venus in Aries tend to want dominion in the home and that can be a problem in today's world.
The Grand Cross creates many challenges, but also teaches lessons that build strength of character. My sense is that Feingold's world is primarily the realm of politics and public life, and this helps him to sublimate the need for a personal life.... During Pluto transits we tend to lose relationships that no longer serve us, and this shows that the end of his marriage will ultimately be a positive influence for him.
Feingold will undergo a series of positive planetary events this year, including several Jupiter cycles that began last December and will continue through August of this year, bringing him opportunities (Jupiter) and expanding his influence. With the exception of a few short challenges, it looks like the planets will be kind to Feingold. Could he be the candidate to watch?
PALESTINIAN TERRORISTS ANNOUNCE THEY HAVE WMD AND WILL USE THEM ON ISRAEL
BREAKING: JPOST:
Aksa Martyrs Brigades group announced on Sunday that it its members have succeeded in manufacturing chemical and biological weapons to be used against Israel.
This comes on the heals of the DELIBERATELY provocative kidnapping of and IDF soldier; (SEE BELOW). It seems to me that the jihadomaniacs - backed by IRAN - are desperately trying to provoke an all-out Arab-Israeli war - to divert attention from Iraq and Afghanistan - where the jihadomaniacs are being routed and cornered - and from Iran's nuke program.
Stay tuned.... (MORE HERE FROM ATLAS! And here from C&R.)
ASIDE: Here's a link to what I blogged on this - as a likelihood of this "DOOMSDAY SCENARIO" - back in March - and it's tied into what I predicted back in September of 2005.
UPDATE: ONE HOUR LATER AND THERE'S NOTHING AT THE NYTIMES, WASHPOST, OR GOOGLE NEWS. Zero. Bupkuss. Nada. Zilch.
UPDATE #2: THE CAPTAIN WEIGHS IN: as always an absolutely MUST READ. NOW! He points out that AL AKSA CLAIMS to have developed these WMD over THE LAST THREE (3) YEARS. Hmmm... 3 years... is that a coincidence!? Here's an excerpt:
UPDATE #3: Some in the blogosphere have questioned whether al Aksa would use these WMD if they have them - after all, The Holy Land is a very small geographic area, and Arabs and Muslims are bound to be killed in any WMD attack. THE ANSWER IS YES. Here's the proof of just how brutal these uncivilized savages are (from 5/30/06):
WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT THIS? SIMPLE: the IDF must make a PREEMPTIVE attack - destroying all the stockpiles and as many al Aksa terrorists as possible - ASAP. HOW? SIMPLE: The IDF should DEMAND that "President" Abbas turn over a list of the terrorists and their location - or face execution himself. DITTO the Hamas "PM."
The alternative is that Olmert would allow them to make a WMD attack - and then respond with a justifiably MASSIVE, "end-game" retaliatory counter-attack, which would utterly annihilate the enemy once and for all.
WHAT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO STAND: A Hamas administered Palistan with WMD. And therefore, since the Palistani jihadomaniacs must KNOW this, they MUST.... USE THEM OR LOSE THEM.
That's why I expect that this ramping up of the stakes will be resolved in DAYS rather than weeks. AND WELL BEFORE IRAN MIGHT RETALIATE AGAINST ISRAEL WITH NUKES. Unless the Iranians have them ALREADY, as some have conjectured. Then, Iran will nuke Israel, and perhaps Baghdad - and the Green Zone. And then the Mullahs and Sheehan and Buchanan and Scheuer and Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson and Larry Wilkerson and David Duke and George Galloway and Assad and Saddam and Binladen will blame the JOOOOOOOZE!
UPDATE #4: Three hours later, NOTHING ON CNN. And nothing at GOOGLE NEWS, and only one (1) relevant hit in a word search for either "AKSA" or "WMD" in GOOGLE NEWS. And it's for an article at Israel's ARUTZ SHEVA - not even for the JPOST.
I guess this is unimportant news to the MSM - jihadists armed with WMD and threatening genocide against Jews just ain't news to the Leftist dominated MSM.
UPDATE#5: ROUNDUP HERE AT MEMEORANDUM.
STAY TUNED...
[BTW: Check out everyone else's time-stamps; you'll see that Reliapundit was FIRST! And Relipundit was before that FAMOUS blog - who backdated their story, too!]
Stay tuned.... (MORE HERE FROM ATLAS! And here from C&R.)
ASIDE: Here's a link to what I blogged on this - as a likelihood of this "DOOMSDAY SCENARIO" - back in March - and it's tied into what I predicted back in September of 2005.
UPDATE: ONE HOUR LATER AND THERE'S NOTHING AT THE NYTIMES, WASHPOST, OR GOOGLE NEWS. Zero. Bupkuss. Nada. Zilch.
UPDATE #2: THE CAPTAIN WEIGHS IN: as always an absolutely MUST READ. NOW! He points out that AL AKSA CLAIMS to have developed these WMD over THE LAST THREE (3) YEARS. Hmmm... 3 years... is that a coincidence!? Here's an excerpt:
... They do not have the research facilities to have developed WMD on their own. ... What country stocked them, until three years ago? And where does Hamas and Islamic Jihad, at least, have themselves established? Syria -- who has long rumored to have received the Iraqi stockpiles in 2002 and 2003, just ahead of the American invasion.The Captain raises the fascinating possibility that AL AKSA has some of Saddam's WMD. RTWT.
UPDATE #3: Some in the blogosphere have questioned whether al Aksa would use these WMD if they have them - after all, The Holy Land is a very small geographic area, and Arabs and Muslims are bound to be killed in any WMD attack. THE ANSWER IS YES. Here's the proof of just how brutal these uncivilized savages are (from 5/30/06):
Masked Al Aksa Martyrs' Brigades gunmen on Tuesday publicly executed a Palestinian man and woman they suspected of having spied for Israel. The man was shot dead in the main street of a refugee camp, with a large crowd looking on. The woman was later shot to death by her relatives in the courtyard of the West Bank's largest hospital.CONJECTURE/GAMING:
WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT THIS? SIMPLE: the IDF must make a PREEMPTIVE attack - destroying all the stockpiles and as many al Aksa terrorists as possible - ASAP. HOW? SIMPLE: The IDF should DEMAND that "President" Abbas turn over a list of the terrorists and their location - or face execution himself. DITTO the Hamas "PM."
The alternative is that Olmert would allow them to make a WMD attack - and then respond with a justifiably MASSIVE, "end-game" retaliatory counter-attack, which would utterly annihilate the enemy once and for all.
WHAT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO STAND: A Hamas administered Palistan with WMD. And therefore, since the Palistani jihadomaniacs must KNOW this, they MUST.... USE THEM OR LOSE THEM.
That's why I expect that this ramping up of the stakes will be resolved in DAYS rather than weeks. AND WELL BEFORE IRAN MIGHT RETALIATE AGAINST ISRAEL WITH NUKES. Unless the Iranians have them ALREADY, as some have conjectured. Then, Iran will nuke Israel, and perhaps Baghdad - and the Green Zone. And then the Mullahs and Sheehan and Buchanan and Scheuer and Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson and Larry Wilkerson and David Duke and George Galloway and Assad and Saddam and Binladen will blame the JOOOOOOOZE!
UPDATE #4: Three hours later, NOTHING ON CNN. And nothing at GOOGLE NEWS, and only one (1) relevant hit in a word search for either "AKSA" or "WMD" in GOOGLE NEWS. And it's for an article at Israel's ARUTZ SHEVA - not even for the JPOST.
I guess this is unimportant news to the MSM - jihadists armed with WMD and threatening genocide against Jews just ain't news to the Leftist dominated MSM.
UPDATE#5: ROUNDUP HERE AT MEMEORANDUM.
STAY TUNED...
[BTW: Check out everyone else's time-stamps; you'll see that Reliapundit was FIRST! And Relipundit was before that FAMOUS blog - who backdated their story, too!]
IRAN - THROUGH ITS SURROGATE HAMAS - IS TRYING TO PROVOKE AN ARAB-ISRAELI WAR
NYTIMES:
Israel threatened strong military action today after Palestinian militants, including those belonging to the ruling faction Hamas, emerged from a long tunnel dug 300 yards into Israel, killed two soldiers, wounded three and kidnapped a fourth wounded soldier at an Israeli outpost near the Egyptian border.
Two of the eight Palestinians were killed; the rest escaped back into Gaza with the Israeli soldier, Cpl. Gilad Shalit, 19, who is believed to have been wounded and whom they may want to try to exchange for jailed militants. He was the first Israeli soldier kidnapped in more than a decade.
Israeli tanks moved a short distance into Gaza, the first tank incursion since Israel pulled its settlers and soldiers from the territory last summer. Israeli officials talked of serious retaliation for the raid, which was weeks in the planning and for which the ruling Hamas faction took partial responsibility, along with other militant groups like the Popular Resistance Committees and a newly formed group called the Army of Islam. ... A spokesman for Hamas, Sami Abu Zuhri, defended the attack on the Arab television ...
Mr. Regev, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, said: "What part of Hamas is responsible is irrelevant. Hamas as an organization has endorsed it. And maybe for those in the international community who are talking about whether there is a new, pragmatic Hamas, this is a wakeup call." ... Mr. Regev added: "Abu Mazen goes to foreign capitals and says, 'I'm the partner you want. I'm the address.' But if he's not a partner in stopping violence, how can he be a partner for peace?"
If the soldier "isn't returned immediately then Israel will have to act," Mr. Regev said. ...
Hamas spokesman, Mushir al-Masri, now a member of the Palestinian Parliament, welcomed the attack. "We consider this operation a part of the natural response to Zionist crimes, especially after the series of killings of children, women, old men and whole families in Gaza," he said. "It is the right of our people to defend themselves with all the means available."
The spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees, Abu Mujahid, said the attack was carried out to avenge Israel's assassination of the group's leader, Jamal Abu Samahdana, on June 8. Mr. Samahdana, who had been wanted by Israel, had also been serving the Hamas government as the commander of a new "executive force," a mostly Hamas militia that has engaged in a series of clashes with Fatah-dominated forces like the Preventive Security.
Iran wants to scuttle any deal between Abbas and Hamas, and to distract the world from maintaining the focus necessary to halt their nuclear weapons program.
REMEMBER: Israel is LITTLE SATAN to Iran - (and to anti-Semitic isolationists in the USA). Their MAIN goal is to get NUKES in order to defeat the GREAT SATAN - the USA. Iran (and al Qaeda) have been attempting to start a regional war in order to distract us from this - their ULTIMATE goal.
REMEMBER: Israel is LITTLE SATAN to Iran - (and to anti-Semitic isolationists in the USA). Their MAIN goal is to get NUKES in order to defeat the GREAT SATAN - the USA. Iran (and al Qaeda) have been attempting to start a regional war in order to distract us from this - their ULTIMATE goal.
ANALYZING LEFTIST IDEOLOGICAL CONTRADICTIONS - or - IRRATIONAL AND INCONSISTENT MORAL RELATIVISM AS A LEFTIST STRATEGY
There's plenty more: RTWT.For a group that wholeheartedly subscribes to moral relativity and subjective ethics, you've got to wonder about the left and their constant search for some kind of "moral authority" to justify their beliefs.
After all, if morality is relative; if truth is subjective and there is no objective "good" or "bad"; then why bother? ...
[The Doctor then describes some famous anti-war Leftists and their arguments - READ IT!]
What these three examples [Murtha, Sheehan, and the Jersey Girls] (and there are many more) have in common is both a breathtaking subjectivism and relativism in one breath; and ideological absolutism in the next.This is as good a demonstration as any of the inherent philosophical and psychological contradictions that the postmodern left exploits in order to achieve political power.
They are perfectly aware that their positions don't make any sense and can be refuted by anyone with basic knowledge of logic and logical fallacies; but their goal is to maintain the psychological denial necessary to believe in the left's ideology.
Interpreting this defense and exposing it is essential to countering that ideology.
Stephen Hicks asks this important question (page 184):The pattern therefore raises the question of which side of the contradiction is deepest for postmodernism.The possibility that the relativism is primary can be ruled out with some thought. If the modern leftist truly embraced relativism, then you would not see the uniformity of their politics. Hicks again:
Is it that postmodernists really are committed to relativism, but occasionally lapse into absolutism?
Or are the absolutist commitments deepest and the relativism a rhetorical cover?If subjectivity and relativism were primary, then postmodernists would be adopting political positions across the spectrum, and that simply is not happening.Indeed. Thus we must conclude that the moral relativism that characterizes the left's equation of terrorism with America; deliberate targeting of innocents with herculean efforts to spare innocent life; Bush with Hitler; Iraq with Vietnam; etc. etc. are simple rhetorical devices being used to manipulate and forward their socialist / totalitarian agenda.
[BTW: isolationists, appeasers, defeatists, hard-core libertarians and anti-Semites use many of the same illogical tropes. IOW: you DON'T have to be a Leftist to be irrational. But if you ARE a Leftist in 2006 then you are irrational.
OR LOOK AT IT THIS WAY: when people don't have the facts on their side - or logic - and when they are unable to admit that their ideology is bankrupt or amoral, then they often resort to contradictory and illogical arguments.]
OR LOOK AT IT THIS WAY: when people don't have the facts on their side - or logic - and when they are unable to admit that their ideology is bankrupt or amoral, then they often resort to contradictory and illogical arguments.]
WHO KILLED MORE IRAQIS: SADDAM AND AL QAEDA; U.N. SANCTIONS; OR THE PENTAGON?
ANSWER: #1 = SADDAM; #2 = UN SANCTIONS; #3 = AL QAEDA; #4 (LAST) THE US MILITARY.
Saddam murdered and tortured more than one million Iraqis. Sanctions might have caused 100,000 Iraqis to die prematurely. Al Qaeda has murdered TENS OF THOUSANDS in Iraq since 2004 - mostly Shias and Kurds. And since 2005, thousands of Sunnis have been murdered in retribution - something which did not happen under Saddam, when all the murdering was Sunni and Kurd/Shia.
BONUS FACT: Except for Baghdad, Iraq is NOT now experiencing murder at a rate higher than most major US cities. Baghdad is the central front in the war against al Qaeda; (Afghanistan is now the second major front). [Subtract Baghdad from the murder rate and you can see that OVERALL the murder rate/terrorism rate in the geographic nation of Iraq is largely under control. REPEAT: the war is centered in and around - if not limited to - Baghdad and parts of the Sunni provinces]
BOTTOM-LINE: Sadam and al Qaeda in Iraq have murdered 33 TIMES more Iraqis than the US and its coalition have killed - and the OVERWHELMING majoprity oif thiose killed by the US and our allies have been enemy fighters, and NOT CIVILIANS.
SO... besides liberating the Iraqis and helping them establish a constitutional democracy by mutual consent of the governed (and thus allowing Kurds and Shias in Iraq to have self-determination), the US led war has also actually LOWERED the death rate in Iraq; IOW: the war has increased freedom, prosperity and saved LIVES.
AND WE HAVE KILLED A LOT OF JIHADOTERRORISTS TO BOOT!
All-IN-ALL: the Iraq War - though it has been VERY tough, and rife with setbacks, (many as a result of imperfect strategies which had to be continuously revamped) - has been a great triumph for humanity: 25 MILLION PEOPLE liberated from tyranny and a murderous regime.
Details at POWERLINE. (Disinformation at the LATIMES.)
Saddam murdered and tortured more than one million Iraqis. Sanctions might have caused 100,000 Iraqis to die prematurely. Al Qaeda has murdered TENS OF THOUSANDS in Iraq since 2004 - mostly Shias and Kurds. And since 2005, thousands of Sunnis have been murdered in retribution - something which did not happen under Saddam, when all the murdering was Sunni and Kurd/Shia.
BONUS FACT: Except for Baghdad, Iraq is NOT now experiencing murder at a rate higher than most major US cities. Baghdad is the central front in the war against al Qaeda; (Afghanistan is now the second major front). [Subtract Baghdad from the murder rate and you can see that OVERALL the murder rate/terrorism rate in the geographic nation of Iraq is largely under control. REPEAT: the war is centered in and around - if not limited to - Baghdad and parts of the Sunni provinces]
BOTTOM-LINE: Sadam and al Qaeda in Iraq have murdered 33 TIMES more Iraqis than the US and its coalition have killed - and the OVERWHELMING majoprity oif thiose killed by the US and our allies have been enemy fighters, and NOT CIVILIANS.
SO... besides liberating the Iraqis and helping them establish a constitutional democracy by mutual consent of the governed (and thus allowing Kurds and Shias in Iraq to have self-determination), the US led war has also actually LOWERED the death rate in Iraq; IOW: the war has increased freedom, prosperity and saved LIVES.
AND WE HAVE KILLED A LOT OF JIHADOTERRORISTS TO BOOT!
All-IN-ALL: the Iraq War - though it has been VERY tough, and rife with setbacks, (many as a result of imperfect strategies which had to be continuously revamped) - has been a great triumph for humanity: 25 MILLION PEOPLE liberated from tyranny and a murderous regime.
Details at POWERLINE. (Disinformation at the LATIMES.)
[NOTE: most of the Saddam statistics are based on a NYTIMES article which was written and filed/published BEFORE the war.]
TENET - NOT BUSH OR ROVE OR POWELL - RESPONSIBLE FOR BAD WMD INTEL
WASH POST:
The CIA is still a joke - a useless bureaucracy which fails to fulfil its mission and leaks anti-administration secrets. MOYNIHAN WAS RIGHT, perhaps: the CIA should be abolished.
UPDATE: Though certainly NOT a "slam-dunk", the mobile-labs claim is hardly DISPROVED.
In briefing Powell before his U.N. speech, George Tenet, then the CIA director, personally vouched for the accuracy of the mobile-lab claim, according to participants in the briefing. Tenet now says he did not learn of the problems with Curveball until much later and that he received no warnings from Drumheller or anyone else.TENET WAS A CLINTON APPOINTEE.
"No one mentioned Drumheller, or Curveball," Lawrence B. Wilkerson, Powell's chief of staff at the time, said in an interview. "I didn't know the name Curveball until months afterward."
The CIA is still a joke - a useless bureaucracy which fails to fulfil its mission and leaks anti-administration secrets. MOYNIHAN WAS RIGHT, perhaps: the CIA should be abolished.
UPDATE: Though certainly NOT a "slam-dunk", the mobile-labs claim is hardly DISPROVED.
INSIDE THE CONFUSED, CONTRADICTORY AND PARANOID MIND OF THE LEFT-WING MSM
HERE'S THE PROOF.
[ASIDE: THIS EXAMPLE OF "BDS" IS NOT UNLIKE THE OFT HEARD REFRAIN THAT BUSH IS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONTROLLED BY THE JOOOZE/NEOCONS OF LIKUD, THE WAHHABIST HOUSE OF SAUD, BIG OIL AND THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT.
AND IT IS RELATED TO THE LEFT'S INSISTENCE THAT "BUSH LIED" EVEN THOUGH, FOR EXAMPLE, THE FACT THAT THE FAMOUS 16 WORDS FROM THE SOTU (ABOUT SADDAM, AFRICA AND URANIUM - AND BRITISH INTELLIGENCE) ARE STILL TRUE, AND THE CHARGES BY JOE WILSON - A PROVEN LIAR - ARE UTTERLY FALSE.
THE LEFT DEPENDS ON DISINFORMATION AND LYING. AND THEY'RE CONSTANTLY GETTING TRIPPED UP IN THEIR OWN LIES ALL THE TIME.
IF THE MSM WERE NOT DOMINATED BY LYING LEFTISTS, THIS FACT WOULD BE POINTED OUT, DAY-AFTER-DAY.
BUT HEY: THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. GLAD TO BE OF SERVICE]
[ASIDE: THIS EXAMPLE OF "BDS" IS NOT UNLIKE THE OFT HEARD REFRAIN THAT BUSH IS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONTROLLED BY THE JOOOZE/NEOCONS OF LIKUD, THE WAHHABIST HOUSE OF SAUD, BIG OIL AND THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT.
AND IT IS RELATED TO THE LEFT'S INSISTENCE THAT "BUSH LIED" EVEN THOUGH, FOR EXAMPLE, THE FACT THAT THE FAMOUS 16 WORDS FROM THE SOTU (ABOUT SADDAM, AFRICA AND URANIUM - AND BRITISH INTELLIGENCE) ARE STILL TRUE, AND THE CHARGES BY JOE WILSON - A PROVEN LIAR - ARE UTTERLY FALSE.
THE LEFT DEPENDS ON DISINFORMATION AND LYING. AND THEY'RE CONSTANTLY GETTING TRIPPED UP IN THEIR OWN LIES ALL THE TIME.
IF THE MSM WERE NOT DOMINATED BY LYING LEFTISTS, THIS FACT WOULD BE POINTED OUT, DAY-AFTER-DAY.
BUT HEY: THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. GLAD TO BE OF SERVICE]
Saturday, June 24, 2006
THE DEMISE OF SOCIALISM - OR WHY ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL APPEASEMENT IS DOOMED
For many, Sweden epitomizes the socialist dream: Swedes have cradle-to-grave welfare, libertinage, multi-culturalism and its concomittant moral relativism. ALL ARE DESTROYING SWEDEN. They also have a huge problem with their Muslim "colonists" and ignore it.
Here are some economic Facts (excerpted from an article by Richard Murray is chief economist at the Swedish Agency for Public Management):
At 51.2 per cent in 2003, Sweden's ratio of tax receipts to GDP is the highest in the world. The comparable average for European Union (EU) countries is about 40 per cent of GDP. In Canada and Britain, the ratio is less than 40 per cent. In some industrial countries, such as the United States, it is less than 30 per cent. The high figure for Sweden is in part (4 percentage points) explained by transfers that are taxed.What drove the USSR and Maoist China and Ireland and India and even friggin VIETNAM to abandon much of socialisim is at play in Sweden and the rest of socialist Europe - and the rest of the socialist world, for that matter: a combination of tax rates which have topped-out and bad demographics plus global competition is making socialist nations as economically bankrupt as they are morally bankrupt.
In the past, rising taxes enabled the growth of public services, social benefits and public investments. Between 1960 and 1980, Swedish taxes as a share of GDP doubled, from roughly 25 to 50 per cent of GDE Since then, the ratio of tax revenues to GDP has been fairly constant, which means that changes in tax rates have not contributed to the growth of public services from 1980 onwards. This may come as a surprise to both proponents and critics of Sweden's high-tax society. ...
Growth in Sweden, as in many European countries, has been "jobless." The total number of hours worked in the Swedish economy is the same today as in 1965. This is so despite an impressive increase in real GDP, and despite an increase in population and in the number of those employed - especially women. The increase in number of employed has been offset by a reduction in number of hours worked per employee as a result of longer holidays, earlier retirement, more absence from work and other changes. ...
From the above evidence, we get a picture of the Swedish welfare state at the end of the road. Further development seems out of the question.
THE JIG IS UP: they can no longer tax their way into solvency or grow their way into it.
When their government's finances collapse - as they are bound to within the next decade, the socialist nations will have even tougher choices, AND THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO BLAME BUSH AND THE GOP. Socialism will finally be consigned to the trashheap of history - where it belongs. GOOD RIDDANCE.
Of course, there is a chance that ISLAMOFASCISTS WILL FILL THE VACUUM: the Europeans may either choose it, or have it forced upon them by the burgeoning Muslim population.
Europe needs to get REAGANIZED and/or THATCHERIZED, and fast. The fact that Italy chose the socialsit Prodi and Spain the socialist Zapatero does not bode well - not for Europe on the economic front, or in the GWOT, as these very same socialists are the chief advocates of APPEASEMENT.
IS THIS A COINCIDENCE!? NO: IT IS NOT.
SOCIALISTS APPEASE PROBLEMS AND DO NOT SEEK TO SOLVE THEM AT THEIR ROOT CAUSES.
THEY SEEK TO AMELIOLRATE POVERTY BY APPEASING IT, BY HANDING OUT WELFARE CHECKS - (INSTEAD OF BY CUTTING TAXES, TARIFFS, AND PROMOTING ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBALISM AND INDUSTRIALIZATION).
THEY ALSO SEEK TO APPEASE THE JIHADISTS.
Appeasement is a primary way Leftists deal with problems in the world. DHIMMITUDE and the WELFARE STATE reflect a deep attitude or weltanschauung of Leftists. They appeased the USSR, and appeased Arafat. And they appease poverty.
In all of human history, appeasement has never defeated ANY enemy. It never will because it can't.
That's why, to make poverty history, we have to make SOCIALISM history.
And to win the GWOT overseas, we have to defeat the DHIMMIS at home.
THEY'RE THE SAME PEOPLE.
BOTTOM-LINE ON THE 500 SARIN ARTILLERY SHELLS REVEALED BY SANTORUM AND HOEKSTRA
Santorum and Hoekstra - and others - say that the existence of these 500 shells proves that there were WMD stockpiles in Iraq, and that it matters not when the WMD's were made.
Others say, (paraphrasing), "NO; they were so degraded they were harmless." Some conservatives are just underwhelmed.
HARMLESS?! Maybe yes; maybe no. As TKS/NRO said: OKAY, THEN YOU OPEN THEM!" Heh.
But this is the BOTTOM-LINE:
UNSCR #1441 DEMANDED that Saddam make a full and final declaration of all of his WMD's.
The INSPECTORS were meant to be auditors (not detectives) who would examine that FULL & FINAL declaration and verify it.
The fact that MANY WMD ITEMS - these 500 WMD artillery shells, and parts for NUCLEAR CENTRIFUGES, for example - were found in Iraq, and WERE NOT DECLARED BY SADDAM, PROVES BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, BEYOND ANY DOUBT AT ALL, THAT SADDAM'S DECLARATION WAS NOT "FULL & FINAL", BUT PARTIAL, OBFUSCATORY, AND A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE HEART & SOUL OF UNSCR #1441.
UNSCR #1441 was EXPLICITLY, OVERTLY, SIMPLY, UNALTERABLY, AND OBVIOUSLY MEANT AS SADDAM'S LAST CHANCE.
The UNSC could not pass mo' tougher sanctions, or do anything else short of what the USA and the COALITION OF THE WILLING ultimately did do: attack Saddam, and dethrone this lying, genocidal, terrorist-supporting tyrant.
If those on the so-called "anti-war" side think that a more sternly worded warning than UNSC #1441 would have done ANYTHING, then they are even stupider than I have ever imagined. Or could imagine.
Saddam's decision to LIE AND NOT COMPLY with UNSCR #1441 was the reason we HAD TO GO TO WAR. The 500 WMD artillery shells found in Iraq since 2003 proves this. We should all thank Santorum and Hoekstra for putting more of the proof on the table. For all to see.
Only dingbats of denial - blinded by BDS, or by delusions of "peace through isolationism, appeasement and retreat" - refuse to see what is as plain as day - AND UTTERLY UNDENIABLE: THE WAR WAS RIGHT, LEGAL, JUST, AND A POWERFUL MESSAGE TO OUR ENEMIES: "Don't tread on me, the law, or the truth."
[ASIDE: STRATEGYPAGE posits an explanation for the DOD's three year old policy for obfuscating the existence of these shells.]
UPDATE: The shells are still deadly - according to the BBC.
Others say, (paraphrasing), "NO; they were so degraded they were harmless." Some conservatives are just underwhelmed.
HARMLESS?! Maybe yes; maybe no. As TKS/NRO said: OKAY, THEN YOU OPEN THEM!" Heh.
But this is the BOTTOM-LINE:
UNSCR #1441 DEMANDED that Saddam make a full and final declaration of all of his WMD's.
The INSPECTORS were meant to be auditors (not detectives) who would examine that FULL & FINAL declaration and verify it.
The fact that MANY WMD ITEMS - these 500 WMD artillery shells, and parts for NUCLEAR CENTRIFUGES, for example - were found in Iraq, and WERE NOT DECLARED BY SADDAM, PROVES BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, BEYOND ANY DOUBT AT ALL, THAT SADDAM'S DECLARATION WAS NOT "FULL & FINAL", BUT PARTIAL, OBFUSCATORY, AND A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE HEART & SOUL OF UNSCR #1441.
UNSCR #1441 was EXPLICITLY, OVERTLY, SIMPLY, UNALTERABLY, AND OBVIOUSLY MEANT AS SADDAM'S LAST CHANCE.
The UNSC could not pass mo' tougher sanctions, or do anything else short of what the USA and the COALITION OF THE WILLING ultimately did do: attack Saddam, and dethrone this lying, genocidal, terrorist-supporting tyrant.
If those on the so-called "anti-war" side think that a more sternly worded warning than UNSC #1441 would have done ANYTHING, then they are even stupider than I have ever imagined. Or could imagine.
Saddam's decision to LIE AND NOT COMPLY with UNSCR #1441 was the reason we HAD TO GO TO WAR. The 500 WMD artillery shells found in Iraq since 2003 proves this. We should all thank Santorum and Hoekstra for putting more of the proof on the table. For all to see.
Only dingbats of denial - blinded by BDS, or by delusions of "peace through isolationism, appeasement and retreat" - refuse to see what is as plain as day - AND UTTERLY UNDENIABLE: THE WAR WAS RIGHT, LEGAL, JUST, AND A POWERFUL MESSAGE TO OUR ENEMIES: "Don't tread on me, the law, or the truth."
[ASIDE: STRATEGYPAGE posits an explanation for the DOD's three year old policy for obfuscating the existence of these shells.]
UPDATE: The shells are still deadly - according to the BBC.
Friday, June 23, 2006
RELIAPUNDIT SCOOPS NYTIMES ON BIRD FLU
TODAY'S NYTIMES:
This proves once again that THE ASTUTE BLOGGER gives you IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS AND ANALYSIS BEFORE THE NYTIMES DOES, AND WITHOUT ANY TRAITOROUS LEAKING OF VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY DATA, EITHER!
An Indonesian man who died of H5N1 bird flu caught it from his 10-year-old son, the first laboratory-confirmed case of human-to-human transmission of the disease, according to a World Health Organization investigation of an unusual family cluster of bird-flu cases.RELIAPUNDIT REPORTED THIS 2 DAYS AGO, ON WEDNESDAY.
This proves once again that THE ASTUTE BLOGGER gives you IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS AND ANALYSIS BEFORE THE NYTIMES DOES, AND WITHOUT ANY TRAITOROUS LEAKING OF VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY DATA, EITHER!
NYTIMES: TRAITORS IN WAR-TIME WHO SHOULD BE SHOT
PINCH SULZBERGER AND BILL KELLER - THE PUBLISHER/OWNER AND THE EDITOR OF THE NYTIMES - ARE TRAITOROUS SCUM WHO SHOULD BE CHARGED, TRIED, CONVICTED AND EXECUTED.
Here's a link to the article. I read it. It made me sick: maybe we shouldn't bother with a trial! After all THEY CONFESS:
Where do traitorous scumbags like Keller get the idea that they have more power authority and insight than the populary elected WAR-TIME president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and his Congressionally confirmed Cabinet members!? Sheesh.
Keller and Pinch are UNELECTED leaders of a now second-rate rag-sheet. They have no right to assume ABSOLUTE POWER over NATIONAL SECURITY SECRETS! They have no right to determine what is a proper secret and what is not. WHAT EGOMANIACAL SCUM!
I wouldn't even let Keller or Pinch have a blindfold.
Here's a link to the article. I read it. It made me sick: maybe we shouldn't bother with a trial! After all THEY CONFESS:
Bill Keller, the newspaper's executive editor, said: "We have listened closely to the administration's arguments for withholding this information, and given them the most serious and respectful consideration. We remain convinced that the administration's extraordinary access to this vast repository of international financial data, however carefully targeted use of it may be, is a matter of public interest."Terrorists planning attacks against our TROOPS and our allies and US DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW! But now they do know. Courtesy of the godless anti-American pro-socialism traitorous scum of the NYTIMES.
Where do traitorous scumbags like Keller get the idea that they have more power authority and insight than the populary elected WAR-TIME president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and his Congressionally confirmed Cabinet members!? Sheesh.
Keller and Pinch are UNELECTED leaders of a now second-rate rag-sheet. They have no right to assume ABSOLUTE POWER over NATIONAL SECURITY SECRETS! They have no right to determine what is a proper secret and what is not. WHAT EGOMANIACAL SCUM!
I wouldn't even let Keller or Pinch have a blindfold.
Thursday, June 22, 2006
AP/MSM: "Study Says Earth's Temp at 400-Year High"
Econazis admit: it WAS this warm 400 years ago.
Er, um.... so: what kind of SUV did your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather drive?!
BOTTOM-LINE: the folks who believe that current global-warming is man-made are idiots.
Er, um.... so: what kind of SUV did your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather drive?!
BOTTOM-LINE: the folks who believe that current global-warming is man-made are idiots.
FRANK CAPRA, GEORGE BAILEY, AND "CHICKENHAWKS "
One of the greatest movies of all-time it IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE. It was co-written and directed by Frank Capra, and starred Jimmy Stewart as George Bailey. Jimmy Stewart said it was his favorite movie, and felt it'd been so popular for so many decades because it fulfilled a basic wish almost all of us have: "To see what the world would've been like had we never been born, and to find out that it's a better place because we are here."
The movie is about a character named George Bailey, whose life-story spans from 1900 to 1945. He's someone who's put is own dreams on the back-burner his whole life. George wanted to become an adventurer and a globe-trotter and then return and go to college, and become an architect/builder of magnificent edifices.
He ended up not travelling, not going to college, and merely taking over the family business, and "merely" becoming a husband and "merely" a father and and "merely" a "local community leader." (SYNOPSIS and MORE MOVIE INFO/TRIVIA/LINKS HERE.)
Well... George's younger brother, Harry, does go to college, marries a millionairess, and comes home from the war (WW2) a decorated war hero - winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor. George isn't jealous; he's proud - as is the whole Bailey clan. Uncle Billy Bailey brags to the Bailey clan's nemesis - the evil banker Mr. Potter - about his nephew Harry Bailey's heroism. Potter counters by calling George a slacker on account of the fact that George was 4F (because George was deaf in one ear as a result of an infection he got when he dove into a freezing river to save his kid brother's life when they were young boys).
Uncle Billy's reply to Potter's attack on George is one that all people accused of being CHICKENHAWKS (by moonbats and nutroots and BDS-afflicted anti-war people) should remember. Here's the exchange:
The movie is about a character named George Bailey, whose life-story spans from 1900 to 1945. He's someone who's put is own dreams on the back-burner his whole life. George wanted to become an adventurer and a globe-trotter and then return and go to college, and become an architect/builder of magnificent edifices.
He ended up not travelling, not going to college, and merely taking over the family business, and "merely" becoming a husband and "merely" a father and and "merely" a "local community leader." (SYNOPSIS and MORE MOVIE INFO/TRIVIA/LINKS HERE.)
Well... George's younger brother, Harry, does go to college, marries a millionairess, and comes home from the war (WW2) a decorated war hero - winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor. George isn't jealous; he's proud - as is the whole Bailey clan. Uncle Billy Bailey brags to the Bailey clan's nemesis - the evil banker Mr. Potter - about his nephew Harry Bailey's heroism. Potter counters by calling George a slacker on account of the fact that George was 4F (because George was deaf in one ear as a result of an infection he got when he dove into a freezing river to save his kid brother's life when they were young boys).
Uncle Billy's reply to Potter's attack on George is one that all people accused of being CHICKENHAWKS (by moonbats and nutroots and BDS-afflicted anti-war people) should remember. Here's the exchange:
UNCLE BILLY
(showing POTTER a newspaper with a HEADLINE about Harry's Medal)
Well, well, well, Harry Bailey wins Congressional Medal. Hmm. That couldn't be one of the Bailey Boys, could it!? You just can't keep those Bailey's down, now can you Mr. Potter!?
(showing POTTER a newspaper with a HEADLINE about Harry's Medal)
Well, well, well, Harry Bailey wins Congressional Medal. Hmm. That couldn't be one of the Bailey Boys, could it!? You just can't keep those Bailey's down, now can you Mr. Potter!?
POTTER
How does SLACKER George feel about it?
UNCLE BILLY
Very jealous, very jealous: he only lost three buttons off his vest!
Of course, "slacker George" would've won TWO of those medals if he'd gone.
POTTER
(sarcastically)
Bad ear...
UNCLE BILLY
Yes. After all Potter, some people like George HAD to stay home: not every HEEL was in Germany and Japan!
How does SLACKER George feel about it?
UNCLE BILLY
Very jealous, very jealous: he only lost three buttons off his vest!
Of course, "slacker George" would've won TWO of those medals if he'd gone.
POTTER
(sarcastically)
Bad ear...
UNCLE BILLY
Yes. After all Potter, some people like George HAD to stay home: not every HEEL was in Germany and Japan!
There are HEELS at home now, too. And those of us who support OUR side in the GWOT can contribute to the cause by fighting these HEELS and vigorously defending our side's goals. Just like George did.
ANOTHER BIG SCOOP FOR RELIAPUNDIT: TODAY THE WASHINGTON TIMES OPINED ON MURTHAGATE; I BLOGGED IT ON 11/20/05 - 7 MONTHS AGO
YUP, WHAT THE WASHINGTON TIMES HAD TODAY, RELIAPUNDIT WROTE ABOUT SEVEN MONTHS AGO: MURTHA IS A CORRUPT CROOK!
AND LUCIANNE LINKED TO IT. AND MIKE SAVAGE TALKED ABOUT IT TONIGHT.
THIS IS MORE PROOF THAT YOU MUST READ THE ASTUTE BLOGGER EVERYDAY!
EVEN MORE PROOF BELOW...
(Others reporting this MONTHS AFTER Reliapundit HERE.)
AND LUCIANNE LINKED TO IT. AND MIKE SAVAGE TALKED ABOUT IT TONIGHT.
THIS IS MORE PROOF THAT YOU MUST READ THE ASTUTE BLOGGER EVERYDAY!
EVEN MORE PROOF BELOW...
(Others reporting this MONTHS AFTER Reliapundit HERE.)
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
EVEN MORE PROOF THAT WE'RE WINNING IN IRAQ
ONLY THE MOONBATS THINK WE'RE LOSING - AND THEN THEY PROPOSE DOING WHAT THE ENEMY WANTS US TO DO : RETREAT!
The OVERWHLEMING MAJORITY of Iraqis - 77% OVERALL, but 95% of the Kurds and Shias - believe we are winning, and that their lives are better and getting better all the time and that their future is better now than under Saddam.
VIA GATEWAY PUNDIT:
The OVERWHLEMING MAJORITY of Iraqis - 77% OVERALL, but 95% of the Kurds and Shias - believe we are winning, and that their lives are better and getting better all the time and that their future is better now than under Saddam.
VIA GATEWAY PUNDIT:
To give one relevant example, a recent Brookings Institute report on Iraq, shows the majority (yes, that means more than 50%) of Iraqis are living fairly safe and secure lives:
Gateway has plenty of cool charts. If you want the truth, then check it out. (If you want to keep ranting about Bush and the neocons/Jooooze and how we're losing, then just stick your head back up your ass!)"Insurgent attacks tended to be concentrated (85%) in 4 of 18 provinces. These provinces contain less than 42% of the Iraqi population. Half of the Iraqi population (12 provinces) lives in areas that experience 6% of all attacks. 6 provinces listed a statistically insignificant number of attacks based on population size. 80% of all attacks are directed towards Coalition Forces. 80% of all casualties are suffered by the Iraqi population."
FANNIE MAE'S $40 BILLION SCANDAL - AND HOW RELIAPUNDIT SCOOPED BOTH INSTAPUNDIT AND THE WASHINGTON TIMES BY MONTHS - IF NOT YEARS!
Today, INSTAPUNDIT linked to a WASHINGTON TIMES article about the HUMONGOUS Fannie Mae Scandal. WASHTIMES:
When most people hear the word "Enron," they mentally complete the phrase by adding the word "scandal." As reporter Lester Holt of NBC's "Today" put it in a Jan. 1 story, "Enron has been the poster child, if you will, of corporate scandals."I first blogged on EXACTLY this HERE on DECEMBER 23rd 2004. YUP 2004!
It isn't the only one, though. There's $40-billion scandal with most of the same elements -- even connection to prominent politicians. Just don't expect to see much about it on TV. After all, the top people involved here are Democrats.
Welcome to Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored mortgage giant. As part of a scandal that's been running nearly two years, Fannie Mae has "misstated earnings" to the tune of $10.8 billion. That's some tune.
So far, the Fannie fiasco has cost Chief Executive Officer Franklin Raines and several other top executives their jobs. The stock has dropped from nearly $80 a share to around $50 -- roughly $30 billion in lost value. And the company recently settled with the federal government and agreed to pay $400 million in fines, stemming from allegations the firm fiddled with the books to ensure bigwigs got performance bonuses.
To top it off, the Fannie Mae leadership was quite well-connected in D.C., especially to the Democratic Party. The Washington Post on May 23 made this all clear in black and white. The front page of that day's Business section showed how James A. Johnson, a former campaign manager for Walter Mondale's presidential run, had created "a political powerhouse."
That story had a photo of Mr. Johnson, who had been chairman and chief executive of Fannie Mae, flanked by two other photos -- both other prominent Democrats. On one side was Mr. Raines, a former head of the Office of Management and Budget under Bill Clinton. On the other was Clinton Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick.
While the rest of the graphic listed other prominent Democrats and Republicans, the titanic captains at Fannie Mae were clearly Democrats.
I then blogged it again on NOVEMBER 21st, 2005 - HERE.
I then blogged this on MAY 24th, 2006 - HERE.
This is more proof that if you want the best news analysis BEFORE anyone else is even covering the nes, then just read THE ASTUTE BLOGGER - EVERYDAY.
(The American Thinker, BIZBLOGGER and NRO did link to the 5/24 post.)
(The American Thinker, BIZBLOGGER and NRO did link to the 5/24 post.)
JIHADOMANIACS PLANNED MORE 9/11'S. MAYBE, UNBEKNOWNST TO MOUSSAOUI, HE WAS ACTUALLY PART OF THE SUBSEQUENT PLOTS, AND NOT 9/11
CAPT'S QUARTERS:
ABC News reports this morning on a Homeland Security document that describes at least three plans to attack America and its allies via commercial aviation. The DHS analysis notes the "ingenuity" of al-Qaeda planners even though US security efforts stopped all of the plots:NOW THIS - FROM CNN:ABC News reports this morning on a Homeland Security document that describes at least three plans to attack America and its allies via commercial aviation. The DHS analysis notes the "ingenuity" of al-Qaeda planners even though US security efforts stopped all of the plots.
An islamic Web site has posted a video released by a group calling itself al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula of what it said was a man Osama bin Laden intended to be the 20th hijacker in the attacks on September 11, 2001.AND THEN THIS:
The video, released on Tuesday, shows clips of Fawaz al-Nashmi -- also known as Turki bin Fhaid al-Mutairi. It follows by a few days another Web posting from the group that claims al-Nashmi was the man chosen by Osama bin Laden to be the 20th hijacker.
Al-Nashmi was a Saudi who later participated in a terrorist attack against oil workers in Khobar, Saudi Arabia. He was killed in a shootout with Saudi authorities in June 2004, shortly after the kidnapping and beheading of an American engineer.
An audio recording of a voice claiming to be that of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden has been posted on a website used by Islamic militants. The message states the recently convicted Zacharias Moussaoui had nothing to do with the 11 September attacks, which is referred to as 'that mission'.MAYBE THESE THREE ITEMS ARE CONNECTED? If the jihadomaniac cells are truly compartmentalized, then maybe Moussaoui believed he might have been part of 9/11 - but was actually part of attacks planned to occur AFTER 9/11 - (but which were disrupted by "Bushitlerhalliburtonneoconjewloverchimp").
I think this might be the case, yet I still think that Moussaoui deserved the death penalty; therefore it's a distinction without a difference.
W.H.O. CONFIRMS INDONESIAN BIRD FLU VIRUS NOW MILDLY H2H
BAD NEWS:
THE CLOCK IS TICKING...
And the bad news is made worse by this:
MORE HERE ABOUT CHINA, TOO.
The World Health Organization has concluded that human-to-human transmission likely occurred among seven relatives who developed bird flu in Indonesia. In a report obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, WHO experts said the cluster's index case was probably infected by sick birds and spread the disease to six family members. One of those cases, a boy, then likely infected his father, it said. The U.N. agency stressed the virus has not mutated and that no cases were detected beyond the family.This is bad news because this transformation of the bird flu was the PREDICTED first step before the virus mutates into a full-blown and then becomes a more easily transmitted H2H virus. That's when the global pandemic begins.
THE CLOCK IS TICKING...
And the bad news is made worse by this:
Indonesia says it lacks the resources to effectively combat the spread of bird flu and is appealing for international help. It is appealing for $50 million, spread over three years, to set up a system to combat bird flu in farmed and backyard poultry. The appeal was made during a three-day meeting of international experts in the capital, Jakarta. ...The fact that scientists are BAFFLED is NOT reassuring...
H5N1 does have the ability to transmit from human-to-human if there is continuous, close physical contact with the infected person.
Tests indicated the virus had not mutated.
Scientists were intrigued that only blood relatives were infected - from father to son, to sister, but not from father to wife or in-laws.
Scientists are also baffled that they cannot find an animal source for this cluster of infections.
MORE HERE ABOUT CHINA, TOO.
KIDNAPPED SOLDIERS WERE TORTURED AND BEHEADED
SKYNEWS/VIA DRUDGE:
The enemy is NOT a signatory, nor do they abide by the Treaty's rules: they are un-uniformed, they use terror - which is the deliberate targeting of civilians - and they hide among the civilain population - BOTH in violation of the Geneva treaty. Terefore, by any and all legal standards and measures the enemy is not - and should not be - covered by any protections afforded to treaty-abiding nations which have signed the Geneva Treaty.
The relatives of two US soldiers who were murdered in Iraq have reacted with a mix of grief and outrage over the news that the pair had been tortured and beheaded.Our enemies in this war are evil animals: They are UN-UNIFORMED, non-signatories to the GENEVA TREATY (which is a TREATY relevant to only to signatory nations which abide by it, and not a set of universally applicable international laws).
The enemy is NOT a signatory, nor do they abide by the Treaty's rules: they are un-uniformed, they use terror - which is the deliberate targeting of civilians - and they hide among the civilain population - BOTH in violation of the Geneva treaty. Terefore, by any and all legal standards and measures the enemy is not - and should not be - covered by any protections afforded to treaty-abiding nations which have signed the Geneva Treaty.
Those who demand that the USA abide by the Geneva Treaty in our dealings with THIS enemy are either idiots and dupes or willing tools of the enemy.
This enemy deserves nothing except our total wrath and utter annihilation. By rights, the GITMO detainees can be summarily executed. (I favor firing squads, and no beheadings.)
Does this sound cruel!? Do you think it makes me like the enemy!? IT DOES NOT. We must fight fire with fire. FDR and Truman understood this; they were not shy about using the full force and fury of the US military against the enemy. That's why we won. We need to be more resolute and ruthless in our application of violence against our enemy.
NYTIMES:" A Campus for 'Scholars, Not Fighters' on a Settlement Site"
A large photo accompanies this front page article (about a new college campus in Gaza); here's the caption:
Either the folks who run the NYTIMES are idiots and dupes or intelligent traitors - take your pick.
GLEANED FROM THE ARTICLE: (1) Al Aksa University is affiliated with FATAH, Arafat's terrorist organization. THE FATAH FLAG FLIES ON CAMPUS BUILDINGS. Also there's this item (2):
The NYTIMES: a tool of the enemy.
"A poster of Yasir Arafat has a place of honor on a cafeteria wall on the new campus of Al Aksa University."This poster of Arafat (terrorist, murderer, racist, advocate of genocide, and billionaire thief - who won the Nobel "Peace Prize") and its caption tell the truth about this so-called college - it's a school poisoned by islamofascism and jihadoterrorism. The article is pure PROPAGANDA for the enemy.
Either the folks who run the NYTIMES are idiots and dupes or intelligent traitors - take your pick.
GLEANED FROM THE ARTICLE: (1) Al Aksa University is affiliated with FATAH, Arafat's terrorist organization. THE FATAH FLAG FLIES ON CAMPUS BUILDINGS. Also there's this item (2):
A new classroom building is going up to house 4,000 women, who are taught separately in this conservative society.The NYTIMES deliberately calls the Islamofascist/misogynists who perpetrate gender segregation "conservative" in order SIMULTANEOUSLY soften the image of the enemy and to slander US conservatives.
The NYTIMES: a tool of the enemy.
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
GLOBAL WAR VERSUS GLOBAL-WARMING
ONE IS THREAT REAL, THE OTHER IS IMAGINED.
THE TWO HEROIC US SOLDIERS IN IRAQ WHO WERE KIDNAPPED. TOTURED, MURDERED, AND THEN HAD THEIR BODIES BOOBY-TRAPPED WERE NOT VICTIMS OF AN IMAGINARY FOE.
THE ENEMY IS A REAL ONE; IT IS CALLED AL QAEDA, AND INCLUDES MANY JIHADOMANIACS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.
MANIACS WHO PERPETRATE TERROR ALL OVER THE WORLD - FROM THE PHILLIPINES THROUGH THAILAND AND PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, JORDAN, EGYPT, TURKEY, MOROCCO, AND LONDON. TO NAME JUST A FEW PLACES THEY HAVE ATTACKED, RECENTLY.
The other threat "man-made global-warming' - is merely a theoretical danger, one I am skeptical of because it is a FACT that the globe has had many MANY eras of warming and cooling, ALL before SUV's or man-made "greenhouse gases."
And then there's this FACT: As CO2 levels increased from 1940-1970, global temperatures DECLINED; this is DISPOSITIVE PROOF; increases in atmospheric CO2 cannot cause global warming. In fact, many areas where we see OBVIOUS warming are places where the local conditions are the cause - like Kilimanjaro and the Arctic.
People who are more worried about "man-made global warming:" are either DUPES or INSANE; most're victims of a deliberately provoked mass-hysteria perpetrated by politicians who literally and absolutely (and self-admittedly) want to enact laws which give government more control over the marketplace, if not the global economy, and who want to stultify the growth of trade and industrialization - the two economic engines which can actually best END worldwide poverty.
(FACT: China and south Korea have not improved their economies by becoming more socialist, but by becomg LESS socialist; DITTO Ireland, the UK, Poland, Hungary, Russia, India, etc., etc. etc. FACT: We will never redistribute our way to increased wealth, and we need to increase wealth to make more people have a higher standard of living.)
That's why I say:
THE TWO HEROIC US SOLDIERS IN IRAQ WHO WERE KIDNAPPED. TOTURED, MURDERED, AND THEN HAD THEIR BODIES BOOBY-TRAPPED WERE NOT VICTIMS OF AN IMAGINARY FOE.
THE ENEMY IS A REAL ONE; IT IS CALLED AL QAEDA, AND INCLUDES MANY JIHADOMANIACS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.
MANIACS WHO PERPETRATE TERROR ALL OVER THE WORLD - FROM THE PHILLIPINES THROUGH THAILAND AND PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, JORDAN, EGYPT, TURKEY, MOROCCO, AND LONDON. TO NAME JUST A FEW PLACES THEY HAVE ATTACKED, RECENTLY.
The other threat "man-made global-warming' - is merely a theoretical danger, one I am skeptical of because it is a FACT that the globe has had many MANY eras of warming and cooling, ALL before SUV's or man-made "greenhouse gases."
And then there's this FACT: As CO2 levels increased from 1940-1970, global temperatures DECLINED; this is DISPOSITIVE PROOF; increases in atmospheric CO2 cannot cause global warming. In fact, many areas where we see OBVIOUS warming are places where the local conditions are the cause - like Kilimanjaro and the Arctic.
People who are more worried about "man-made global warming:" are either DUPES or INSANE; most're victims of a deliberately provoked mass-hysteria perpetrated by politicians who literally and absolutely (and self-admittedly) want to enact laws which give government more control over the marketplace, if not the global economy, and who want to stultify the growth of trade and industrialization - the two economic engines which can actually best END worldwide poverty.
(FACT: China and south Korea have not improved their economies by becoming more socialist, but by becomg LESS socialist; DITTO Ireland, the UK, Poland, Hungary, Russia, India, etc., etc. etc. FACT: We will never redistribute our way to increased wealth, and we need to increase wealth to make more people have a higher standard of living.)
That's why I say:
To make poverty history, we need to make socialism history.MORE HERE.
To make jihadoterrorism history, we need to make Leftism, defeatism, isolationism, pacifism, post-modernism, moral relativism and multi-culturalism history.
JOHN MURTHA: THE CONGRESSMAN FROM TORA BORA
BY ALL STANDARIZED RATIONAL MEASURES: WE'RE WINNING IN IRAQ
Monday, June 19, 2006
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY: TEDDY'S TOY
He backed Kerry gave him his Chief of Staff to turn around his campaign and got him nominated.
He has virtually backed fellow Leftist/millionaire Ned Lamont in his quest to unseat the cemtrist Lieberman.
NOW: is he backing GORE!? Makes sense: Gore has become a Leftie loon like Teddy.
BTW: Besides being the Dems kingmaker, Teddy is a murderer.
He has virtually backed fellow Leftist/millionaire Ned Lamont in his quest to unseat the cemtrist Lieberman.
NOW: is he backing GORE!? Makes sense: Gore has become a Leftie loon like Teddy.
BTW: Besides being the Dems kingmaker, Teddy is a murderer.
MURTHA: JUST ANOTHER FAT OLD WHITE-HAIRED BLOWHARD LIBERAL
SOME CONJECTURE ON 2008: THE LEFT, THE RIGHT AND THE THIRD WAY
How is it possible—with 2,500 U.S. solders dead, no discernible progress on the ground and a solid majority of the public now agreeing that the war in Iraq was a mistake—for the Democrats to seem so bollixed about the war and for the President to seem so confident? A good part of it is flawed strategy. Democrats keep hoping that the elections can be framed as a referendum on the Bush policy, and Republicans keep reminding the public that elections are a choice, not a referendum.
This is obviously TRUE WHEN THE ELECTION IS PRESENTED AS A CHOICE BETWEEN TWO CANDIDATES - between Bush and the GOP or Murtha/Sheehan/Kos and the doves of the Dem-Left - the GOP will win EVERY SINGLE TIME, in spite of spending too much and having a weak immigration policy.
But NOW - because of their low popularity - Bush and the GOP cannot win if a third party enters the contest. And this might be VERY likely. WHY?! Well, I see something else at play, a change which may signal something deeper: I believe the fact that the GOP have gained in the last two elections ('02 & '04) because what the elections were reduced to TWO CHOICES. The electorate is VERY diverse: there are liberal hawks and conservative doves - and each io these grous have diverse opinons on stem cells and gay marriage etc..
And as the electorate splits, elections can be WON by politicians and political parties which do NOT have the support of a majority, and which poll poorly popular overall -- as long as they come out number one. This is SORT OF LIKE IN THE UK'S SYSTEM - (OR ANY PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, PERHAPS), WHERE LABOR CAN SWEEP INTO POWER DESPITE ONLY GETTING 35% of the vote.
Bush and the GOP have pretty low numbers overall - especially considering that the economy is great and the GWOT is going well (not the MSM is reporting it!). But Bush and the GOP have low numbers MOSTLY because of leakage of conservative support (and partly because of leakage of the support of independents).
These disgruntled right-of-center voters are NOT likely to EVER vote for the doves of the Dem Left - (who want to cut & run overseas and raise taxes at home).
These disgruntled voters are more likely to (a) stay home, or (b) vote for a THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE - even one who runs in a single issue, or (c) hold their noses and vote GOP. If the GOP can paint the Dems as weak on national defense and risky on traditional culture than most of the disgruntled voters will vote GOP, and the GOP will win a two=party contest.
But, I think (b) might actually be the most likely eventuality because since 1980 we've had 7 presidential elections and 4 have had third party candidates who effected the outcome (Anderson, Perot twice, and Nader in 2000).
The scenario for 2008 might be one of these: If McCain wins the GOP nomination in 2008, I'd expect a third party run for the right (an anti-immigration/anti-stem-cell/anti-campaign-finance-reform candidate) - which would lead to the election the Dem dove. If McCain loses the nomination then he, or another Left-of-center hawk, will probably run as a third party candidate and thereby elect the Dem dove.
I think some type of a repeat of the Perot/Clinton/Bush contest may very well be the norm of the next four elections. There might be a 3rd party made up of anti-immigration Righties or of Daily Kos/cut&run Lefties. And if this happens then the USA will elect Leftists as president. (As Spain and Italy have done, recently ). This will be a DISASTER for our side in the GWOT.
I also think this scenario is most likely because I don't sense that there's a candidate in either party who can unite either party - and attract independents.
Well, maybe Mitt Romney can unite the GOP: (he's a conservative and a hawk but still managed to pass some sort of universal healthcare coverage in liberal Massachusetts).
But - as far as the Dems are concerned, I think that the Kos Krowd is so loony that they're incapable of settling on a Dem moderate in order to win, and therefore will end up supporting a third party candidate; (Webb in VA is NOT a true centrist because he is a DOVE).
A third party candidate from the Left could make the Dems appear as if they occupied the CENTER if the Dems nominate DLC centrists and therefore they might win (by getting the independents and the disgruntled GOP voters - as Clinton did). I think that the only two candidates who could do this for the Dems are Warner and Richardson - or a Warner-Richardson ticket. Or Bayh. A Dem ticket made up of any two of these three would easily win a three way race and be tough to beat in a two-way race. Tyhe Kos Krowd is not likely to allow this to happen.
WILD CARD: Condi. "Romney and Rice" wins - no matter what the rest of the field looks like.
And as the electorate splits, elections can be WON by politicians and political parties which do NOT have the support of a majority, and which poll poorly popular overall -- as long as they come out number one. This is SORT OF LIKE IN THE UK'S SYSTEM - (OR ANY PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, PERHAPS), WHERE LABOR CAN SWEEP INTO POWER DESPITE ONLY GETTING 35% of the vote.
Bush and the GOP have pretty low numbers overall - especially considering that the economy is great and the GWOT is going well (not the MSM is reporting it!). But Bush and the GOP have low numbers MOSTLY because of leakage of conservative support (and partly because of leakage of the support of independents).
These disgruntled right-of-center voters are NOT likely to EVER vote for the doves of the Dem Left - (who want to cut & run overseas and raise taxes at home).
These disgruntled voters are more likely to (a) stay home, or (b) vote for a THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE - even one who runs in a single issue, or (c) hold their noses and vote GOP. If the GOP can paint the Dems as weak on national defense and risky on traditional culture than most of the disgruntled voters will vote GOP, and the GOP will win a two=party contest.
But, I think (b) might actually be the most likely eventuality because since 1980 we've had 7 presidential elections and 4 have had third party candidates who effected the outcome (Anderson, Perot twice, and Nader in 2000).
The scenario for 2008 might be one of these: If McCain wins the GOP nomination in 2008, I'd expect a third party run for the right (an anti-immigration/anti-stem-cell/anti-campaign-finance-reform candidate) - which would lead to the election the Dem dove. If McCain loses the nomination then he, or another Left-of-center hawk, will probably run as a third party candidate and thereby elect the Dem dove.
I think some type of a repeat of the Perot/Clinton/Bush contest may very well be the norm of the next four elections. There might be a 3rd party made up of anti-immigration Righties or of Daily Kos/cut&run Lefties. And if this happens then the USA will elect Leftists as president. (As Spain and Italy have done, recently ). This will be a DISASTER for our side in the GWOT.
I also think this scenario is most likely because I don't sense that there's a candidate in either party who can unite either party - and attract independents.
Well, maybe Mitt Romney can unite the GOP: (he's a conservative and a hawk but still managed to pass some sort of universal healthcare coverage in liberal Massachusetts).
But - as far as the Dems are concerned, I think that the Kos Krowd is so loony that they're incapable of settling on a Dem moderate in order to win, and therefore will end up supporting a third party candidate; (Webb in VA is NOT a true centrist because he is a DOVE).
A third party candidate from the Left could make the Dems appear as if they occupied the CENTER if the Dems nominate DLC centrists and therefore they might win (by getting the independents and the disgruntled GOP voters - as Clinton did). I think that the only two candidates who could do this for the Dems are Warner and Richardson - or a Warner-Richardson ticket. Or Bayh. A Dem ticket made up of any two of these three would easily win a three way race and be tough to beat in a two-way race. Tyhe Kos Krowd is not likely to allow this to happen.
WILD CARD: Condi. "Romney and Rice" wins - no matter what the rest of the field looks like.
Saturday, June 17, 2006
SOME PERSPECTIVE ON "INSURGENCIES" AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
For three years the Left and the MSM they dominate - have relentlessly harangued to public with propaganda about Iraq; this is typified by their constantly calling the jihadoterrorism there (which is almost exclusively perpetrated by "al Qaeda in Iraq") an "insurgency".
Sri Lanka has had an "insurgency" for 25 years - about 3000 people are killed each year by it, on average. Yet no one calls Sri lanka a failed state - a land of chaos and despair OR A QUAGMIRTE because of this persistent violence.
And, Thailand suffers from a jihadoterrorist attack every third day, on average - but no one calls Thailand a failed state.
So why does the Left - and the MSM and Democrat Party and EU/UN-elite they dominate - treat Iraq as if it was a failed state or a phony democracy!?
It's simply bullshit.
People who REALLY support human rights for ALL humans - as Lincoln, WIlson, FDR, Eleanor Roosevelt and JFK did - should be whole-heartedly supporting Bush and the US military's efforts in Iraq and the Iraqi's constitutionally elected democratic unity government .
That the Left does not support our efforts there - and instead says that Iraq's a quagmire, and that we are failing in Irq and that we should withdraw - says more about THEM and THEIR BIASES and their HYPOCITICAL, VAPID and USELESS IDEOLOGY than it does about the war in Iraq.
The doves of the Democrat Party suspended financing for the emerging democracy of South Vietnam in 1975 - and it fell soon after --- A FULL TWO YEARS AFTER THE LAST USA COMBAT TROOPS HAD RETURNED TO THE USA.
Given the chance, the Democrat Party would do the same thing to Iraq: abandon them to terrorists and tyrnanny.
If the public votes in a Democrat majority into the House this fall, then Speaker Pelosi will lead her majority in avote to abandon the Iraqis - and allow al Qaeda to set up shop there.
This is why the most important battle in the war against global jiahd is the poltical battle right here in the USA.
IT'S SIMPLE: Vote Democrat if you want al Qaeda to win.
In the 1970's, the Democrats didn't care if the communists took over Vietnam and southeast Asia - or if the USSR took over Afghanistan and Khomeini took over Iran.
ALL OF OUR CURRENT PROBLEMS BEGAN BECAUSE OF THIS NEGLECT, COWARDICE AND APPEASEMENT.
NOW: the Democrat Party doesn't care if jihadoterrorists take over Iraq.
The results will be worse.
That's why everyone should VOTE GOP. No matter how you feel about immigration or spending: VOTE GOP.
And hey: I'm a registered Democrat - have been since 1974! A nauseated Democrat, sickened by the Left/dove take-over of my party.
Sri Lanka has had an "insurgency" for 25 years - about 3000 people are killed each year by it, on average. Yet no one calls Sri lanka a failed state - a land of chaos and despair OR A QUAGMIRTE because of this persistent violence.
And, Thailand suffers from a jihadoterrorist attack every third day, on average - but no one calls Thailand a failed state.
So why does the Left - and the MSM and Democrat Party and EU/UN-elite they dominate - treat Iraq as if it was a failed state or a phony democracy!?
It's simply bullshit.
People who REALLY support human rights for ALL humans - as Lincoln, WIlson, FDR, Eleanor Roosevelt and JFK did - should be whole-heartedly supporting Bush and the US military's efforts in Iraq and the Iraqi's constitutionally elected democratic unity government .
That the Left does not support our efforts there - and instead says that Iraq's a quagmire, and that we are failing in Irq and that we should withdraw - says more about THEM and THEIR BIASES and their HYPOCITICAL, VAPID and USELESS IDEOLOGY than it does about the war in Iraq.
The doves of the Democrat Party suspended financing for the emerging democracy of South Vietnam in 1975 - and it fell soon after --- A FULL TWO YEARS AFTER THE LAST USA COMBAT TROOPS HAD RETURNED TO THE USA.
Given the chance, the Democrat Party would do the same thing to Iraq: abandon them to terrorists and tyrnanny.
If the public votes in a Democrat majority into the House this fall, then Speaker Pelosi will lead her majority in avote to abandon the Iraqis - and allow al Qaeda to set up shop there.
This is why the most important battle in the war against global jiahd is the poltical battle right here in the USA.
IT'S SIMPLE: Vote Democrat if you want al Qaeda to win.
In the 1970's, the Democrats didn't care if the communists took over Vietnam and southeast Asia - or if the USSR took over Afghanistan and Khomeini took over Iran.
ALL OF OUR CURRENT PROBLEMS BEGAN BECAUSE OF THIS NEGLECT, COWARDICE AND APPEASEMENT.
NOW: the Democrat Party doesn't care if jihadoterrorists take over Iraq.
The results will be worse.
That's why everyone should VOTE GOP. No matter how you feel about immigration or spending: VOTE GOP.
And hey: I'm a registered Democrat - have been since 1974! A nauseated Democrat, sickened by the Left/dove take-over of my party.
Friday, June 16, 2006
HERE'S A SATIRICAL DEM/LEFT/DOVE/KOS VERSION OF THE WAR ON TERROR RESOLUTION
The Senate and the House have now both passed resolutions in support of our continued military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and in the global war on terror. Only the most extreme isolationists, defeatists and doves voted against the measures - six in the Senate and 150 Democrats in the House.
HERE'S A SATIRICAL VERSION OF THE RESOLUTION - ONE WHICH SENATORS HARKIN, TEDDY JO KENNEDY, BABS BOXER, FEINGOLD, JOHN "X-MAS IN CAMBODIA" KERRY, AND BOB "KKK" BYRD - AND 150 DEMOCRAT MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE - PROBABLY WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED:
HERE'S A SATIRICAL VERSION OF THE RESOLUTION - ONE WHICH SENATORS HARKIN, TEDDY JO KENNEDY, BABS BOXER, FEINGOLD, JOHN "X-MAS IN CAMBODIA" KERRY, AND BOB "KKK" BYRD - AND 150 DEMOCRAT MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE - PROBABLY WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED:
Declaring that the United States doesn’t have to prevail in the Global War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary.This would be a perfect RESOLUTION for the DOVES AND DEFEATISTS WHO NOW CONTROL THE DEMOCRAT PARTY - DEMAGOGUES WHO MIGHT VERY WELL GAIN CONTROL OF CONGRESS AND THEREBY MAKE PELOSI INTO SPEAKER PELOSI. And make me puke.
Whereas the United States and its allies are engaged in a Global War on Terror, a too long and too demanding struggle against an adversary that is driven by relevant grievances of America’s selfish values and that is committed to its own value system using means which are acceptable to it for self-preservation and proselytization in its historical sphere of influence;
Whereas for the past two decades, terrorists have used violence to gain sympathy with the Left, anti-Semites, the EU and the MSM;
Whereas it is essential to the security of the American people and to world security that the United States, together with its allies, appease the terrorists and to those who provide them assistance;
Whereas the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terrorists haven’t stopped fighting in Afghanistan;
Whereas the Afghanistan, the United States, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization cannot afford to sustain a sovereign, free, and secure Afghanistan;
Whereas by early 2003 Saddam Hussein and his Baathist regime in Iraq, was contained and did not constitute a threat against global peace and security and was in violation of only minor parts of the mandatory United Nations Security Council Resolutions;
Whereas because the United States and its Coalition partners, having removed Saddam Hussein and his regime from power, have failed to establish an entirely peaceful Iraq;
Whereas the terrorists moved into the power vacuum created by the United States and the incompetent Rumsfeld and his Jewish advisors acting in the interests of Israel and the Likud and have declared Iraq to be the central front in their war against the GOP's crusader occupiers led by the criminal Bush Administration;
Whereas the Iraqi people, because of this war brought on by the United States and other so-called Coalition partners, have a chaotic government which is not truly representative;
Whereas the terrorists seek to overthrow this imposed democracy because democracy cannot be imposed in Iraq or in the broader Middle East;
Whereas United States Armed Forces, in coordination with Iraqi security forces and Coalition and other friendly forces, have terrorized Iraqis and are stuck in a quagmire;
Whereas Iraqi security forces are a joke;
Whereas the United States and Coalition service members and civilians and the members of the Iraqi security forces and those assisting them who have made the ultimate sacrifice or been wounded in Iraq have only done so to advance the GOP at Rove’s behest;
Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) mourns the losses of all those Americans who have died in vain by taking part in the phony war Bush calls the Global War on Terror;
(2) feels more sympathy for the victims of the USA’s retribution than for the victims of jihad, and we blame the Bushies for the deaths which the jihadis commit;
(3) declares that it is not in the national security interest of the United States to fight the Islamic radicals in Iraq or anywhere else;
(4) declares that the United States will redeploy immediately all forces out of Iraq;
(5) informs Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki and the Iraqi people that they are on their own;
(6) calls upon the nations of the world to accept our sincerest apologies for creating Third World poverty and Global Warming, for starting a phony global war against peace-loving jihadists, and for attacking the UN; and
(7) declares that the United States will immediately cede our borders to Mexico and our foreign policy to the UN and France.
SWEDEN: SOCIALIST NIGHTMARE - AND THE FUTURE OF THE EU
FT (via Memeorandum):
There is a connection between Sweden's lack of any real domestic commercial growth - (which will strangle them economically), and their jihadist problem - (which will smother their indigenous culture): both are being fueled by SOCIALISM - and ideology which is a DIS-incentive to prosperity and which promotes MULTICULTURSALISM amd MORAL RELATIVISM.
Socialism entirely DISARMED the Swedes of the means to grow their economy and project THEIR OWN CULTURE into the future. The fact is the so-called SWEDISH MODEL sucks, BIGTIME. SADLY, the same will be true for most of the rest of the EU, which over the last 35 years has emulated Sweden more than the USA. INSANELY: THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WANTS THE USA TO FOLLOW THE SWEDISH MODEL.
(And of course, Sweden is vehemently anti-Israel, after all, the reactionary Left is the home of anti-Semitism.)
More HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE. And HERE.
Sweden's unemployment rate is 15 per cent, three times the figure being used by the government, according to new research from McKinsey Global Institute, the think tank.... In its first assessment of the country's economy since 1995, it said: "Sweden's economy has reached a critical juncture. If nothing is done, the problems will become much more serious."From 1900-1950 Sweden was one of the fastest growing economies in the world - due to INDUSTRIALIZATION and CAPITALISM. Since 1950 only their PUBLIC SECTOR has consistently grown - (now, most people work for the government or are on welfare/public support). But it gets worse: Sweden also has a HUGE immigrant problem - a MUSLIM IMMIGRANT PROBLEM: epitomized by their rape epidemic.
It praised Sweden for achieving average GDP growth of 2.7 per cent a year since 1995, which it attibuted to deregulation and improvements in private sector productivity. But it said the country could not rely on future improvements in private-sector productivity, as the catch-up effect that had driven these developments would decline over time. The ageing population would put the public sector under "intolerable pressure" unless productivity improved, it added.
"If nothing else changes, the resulting increase in welfare costs would become too large to finance through the current tax system in only 10 to 20 years," McKinsey said.
There is a connection between Sweden's lack of any real domestic commercial growth - (which will strangle them economically), and their jihadist problem - (which will smother their indigenous culture): both are being fueled by SOCIALISM - and ideology which is a DIS-incentive to prosperity and which promotes MULTICULTURSALISM amd MORAL RELATIVISM.
Socialism entirely DISARMED the Swedes of the means to grow their economy and project THEIR OWN CULTURE into the future. The fact is the so-called SWEDISH MODEL sucks, BIGTIME. SADLY, the same will be true for most of the rest of the EU, which over the last 35 years has emulated Sweden more than the USA. INSANELY: THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WANTS THE USA TO FOLLOW THE SWEDISH MODEL.
(And of course, Sweden is vehemently anti-Israel, after all, the reactionary Left is the home of anti-Semitism.)
More HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE. And HERE.
Thursday, June 15, 2006
WHAT'S THE MOST IMPORTANT FRONT IN THE GLOBAL JIHAD? THE USA
Arafat tried to make Jordan his base; he got whacked and tried to make Lebanon his base; he got whacked again and tried to make Tunis his base. Then the Oslo Peace Process HANDED HIM THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES for him to use as a terrorist base. Now that base belongs to Hamas, which is just as bloodthirsty as Arafat's Fatah but not as good at PR; (for some reason the EU/UN/Left LOVED Arafat - like they do Fidel). Hamas's OVERT EXTREMISM has isolated the Arab-Palestinians from the entire world, and has brought them to the edge of civil war.
I think it is fitting to point out that AL QAEDA means THE BASE, and that Afghanistan WAS a base of oprations for Binladen until we whacked them and the Taliban pretty good. They're still trying to stage a comeback but NATO forces are keeping them at bay, and winning nthe war of attrition.
OBVIOUSLY, the jihadoterrorists have been trying to make Iraq a base of operations since Saddam was toppled. By all reasonable and historical standards THEY ARE FAILING.
Despite the fact that they have failed over and over again, the Jihdoterrorists will probably continue this pattern for several MORE DECADES before we will have effectively smothered all the cinders of jihadoterrorism.
I mean, the fact they they have been trying global jihad for 1400 years and have failed against the West for the last 700 years AND YET HAVEN'T GIVEN UP sort of defines one aspect of their INSANITY - (along with their diathesis for child abuse, misogyny, beheadings and genocidal racism).
Somalia might be next the next base. Or Indonesia. Or Kashmir - ANYWHERE the jihadists think they can grab some territory. For a base.
I worry that after we defeat al Qaeda in Iraq (probably in the next year), that maybe Americans will have a false sense of victory. And that it will take a "9/11 to the 10th power" to wake us up and motivate us to finish the job.
I mostly worry about this because the Democrats (my party for the last three decades) have shown me ZERO. The Dems are more dovish and more Left-wing now then during the Vietnam War - back then, the Dems had a few trustworthy Cold Warriors. Now they have ONE: Lieberman, and soon he might be an Independent - or out of office.
When only one party is committed to the national defence, and when the other is willing to lie and demagogue and spew enemy propaganda - (as Kennedy and Murtha have done over and over, for example) - well then the odds that the nation will retain the necessary resolve greatly diminish. And withouy resolve we cannot win a decades long war.
The Left - and the MSM and Democrat Party they dominate - does not want us to win. They want us rebuked and chastized, and put in our place - never again to play the role of "lone superpower" playing "world cop" riding rough-shod over the Third World while despoiling the atmosphere with our CO2. (They'd love it if the UN and Kofi would play world cop!)
As a result of the constant and withering blitz of Left-wing "anti-war" propaganda, which is, for all intents and purposes, written by the enemy, large segments of the public have become defeatist.
That's why I think the most important battle in the global jihad is NOT being fought in Iraq or Afghanistan or Somalia or Saudi Arabis or Gaza.
It's being fought RIGHT HERE. And D-Day is the up-coming election.
If the Left wins - if the Dems win - then so does al Qaeda.
I think it is fitting to point out that AL QAEDA means THE BASE, and that Afghanistan WAS a base of oprations for Binladen until we whacked them and the Taliban pretty good. They're still trying to stage a comeback but NATO forces are keeping them at bay, and winning nthe war of attrition.
OBVIOUSLY, the jihadoterrorists have been trying to make Iraq a base of operations since Saddam was toppled. By all reasonable and historical standards THEY ARE FAILING.
Despite the fact that they have failed over and over again, the Jihdoterrorists will probably continue this pattern for several MORE DECADES before we will have effectively smothered all the cinders of jihadoterrorism.
I mean, the fact they they have been trying global jihad for 1400 years and have failed against the West for the last 700 years AND YET HAVEN'T GIVEN UP sort of defines one aspect of their INSANITY - (along with their diathesis for child abuse, misogyny, beheadings and genocidal racism).
Somalia might be next the next base. Or Indonesia. Or Kashmir - ANYWHERE the jihadists think they can grab some territory. For a base.
I worry that after we defeat al Qaeda in Iraq (probably in the next year), that maybe Americans will have a false sense of victory. And that it will take a "9/11 to the 10th power" to wake us up and motivate us to finish the job.
I mostly worry about this because the Democrats (my party for the last three decades) have shown me ZERO. The Dems are more dovish and more Left-wing now then during the Vietnam War - back then, the Dems had a few trustworthy Cold Warriors. Now they have ONE: Lieberman, and soon he might be an Independent - or out of office.
When only one party is committed to the national defence, and when the other is willing to lie and demagogue and spew enemy propaganda - (as Kennedy and Murtha have done over and over, for example) - well then the odds that the nation will retain the necessary resolve greatly diminish. And withouy resolve we cannot win a decades long war.
The Left - and the MSM and Democrat Party they dominate - does not want us to win. They want us rebuked and chastized, and put in our place - never again to play the role of "lone superpower" playing "world cop" riding rough-shod over the Third World while despoiling the atmosphere with our CO2. (They'd love it if the UN and Kofi would play world cop!)
As a result of the constant and withering blitz of Left-wing "anti-war" propaganda, which is, for all intents and purposes, written by the enemy, large segments of the public have become defeatist.
That's why I think the most important battle in the global jihad is NOT being fought in Iraq or Afghanistan or Somalia or Saudi Arabis or Gaza.
It's being fought RIGHT HERE. And D-Day is the up-coming election.
If the Left wins - if the Dems win - then so does al Qaeda.
SENATE RE-APPROVES OF THE IRAQ WAR BY HUGE MARGIN
THE SENATE VOTED ONCE AGAIN TO SUPPORT THE WAR IN IRAQ - BY 93-6.
(Hat tip GATEWAY.)THE SIX WHO VITED FOR IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL/SURRENDER ARE:
(Hat tip GATEWAY.)THE SIX WHO VITED FOR IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL/SURRENDER ARE:
Kerry, Feingold, Boxer, Byrd, Harkin, AND Kennedy.LET'S LOOK A LITTLE MORE CLOSELY AT THAT LIST OF THE SIX LEFTIE DOVES WHO VOTED TO SURRENDER:
KERRY: A LIAR AND SLANDERER OF THE US MILITARY;THE LEFT'S SURRENDERING DOVES ARE NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF LYING, SLANDERING SCUM.
FEINGOLD: A MAN WHO'S LAW CURTAILS FREE SPEECH, AND WHO SOUGHT TO CENSURE THE PRESIDENT;
BOXER: A NOVELIST;
BYRD: A "FORMER" KKK MEMBER - AND "KLEAGLE";
HARKIN: A PROVEN LIAR WHO LIED ABOUT SERVING IN VIETNAM;
KENNEDY: A DRUNKEN MURDERER.
ZARQAWI KNEW HE WAS LOSING; WHY CAN'T THE LEFT/MSM ADMIT IT?
AP:
Zarqawi:
MORE PROOF HERE. (Hat tip NEWSBUSTERS.)
The situation and conditions of the resistance in Iraq have reached a point that requires a review of the events and of the work being done inside Iraq. Such a study is needed in order to show the best means to accomplish the required goals, especially that the forces of the National Guard have succeeded in forming an enormous shield protecting the American forces and have reduced substantially the losses that were solely suffered by the American forces. This is in addition to the role, played by the Shi'a (the leadership and masses) by supporting the occupation, working to defeat the resistance and by informing on its elements.We are winning. No matter what the doves/Lefties/MSM says. The enemy's ONLY hope is if we withdraw prematurely - which is what the doves/Left want. Zarqawi KNEW this and most of his strategy was an attempt to use the MSM/Left as al Qaeda's propaganda weapon to get the USA to withdraw.
As an overall picture, time has been an element in affecting negatively the forces of the occupying countries, due to the losses they sustain economically in human lives, which are increasing with time. However, here in Iraq, time is now beginning to be of service to the American forces and harmful to the resistance...
MORE PROOF HERE. (Hat tip NEWSBUSTERS.)
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
DEM VETS: DEFEATISTS, DOVES, AND DEMAGOGUES
WHERE DO THEY FIND THEM: KERRY; MURTHA; WEBB; AND HACKETT?! THEY DON'T WANT US TO WIN. VIDEO HERE, FROM EXPOSE THE LEFT, (VIA JIM ROSE).
BUSH WINNING IRAQ AND UPHOLDING FDR'S CHURCHILLIAN LEGACY
RTWDT.Let's recap this Administration's success in Iraq:* Elimination of any WMD threat; Check[...] Let us congratulate this Administration for it has revived the noble pledge of old, 'The Atlantic Charter', forced to be abandoned throughout the cold war...
* Regime change Iraq; Check
* Liberating Iraqis from murderous tyranny; Check
* Fair elections; Check
* Constitution; Check
* Representative government; Check
* Decimating al Qaeda; Check
* Decimating Insurgents; Check
* Preventing civil war; Check
IRAQ PM OFFICIALLY INFORMS THE UN IT NEEDS US MILITARY AID
AND AN IRAQI VOTER OFFICIALLY INFORMS THE PUBLIC WHAT SHE THINKS OF THE DEFEATIST/ISOLATIONIST/ANTI-BUSH/"PRO-INSURGENCY" CROWD. (FROM SUGIERO).
JOHN FRANCOIS "GHENGIS KHAN" HEINZ-KERRY STRIKES AGAIN
Before: "I WAS FOR IT BEFORE I WAS AGAINST IT."
Now: "VICTORY THROUGH RETREAT." (Via Gateway.)
Contrast Kerry's defeatism (above) with Bush's resoluteness, (below).
Now: "VICTORY THROUGH RETREAT." (Via Gateway.)
Contrast Kerry's defeatism (above) with Bush's resoluteness, (below).
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
HE DA MAN
BUSH'S SPEECH TO OUR TROOPS. HERE'S A VIDEO; WATCH IT, TOO. GREAT STUFF. HEARTFELT. RESOLUTE. HE'S BEEN A GREAT POTUS.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 12: THE MUSLIM NATIONS AND THE EU: ANTI-AMERICAN
BBC:
People in European and Muslim countries see US policy in Iraq as a bigger threat to world peace than Iran's nuclear programme, a survey has shown.NO WONDER THEY THINK ALIKE: People in the "EUSSR" - like people in Muslim nations - have a Leftist MSM which makes the Left-wing dominated MSM in the USA seem unbiased, (SEE BAWER). This is more evidence of the convergence of the EU and Arabia... IOW: EURABIA.
The survey by the Pew Research Group also found support for US President George W Bush and his "war on terror" had dropped dramatically worldwide.
AL JAZEERA : TRUTH ABOUT ISRAEL :: MSM : TRUTH ABOUT WAR ON TERROR
Many in the media don't accurately REPORT news, instead they disort news to fit their agendas and memes and story-templates.
This is the essence of "FAKE BUT ACCURATE" news, and THE BIG LIE. Last year I blogged a list of two dozen BIG MEDIA LIES AGAINST BUSH. Every single one of the Bush scandals proved to be BOGUS. DID THAT STOP THE LIES!? Nope. The lies continue: Gaza Beach; Haditha; Rove indicted. Worry not: Lies and propaganda are the hallmark of ideologues who know that the truth - and the march of history - is not on their side.
(Historic defeatist/negativist distortions HERE.) Another Jews/Americans analogy here.
This is the essence of "FAKE BUT ACCURATE" news, and THE BIG LIE. Last year I blogged a list of two dozen BIG MEDIA LIES AGAINST BUSH. Every single one of the Bush scandals proved to be BOGUS. DID THAT STOP THE LIES!? Nope. The lies continue: Gaza Beach; Haditha; Rove indicted. Worry not: Lies and propaganda are the hallmark of ideologues who know that the truth - and the march of history - is not on their side.
(Historic defeatist/negativist distortions HERE.) Another Jews/Americans analogy here.
NEWS FROM IRAQ THE MSM/LEFT/DOVES DON'T WANT YOU TO HEAR
KYOTO, CHINA, COAL, OIL AND TECHNOLOGY
CHINA IS ONE OF THE WORLD BIGGEST AIR POLLUTUERS - FROM BURNING COAL; (NYTimes):
BUT TECHNOLOGY - AND THE MARKETPLACE MIGHT SOLVE IT. PRONTO. AND BIGTIME: Existing coal-to-liquid technology can turn China's coal into cleaner burning oil/gasoline, and make them billions of dollars too. China has 190 billion tons of coal:
TECHNOLOGY AND THE MARKETPLACE HAVE REDUCED HUMAN MISERY AND IMPROVED LIFE ON EARTH MORE THAN ANY GOVERNMENT EVER HAS. THEY ALWAYS WILL.
Already, China uses more coal than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined. And it has increased coal consumption 14 percent in each of the past two years in the broadest industrialization ever. Every week to 10 days, another coal-fired power plant opens somewhere in China that is big enough to serve all the households in Dallas or San Diego.KYOTO WOULD HAVE EXEMPTED CHINA, AND THEREFORE DONE ABSO-FRIGGIN-LUTELY NOTHING/NADA/BUPKUS/ZILCH ON THIS SCORE.
BUT TECHNOLOGY - AND THE MARKETPLACE MIGHT SOLVE IT. PRONTO. AND BIGTIME: Existing coal-to-liquid technology can turn China's coal into cleaner burning oil/gasoline, and make them billions of dollars too. China has 190 billion tons of coal:
TECHNOLOGY AND THE MARKETPLACE HAVE REDUCED HUMAN MISERY AND IMPROVED LIFE ON EARTH MORE THAN ANY GOVERNMENT EVER HAS. THEY ALWAYS WILL.
Monday, June 12, 2006
LEFT VERSUS RIGHT: ON ABORTION AND LIBERATION
I think there's a deep connection on the positions that Left and Right take on two seemingly unrelated issues - two issues which are at the center of America's political debate: abortion and liberation.
The Left is pro-abortion and anti-liberation.
The Right is anti-abortion and pro-liberation.
ON ABORTION:
The Left might criticize the Right's position on BOTH abortion and liberation as desiring the baby/democracy to be born, but then NOT guaranteeing a honkey-dorey life, after that. In the absence of that GUARANTEE, the Left says it's a better deal if the baby - and the democracy - HAD NEVER BEEN BORN. Iraq and Afghanistan have had rocky starts - and their futures SEEM UNCERTAIN ; to the Left, this proves these democracies should have never been born.
The Right believes that LIFE and LIBERTY are fundamental human rights derived from the Creator - AND NOT THE STATE, and that it's up to each of us - not the state - to do the best we can for ourselves. On a national scale, ONCE LIBERTY HAS BEEN SECURED, it's up to each nation to do the best that it can, too. Italy and France can do it their way; the UK and Poland can do it another way. Democracies allow the governed to decide - by majority rule. It ain't one size fits all, and some will do better than others.
The Left is pro-abortion and anti-liberation.
The Right is anti-abortion and pro-liberation.
ON ABORTION:
The Right is basically anti-abortion, believing that the only non-arbitrary point at which to argue individual life begins is at conception, and that because each and every life is sacred they must be treated as such - from conception. Abortion is the taking of human life and should be avoided; adoption should be promoted as the only acceptable way to deal with unwanted pregnancies.ON LIBERATION:
The Left argues that a woman's control of her own body is a fundamental human right, and that ths includes control over the fetus until viability.
The Left feels that the Right only cares about the fetus, and that as soon as the baby is born "the Right doesn't give a rat's ass about that person - otherwise, they'd support a cradle-to-grave welfare state." (I have personally heard this argument a thousand and one times!) The Left believes that people should have their basic needs GUARANTEED by the state - FOR LIFE.
The Left argues that Iraq and Afghanistan are disaster zones where chaos and violence rule the day, and that there was more stability ands safety for Iraqis and Afghanis, and their regions - if not the world - before Bush decided that he had the duty and authority to "impose democracy" on people who probably aren't ready for it.THE PARALLEL: how the literal birth of a baby, and the figurative birth of a democracy are politically related
(BEAR WITH ME: Forget that this conclusion doesn't jibe with the facts, for a moment! Foeget that the annualized death toll during Saddam's reign of terror was GREATER than the last three years! Forget that MILLIONS of Afghani refugees have RETURNED to Afghanistan, and that women are learning to read again - and see doctors, and children are flying kites.)
The Right argues that democracy isn't ever "imposed" - rather, that what we had in Iraq and Afghanistan were tryannies - which WERE imposed - and that have mow been removed. Hence the term LIBERATION.
The Right thinks it's unfair to criticize the inefficient and messy "sausage-making" process (called self-government by consent of the governed) in nations which have JUST begun to form their democracies; IOW: democracy is a messy process not an catered event. "SURE SURE SURE," the Right admits, "things are tough now, but the people are materially better off already and they have more liberty, too. And the situation is improving. And, ultimately... IT'S UP TO THE IRAQIS AND AFGHANIS THEMSELVES (to paraphrase Franklin): "They have their democracies, now they must defend them!"
The Left might criticize the Right's position on BOTH abortion and liberation as desiring the baby/democracy to be born, but then NOT guaranteeing a honkey-dorey life, after that. In the absence of that GUARANTEE, the Left says it's a better deal if the baby - and the democracy - HAD NEVER BEEN BORN. Iraq and Afghanistan have had rocky starts - and their futures SEEM UNCERTAIN ; to the Left, this proves these democracies should have never been born.
The Right believes that LIFE and LIBERTY are fundamental human rights derived from the Creator - AND NOT THE STATE, and that it's up to each of us - not the state - to do the best we can for ourselves. On a national scale, ONCE LIBERTY HAS BEEN SECURED, it's up to each nation to do the best that it can, too. Italy and France can do it their way; the UK and Poland can do it another way. Democracies allow the governed to decide - by majority rule. It ain't one size fits all, and some will do better than others.
The Right's positions are entirely consistent and based on First Principles: LIFE AND LIBERTY ARE SACRED; THE LIVES OF ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE ARE SACRED - INCLUDING MUSLIMS WHO HAVE NEVER YET LIVED UNDER DEMOCRACY AND FETUSES.
The Left's positions are consistent, too: they'd rather have less liberty and a strong state which guarantees cradle-to-grave welfare and "public safety" - (like the USSR and Saddam's Iraq) - than have more liberty and more personal risk.
The acceptance of hazard and risk (as a COST OF FREEDOM) is also why people on the Right are more comfortable with the idea that wars do not always go so well, but that if we perservere we will win.
The Left wants military victory guaranteed - in a short time-frame, too. And without any costs. That's why they get wobbly and defeatist as soon as the going gets tough.
BOTTOM-LINE: Just as the Left thinks it's WRONG to "IMPOSE" life on a fetus, they feels it's wrong to "IMPOSE" democacy on the tyrannized.
We on the Right thinks it's our duty to do both.
This basic difference between the Left and the Right is why the enemy is counting of the Left gaining power, and aborting the nascent democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is no mere metaphor - nor one over-extended. Lincoln rightly said - in the Gettysburg Address - that VICTORY in the US Civil War would lead to a NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. It did. So did victory in WW2 and the Cold War. So too will victory in WW4. It will not be a "final victory", but it will be an important victory - another pivotal victory - in the continuing saga of humanity's ever-expanding liberation.
And we gotta just keep fighting. YUP: Just keep fighting, baby! It's a good fight. THE GOOD FIGHT.
It'd be an easier fight if the Left would join our side instead of aiding and appeasing the enemy. But we'll win anyhow.
God Bless America. God Bless Our Troops.
The Left's positions are consistent, too: they'd rather have less liberty and a strong state which guarantees cradle-to-grave welfare and "public safety" - (like the USSR and Saddam's Iraq) - than have more liberty and more personal risk.
The acceptance of hazard and risk (as a COST OF FREEDOM) is also why people on the Right are more comfortable with the idea that wars do not always go so well, but that if we perservere we will win.
The Left wants military victory guaranteed - in a short time-frame, too. And without any costs. That's why they get wobbly and defeatist as soon as the going gets tough.
BOTTOM-LINE: Just as the Left thinks it's WRONG to "IMPOSE" life on a fetus, they feels it's wrong to "IMPOSE" democacy on the tyrannized.
We on the Right thinks it's our duty to do both.
This basic difference between the Left and the Right is why the enemy is counting of the Left gaining power, and aborting the nascent democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is no mere metaphor - nor one over-extended. Lincoln rightly said - in the Gettysburg Address - that VICTORY in the US Civil War would lead to a NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. It did. So did victory in WW2 and the Cold War. So too will victory in WW4. It will not be a "final victory", but it will be an important victory - another pivotal victory - in the continuing saga of humanity's ever-expanding liberation.
And we gotta just keep fighting. YUP: Just keep fighting, baby! It's a good fight. THE GOOD FIGHT.
It'd be an easier fight if the Left would join our side instead of aiding and appeasing the enemy. But we'll win anyhow.
God Bless America. God Bless Our Troops.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 11: CHAVEZ AND ASSAD
NASDAQ/AP:
Syria is backing Venezuela's efforts to win a contested seat on the U.N. Security Council, Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Fayssal Mekdad said Monday. "We are going to collaborate so Venezuela obtains that seat," Mekdad said in a statement following a closed-door meeting with Venezuelan Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel. Venezuela is competing with Guatemala for a regional seat on the Security Council, which is charged with maintaining international peace and security. The U.S. government - which has frequently been at odds with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez - publicly backed Guatemala's bid at last week's Organization of American States general assembly in the Dominican Republic.Marxists and Baathists and Jihadists: birds of a feather. Assad would be able to count on Chavez voting against the USA.
LEFTIST LAWYERS PRAISE GITMO SUICIDERS AS SHAHIDS/MARTYRS
BBC:
William Goodman from the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights told AFP news agency the three dead men were "heroes for those of us who believe in basic American values of justice, fairness and democracy". Mr Goodman, whose organisation represents some 300 detainees, said the government had denied them that.
HEROES?! THEY MIGHT AS WELL CALL THEM MARTYRS OR SHAHIDS.
HIS CHARACTERIZATION IS RIDICULOUS. THESE TERRORISTS DO NOT BELIEVE IN HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY EPITOMIZE THE OPPOSITE OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
THESE DETAINEES WERE NON-UNIFORMED ENEMY COMBATANTS FROM 3RD PARTY COUNTRIES WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED TO GENEVA TREATY RIGHTS.
HIS CHARACTERIZATION IS RIDICULOUS. THESE TERRORISTS DO NOT BELIEVE IN HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY EPITOMIZE THE OPPOSITE OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
THESE DETAINEES WERE NON-UNIFORMED ENEMY COMBATANTS FROM 3RD PARTY COUNTRIES WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED TO GENEVA TREATY RIGHTS.
BESIDES THAT, POW'S ARE NOT ENTITLED TO LAWYERS; THEY MAY BE LEGALLY HELD UNTIL THE END OF HOSTILITIES. THEY ALWAYS HAVE BEEN IN EVERY PREVIOUS WAR.
MORE ON THE CCR HERE.
NEW LEFT-WING/MSM/CNN EUPHEMISM FOR TERRORISTS: "SECURITY FORCES"
CNN: Palestinian security forces clash - Clash kills 2 in Rafah; fire at government building in Ramallah
More on Palistan's Civil War between rival jihadoterrorist crime families HERE.Monday, June 12, 2006 Posted: 2030 GMT (0430 HKT) - JERUSALEM (CNN) -- Palestinian security forces were on high alert Monday after Palestinian Authority and Hamas security forces clashed in Rafah, resulting in two deaths.
If either Fatah or Hamas is a security force, then George Bush is the Dalai lama. These are two terrorist groups comprised of genocidal, misogynistic, child-abusing islamothugs. In ANY clash between them, one can only hope that BOTH sides lose. More HERE on their uncivil war (BBC):
Gunmen loyal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas have set fire to the offices of the Hamas prime minister and parliament in Ramallah. Security personnel and militiamen fired shots then rampaged through the offices in protest at earlier Gaza clashes. Hamas MP Khalil Rabei was briefly kidnapped, but later released.I'd call them animals but it would unkind to all animals - including hyenas, snakes, and e coli. AS JIM ROSE PUT IT:
You hear all this talk from the anti-American types like Jack Murtha and Ted Kennedy about a civil war in Iraq when the real civil war in the Middle East is going on in the Palestinian territories.
SPANIARDS PROTEST SOCIALIST APPEASEMENT OF TERROR
Zapatero - the socialist PM of Spain, who withdrew Spanish forces from Iraq - has recently begun negotiations with ETA - the Bsaque TERRORIST group - WITHOUT DEMANDING THEY DISARM OR DISAVOW TERROR. IOW: He has caved in, once again.
Well, Spaniards are protesting. (Via Gateway.)
The Left has always appeased tyranny and terror: Castro & Che; Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung/Kim Jong Il; Mugabe; Stalin; Mao; and so on.
6/13: UPDATE: - from PUBLIUS PUNDIT: ONE MILLION MARCHED IN MADRID ... and the MSM ignored it.
Well, Spaniards are protesting. (Via Gateway.)
The Left has always appeased tyranny and terror: Castro & Che; Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung/Kim Jong Il; Mugabe; Stalin; Mao; and so on.
6/13: UPDATE: - from PUBLIUS PUNDIT: ONE MILLION MARCHED IN MADRID ... and the MSM ignored it.
ACLU: LAWYERS FOR THE ENEMY
WASH POST/AP:
The American Civil Liberties Union has asked for an immediate halt to the warrantless wiretapping program.
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor was to hear the case brought by the ACLU against the National Security Agency. The Bush administration has asked Taylor to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the litigation would jeopardize state secrets. But Taylor said she would first hear arguments on the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, despite the government's assertion that no court can consider the issues.
The case goes to the heart of the larger national debate about whether President Bush has assumed too much power in his declared war on terrorism. Bush said he authorized NSA intercepts soon after the September 11 attacks, allowing the NSA to monitor the international phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens without first obtaining warrants if in pursuit of al Qaeda suspects.
(The judge was a Carter appointee. D'ya think the ACLU shopped around for a friendly court/judge, or what!?)
BOTTOM-LINE: This proves - once again - that the ACLU is trying to make YOUR world LESS SAFE, and the terrorist's world SAFER.
QUESTION: Is there such a thing as a SIXTH COLUMN?! (The Left-wing dominated MSM is the Fifth Column.)
BOTTOM-LINE: This proves - once again - that the ACLU is trying to make YOUR world LESS SAFE, and the terrorist's world SAFER.
QUESTION: Is there such a thing as a SIXTH COLUMN?! (The Left-wing dominated MSM is the Fifth Column.)
Sunday, June 11, 2006
GAZA BEACH: ANOTHER JENINGRAD/HADITHA/AL DURA?
CBC:
UPDATE; JIHAD WATCH/INN:
6/12 UPDATE: More and more it seems lime a HOAX (THE AMERICAN THINKER):
The Israeli military is still trying to determine if shells it fired killed seven members of a Palestinian family picnicking on a beach in Gaza on Friday. The military has accounted for five of the six shells it fired into Gaza, and said they didn't kill the family.If the whole thing wasn't staged and phony, then perhaps the artillery shell was deliberately fired by Hamas?! IT'S A FACT THAT HAMAS HAS MURDERED MANY MANY GAZANS - (mostly Fatah members). I think it's possible that Hamas thought it might advance their control of Gaza and hurt Abbas and Fatah.
UPDATE; JIHAD WATCH/INN:
An Israel Defense Forces intelligence officer has confirmed that the explosion that killed eight Palestinians on Friday, was caused by a stockpile of Hamas explosives.This would make it an accident, and the reaction - immediately blaming the IDF - merely knee-jerk anti-Semitism by Arabs and the MSM. The immediacy of the videotaping makes me think it was DELIBERATE and not an accident. Stay tuned.
"Shortly after we stopped defensive firing at Hamas rocket launch pads which were deployed behind Palestinian human shields, members of Hamas scrambled to fire more rockets at our positions," said Col. M. "We have eyes on every meter of Gaza, from the sky, from the ground and from the sea. One of their rocket tripods collapsed inadvertently setting off an explosion of a stockpile of Qassam rockets. The Palestinians killed their own children. And this was not the first time."
6/12 UPDATE: More and more it seems lime a HOAX (THE AMERICAN THINKER):
Israel’s IDF uses 155 mm artillery shells. These are quite powerful and invariably leave a crater, some as deep as four feet in soft soil like sand. Virtually none were visible in the film. Particularly in the area immediately adjacent to the family’s alleged picnic site.WOULD THE PALISTANIS REALLY DO SUCH A THING?! Of course: those who would MURDER thier own daughters and call it "honor-killings" would do anything and lie about it; they cannot be trusted; they mustn't be trusted.
12/6/41 AND 9/10/01 - DOVES OF DENIAL VERSUS HAWKS
There are still folks around who think that we are living in a 9/10 world. As if we brought global jihad on us by invading Iraq.
I FEEL I NEED TO REMIND THEM:
This global jihad was declared by the enemy when Carter allowed the Shah to be overthrown and replaced by Khomeini - in 1979. They attacked us MANY times between 1979 and 9/10/01. And we never responded adequately. And they escalated their attacks - month after month after month.
On 9/12/01, Bush accepted the fact that the so-called "realism" which had dominated foreign policy since Vietnam - (EXCEPT for Reagan's "in your face" approach to the USSR, which scared the becheezus out of the Left and the MSM and the EU, but which WON THE FRIGGIN COLD WAR!) - was obsolete.
Bush became a 9/11 person and a war-time president.
There are still "9/10 people" around - half of the Dems (their Left-wing base) and some fringe GOP'ers who long for the status quo - as if it was ever good!
A wise man once said that yesterday has never defeated tomorrow.
Which is why the jihadomaniacs can never defeat us: they're not just yesterday; they're living with an attitude that 1500 years old.
And it's also why the 9/10 people will never defeat the 9/11 people.
Denying the TRUTH of today's world and living in yesterday or yester-year cannot ever make the world safer or freer or more prosperous.
More HERE.
I FEEL I NEED TO REMIND THEM:
The jets which came out of a clear blue sky on 9/11, and were used as jihadoterror-bombs were on a mission PLANNED while: Clinton was president; the Oslo Plan was on track - and Israel had a Labor PM who was firmly in the Dove camp and had UNILATERALLY withdrawn from Lebanon; Afghanistan was firmly controlled by the Taliban; and oil was cheap.Neoconservatism had about as much to do with the people who were behind 9/11 as ice hockey does.
This global jihad was declared by the enemy when Carter allowed the Shah to be overthrown and replaced by Khomeini - in 1979. They attacked us MANY times between 1979 and 9/10/01. And we never responded adequately. And they escalated their attacks - month after month after month.
On 9/12/01, Bush accepted the fact that the so-called "realism" which had dominated foreign policy since Vietnam - (EXCEPT for Reagan's "in your face" approach to the USSR, which scared the becheezus out of the Left and the MSM and the EU, but which WON THE FRIGGIN COLD WAR!) - was obsolete.
Bush became a 9/11 person and a war-time president.
There are still "9/10 people" around - half of the Dems (their Left-wing base) and some fringe GOP'ers who long for the status quo - as if it was ever good!
A wise man once said that yesterday has never defeated tomorrow.
Which is why the jihadomaniacs can never defeat us: they're not just yesterday; they're living with an attitude that 1500 years old.
And it's also why the 9/10 people will never defeat the 9/11 people.
Denying the TRUTH of today's world and living in yesterday or yester-year cannot ever make the world safer or freer or more prosperous.
More HERE.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART TEN: FIDEL AND ZARQAWI
ABC/AP:
President Fidel Castro called the U.S. airstrike that killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi a "barbarity," saying he should have been put on trial. The United States acted as "judge and jury" against the leader of the al-Qaida in Iraq, Castro said late Friday. "They bragged, they were practically drunk with happiness." "The accused cannot just be eliminated," he told a literacy conference. "This barbarity cannot be done."The Left and the Jihadothugs are allies. Both hate the West, liberty, and capitalism. HERE'S MORE PROOF (via LGF):
William Goodman from the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights told AFP news agency the three dead men were "heroes for those of us who believe in basic American values of justice, fairness and democracy". Mr Goodman, whose organisation represents some 300 detainees, said the government had denied them that.The CCR is a hardcore Leftist group to the Left of the ACLU! They prove once again that THE LEFT AND THE JIHADOTERRORISTS ARE PERFECT TOGTHER.
Saturday, June 10, 2006
JIHAD: IT'S ALL ABOUT SEX, ISN'T IT!?
Friday, June 09, 2006
ZARQAWI'S LAST WORDS RECOVERED!
It's been widely reported that Zarqawi didn't die instantly from the bombing, but lived a little while longer and was actually mumbling on the stretcher as he was taken away by US forces. Here is a translation of what he said:
"HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME, I WAS JUST ACCEPTED BY YALE!?"
"HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME, I WAS JUST ACCEPTED BY YALE!?"
RELIAPUNDIT WONDERED IF THE HADITHA MASSACRE WAS A HOAX ON JUNE 3RD
ON JUNE 3RD, I COMPARED HADITHA TO THE "JENINGRAD MASSACRE HOAX" - AND EVEN RATHERGATE, AND EVEN THE "AL DURA AFFAIR" --- EACH A WELL-KNOWN EXAMPLE OF DISINFORMATION HAPPILY BROADCAST BY THE MSM. ("Fake but accurate" is what THEY call it.)
NOW, NEARLY A WEEK LATER, OTHERS IN THE BLOGOSPHERE WONDER, TOO.
Since the LIARS always get caught - especially now with the blogospheric army of fact-checkers - ya gotta wonder they even try!?
EASY: Just remember that great quote from Churchill (paraphrasing): "A lie can go around the world five times before the truth has its pants on."
To paraphrase another old saying: A spectacular lie is often long remembered by people after the simple truth is forgotten - especially if the lie is a spectacular one which reinforces their ideological prejudice.
EASY: Just remember that great quote from Churchill (paraphrasing): "A lie can go around the world five times before the truth has its pants on."
To paraphrase another old saying: A spectacular lie is often long remembered by people after the simple truth is forgotten - especially if the lie is a spectacular one which reinforces their ideological prejudice.
SO-CALLED "MONTHLY TRADE DEFICIT" FIGURE RELEASED - JUST THE LATEST INSTALLMENT OF THE LEFT'S ANTI-GLOBAL TRADE "BIG LIE"
ABC:
SECOND: The term "trade deficit" IMPLICITLY asserts that the GOODS - (or goods and services) - are WORTHLESS, which is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. When a USA gasoline company buys 1 billion dollars worth of OIL from an overseas supplier, they have traded ONE BILLION DOLLARS in cash for ONE BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF OIL, (OIL THAT THEY WILL REFINE AND MAKE A PROFIT ON); therefore, this PURCHASE - (one which Conventional Wisdom asserts "adds" to the so-called "trade deficit") - is IN PERFECT BALANCE; (REPEAT: the seller has traded goods for money - IOW: traded a "goods asset" for a cash asset; the buyer will probably turn their newly acquired goods asset into a PROFITABLE SALE). This even-steven TRADE can in no way be logically construed as a deficit, or anything bad for the economy of the USA.
The trade deficit is rising again after two months of declines, pushed by oil prices and a flood of imports from China. Analysts warned that global oil prices above $70 per barrel will swell the deficit more in coming months.The Commerce Department reported Friday that the gap between what the United States sells abroad and what it imports rose to $63.4 billion in April, 2.5 percent higher than the March imbalance of $61.9 billion.FIRST: It's RIDICULOUS to argue that ANY nation should buy the same amount of goods - or goods and services - as it sells overseas. Therefore the expectation that trade should always be in balance or that balance is best is stupid.
SECOND: The term "trade deficit" IMPLICITLY asserts that the GOODS - (or goods and services) - are WORTHLESS, which is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. When a USA gasoline company buys 1 billion dollars worth of OIL from an overseas supplier, they have traded ONE BILLION DOLLARS in cash for ONE BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF OIL, (OIL THAT THEY WILL REFINE AND MAKE A PROFIT ON); therefore, this PURCHASE - (one which Conventional Wisdom asserts "adds" to the so-called "trade deficit") - is IN PERFECT BALANCE; (REPEAT: the seller has traded goods for money - IOW: traded a "goods asset" for a cash asset; the buyer will probably turn their newly acquired goods asset into a PROFITABLE SALE). This even-steven TRADE can in no way be logically construed as a deficit, or anything bad for the economy of the USA.
The concept of TRADE DEFICIT is an entirely false one, contrived long ago by anti-trade partisans in order to demagogue trade by ginning up fear - by deliberately misconstruing an even-steven trade into a "loss". As PJ O'Rourke so brilliantly argued:
More HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE.
"... there is no such thing as a trade imbalance. Trade can't be out of balance because a balance is what a trade is. Buyers and sellers decide that one thing is equivalent to another. Free trade is balanced trade. You might as well have free love then claim your partner had sex but you didn't."If the MSM were objective, then they'd stop using this propagandistic and misleading number. But the MSM is not objective; the MSM is Left-wing, and anti-free trade/anti-globalism.
More HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 9: CASTRO AND ASSAD
Baathism = socialism. Assadism = Fidelism.
These birds flock together because they hate liberty, love tyranny, and rant about the Great Satan.
These birds flock together because they hate liberty, love tyranny, and rant about the Great Satan.
Thursday, June 08, 2006
WAS BIG IMMIGRANT BUST IN DETORIT TERROR-RELATED?
DETROIT FREE PRESS:
They called it Operation Motor City, and for five days, federal agents working late-night shifts in unmarked cars shadowed illegal immigrants living in towns and cities across southeast Michigan.Targeting eastern Eurpeans from Albania and Macedonia (where many people are Muslim) might mean this raid was REALLY related to the recent terror-bust in Toronto - right across the border from Detroit. Just wondering... After all - if that CBS NEWS report was accurate - maybe the fedas are VERY worried something BIG is about to happen, and they're rounding up anyone who can give them a lead...
By Wednesday, 63 immigrants -- most of them from Eastern European countries and ranging in age from 10 to 60 -- were in the process of being deported in one of the largest roundups yet in an ongoing effort to clear Michigan and Ohio of an estimated 4,500 illegal immigrants. ... Twenty-five of the people targeted during the latest operation, which lasted from May 31 to Sunday, were from Albania, while eight were from Macedonia, officials said. The rest were from 13 other countries. ... he immigrants lived across metro Detroit, including in Canton, Farmington Hills and West Bloomfield. The largest number of arrests occurred in Royal Oak, where eight Albanians were picked up, Baker said.
DENMARK AND CHINA SIGN WIND-ENERGY DEAL
One reason oil prices are up is because demand is up, in part because the world economy is good, and in part because India and China have become big consumers of oil. And they will need more and more energy as their economies grow. SO THIS DEAL IS POTENTIALLY VERY IMPORANT:
China and Denmark on Wednesday launched a wind energy program, which will be financed by a Danish grant of 45 million Danish Kronur (about 60 million yuan) over the next three years.The more WIND China harnesses for energy the less oil they will need and the lower OIL prices will become. And remember this: the Three Gorges Hydroelectric Plant will be openIng soon. This will help too. Technology - and not taxes or Kyoto or price controls - is the answer to our energy needs.
In an agreement signed in Beijing on Wednesday, the Danish aid will be used to help China improve its technological and management capacity in wind power development, and to help local authorities develop their own wind energy development plans.
Denmark is leading the world in wind energy development.
BUSH AGREES WITH RELIAPUNDIT: NO IMMIGRATION WITHOUT ASSIMILATION
WASH POST:
Reliapundit, 2006: No immigration withut assimilation.
We have to make English the OFFICIAL language of the USA and all state and federal activities, and forms.
I NEVER EVER want to have to "press one for English" again!
Continuing his campaign to build support for comprehensive immigration legislation, President Bush on Wednesday emphasized that illegal immigrants who want to stay here should learn English and demonstrate that they are committed to assimilating into American culture.Founding Fathers, 1776: No taxation without represenation.
Reliapundit, 2006: No immigration withut assimilation.
We have to make English the OFFICIAL language of the USA and all state and federal activities, and forms.
I NEVER EVER want to have to "press one for English" again!
ADDENDUM: Assimilation doesn't mean HOMOGENIETY or the end of pluralism, and diversity - as some on the Left misconstrue in the comments section. It means the end of multicultuarlism and of disintegrative forces. REMEMBER: Even the French Left admitted that one reason they had those HORRIFYING RIOTS was because they do such a HORRIBLE job at ASSIMILATING immigrants. We can do better, too. And those who argue that Mexicans CAN'T assimilate are the real racists - peddling their soft racism of lowered expectations. I think Mexicans can assimilate - if we demand it, and that they'll contribute even more to our economy and our USA culture then they alreadt contribute if they do assimliate. We need MORE ASSIMILATION from them, and English FIRST is where we should start.
ALSO: here's what I wrote a long time ago about AMERICAN CULTURE - (BTW: if you GOOGLE "american cultural hegemony" you get this article FIRST!):
Simple: Leftists are basically statists who want the state to pre-determine outcomes in the marketplace, and one CHIEF way Leftists have always done this is to allocate goods to people based on which groups they belong to. If people assimilate they become LESS a part of any group and this make them less susceptible to these kinds of Leftist statist schemes.
The Right believes that the marketplace is the most accurtate a fair allocator of goods and services, and that each person should be treated according to their character and ability and not membership in any group or class or race. Human Rights are INDIVIDUAL, and not dependent on an individuals membership in any group. In a fair and open society, people jn one group should not have more - or less - rights than any other persons. That's why we want assimilation and an end to affirmative action. BOTH ARE RACIST. And Leftist. BOTOM-LINE: today's reactionary Left is the home of racism and anti-Semitism.
ALSO: here's what I wrote a long time ago about AMERICAN CULTURE - (BTW: if you GOOGLE "american cultural hegemony" you get this article FIRST!):
The strength of American culture - so-called - is that it is FREE TO EVOLVE HOWEVER THE PEOPLE WANT IT TO EVOLVE. It absorbs whatever it wants from wherever it wants for as long as it wants - and "it" is the people, the "marketplace" if you prefer.WHY ARE LEFTISTS SO OPPOSED TO ASSIMILATION!?
Within this ever-evolving culture, people are of course free to maintain enclaves of whatever they wish: they can be more devout & conservative (like 50's greasers, or Amish), or they can be xenophiles (like Woody Allen and Michael Moore and their fixation on the pre-eminence of French culture), or they can even be trekkies. This is because a FREE culture doesn't demand that everybody tows the line - heterogeneity and pluralism are fine in an open culture. That's why it evolves. America's culture is open-sourced and free; anti-American elitists are closed-minded and dictatorial.
And, that's why the LAND OF THE FREE is the home of world culture: because here the public determines what culture is (at any given moment) - and not members of the Academy or Mullahs or aristocrats of any stripe.
That's democracy of culture, and like democracy in the political realm: it only frightens tyrants. As well it should.
Simple: Leftists are basically statists who want the state to pre-determine outcomes in the marketplace, and one CHIEF way Leftists have always done this is to allocate goods to people based on which groups they belong to. If people assimilate they become LESS a part of any group and this make them less susceptible to these kinds of Leftist statist schemes.
The Right believes that the marketplace is the most accurtate a fair allocator of goods and services, and that each person should be treated according to their character and ability and not membership in any group or class or race. Human Rights are INDIVIDUAL, and not dependent on an individuals membership in any group. In a fair and open society, people jn one group should not have more - or less - rights than any other persons. That's why we want assimilation and an end to affirmative action. BOTH ARE RACIST. And Leftist. BOTOM-LINE: today's reactionary Left is the home of racism and anti-Semitism.
ZARQAWI KILLED IN IRAQ BY TARGETED US BOMBING RAID
BBC: OIL DROPS BELOW $70. AL QAEDA ON THE RUN. DEMOCRACY ON THE MOVE. LEFTISTS DISAPPOINTED.
GOD BLESS THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
BTW: We will get Binladen and Zawahiri, too. More HERE. And HERE. IRAQ THE MODEL comments HERE.
The head of US-led forces in Iraq, General George Casey, said Zarqawi was killed at 1815 (1415 GMT) on Wednesday, in an air strike against an "isolated safe house... approximately 8km (five miles) north of Baquba.
"Iraqi police were first on the scene after the air strike," he said, followed shortly afterwards by coalition forces. Zarqawi was said to have been in a meeting with associates at the time. Several other people were reported to have been killed in the raid. General Casey said Zarqawi's body was identified through fingerprints, facial recognition and known scars.
GOD BLESS THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
BTW: We will get Binladen and Zawahiri, too. More HERE. And HERE. IRAQ THE MODEL comments HERE.
UPDATE: As PROOF that the Arab world and Iraq's immediate neighborhood is increasingly on OUR side, this item from "REUTERS":
ADDENDUM - via POWERLINE: Casey:
UPDATE: FITTING COINCIDENCE (Via GATEWAY): THE USS COLE DEPARTS FOR THE PERSIAN GULF. Like the death of Zarqawi, this shows the evil-doers they cannot defeat us.
Jordanian intelligence helped in the operation that led to the killing of al Qaeda's leader in Iraq Abu Musab al-Zarqawi on Thursday, a Jordanian spokesman said. "There has been early exchange of intelligence information with the United States that helped in the operation that killed Zarqawi," government spokesman Nasser Joudeh told Reuters.As Binladen once said, when peple see a weak horse and a strong horse they are naturally drawn to the strong horse. We are the strong horse.
Jordanian-born Zarqawi, who had sworn loyalty to Osama bin Laden, had come to symbolise the radical Islamic insurgency against U.S. occupation in which thousands had been killed.
ADDENDUM - via POWERLINE: Casey:
“Tips and intelligence from Iraqi senior leaders from his network led forces to al-Zarqawi and some of his associates who were conducting a meeting approximately eight kilometers north of Baqubah when the air strike was launched."TIPS. The Iraqis want to be free. Just like most people.
UPDATE: FITTING COINCIDENCE (Via GATEWAY): THE USS COLE DEPARTS FOR THE PERSIAN GULF. Like the death of Zarqawi, this shows the evil-doers they cannot defeat us.
Wednesday, June 07, 2006
DESPITE THE LEFT'S PERVASIVE NEGATIVISM - AND THE CONSTANT ATTACKS FROM THE MSM - BUSH'S AGENDA IS SUCCEEDING
THE EXAMINER:
“President Bush’s leadership is achieving a steady flow of results that do not always dominate the day’s headlines on their own but that together represent real progress for the American people,” Bartlett said. ... “In today’s political climate, daily headlines and fast-moving events make it easy to lose the forest for the trees,” Bush counselor Dan Bartlett wrote in a memo this week. “But there is a clear tide of positive developments that reflect the president’s ability to get things done.”Things are far from perfect: al Qaeda refuses to surrender in Iraq; gasoline prices remain high; the federal budget is filled with pork. Nevertheless, despite all that - and the constant negativity from the MSM - the Bush Administration's policies are advancing (see the article for some of Bush's recent successes). WHICH MEANS: be patient; be resolute; don't worry; don't overreact; keep the faith.
THE LEFT: PARANOID ABOUT BUSH AND FALWELL; IN DENIAL ABOUT GLOBAL JIHAD
LILEKS:
You're an enlightened world citizen. Your T-shirt says "9/11 was an inside job." You're pretty sure we're living in a fascist state, that President Bush taps the Dixie Chicks' phones, Christian abortion clinic bombers outnumber jihadis, and the war on "terror" is a distraction from the real threats: carbon emissions and Pat Robertson.It would be funny if it weren't so so so so SO very VERY true. RTWT.
Then you learn that 17 people were arrested in a terrorist bomb plot. How do you process the information? Let's take it step by step.
Gosh, that's horrible, you think. But no -- that's what they WANT you to feel. Recall the prime directive: Question Authority (unless he's a college professor). The plotters must have been impoverished olive farmers radicalized by the removal of Saddam Hussein.
INCONVENIENT FACT: FLORIDA COOLEST EVER
Via DRUDGE/WUNDERGROUND:
Statement as of 8:55 am EDT on June 7, 2006
record event report
National Weather Service Tallahassee FL
855 am EDT Jun 7 2006
... Record low temperature shattered at Tallahassee Florida!...
AR 6:51 am EDT this morning... the temperature at the Tallahassee
Regional Airport dropped to 54 degrees. This obliterates the old
record low of 57 degrees set in 1991.
This is one more bit of proof that man-made global warming is definitely false, and it might even prove that global warming itself might be false. I think that the whole hysterical effort to curb so called greenhouse gases is really an effort by the reactionary post modern Left - who dominate the Democrats and the MSM - to curb industrialization and global trade and to hobble and diminish the West.
POLL PROVES UNILATERALISM IS THE ONLY PRACTICAL PATH FOR ISRAEL
IBLOGA:
OBVIOUSLY, the Palistanis want war, the destruction of Israel, and genocide against Jews. This makes them unfit partners for peace. This makes them fit for nothing - except to be shunned. Unilateral separation allows them to be shunned. By Israel and the rest of the civilized world.
The poll result that will not make the mainstream media at all is the fact that only 4% of Palestinian Arabs reject terror altogether. The question is ambiguously worded, but what is entirely clear is that the vast majority of Palestinian Arabs want to see continued attacks against Jewish civilians (what is euphemistically called "resistance.")The poll - by Bir Zeit University - also shows that 61% support Hamas in their refusal to recognize Israel's right to exist.
OBVIOUSLY, the Palistanis want war, the destruction of Israel, and genocide against Jews. This makes them unfit partners for peace. This makes them fit for nothing - except to be shunned. Unilateral separation allows them to be shunned. By Israel and the rest of the civilized world.
THE OMEN - SYRIAN VERSION: MAJOR US OIL COMPANY WITHDRAWING FROM SYRIA
MORE PROOF THINGS ARE LIKELY GOING TO GET HOTTER FOR BASGAR IN DAMASCUS REAL SOON:
YA LIBNAN:
YA LIBNAN:
Marathon oil company, America's largest investor in the Syrian oil and gas sectors will soon quit after selling its shares, fearing further U.S. sanctions against Damascus.
ARUTZ SHEVA:
"The decision was sparked by fears from additional sanctions that U.S. President George Bush is seeking to impose on Damascus in addition to problems between the U.S. company and the Syrian government," according to a source quoted by United Press International (UPI). "At any moment President Bush can increase sanctions on Syria to cover investments."
MIDDLE EAST ONLINE:
Industry sources said Marathon Oil, based in Houston, Texas, was seeking to sell virtually all of its interests in Syria by 2007.
Handwriting on the wall... the Brammertz Report is due in a few weeks... the clock is ticking... on Assad's murderous regime...
ONCE AGAIN, THE MSM SHOWS ITS TRUE COLORS
THE BBC AND CTV REFERRED TO THE FLIGHTS WHICH TOOK SUSPECTED AL QAEDA TERRORISTS TO SECRET PRISONS AS "TERROR FLIGHTS".
GOOGLE NEWS HITS FOR "ANTI-TERROR FLIGHTS": ZERO.
THIS REVEALS, ONCE AGAIN, THAT THE LEFTIST DOMINATED MSM REGARDS ANTI-TERROR EFFORTS WITH CONTEMPT, WHILE IT IGNORES THE ATROCITIES OF THE ENEMY. OR BLAMES THEM ON THE USA.
WHICH HELPS THE ENEMY. THE MSM: A FIFTH COLUMN FOR AL QAEDA.
GOOGLE NEWS HITS FOR "ANTI-TERROR FLIGHTS": ZERO.
THIS REVEALS, ONCE AGAIN, THAT THE LEFTIST DOMINATED MSM REGARDS ANTI-TERROR EFFORTS WITH CONTEMPT, WHILE IT IGNORES THE ATROCITIES OF THE ENEMY. OR BLAMES THEM ON THE USA.
WHICH HELPS THE ENEMY. THE MSM: A FIFTH COLUMN FOR AL QAEDA.
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
CHE: TOTALITARIAN AND LEFTIST ICON SUBJECT OF MUSEUM EXHIBIT IN LONDONISTAN
THE VICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM IS HAVING A SHOW ABOUT CHE. Those who admire this murderous racist promoter of tyranny are dupes. Of course, the museum blurb conveniently leaves out the fact that he and Fidel promoted tyranny - in Cuba and abroad.
HERE IS A LINK TO MY FAVORITE PHOTO OF CHE.
What's next, a show honoring Zarqawi!?
More from Paul Berman:
More on CHE here. And here. And here.
AND MUCH MORE HERE.
HERE IS A LINK TO MY FAVORITE PHOTO OF CHE.
What's next, a show honoring Zarqawi!?
More from Paul Berman:
Che presided over the Cuban Revolution's first firing squads. He founded Cuba's "labor camp" system—the system that was eventually employed to incarcerate gays, dissidents, and AIDS victims. To get himself killed, and to get a lot of other people killed, was central to Che's imagination. In the famous essay in which he issued his ringing call for "two, three, many Vietnams," he also spoke about martyrdom and managed to compose a number of chilling phrases: "Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become …"— and so on. ... The present-day cult of Che—the T-shirts, the bars, the posters—has succeeded in obscuring this dreadful reality.A real cool t-shirt here, and here.
More on CHE here. And here. And here.
AND MUCH MORE HERE.
THE AGE OF OIL IS OVER... soon
VIA INSTAPUNDIT: G.E. HAS DISCOVERED HOW TO MAKE HYDROGEN AS CHEAPLY AS GAS:
Researchers at GE’s Global Research lab in Niskayuna, NY, have developed a system that produces hydrogen at a fraction of the cost and could be available commercially in just a few years. ...GE’s breakthrough comes from a proprietary material called Noryl, a highly chemical- and temperature-resistant plastic developed by the GE labs, that lowers the cost of hydrogen production to hundreds of dollars per kilowatt, according to Bourgeois.If it pans out, it means that OPEC and Chavez and the Mullahs are THROUGH! Good riddance.
...Although GE has only built a prototype in their lab, Bourgeois believes that demonstrations can come as soon as the end of next year, and commercialization will follow that. The goal of the project, according to Bourgeois, is to bring down equipment costs enough to take the cost of hydrogen from $8 per kilogram to $3 per kilogram—comparable in energy and price to a gallon of gasoline.
GORE: "LYING ABOUT MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS OKAY"
Gore thinks lying is okay. Key graf - from DISSECTING LEFT:
Gore is a Leftist and since the advent of post-modernism Leftists don't believe that objective truth exists, so OF COURSE lying is okay. (Which is why the Left is so very VERY good at lying - just observe the MSM: according to the MSM, the economy sucks, even though by all historical standards and OBJECTIVE measures it is better now than during the Clinton Era.)
"Wednesday's Washington Times ran a column on global warming by Cato's Patrick Michaels in which he quoted Al Gore as saying, "I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience." As a public service I will now translate this politically obtuse statement into English; It is alright to lie to people in order to scare them into doing something that is against their own interest."OVERREPRESENTATION OF FACTUAL PRESENTATIONS"?!?! Er, um... I think that this is pseudo-intellectual jargon for for "fake but accurate!" - or "getting too far out in front of the TRUTH cycle." Heh.
Gore is a Leftist and since the advent of post-modernism Leftists don't believe that objective truth exists, so OF COURSE lying is okay. (Which is why the Left is so very VERY good at lying - just observe the MSM: according to the MSM, the economy sucks, even though by all historical standards and OBJECTIVE measures it is better now than during the Clinton Era.)
DEMOCRAT DEMENTIA / LEFT-WING LUNACY
LEFTIE DEMS ARE MORE AFRAID OF GLOBAL WARMING - (WHICH HAS KILLED NO ONE - AND WHICH IS PROBABLY A NATURAL EVENT AND NOT EVEN MAN-MADE AND WHICH WE COULD NO MORE STOP THEN WE CAN STOP THE SUN FROM RISING), THEN OF GLOBAL JIHAD - WHICH HAS KILLED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS.
They're LOONS!
They're LOONS!
More proof HERE. And HERE.
WHAT A DEMOCRAT VICTORY WILL MEAN
If you want to:
IOW: "Go ahead, make Zarqawi happy - VOTE DEMOCRAT!"
More HERE and HERE.
cut & run from al Qaeda in Iraq, appease the enemy, and defer to the UN;THEN VOTE DEMOCRAT. Or stay home and don't vote: same effect.
filibuster the judicial nominees;
repeal tax cuts/raise taxes;
raise domestic spending, and cut defense spending;
and open the border -
IOW: "Go ahead, make Zarqawi happy - VOTE DEMOCRAT!"
More HERE and HERE.
Monday, June 05, 2006
SYRIAN OPPOSITION COALESCING IN ANTICIPATION OF BRAMMERTZ REPORT AND ASSAD'S IMMINENT OUSTER
alJazeera/Qatar:
The National Salvation Front, a Syrian opposition group founded in exile, has ended its inaugural congress in London saying there was no doubt that the Syrian government would fall.Yahoo/AP:
In its final declaration at the close of the congress on Monday, the group called on Syrians to "break down the barriers of fear" and overturn the government of Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, but not through violent means. ...
"The National Salvation Front also invites the armed forces to shoulder national and historic responsibility, to be the army of the people," the statement added. It urged the security forces, especially "officers used by the regime to inflict injustice on the citizens ... to live up to their moral and national responsibilities and refuse to obey the orders of the corrupt group that all of you know is corrupt and oppressive."
Alongside Khaddam and the Muslim brotherhood, Kurdish parties, independents and communists took part in the London meeting.
Key Syrian opposition figures Monday urged Syrians to work to oust President Basher Assay by using acts of civil disobedience reminiscent to the upheaval that freed nations behind the Iron Curtain. Describing Assay's regime as oppressive and corrupt, the leaders pledged to bring democracy to Syria, which has been ruled by Assay since the death of his father, Haze, in 2000. ... A representative from the Kurdish minority as well as liberal and democratic groups also attended the London meeting.The alliance has pledged that the proposed transitional government would abolish Syria's 1963 state of emergency and release all political prisoners.
Syrians deserve self government, government by consent of the governed, self-determination as much as anybody else. Soon, the Syrians will have it. Because of Bush, and the Brammertz Report, and because there is a diverse and united opposition to Assad's murderous baathist/socialist regime.
The Bush Doctrine is working and Democracy is on the advance - and democracy will bring prosperity and peace.
The Bush Doctrine is working and Democracy is on the advance - and democracy will bring prosperity and peace.
WW2, VIETNAM, AND IRAQ
BARONE WROTE A MASTERPIECE. RTWT. HERE'S A MONEY GRAF - COURTESY ECONOPUNDIT:
But I think some ADDITIONAL historical perspective is in order. Let me put it this way: JUST HOW STUPID IS THE VIETNAM-IRAQ ANALOGY THE LEFTIE DOVES USE ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME!? It's NOT just the fact that the Iraq War casualty rate is miniscule compared to Vietnam - and EVERY previous war. It's this:
When I was young and a dove and a Leftie - (and wrong about just about everything!) - I protested the Vietnam War. Let's say it was... 1970. PKAY?! Well, back in 1970 WW2 seemed like ancient history to us: no jets; no UN; no color movies, (well: not many!); no TV - you get the idea: THE WORLD HAD CHANGED ENORMOUSLY IN THE 25 YEARS between the end of WW2 and 1970.
WELL... Vietnam was MORE than 25 years ago! YUP: that means that WW2 was more temporally proximate to 1970 than Vietnam is to us today. But it's more than just the years: The world has changed more since Vietnam than between WW2 and Vietnam, and it continues to change at an evermore rapid pace, too. IOW: WW2 was more relevant to Vietnam than Vietnam could possibly be to Iraq. And WW2 wasn't very relevant to Vietnam.
WW2 and VIETNAM are ONLY RELEVANT to Iraq ON THIS LEVEL: In all THREE wars the USA defended democracy and liberty and fought against totalitarianists.
VIETNAM IS ONLY RELEVANT TO IRAQ ON ONE OTHER LEVEL: If given the chance the Dems/doves will do the same thing to the Iraqis (and perhaps the Afghanis) that they did to the South Vietnamese: ABANDON THEM TO TOTALITARIANISM.
If you support democracy and self-government for all peoples of the world, then vote GOP.
If you support Binladen, totalitarianism, appeasement and isolationism, then vote Democrat.
The choice is yours.
Americans are in a sour mood, a mood that may be explained by the lack of a sense of history. The military struggle in Iraq (nearly 2,500 military deaths) is spoken of in as dire terms as Vietnam (58,219), Korea (54,246) or World War II (405,399). We bemoan the cruel injustice of $3 a gallon for gas in a country where three-quarters of people classified as poor have air conditioning and microwave ovens. We complain about a tide of immigration that is, per U.S. resident, running at one-third the rate of 99 years ago.In a post below I explain why I think so many are in a sour mood - I blame the MSM's BLANKET negativity going allthe back to "Gore V. Bush."
George W. Bush has a better sense of history.
But I think some ADDITIONAL historical perspective is in order. Let me put it this way: JUST HOW STUPID IS THE VIETNAM-IRAQ ANALOGY THE LEFTIE DOVES USE ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME!? It's NOT just the fact that the Iraq War casualty rate is miniscule compared to Vietnam - and EVERY previous war. It's this:
When I was young and a dove and a Leftie - (and wrong about just about everything!) - I protested the Vietnam War. Let's say it was... 1970. PKAY?! Well, back in 1970 WW2 seemed like ancient history to us: no jets; no UN; no color movies, (well: not many!); no TV - you get the idea: THE WORLD HAD CHANGED ENORMOUSLY IN THE 25 YEARS between the end of WW2 and 1970.
WELL... Vietnam was MORE than 25 years ago! YUP: that means that WW2 was more temporally proximate to 1970 than Vietnam is to us today. But it's more than just the years: The world has changed more since Vietnam than between WW2 and Vietnam, and it continues to change at an evermore rapid pace, too. IOW: WW2 was more relevant to Vietnam than Vietnam could possibly be to Iraq. And WW2 wasn't very relevant to Vietnam.
WW2 and VIETNAM are ONLY RELEVANT to Iraq ON THIS LEVEL: In all THREE wars the USA defended democracy and liberty and fought against totalitarianists.
VIETNAM IS ONLY RELEVANT TO IRAQ ON ONE OTHER LEVEL: If given the chance the Dems/doves will do the same thing to the Iraqis (and perhaps the Afghanis) that they did to the South Vietnamese: ABANDON THEM TO TOTALITARIANISM.
If you support democracy and self-government for all peoples of the world, then vote GOP.
If you support Binladen, totalitarianism, appeasement and isolationism, then vote Democrat.
The choice is yours.
BUSH ECONOMY BOOMING
I challenge any and all Lefties to provide ONE fact that counters any of the facts in the article I linked to, or to prove that one fact in the article is false.
ABBAS CAN'T NEGOTIATE WITH HAMAS, SO WHO CAN REASONABLY EXPECT ISRAELIS TO!?
YAHOO :
MORE HERE.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Monday he will call a referendum on a plan implicitly recognizing Israel after he failed to persuade Hamas to agree to the idea.If Hamas and Fatah cannot strike a deal - but instead resort to murdering each other in the streets, then how can Israel EVER make a deal with them?! OBVIOUSLY THEY CANNOT. WHICH IS WHY A UNILATERAL ARRANGEMENT IS THE ONLY WAY TO GO FORWARD. KADIMA.
The Islamic militant Hamas, which heads the Palestinian government, strongly opposes a referendum. "President Abbas will set a date for the referendum after the meeting Tuesday of the PLO Executive Committee and parliamentary caucuses," his office said in a statement.
Abbas had set a midnight deadline for agreement. But a participant in late-night talks with Palestinian factions said the president determined they had failed an hour before that.
... The Palestinian infighting has turned deadly in recent weeks. Sixteen people have died in clashes between Hamas and Fatah loyalists, including five killed on Sunday. Five Palestinians were wounded in two clashes in the southern city of Khan Younis on Monday, security officials said. Hamas has stuck to its tough line on Israel despite the crushing international boycott, which has left the government unable to pay the salaries of tens of thousands of civil servants for three months.
MORE HERE.
MORE PROOF OF GLOBAL JIHAD - and why Binladen is rooting for the Democrats
BREITBART/AP VIA DRUDGE:
"This investigation is not finished," Mike McDonell, deputy commissioner for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, told Canadian Broadcasting Corp. on Monday. "Anybody that aided, facilitated or participated in this terrorist event will be arrested and prosecuted in court."
Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day also predicted more arrests. Another senior government official told The Associated Press on Sunday that more warrants were being gathered and that arrests were likely, possibly this week.
Although both Canadian and U.S. officials said over the weekend there was no indication the purported terror group had targets outside Ontario, McDonnell told National Public Radio on Monday that the inquiry has expanded beyond Canada.
"We are working with and sharing our information with our allied countries," he said.
A U.S. law enforcement official said investigators were looking for connections between those detained in Canada and suspected Islamic militants held in the United States, Britain, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Denmark and Sweden.
American authorities have established that two men from Georgia who were charged this year in a terrorism case had been in contact with some of the Canadian suspects via computer, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation is continuing.
This is absolutely a World War - (either 3 or 4, depending on if you include the Cold War).
And the Dems/doves/appeasers of the Left are ready to turn either Afghanistan or Iraq (or both, given the chance!) into modern day Sudatenland.
I PRAY the American electorate doesn't give them the chance. But, the way the polls look right now, the electorate just MIGHT!
AND TO ME, it just doesn't figure: the enemy has attacked us and our allies with terror at home; they're more brutal and repressive than the Nazis were, (and given the chance would commit genocide on a "grander" scale!); our casualty rate is miniscule compared to Vietnam, (and yet the Vietnam War had GREATER public support TEN YEARS INTO THE CONFLICT THAN IRAQ DOES after three!).
SO WHAT GIVES?! And it ain't just the MSM - after all, the MSM is LESS concentrated now than in the late 1960's-70's. So, why are Americans less resolute, less patient now than then?
For one thing, the Democrat Party is ENTIRELY a party of Leftie dove appeasers now; there is NOT ONE HAWK among them. (In the Vietnam Era, there were some hawks in the Democrat Party.) SO, the opposition to the war is MORE PARTISAN now than then, and the Dems are more desperate for power now than then, so they unabashedly demagogue the Iraq War day in and day out. Of course, they have willing comrades in the MSM. And their spin on the news - ALL NEWS - is more partisan: they never report good economic news, or good news in the GWOT, or good social news - like the fact that drug use and crime continue to decline.
I think this COMPREHENSIVE BLACKOUT OF ANY GOOD NEWS has a powerful overall effect: the bad news from Iraq is compounded EXPONENTIALLY because people are LED TO BELIEVE that the whole world is going to pot - (AND A POT THAT WILL SOON BE BOILING BECAUSE OF MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING, TOO)!
The comprehensive blackout of all good news is essentially driven by Leftists who believe that Bush stole the election IN 2000; they have been "gunning" for Bush ever since, relentlessly slanting ALL NEWS against him. When a little good news gets out (like the fact that the unemployment rate is now 4.6%), it is spun into bad news and gets no traction.
SO WHAT DO WE DO?! (1) We have to remain committed and get out and vote GOP despite any differences some might have with Bush on immigration or spending. The War Against Global Jihad trumps everything else.
Not only will a Dem Congress abandon Iraq and Afghanistan, but they will raise taxes, cut defense spending, and block conservative judicial nominees. And try to impeach Bush.
And a Democrat Party victory will effectively VINDICATE BINLADEN. WHY?! Because ever since Clinton abandoned Somalia, Binladen has been arguing that America doesn't have what it takes to keep fighting a long war with combat deaths. Binladen's ENTIRE strategy is predicated on this; he has said so. If the American people vote the Democrats into power, then they will prove Binladen correct.
IOW: If you support Binladen then vote Democrat.
UK TO DEMAND ASSIMILATION FOR IMMIGRATION
BBC:
Immigrants coming to Britain must learn English, Gordon Brown has insisted. He argued that people entering the UK should "play by the rules" and that means learning the language in order to get work, the chancellor says. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that those who refused to learn English should be made to do so.GOOD. My saying: NO IMMIGRATION WITHOUT ASSIMILATION.
IRAQ: NOT CIVIL WAR, BUT WAR AGAINST JIHADOTERRORISTS
There is no friggin civil war in Iraq. There is no friggin sectarian war, either. The killings and reprisals are not sectarian. It is a war between civilization and brutal barbaric jihadoterrorists.
FACT: The attacks are by carried out by - and instigated by - al Qaeda against Shias, and NOT merely Sunnis on Shias.
FACT: The Kurds are MOSTLY Sunni, and they are NOT attacking Shias.
FACT: Zarqawi has OPENLY called for Sunnis to kill Shias, but not a single Sunni cleric or Sunni politician has done the same. Not a single Sunni politician has left the Iraqi government or civil service to support Zarqawi or al Qaeda. The Iraqi nation has not split, and the Iraqi government has NOT collapsed due to sectarian differences; in fact, the Kurds and the Shias - who have the ability to retaliate and to commit genocide against the Sunnis any time they want to - have been extraordinarily patient, and have worked tirelessly for national unity despite the constant attacks BY AL QAEDA.
HEY LEFTIE SKEPTICS, STILL NOT BUYING IT?!
WELL THEN, LOOK AT IT THIS WAY:
Nothing could more clearly argue the case for STAYING AND HELPING THE IRAQIS DEFEAT THE ENEMY.
Now is the time to ramp up our defense of the Iraqi democracy, not talk of withdrawal.
Withdrawal is what the enemy wants. And the US Left, the doves. The Dems.
But maybe I'm being REDUNDANT: the Left and the Jihadoterrorsts are "Birds of a Feather": they are both enemies of liberty, and democracy. And both want the USA defeated.
The Left is carrying the water for Zarqawi, preaching his version of events and supporting his goals.
Which is why, to make Jihadoterrorism history we have to first make the Left history.
AND REMEMBER THIS: THIS STORY IN THE NYTIMES PROVES THAT SADDAM WAS A TERRORIST. He murdered more Iraqis on a daily basis than have been killed on average each day since liberation.
FACT: The attacks are by carried out by - and instigated by - al Qaeda against Shias, and NOT merely Sunnis on Shias.
FACT: The Kurds are MOSTLY Sunni, and they are NOT attacking Shias.
FACT: Zarqawi has OPENLY called for Sunnis to kill Shias, but not a single Sunni cleric or Sunni politician has done the same. Not a single Sunni politician has left the Iraqi government or civil service to support Zarqawi or al Qaeda. The Iraqi nation has not split, and the Iraqi government has NOT collapsed due to sectarian differences; in fact, the Kurds and the Shias - who have the ability to retaliate and to commit genocide against the Sunnis any time they want to - have been extraordinarily patient, and have worked tirelessly for national unity despite the constant attacks BY AL QAEDA.
HEY LEFTIE SKEPTICS, STILL NOT BUYING IT?!
WELL THEN, LOOK AT IT THIS WAY:
If some KKK and Aryan Church radicals carried out a series of attacks - (burning dozens of black churches and murdering dozens and dozens of blacks in, let's say... Indiana) - it would not be right to call it a race war or a religious war - even though that's EXACTLY how the KKK and Aryan Church would want it portayed. It would properly be called a series of racist attacks by a couple of dangerously radical and fanatically extreme fringes groups bent on igniting civil war.NOTHING could more clearly PROVE that the Iraq War is the most important front in the GWOT.
Well, that what's happening in Iraq: a fringe group - al Qaeda in Iraq - is carrying out extraordinarily brutal and barbaric attacks on Shias in an attempt to foment a civil war and destroy the constitutional democratic republic of Iraq and take over a chunk of it and turn it into a Taliban-like base from which to carry out global jihad.
Nothing could more clearly argue the case for STAYING AND HELPING THE IRAQIS DEFEAT THE ENEMY.
Now is the time to ramp up our defense of the Iraqi democracy, not talk of withdrawal.
Withdrawal is what the enemy wants. And the US Left, the doves. The Dems.
But maybe I'm being REDUNDANT: the Left and the Jihadoterrorsts are "Birds of a Feather": they are both enemies of liberty, and democracy. And both want the USA defeated.
The Left is carrying the water for Zarqawi, preaching his version of events and supporting his goals.
Which is why, to make Jihadoterrorism history we have to first make the Left history.
AND REMEMBER THIS: THIS STORY IN THE NYTIMES PROVES THAT SADDAM WAS A TERRORIST. He murdered more Iraqis on a daily basis than have been killed on average each day since liberation.
Sunday, June 04, 2006
SYRIAN OPPOSITION HOLDS 2 DAY SUMMIT IN LONDON
They're getting ready for the BRAMMERTZ REPORT, and the end of Assad's murderous Baathist/socialist tyranny.(Hat tip Prairie Pundit.)
Saturday, June 03, 2006
JENINGRAD REDUX? THE HADITHA MASSACRE: DID IT HAPPEN AT ALL? IF SO, WHO DID IT?
IS HADITHA A REPRISE OF JENINGRAD? MAYBE. (More on Jenin HERE and HERE. More on another MSM pro-jihado-thug propaganda hoax HERE and HERE.)
I don't know ALL the facts yet, but I believe that the al Dura Affair, Jeningrad, and Rathergate, have PROVEN that the MSM has a diathesis for anti-USA/anti-Bush/anti-Israel "news" - "news" that's "FAKE BUT TRUE" - news that false but advances their agenda.
IOW: The Left-wing dominated MSM leaps at every opportunity to broadcast unverified propaganda as long as it hurts their ideological enemies on the Right - and even if it helps the enemy. Which makes them simply traitorous.
Haditha may very well be another case of phony news.
I don't know ALL the facts yet, but I believe that the al Dura Affair, Jeningrad, and Rathergate, have PROVEN that the MSM has a diathesis for anti-USA/anti-Bush/anti-Israel "news" - "news" that's "FAKE BUT TRUE" - news that false but advances their agenda.
IOW: The Left-wing dominated MSM leaps at every opportunity to broadcast unverified propaganda as long as it hurts their ideological enemies on the Right - and even if it helps the enemy. Which makes them simply traitorous.
Haditha may very well be another case of phony news.
Friday, June 02, 2006
FACT: THE BUSH ECONOMY IS BETTER THAN THE CLINTON ECONOMY
SIX MONTHS AGO FROM THE ANCHORESS (VIA DR. SANITY):
AND UNEMPLOYMENT CONTINUES TO DECLINE.
AND HOME OWNERSHIP - WHERE MOST PEOPLE PUT THEIR SAVINGS, DERIVE THEIR WEALTH, AND FULFILL THEIR DREAMS - HAS STEADILY EXPANDED, TOO.
Yet polls show that most Americans feel the economy sucks. WHY?! The Left-wing dominated MSM refuses to report any good news, or give Bush credit for the good news they do report.
WHICH IS WHY, TO DEFEAT THE JIHADOMANIACS AND MAKE POVERTY AND TYRANNY HISTORY, WE MUST MAKE THE LEFT HISTORY.
UPDATE - 6/3/06: Instapundit chimes in with another angle which proves my point HERE.
The economy has now expanded faster than 3% for 10 straight quarters. So when was the last time the economy expanded faster than 3% for 10 straight quarters? It didn’t happen during the 1990s (the longest streak was eight).AND NOW - SOME SIX MONTHS LATER - THE ECONOMY HAS NOW ALSO WEATHERED VERY HIGH OIL PRICES, AND... YET... IT'S STILL GROWING!
It last happened during the 13 quarters from 1Q 1983 through 1Q 1986. Not coincidentally, a president who believed in lowering taxes to stimulate economic growth was in charge the last time it happened.
So despite being at war, despite devastating storms, and despite legislative and regulatory drags on the economy like Sarbanes-Oxley, this has been most consistently growing economy in almost 20 years.
AND UNEMPLOYMENT CONTINUES TO DECLINE.
AND HOME OWNERSHIP - WHERE MOST PEOPLE PUT THEIR SAVINGS, DERIVE THEIR WEALTH, AND FULFILL THEIR DREAMS - HAS STEADILY EXPANDED, TOO.
Yet polls show that most Americans feel the economy sucks. WHY?! The Left-wing dominated MSM refuses to report any good news, or give Bush credit for the good news they do report.
WHICH IS WHY, TO DEFEAT THE JIHADOMANIACS AND MAKE POVERTY AND TYRANNY HISTORY, WE MUST MAKE THE LEFT HISTORY.
UPDATE - 6/3/06: Instapundit chimes in with another angle which proves my point HERE.
LIKE THEIR COMRADES IN THE MSM THEY COVER, THE LEFTIES WHO RUN "EDITOR & PUBLISHER" SLANT POLL RESULTS AGAINST BUSH
EDITOR & PUBLISHER:
A new Quinnipiac Poll finds American voters selecting George W. Bush as easily the worst American president in the past 61 years, with fellow Republican Ronald Reagan picked as the best.WRONG. THIS IS A RANK DISTORTION. The word "easily" is used to intensify the poll result, as if those who thought Bush was the worst, thought so MORE READILY than those who thought Nixon or Carter were the worst. This is false. The poll MERELY relates how many of those polled thought which president was the worst:
Bush was named by 34% of voters, followed by Richard Nixon at 17% and Bill Clinton at 16%, according to the Quinnipiac University national poll of over 1,500 voters released today. Leading the list for best President since 1945 is Ronald Reagan with 28%, and Clinton with 25%.
Twice as many polled thought Bush was the worst than thought Clinton was the worst. BUT:
BUT THE RSULTS ARE REALLY NOT NEWS AT ALL. WHY?! BECAUSE PRESIDENTIAL POPULARITY CHANGES WILDLY IN THE DECADES WHICH FOLLOW THE YEARS OF SERVICE: for example, at the time, Truman was wildly unpopular, and did not seek another term, stepping aside for the wonkish Leftie Dove Adlai Stevenson, (whom Ike beat easily, TWICE!). But now, Truman is correctly VERY HIGHLY REGARDED.
While Democrats and Republicans split widely on the "worst" choice, 35% independent voters picked Bush.Okay, this is logocal: GOP voters LIKE Bush, and Dem voters do not. And Independents don't RIGHT NOW. AND WHY IS BUSH LEADING, RIGHT NOW? SIMPLE: IRAQ:
The main reason cited by voters who disapprove of Bush is the war in Iraq -- listed by 43%. By 56% to 39% they say that that going to war in Iraq was the wrong thing to do. Nearly 6 in 10 want withdrawal of troops from Iraq.If the MSM covered the good news from Iraq like they cover the bad news from Iraq - and if they reported ANY GOOD ECONOMIC NEWS AT ALL - then Bush's numbers would be higher.
BUT THE RSULTS ARE REALLY NOT NEWS AT ALL. WHY?! BECAUSE PRESIDENTIAL POPULARITY CHANGES WILDLY IN THE DECADES WHICH FOLLOW THE YEARS OF SERVICE: for example, at the time, Truman was wildly unpopular, and did not seek another term, stepping aside for the wonkish Leftie Dove Adlai Stevenson, (whom Ike beat easily, TWICE!). But now, Truman is correctly VERY HIGHLY REGARDED.
Here are some more FACTS:
Likewise, opinon of Clinton will change over time: soon, Clinton will join Carter in the DUNGHEAP of HORRIBLE PRESIDENTS. Carter gave us a HUGE MISERY INDEX - and the ethos of sweater-wearing defeatism, AND the hostage crisis, AND the fall of the Shah, AND the invasion of Afghanistan. Truly, ALL the problems we face now BEGAN ON HIS AWFUL WATCH. (And he has been WORSE since then: defending anti-American tyrants like Chavez and Arafat and Hamas and Kim Jung Il!)
Clinton - (whom I voted for TWICE, I'm ashamed to admit!) - fiddled around with Monica as the world "burned":
BOTTOM-LINE: This list is why Clinton should be, and soon will be, regarded as one of our worst presidents - ever.
Under Bush we are fighting back and defeating the jihadoterrorists. We've "converted" Khaddafy. We saved Georgia and Ukraine. We caught the AQKhan smuggling ring. We EXPOSED the deceitful UN-Oil-For-Food Scam, and their "sex-for-refugee status" scam. Home-ownership is at AN ALL TIME HIGH - EVEN FOR ALL MINORITIES. Unemployment is VERY VERY VERY LOW. The economy is booming. And democracy - worldwide - is ON THE MARCH.
Truly, Bush has already been a GREAT president. And soon history will judge him so. And so will the polls. But Lefties like the folks who run E&P and the MSM will never admit it.
Reagan's - [NOW REGARDED AS THE BEST PRESIDENT ACCORDING TO THE QUINNIPAC POLL CITED BY E&P] - 52% average approval rating for his entire presidency was topped by Kennedy's 70% average, Eisenhower's 66%, Roosevelt's 68%, and even by Johnson (54%), who eschewed running for reelection because of the unpopularity of his Vietnam policy.This proves that public opinion on presidential perfromance changes over time, with perspective. CASE IN POINT: I hated Reagan at the time, but now agree: HE WAS A GREAT AND GOOD PRESIDENT, ONE OF OUR BEST. The same will be true of Bush: history will regard him as one of the very best presidents of ALL TIME.
In short, about half-- and sometimes more than half-- of the US public did not approve of Reagan's presidential performance.
His approval index was not much better than the lowest modern presidential averages: Truman's and Ford's, each at 46%; Carter's at 47%; and 48% for Nixon.
... the facts show that Reagan was definitely not the most popular post-war president, and during many comparable periods he was among the most unpopular.
Likewise, opinon of Clinton will change over time: soon, Clinton will join Carter in the DUNGHEAP of HORRIBLE PRESIDENTS. Carter gave us a HUGE MISERY INDEX - and the ethos of sweater-wearing defeatism, AND the hostage crisis, AND the fall of the Shah, AND the invasion of Afghanistan. Truly, ALL the problems we face now BEGAN ON HIS AWFUL WATCH. (And he has been WORSE since then: defending anti-American tyrants like Chavez and Arafat and Hamas and Kim Jung Il!)
Clinton - (whom I voted for TWICE, I'm ashamed to admit!) - fiddled around with Monica as the world "burned":
(1) We were attacked by jihadoterrorists OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, and BJ Clinton did BUPKUS. And (2), he allowed the economic Bubbles to grow, and burst as he left office. And (3), he allowed the CROOKED CEO's to loot Wall Street. All the crooked CEO's - who Bush is sending to jail - did their crimes on Clinton's watch. And (4), Enron, et al., ripped off California in their energy scam on his watch. And (5), Clinton entertained Arafat in the oval office more than any president. And (6), he stood by and did nothing as MILLIONS of blacks were MURDERED as victims of racist genocide in Africa - (in Rwanda and the Sudan. YUP: MILLIONS. Yet, African-Americans still love him! Go figure!) And (7), the New Orleans levees which were BREECHED were built on HIS WATCH! And (8), Assad was allowed to occupy Lebanon compleyely unchallenged. And (9), the Pakistanis were allowed to build nukes and ILLEGALLY export nuke technology. AND (10), Saddam was allowed to abuse the UN Oil for Food prgram, and bribe our supposed allies.I COULD GO ON, BUT I'LL STOP AT TEN - 'CAUSE I'M GETTING NAUSEOUS!
BOTTOM-LINE: This list is why Clinton should be, and soon will be, regarded as one of our worst presidents - ever.
Under Bush we are fighting back and defeating the jihadoterrorists. We've "converted" Khaddafy. We saved Georgia and Ukraine. We caught the AQKhan smuggling ring. We EXPOSED the deceitful UN-Oil-For-Food Scam, and their "sex-for-refugee status" scam. Home-ownership is at AN ALL TIME HIGH - EVEN FOR ALL MINORITIES. Unemployment is VERY VERY VERY LOW. The economy is booming. And democracy - worldwide - is ON THE MARCH.
Truly, Bush has already been a GREAT president. And soon history will judge him so. And so will the polls. But Lefties like the folks who run E&P and the MSM will never admit it.
MORE PROOF THAT POLAR SNOW AND ICE AMOUNTS HAVE VARIED FOREVER, AND ARE NOT "MAN-MADE"
6/6 UPDATE.
TCS:
Therefore, the ranting eco-nuts - like Gore and McCain - who blame HUMANITY and industrializatiuon and man-made CO2 are ALL WRONG.
TCS:
Snowfall has been on the increase in parts of the United States and the world to record proportions in recent years even as summer snow and ice levels reach multi-decadal lows.The article has charts and graphs which prove that the receding ice and increasing snow which the Arctic is currently experiencing is NOT UNUSUAL, AND HAS PROBABLY BEEN OCCURRING REGULARLY FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.
The changes relate to natural cyclical changes in the Atlantic Ocean and atmosphere that favor both more tropical activity in summer and more snowfall in winters.
Climatologists believe the current phase of the Atlantic cycle may last another decade or two. If this outlook is correct, we might expect both more big snows and hurricanes for years to come.
... As George Taylor summarized on this site in his story "Arctic Sea Ice -- Is It Disappearing?""A number of researchers have suggested that inflows of Atlantic water into the Arctic profoundly affect temperatures and sea ice trends in the latter ocean. Polyakov, et al (2004) are among these. The first sentence of their paper states 'Exchanges between the Arctic and North Atlantic Ocean have a profound influence on the circulation and thermodynamics of each basin.' The authors attributed most of the variability to multidecadal variations on time scales of 50-80 years, with warm periods in the 1930s-40s and in recent decades, and cool periods in the 1960s-70s and early in the twentieth century. These are associated with changes in ice extent and thickness (as well as air and sea temperature and ocean salinity). The most likely causative factor involves changes in atmospheric circulation, including but not limited to the Arctic Oscillation"
Therefore, the ranting eco-nuts - like Gore and McCain - who blame HUMANITY and industrializatiuon and man-made CO2 are ALL WRONG.
NYTIMES DISTORTS "ASIAN CAR MAKER" MARKET SHARE
The NYTIMES uses one of the oldest tricks in the book (and a logical fallacy called "arguing from ambiguity") to make it seem like "American" car makers who make cars in Detroit are losing to "Asian" car makers who make cars in Asia:
WHY IS THIS ANGLE BOGUS?! Because most of the so-called "Asian cars" the so-called "Asian car makers" sell here in the USA are made right here IN THE USA! They're no more "Asian cars" than a Chrsysler is a "European car." (And so-called American car makers make many of their cars - and car parts - OVERSEAS!)
This is really a story about the slowdown of the sales of BIG CARS, and the increase in sales of smaller cars, and NOT "import versus domestic cars" or "FOREIGN OWNED" makers versus "AMERICAN OWNED" makers. Especially NOT since the all car manufacturers make cars all over the world, and are ALL public companies whose stockholders are from ALL OVER THE GLOBE.
The NYTIMES is attempting to mount a sneaky, subliminal anti-free trade argument - one that has the added bonus of being anti-US business, (always a plus for anti-Americans like the NYTIMES). The NYTIMES is trying to spin it as if "AMERICAN MAKERS" were bad, and "FOREIGN MAKERS" were good. This is especially bogus when one additionally considers that much of the car design and marketing for the so-called "ASIAN car makers" is also DONE RIGHT HERE IN THE USA - BY AMERICANS!
BOTTOM-LINE: It matters NOT ONE WHIT where the cars are made - or where the corporations that make them are registered, or in what country their stock is listed - because FOREIGN TRADE IMBALANCES are also BOGUS; it's meaningless because it treats goods as if they were valueless. So called "foreign trade imbalances" are phantoms which REALLY DO NOT EXIST - (SEE MORE PROOF HERE).
When a free consumer buys the car she wants, then she is a WINNER. And the company that makes the sale WINS, TOO. Where they are and who owns them and where the car was made are IRRELEVANT. Except to anti-globalism/anti-American Lefties. Like the NYTIMES.
ADDENDUM: THE SO-CALLED "ASIAN CAR MAKERS" WHO MAKE CARS HERE HAVE BETTER LABOR CONTRACTS THAN THE OLD "BIG THREE" AND THAT'S A MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR REASON THEY MAKE MORE MONEY ON SALES OF SMALL CARS, AND HENCE MARKET THEM MORE AGGRESSIVELY/SUCCESSIVELY. THE OLD BIG THREE MAKE MORE MONEY PER UNIT ON SALES OF BIGGER CARS.
THE BAD DEALS THE OLD BIG THREE MADE WITH UNIONS IS THE MAJOR REASON THE OLD BIG THREE TEND TO MARKET BIG CARS.
THE OLD BIG THREE'S LABOR COSTS ARE HIGHER PER UNIT THAN "ASIAN CAR MAKERS" MANUFACTURING HERE IN THE USA.
BECAUSE THE LABOR-COST/UNIT-COST IN A BIG CAR IS SMALLER THAN THE LABOR-COST/UNIT-COST IN A SMALL CAR, THE OLD BIG THREE MAKE A BETTER RETURN ON BIGGER CARS. BECAUSE THEY MAKE MORE ON BIGGER CARS THEY MARKET THEM MORE AGGRESSIVELY AND SELL MORE - WHEN GAS IS PERCEIVED AS BEING RELATIVELY CHEAP.
THEIR DEPENDENCE ON BIG CAR SALES IS WHY THEIR CURRENT SALES ARE SUFFERING - BECAUSE GAS IS NOW BEING PERCEIVED AS RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE.
Sales figures reported Thursday showed that Toyota, Honda and other Asian manufacturers claimed a record 40 percent of the American market in May, when sales of fuel-efficient vehicles like the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Hyundai Sonata all rose 20 percent or more compared with May 2005.the NYTIMES headline is the most blatant; it reads: "Asian Cars Won 40% of Market Last Month"
For Detroit companies, which have continued to aggressively market their costly new sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks despite the high gas prices, market share last month dropped to 52.9 percent — their second-lowest in history.
WHY IS THIS ANGLE BOGUS?! Because most of the so-called "Asian cars" the so-called "Asian car makers" sell here in the USA are made right here IN THE USA! They're no more "Asian cars" than a Chrsysler is a "European car." (And so-called American car makers make many of their cars - and car parts - OVERSEAS!)
This is really a story about the slowdown of the sales of BIG CARS, and the increase in sales of smaller cars, and NOT "import versus domestic cars" or "FOREIGN OWNED" makers versus "AMERICAN OWNED" makers. Especially NOT since the all car manufacturers make cars all over the world, and are ALL public companies whose stockholders are from ALL OVER THE GLOBE.
The NYTIMES is attempting to mount a sneaky, subliminal anti-free trade argument - one that has the added bonus of being anti-US business, (always a plus for anti-Americans like the NYTIMES). The NYTIMES is trying to spin it as if "AMERICAN MAKERS" were bad, and "FOREIGN MAKERS" were good. This is especially bogus when one additionally considers that much of the car design and marketing for the so-called "ASIAN car makers" is also DONE RIGHT HERE IN THE USA - BY AMERICANS!
BOTTOM-LINE: It matters NOT ONE WHIT where the cars are made - or where the corporations that make them are registered, or in what country their stock is listed - because FOREIGN TRADE IMBALANCES are also BOGUS; it's meaningless because it treats goods as if they were valueless. So called "foreign trade imbalances" are phantoms which REALLY DO NOT EXIST - (SEE MORE PROOF HERE).
When a free consumer buys the car she wants, then she is a WINNER. And the company that makes the sale WINS, TOO. Where they are and who owns them and where the car was made are IRRELEVANT. Except to anti-globalism/anti-American Lefties. Like the NYTIMES.
ADDENDUM: THE SO-CALLED "ASIAN CAR MAKERS" WHO MAKE CARS HERE HAVE BETTER LABOR CONTRACTS THAN THE OLD "BIG THREE" AND THAT'S A MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR REASON THEY MAKE MORE MONEY ON SALES OF SMALL CARS, AND HENCE MARKET THEM MORE AGGRESSIVELY/SUCCESSIVELY. THE OLD BIG THREE MAKE MORE MONEY PER UNIT ON SALES OF BIGGER CARS.
THE BAD DEALS THE OLD BIG THREE MADE WITH UNIONS IS THE MAJOR REASON THE OLD BIG THREE TEND TO MARKET BIG CARS.
THE OLD BIG THREE'S LABOR COSTS ARE HIGHER PER UNIT THAN "ASIAN CAR MAKERS" MANUFACTURING HERE IN THE USA.
BECAUSE THE LABOR-COST/UNIT-COST IN A BIG CAR IS SMALLER THAN THE LABOR-COST/UNIT-COST IN A SMALL CAR, THE OLD BIG THREE MAKE A BETTER RETURN ON BIGGER CARS. BECAUSE THEY MAKE MORE ON BIGGER CARS THEY MARKET THEM MORE AGGRESSIVELY AND SELL MORE - WHEN GAS IS PERCEIVED AS BEING RELATIVELY CHEAP.
THEIR DEPENDENCE ON BIG CAR SALES IS WHY THEIR CURRENT SALES ARE SUFFERING - BECAUSE GAS IS NOW BEING PERCEIVED AS RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE.
AL QAEDA DECLARES WAR ON SHIAS
NYTIMES:
The leader of al-Qaida in Iraq says in an audiotape posted on the Web Friday that Shiite militias are killing and raping the country's Sunni Arabs and urged Sunnis to confront them.
FOX:
The tape was a four-hour sermon by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi against Shiites, denouncing their top cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani as an "atheist" and saying the community had collaborated with invaders throughout Iraq's history."Oh Sunni people, wake up, pay attention and prepare to confront the poisons of the Shiite snakes who are afflicting you with all agonies since the invasion of Iraq until our day. Forget about those advocating the end of sectariansim and calling for national unity," al-Zarqawi said.
MEO:
The head of the Iraqi branch of Al-Qaeda, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, called Thursday for the disarmament of the Lebanese Shiite fundamentalist movement Hezbollah, according to an audio message posted on the Internet. Zarqawi accused Hezbollah of serving as a "shield protecting the Zionist enemy (Israel) against the strikes of the mujahedeen in Lebanon," in an apparent reference to Sunni Arab militants loyal to the Al-Qaeda network.
"Why should Hezbollah be exempt from the... Taef accords" which brought an end to fighting in Lebanon's 15-year civil war, a voice purporting to be Iraq's most wanted man asked in the lengthy audio message whose authenticity could not be verified. "Hezbollah is an independent state inside Lebanon... It puts forth lying slogans about Palestinian liberation when in fact it serves as a security wall (for Israel) and prevents Sunnis from crossing its borders."
Zarqawi is a paranoid schizophrenic serial killer, and his creed is evil and his followers vermin. Zarqawi has deliberately murdered more Muslims in Iraq and Jordan in the last three years than the IDF has killed in the last ten, and Zarqawi has killed more Iraqis than anyone EXCEPT Saddam.
The Muslims of the world should be staging massive protests against Zarqawi and Al Qaeda, and not cartoons. The fact that MOST Muslim leaders remain silent in the face of Zarqawi's genocidal rants (and Binladen's and Zawahiri's and Ahmadinejad's) proves they are largely a bunch of morally bankrupt vermin themselves.
BOTTOM-LINE: Islamofascist leaders are the ONLY people who openly call for genocide, and Muslims and Leftists are the only people in the world who ignore it - and even make it HARDER for us to defeat these racist, misogynist, genocidal, child-abusing terrorists.
The Muslims of the world should be staging massive protests against Zarqawi and Al Qaeda, and not cartoons. The fact that MOST Muslim leaders remain silent in the face of Zarqawi's genocidal rants (and Binladen's and Zawahiri's and Ahmadinejad's) proves they are largely a bunch of morally bankrupt vermin themselves.
BOTTOM-LINE: Islamofascist leaders are the ONLY people who openly call for genocide, and Muslims and Leftists are the only people in the world who ignore it - and even make it HARDER for us to defeat these racist, misogynist, genocidal, child-abusing terrorists.
MORE PROOF THAT ASSAD'S MURDEROUS TYRANNY IS IN TROUBLE
BBC:
Four gunmen and a security guard have been killed in clashes between suspected militants and security forces in the Syrian capital, Damascus. Officials said a "terrorist" attack on a building near the offices of Syrian state TV and radio had been halted.
Four militants were also arrested and were being interrogated. It was not clear why the building was a target. Several international hotels, government buildings and the city university are located in the area.
Assad's weakness is drawing out his foes, and making Assad even more repressive and defensive. I think the Brammertz Report - due in two weeks - may very well lead to his overthrow, exile, or assassination. He will go soon - either like Ceausescu or Baby Doc' or Idi Amin or Gorbachev. And the neighborhood will improve as a result: Hizballah will weaken - strengthening Lebanon's democracy and securing the borders between Lebanon, Syria and Israel. Jordan will be safer, too. As will Iraq. FASTER PLEASE!
Thursday, June 01, 2006
ARMY CORPS ACCEPTS BLAME FOR NEW ORLEANS LEVEE FAILURES - BUILT UNDER CLINTON
NYTIMES - TODAY:
Clinton did bupkus for the levee system, and tragedy struck on Bush's watch. And Bush is cleaning up the mess.
SOUND FAMILIAR?! It should: Clinton did bupkus against jihadoterrorism, and tragedy struck on Bush's watch. And now, Bush is cleaning up the mess.
Clinton did bupkus as unscrupulous CEO's egged on an "irrationally exuberant" market, leading to "bubbles" - "BUBBA'S BUBBLES", I call them. And again, Bush has to clean up the mess.
BOTTOM-LINE: Clinton was the second worst president in the last century - only Carter - (on whose watch the USSR invaded Afghanistan, and Khomeini took over Iran, and Saddam took over Iraq) - was worse. (And don't forget the MISERY INDEX under Carter!)
In a sweeping new study of the causes of the disaster in New Orleans, the Army Corps of Engineers acknowledged today that the levees it built in the city were an incomplete and inconsistent patchwork of protection, containing flaws in design and construction, and not built to handle a hurricane anywhere near the size of Katrina.ASTUTE BLOGGER - 9/05:
"... from 1993-2000 the Clinton Adminstration refused to allow the Army Corps - or anyone else - to get the funding they needed to redo the levees and rebuild the marshes/bayous. ... Clinton ignored the dangers on this front as he did the dangers from jihadoterrorism.
ASTUTE BLOGGER - 10/05 (MSNBC):
"... the 1998 documents — filed as part of a legal dispute over costs — indicate the contractor complained about “weakness” of the soil and “the lack of structural integrity of the existing sheet pile around which the concrete was poured.” The ruling also referenced the “flimsiness” of the sheet piling. ... The construction company said as a result of these problems the walls were shifting and “out of tolerance,” meaning they did not meet some design specifications. Nevertheless, the Army Corps of Engineers accepted the work."
So, er um: the CANAL which broke was made badly DURING THE CLINTON ERA. Seems to me, that the Clinton Adminstration was asleep at the wheel on this - as they were on jihadoterrorism.EUROTA - compiled a detailed list, with hyperlinks, of the Clinton Adminstration's numerous failures regarding levees construction funding.
Clinton did bupkus for the levee system, and tragedy struck on Bush's watch. And Bush is cleaning up the mess.
SOUND FAMILIAR?! It should: Clinton did bupkus against jihadoterrorism, and tragedy struck on Bush's watch. And now, Bush is cleaning up the mess.
Clinton did bupkus as unscrupulous CEO's egged on an "irrationally exuberant" market, leading to "bubbles" - "BUBBA'S BUBBLES", I call them. And again, Bush has to clean up the mess.
BOTTOM-LINE: Clinton was the second worst president in the last century - only Carter - (on whose watch the USSR invaded Afghanistan, and Khomeini took over Iran, and Saddam took over Iraq) - was worse. (And don't forget the MISERY INDEX under Carter!)
MRS. JOHN FRANCOIS KERRY-HEINZ FIRING THOUSANDS OF WORKERS
REUTERS:
Heinz said it expects to cut 2,700 jobs and exit 15 plants in 2007 to cut costs. Another five plants could be closed in 2008, it said.
The company's board of directors also approved $1 billion for share repurchases over the next two years.
Closing 20 (TWENTY!) plants in the next 2 (TWO) years while BUYING BACK THEIR OWN STOCK TO BOOST ITS PRICE.
Are these actions in keeping with Democrat Party values and policies, or... are Mr. and Mrs. Heinz-Kerry 2 (two) of the most hypocritical slimeballs on the entire Left!?
Remember, they have plenty of competition:
Gore uses private jets; Teddy Jo is a murderer; Barack Obama doesn't know the meaning of the words LOYALTY or HONOR; John Edwards made all his money LYING to juries and taking 35% of the net OUT OF THE MOUTHS of the supposed victims he was defending; and so on. They decry high gas prices and yet vote against drilling in ANWR (or pff the coast of the USA!), AND they even oppose a wind-farm off the coast of Nantucket.What a collection of liars, hypocrites, phonies, dupes, and appeasers. The only things that keep them in power is their demagoguery and fear-mongering. And a Left-wing dominated MSM.
MORE NEWS OF INCREASED REPRESSION FROM REACTIONARY SYRIA
UPI/World Peace Herald:
ADDENDUM: When the jihadomaniacs go on a hunger strike in GITMO the Left - and the MSM they dominate - are all over the story. But when a freedom-fighter like Anwar Bunni goes on a hunger strike, the Red Cross, and the ACLU and The Nation and the MSM are SILENT.
That's because the Left are really not "anti-war"; they're on the other side.
A human rights activist speaking to United Press International on condition of anonymity stressed that "under present conditions," the opposition's activities are viewed as provocative to the Syrian authorities.People who believe in Universal Human Rights - as defined by Eleanor Roosevelt's UN Declaration of same - should be in an uproar over the situation in Syria. Especially because of this - from Khaleej Times:
"There is no doubt that the opposition has moved from a tight domain limited to individual parties to a larger context that grouped all types of political parties from extreme right to extreme left, and this has alarmed and angered the authorities," the activist said. The activist was referring to the Damascus Declaration, signed by Syrian political activists representing all aspects of the opposition, including the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood Organization whose members face the death penalty under law 49.
The declaration called for ending the emergency law; ensuring public freedoms and the liberty of expression; introducing reforms allowing the creation of a multi-party system; combating corruption; and conducting a dialogue for initiating change.
A hunger strike by Syrian lawyer and rights activist Anwar Bunni, arrested in a crackdown on opposition figures seeking better ties with Lebanon, entered its third week on Thursday, his wife said. Bunni has been on “only water and some tea. He has lost several kilos (pounds) but his morale is good”, said Raghida Bunni after visiting her husband in Adra prison, near Damascus. She said he was continuing his hunger strike “in protest at being held in jail and the manner in which he was arrested” on May 18.Assad's murderous regime is every bit as bad as Hamas and Ahmadinejad. And Assad is getting worse as his hold on power is evermore threatened. Stay tuned...
ADDENDUM: When the jihadomaniacs go on a hunger strike in GITMO the Left - and the MSM they dominate - are all over the story. But when a freedom-fighter like Anwar Bunni goes on a hunger strike, the Red Cross, and the ACLU and The Nation and the MSM are SILENT.
That's because the Left are really not "anti-war"; they're on the other side.
MORE SIGNS ASSAD REALIZES HE'S CORNERED
CHICAGO TRIB:
The regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad has found religion.Assad - the murderous tyrant of Syria - is an Alawite and a Baathist/socialist. His only major ally is the tyranny of Iran, with whom he has signed a mutual defense pact. The move towards from somewhat secularized Baathism to overt islamofascism is another DEFENSIVE move by the evermore beleaguered Leftist tyrant. The more pressure we put on him, the more reactionary he will get: more arrests and crackdowns, and more jihado-jingoism will certainly be evident as we get closer to the UNSC's Brammertz Report on the Hariri murder - which is suppposed to be published on June 15. Assad's days are numbered.
Green and yellow banners fluttered at every turn in this capital's ancient stone bazaar a month after they marked the Prophet Muhammad's birthday April 10. For the first time in years, Muslims were allowed to openly observe that day. Other government bans on religious life also have diminished in recent weeks: Mosques are open between prayers. Religious weddings, once deemed to be risky public assembly, no longer need state security clearance.
Mosques are urging women to join study groups that champion their role in Islam. The state military academy has invited religious authorities to speak for the first time in decades.
In the street, Syrians of every faith are adjusting to a strange political spring. The oft-brutal regime, while cracking down anew on secular reform advocates, is courting favor with Islamists to keep at bay some publicly defined devils: dissidents and the Bush administration.
... In February, state security in Damascus allowed mobs to torch the Danish Embassy to protest the portrayal of the prophet in cartoons in Danish media. ... Assad gained political points in Syria for allowing Muslims to vent, even excessively, over the prophet insult. Analysts said the regime was also sending a message to the West. "They want the international community to be afraid," said Anwar al-Bunni, a human-rights attorney. "Syrian Islamists are not radical, but they want to make them out to be a threat." (Al-Bunni made his remarks in an interview with the Chicago Tribune in April. Last week, he and five other secular human-rights activists were arrested by Syrian police.)
"The Islamist card is a very useful card for them," said Ibrahim Hamidi, a correspondent for Al Hayat newspaper.
BLOGROLL US!
















































