Carter's refusal to debate wouldn't be so strange if it weren't for the fact that he claims that he wrote the book precisely so as to start debate over the issue of the Israel-Palestine peace process. If that were really true, Carter would be thrilled to have the opportunity to debate. Authors should be accountable for their ideas and their facts. Books shouldn't be like chapel, delivered from on high and believed on faith.
What most rankles is Carter's insistence that he is somehow brave for attacking Israel and highlighting the plight of the Palestinian people. No other conflict in the world -- not even the genocides in Rwanda and Sudan -- evokes more hand-wringing in the media, universities, and human rights organizations than the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Jimmy Carter isn't brave for beating up on Israel. He's a bully. And like all school-yard bullies, underneath the tough talk and bravado, there's a nagging insecurity and a fear that one day he'll have to answer for himself in a fair fight.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
DERSHOWITZ ANALYZES CARTER'S REFUSAL TO DEBATE
In an earlier post, the Punditarian suggested that Dhimmi Carter declined to debate Alan Dershowitz because Carter is a cowardly liar. Now Dershowitz, in the Boston Globe, weighs in with his own observations:
Posted by Punditarian at 8:51 AM